Attachment 6 HW Question Answer Responses Amd 3.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 25 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Forensics Hardware Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 70US0924R70094621
About this file
This document is a Question and Answer (Q&A) matrix related to a Request for Proposal (RFP) for Forensics Hardware (Brand Name or Equal) issued by the United States Secret Service (USSS), National Computer Forensics Institute (NCFI).
Key details:
- This is a single award Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract for commercial forensic hardware products to be delivered to the NCFI in Hoover, Alabama.
- The RFP includes a list of required hardware items such as laptops, workstations, network attached storage, and other peripherals. Offerors must provide pricing and technical proposals for all line items.
- The government will evaluate proposals and award a single contract to one vendor. No substitutions are allowed without written approval.
- Payment terms are Net 30 with no advance payments. Deliveries must be complete, with no partial shipments allowed without prior approval.
- This is a small business set-aside procurement with a NAICS code of 423430 and a size standard of 250 employees.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 16
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1 United States Secret Service (USSS), Forensics Hardware (Brand Name or Equal), RFP 70US0924R70094621, Question and Answer Matrix
| Question Number | Attachment | Section | Paragraph | Page Number | Offerors Questions and Comments | Government Response | |
| 1 | While the document does not explicitly mandate that all items must be included, the evaluation criteria strongly imply that a complete proposal covering all listed items is necessary for consideration. I want to confirm whether we need to be able to procure every line item at the quantities outlined should the client request it. | To be evaluated and considered for award, Offerors must provide a technical proposal and pricing inclusive of all line items within the RFP. This is a single award IDIQ inclusive of all items. | |||||
| 2 | Interested Parties Letter | 2 | 2 | 1 | The letter states; "This effort will be competed as a small business set-aside on sam.gov and the winning offeror will be selected as detailed in the Basis of Award section of Attachment 5. The government will award a single IDIQ contract as a result of this solicitation." Does the Government anticipate awarding a single IDIQ with multiple awardees? | The government will be conducting a single award to a single vendor. | |
| 3 | Attachment 1 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Attachment 1, The statement of requirements (SOR), was not provided on SAM.gov, is it available through another source? Will the Government make the SOR available? | SOR was posted in Amendment 1 to the sam.gov posting | |
| 4 | Attachment 4 | Business and Price Evaluation | 4 | 2 | The requirement states the offerors need to complete all of the provisions in Attachment 2. If we have these completed on SAM.gov, are we able to provide those in place of Attachment 2? | Yes, see paragraph 11 of the interested offeror letter, it states "The Offeror shall provide any fill-ins completed along with other documentation required by any clause or provision of the solicitation or provide documentation that Reps and Certs are completed in SAM.gov." Please make sure all clauses are addressed. | |
| 5 | Interested Parties | 2 | 1 | This section states "This effort will be competed as a small business set-aside on sam.gov ..." | |||
| As a small business, logistically this is all manageable, I am unable to identify any payment terms in any of the Attachments. Are advance payments an option? If not, what are the anticipated payment terms? As this is a hardware only RFP. | Payment Terms are Net 30. No advance payment authorized. | ||||||
| 6 | 1 | 4 | 4.2 (b) | 8 | This section states "Hardware shall not be shipped until complete. To do otherwise, requires written approval …" | ||
| Orders may come from multiple vendors, is this section (4.2 (b)) suggesting that all components from multiple vendors or distributors should be consolidated and shipped together as a complete order. | Each line item must be shipped full and complete containing full functionality within the line item; shipments can come direct from the OEM or distributor must they must ship a complete order (ie, if 50 laptops are ordered all 50 must be shipped at once and not in multiple shipments) | ||||||
| 7 | 1 | 4 | 4.2 (b) | 8 | Is it permissible to ship items directly to the specified address, provided that shipping information is supplied for each shipment from each vendor or distributor? | Yes, items can ship directly to the specified address assuming the order is complete. | |
| 8 | 1 | 3 | T.5 | 4 | Item Title "Synology DS1823xs with drives" |
The description states "Synology DS1823xs with drives," but the manufacturer sells the drives separately under different part numbers. They must be ordered independently. Is it expected that the bidder procure the equipment, open packages, and populate drive DS1823xs+ drive bays with the 8 drives(HAT5300-4T)?
or, is it expect to be separate orders, to which the shipments will be direct from the vendor or distributor and it is the Departments responsibility to populate the drive bays?
| Note: Part Numbers in reference: DS1823xs+, HAT5300-4T | It is expected that the drives be installed in the Synology prior to shipment. They should not be shipped separately. There shall be no effort on the governments part to assemble any items. | |||||
| 9 | 3 | CLIN 5 | Item Description states "Synology DS1823xs with 8, 4TB disks" | |||
| See above question. | See question directly above. | |||||
| 10 | 1 | 3 | T.8 | 6 | Item Title "FCI NVME 10GbE NAS (Asustor Flashstor 6 Pro)" | |
| Is this specifying that the Asustor item needs to be procured through FCI, as their NAS product? Or can this item be procured through other sources? | This item can be procured through other sources | |||||
| 11 | 1 | 3 | T.8 | 6 | Item Title "FCI NVME 10GbE NAS (Asustor Flashstor 6 Pro)" | |
| The description and spec '6x M.2 NVMe Slots' imply the Flashstor 6 (PN: FS6706T), where as all other specifications listed in this table are the specs for the Flashstore 12 (PN: FS6712X) | This should be the Flashstor 12 | |||||
| 12 | 3 | CLIN 8 | Item Description "Asustor Flashstor 6 Pro" |
This is not a current product. The current product from the manufacturer, Asustor, is the Flashstor 6 (FS6706T) and the Flashstor 12 Pro (FS6712X).
| Please clarify the desired product and specification. | Please quote the Flashstor 12 Pro (FS6712X) | ||||||
| 13 | 4 | 1 | b | 1 | Document states "(b) All Provisions contained within RFP Attachment 2, that require fill-in, shall be provided." | ||
| Do the FAR provisions that are filled out and updated on sam.gov need to be added in their entirety to the Proposal? | Any provision / clause that is filled out and current on sam.gov does not need to be provided - vendor shall direct our attention to sam.gov for them. All others outisde sam.gov shall be filled-in and provided within your submission. | ||||||
| 14 | 4 | 1 | c | 1 | Document states "(c) Fill In FAR 52.209-5, 52.209-7, 52.209-11 to support the government’s responsibility evaluation. This section shall be contained in the Business Volume of the Proposal." | ||
| Do the FAR provisions (FAR 52.209-5, FAR 52.209-11) that are filled out and updated on sam.gov need to be added in their entirety to the Proposal? | No, see question directly above for details. | ||||||
| 15 | na | A Small Business follow up question -- Will the agency provide a Letter of Commitment, Funding Certifiaction, Task Order Authorization, or other form of certification or statement guaranteeing commitment to purchase and availible funds, that we, as a purchaser, can share with Vendors and Distrbutors, that may assist with more flexible payment terms with Vendors and Distributors? | See the ordering process within Section 5 of the Statement of Work/Statement of Requirements and the ordering procedures in Attachment 2. The vendor will receive a signed delivery order prior to performing any work on the contract. The government anticipates placing 3-4 orders per year and the projected annual quantities are contained within Attachment 3. | ||||
| 16 | 3 | All sheets | With the Item description column locked, if an alternate piece of hardware is being quoted with better pricing then the brand name, how do we indicate what the alternate item is? | The "or equal" shall be listed within the technical proposal (bill of materials). If the "or equal" is determined acceptable, at time of award, the government will update the line item description accordingly. | |||
| 17 | 1 | 2,4 | Section 2 para 1 an 2; Section 4.2 (c ) | pg 1, 8 | SOR states in Section 2 "The contractor shall deliver the following commercial forensic hardware products, brand name or equal, to the NCFI located in Hoover, Alabama" and "Please see the table below for more detailed specifications. Each piece of hardware shall contain the required, brand name or equal items (as appropriate) as listed within the tables in Section 3 of this document. If substitutes are offered, the contractor shall notify the government by providing manufacturer specification sheet(s) for government evaluation and agreement the “or equal” offered is equivalent to the brand name items requested (see paragraph 4.2 for further details regarding this process)." BUT in SOR Section 4.2 (c) it states "No substitutions are allowed without written approval from the COR." How do we get the COR's approval with in the proposal process? | See the question/reponse directly above.This approval will come in the form of the government evaluating technical proposals and determining them either acceptable and eligible for award or unacceptable and not eligible for award. Or vendors can list "or equal" questions using the Q/A Matrix and the Government will provide comment and publish the question and response to all bidders on sam.gov (question 19 below is an example of this). Please note: The paragraphs pointed to in this question are for changes that occur after award and the paragraphs in Section 2 and 4.2 have been revised for some further clarity. The Question window will be re-opened and closed at 5 pm EST on 7/8/2024. | |
| 18 | 1 | 4 | 4.2 | pg 7 | SOR states in Section 4.2 "The contractor shall be responsible for off and on loading equipment and materials." What is meant by this statement, is this physical process or paperwork process? If a physical process, what is the expectation? | The contractor should schedule deliveries using appropriate delivery methods. If shipping freight, the delivery truck should have a lift gate or be able to back up to a loading dock and unload with a pallet jack. Delivery should not arrrive in a manner that requires NCFI staff to unload a delivery vehicle. | |
| 19 | 1 | 3. Requirements: Products/Services | 4 FCI Forensic Workstation (assume quantity of 1 unless otherwise specified) | 4 | For the workstations, an RX 6900 is listed for the video card. We have worked with NCFI to change that over to a 4070 Ti due to certain utilization limits. Is that change still desired or would they prefer to go back to the 6900? | The 4070 Ti is an acceptable replacement for the 6900 and we will accept either GPU in the forensic workstations. | |
| 20 | |||||||
| 21 | |||||||
| 22 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .