5. PPQ.docx

DOCX document 31 KB Posted

Attached to
San Juan NF Vault Toilets Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
1282B123Q0036
Issued by
Department of Agriculture Forest Service

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to San Juan NF Vault Toilets, newest first.
File Type Posted
1442_1282B123Q0036.pdf PDF
1442_1282B123Q0036.pdf PDF
2.Supplemental Specifications_final.pdf PDF
4. Vault Toilet Installation Guidelines_Final.pdf PDF
7. Wage Rates.pdf PDF
6. Bid Sheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
1.Drawing Set 1-2023 RMRI Toilets.pdf PDF
3. SOW - 2023 RMRI Toilets_Final.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE SHOULD BE RETURNED DIRECTLY TO THE CONTRACTING OFFICER, NO LATER THAN PROPOSAL DUE DATE. QUESTIONNAIRES MUST BE RECEIVED EMAIL.EMAIL ADDRESS IS matthew.sutton@usda.gov PLEASE SPECIFY IN THE SUBJECT LINE 1282B123Q0036

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE

Person completing questionnaire: Firm’s name:

Phone No.:

NOTE: Information obtained may be shared with Contractor if requested, but the name of person providing information will be kept confidential.

Contractor:

Project: 2023 RMRI Toilets San Juan National Forest Durango, CO

1. The U.S. Forest Service has a requirement for two campgrounds on the San Juan National Forest that require new single vault toilets installed. This project includes purchasing and delivery of the single vault toilets, site excavation, grading, and finishing work. This project also includes removal of one existing toilet at the North Canyon location.

2. Did the contractor adhere to good standards of workmanship? Do you have specific examples of this?

3. Overall, to what extent were you satisfied with the contractor’s completed services?

_ _ Extremely satisfied _ _ Generally satisfied___

_ _ Generally dissatisfied _ _ Extremely dissatisfied___

4. Timeliness of performance:

a. Did the contractor comply with contract performance schedules? If no, were there mitigating circumstances?

b. Were they reliable?

c. Were they responsive to technical direction?

d. Any liquidated damages assessed?

5. Business relations:

a. Does the contractor have effective management?

b. Good working relationship with the Contracting Officer/technical representatives?

c. Are they reasonable, cooperative, and flexible?

d. Do they present effective recommendations for solutions to problems?

e. Do they show a businesslike concern for the Government’s (or landowner if the project was with a private firm) interests?

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .