SF30 Amend 0002 Alliant 3.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

FACILITY CODE

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER

General Services Administration/FAS/ITC 1800 F Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20405

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

47QTCB24R0009

09/19/2024

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

06/28/2024

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers X is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

See attached.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Alliant 3 Amendment 2 Summary of Changes Item # RFP Paragraph Reference Changed From Changed To/Addition/Deletion

1 List of Acronyms N/A Added: PECP - Professional Employee Compensation Plan

2 Attachment J.P-8, Tab 4_TotalPrice, Cell A18

Comment in Cell A18 Amendment provides an updated J.P-8 Pricing Template V2 to remove the GSA comment in Cell A18.

3 RFP Attachment J.P-9 V3 xlsx N/A Amendment provides the updated attachment titled “J.P-9 A3 Model Individual Subcontracting Plan Template V.3.xlsx.

4 RFP Attachment J.P-9, Tab:

1_Subcontracting Plan, Cell A9

Enter the name of your company name (in Cell B4) …”

“Enter the name of your company name (in Cell A4)"

5 RFP Attachment J.P-9, Tab: FAR Elements, Cell A12

Locked cell. Cell has been unlocked allowing Offerors to enter data in the cell.

6 RFP Attachment J.P-9, Tab: Other FAR Elements, Cell A10

3. Indirect costs: HAVE BEEN (or) HAVE NOT BEEN included in the dollar and percentage subcontracting goals provided in this plan. (FAR clause 52.219-9(d)(6)).

This can be changed to 3. Indirect costs:

State if indirect cost is included in the dollar and percentage subcontracting goals provided in this plan. (FAR clause 52.219-9(d)(6)).

3. Indirect costs: State if indirect cost is included in the dollar and percentage subcontracting goals provided in this plan. (FAR clause 52.219-9(d)(6)). This can be changed to 3. Indirect costs:

State if indirect cost is included in the dollar and percentage subcontracting goals provided in this plan. (FAR clause 52.219-9(d)(6)).

7 RFP Attachment J.P-11 A3 Contractor C-SCRM Responsibility Questionnaire

J.P-11 A3 Contractor C-SCRM Responsibility Questionnaire V.2.xls (Excel format)

A new version of J.P-11 A3 Contractor C-SCRM Responsibility Questionnaire V.2.pdf has been provided as a fillable and signable PDF. This version requires the exact same information from the Offeror as the previous version, but in a PDF format allowing offerors to digitally sign the document.

8 RFP Attachment J.P-16 A3 Self-Scoring Worksheet - Row 22

N/A Added: L.5.5, GSA Form 527

9 RFP Attachment J.P-16 A3 Self-Scoring Worksheet - Row 23

N/A Added: L.5.8, Labor Rate Attestation Form

10 RFP Attachment J.P-16 A3 Self-Scoring Worksheet - Cell B10

General General (Pass/Fail - No Points Assigned)

11 RFP Attachment J.P-16 A3 Self-Scoring Worksheet - Cell B165

Adequate Accounting System DCMA or DCAA Certified

Adequate Accounting System DCMA / DCAA / CFA Audited and Adequate

12 RFP Attachment J.P-16 A3 Self-Scoring Worksheet - Cell B166

Adequate Accounting System CFA or CPA Audited & Acceptable

Adequate Accounting System CPA Audited & Acceptable

13 RFP Attachment J.P-16 A3 Self-Scoring Worksheet - Cell B167

Approved Purchasing System DCMA or DCAA Certified

Approved Purchasing System DCMA / CFA Certified

14 RFP Attachment J.P-16 A3 Self-Scoring Worksheet - Cell B168

Approved Purchasing System CFA or CPA Audited & Acceptable

Approved Purchasing System CPA Reviewed & Acceptable

15 RFP Attachment J.P-16 A3 Self-Scoring Worksheet - Cell B171

Acceptable Estimating System DCMA or DCAA Certified

Acceptable Estimating System DCMA / DCAA / CFA Audited and Approved

16 RFP Attachment J.P-16 A3 Self-Scoring Worksheet - Cell B172

Acceptable Estimating System CFA or CPA Audited & Acceptable

Acceptable Estimating System CPA Audited & Acceptable

17 RFP Attachment J.P-16 A3 Self-Scoring Worksheet - Cell B189

Responsibility Responsibility (Pass/Fail - No Points Assigned)

18 RFP Attachment J.P-18 J.P-18 A3 Labor Rate Attestation V.1 J.P-18 A3 Labor Rate Attestation V.2.pdf has been provided and must be submitted with the offeror’s proposal to be considered responsive.

19 Section B.4 (c) As authorized by CD-2023-01, there is no maximum dollar ceiling for the Master Contract or for each individual Task Order.

As authorized by CD-2022-08, there is no maximum dollar ceiling for the Master Contract or for each individual Task Order

20 Section B.11.5.1 (a), second sentence

It represents and establishes maximum allowable labor rates in the form of burdened rates for all Standard IT Service LCATs indicated in this Master Contract.

It represents and establishes maximum allowable labor rates in the form of burdened rates for Senior Level Standard IT Service LCATs indicated in this Master Contract.

21 Section H.1, first sentence The following provisions apply at the Master Contract (MC), as indicated by the “X” in the table and on individual Task Orders if determined applicable by the

OCO.

The following provisions apply at the Master Contract (MC) and on individual Task Orders if deemed applicable by the

OCO.

22 Section J - List of Attachments, Attachment J-3.2

Data Scientist" (Labor IDs 211-214) and "Web and Digital Interface Designer" (Labor IDs 401-404).

Removed

23 Section J - List of Attachments, Attachment J-3.2, Table 13

Attachment J-3.2, Individual Labor Categories have been changed to align to J.P-8 A3 Price Template and the Alliant 2 Labor Categories.

Net effect of the changes to Table 13 decreased the total number of labor categories from 32 to 31. ( Note to offerors: Please ensure proposed pricing in J.P-8 A3 Price Template corresponds to the adjusted Labor IDs listed in the amended RFP Section J-3.2.)

24 Section J - List of Attachments, Attachment J-3.2, Table 13

"Software Developers" (Previously Labor IDs 321-324)

"Software Developers" was separated into two (2) LCATS and were assigned the same description as written in Alliant 2:

"Software Developers, Applications" (New Labor IDs 311-314) and;

"Software Developers, Systems Software" (New Labor IDs 321-324).

25 Section J - List of Attachments, Attachment J-3.2, Table 13

"Software Quality Assurance Analyst and Tester" (Labor IDs 331-334).

"Software Quality Assurance Engineer and Tester"

26 Section J - List of Attachments, Attachment J-3.2, Table 13

Labor ID series, starting at 211 through 324, as well as 401 through 404

Labor ID series, starting at 211 through 324, as well as 401 through 404 have been renumbered to correspond with Attachment J.P-8 A3 Price Template.

27 Section J - List of Attachments, Attachment J-3.2, Table 13

Labor IDs 283 and 284 contain term “Junior”

Deleted term "Junior" from Labor IDs 283 and 284.

28 Section L.3, last paragraph N/A Added as the last paragraph: Offerors are encouraged to register in Symphony and familiarize themselves with providing the required evidence for each scoring element within the application well before proposals are due. Offerors shall attach required evidence to each scoring element within Symphony. For each scoring element, an index can be attached as a cover page to the evidence document pdf file to direct evaluators to the specific page, paragraph number, and line number within the document. Alternatively, offerors can use Symphony’s Evidence Document Tagging Feature as described at the following Apex Logic Link:

https://industrysupport.apexlogic.com/ support/solutions/articles/35000255900-tagging-for-alliant-3 to point to the exact location of the scoring element evidence within the document.

29 Section L.3.2, first paragraph Primary NAICS Code Relevant Experience Projects under Section L.5.2.1…

Primary NAICS Code Relevant Experience Projects under Section L.5.2.2…

30 Section L.3.4, first sentence Proposals are due no later 10/28/2024, 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time (ET).

Proposals are due no later than 1/10/2025, 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time (ET).

31 Section L.3.4, first paragraph, fifth sentence

Offerors are encouraged to utilize comments (“tags”) in supporting documentation indicating the specific reference for verification purposes.

Offerors are encouraged to utilize an index in their supporting documentation indicating the specific reference for verification purposes.

32 Section L.4, second Paragraph All files shall contain the solicitation number and the Offeror’s name in the header of each uploaded document.

Removed

(Note to Offeror: See Section L.3 for more information on headers.)

33 Section L.4.1, Table 22 - Proposal Format Table, Row beginning with L.5.1.6

Recommended 10-page maximum Recommended 10 pages, no maximum page requirement

34 Section L.4.1, Table 22 - Proposal Format Table, Row beginning with L.5.2.3.1, third column:

N/A Added: “7. CPARs report, or J.P-6 Template if CPARS is not available.”

35 Section L.4.1, Table 22 - Proposal Format Table, Row beginning with L.5.2.3.1, fifth column

N/A Added:

“OfferorName.NAICS1of7.CPAR.pdf” and “OfferorName.NAICS1of7.J.P-6PP.pdf”

36 Section L.4.1, Table 22 - Proposal Format Table, Row beginning with L.5.2.3.2, third column:

N/A Added: “7. J.P-6 Template”

37 Section L.4.1, Table 22 - Proposal Format Table, Row beginning with L.5.2.3.2, fifth column:

N/A Added:

“OfferorName.NAICS1of7.J.P-6PP.pdf”

38 Section L.4.1, Table 22 - Proposal Format Table, Row beginning with L.5.2.3.6, third column (multiple changes)

N/A Added: 3. SOW/PWS, if applicable

Added:

OfferorName.NAICS1of7SOW.pdf

39 Section L.4.1, Table 22 - Proposal Format Table, Row beginning with L.5.2.4.2, third column:

N/A Added: “7. CPARs report, or J.P-6 Template if CPARS is not available.”

40 Section L.4.1, Table 22 - Proposal Format Table, Row beginning with L.5.2.4.2, fifth column (multiple changes)

Part 1:

“OfferorName.ET1.1of3.J.P-3.Award.pdf”

Part 2:

“OfferorName.ET1.1of3.J.P-3.SOW.pdf”

Part 3:

“OfferorName.ET1.1of3.J.P-3.NameChng.

pdf

Part 4: N/A

Part 5: N/A

Part 1:

“OfferorName.ET1.1of3.Award.pdf”

Part 2: “OfferorName.ET1.1of3.SOW”

Part 3:

“OfferorName.ET1.1of3.NameChng.pdf”

Part 4: Added:

“OfferorNameET1.1of3.CPAR.pdf or OfferorNameET1.1of3.J.P-6.pdf”

Part 5: Added:

“OfferorNameET1.2of3.CPAR.pdf or OfferorNameET1.2of3.J.P-6.pdf”

41 Section L.4.1, Table 22 - Proposal Format Table, Row beginning with L.5.2.4.3, Fourth column

J.P-3 Template for one project for each category submitted for L.5.2.3 credit

J.P-3 Template for one project for each category submitted for L.5.2.4 credit

42 Section L.4.1, Table 22 - Proposal Format Table, Row beginning with L.5.2.4.4, fifth column

N/A Added:

OfferorName.SBE1.1of5.SOW.pdf

43 Section L.4.1, Table 22 - Proposal Format Table, Row beginning with L.5.4.10, fourth column

Evidence must be in the name of the Offeror, MRCLs will not be accepted

Removed: Evidence must be in the name of the Offeror, MRCLs will not be accepted

44 Section L.4.1, Table 22 - Proposal Format Table, Row beginning L.5.5.2, L.5.1.9 (multiple changes)

Part 1: Last Column- OfferorName.C-SCRM.RA.xls

Part 2: Fourth Column- Excel File

Part 1: OfferorName.C-SCRM.RA.pdf

Part 2: PDF

45 Section L.4.1, Table 22 - Proposal Format Table, Row beginning L.5.6, Column 3

See JV/PT file format N/A for individual company

46 Section L.4.1, Table 22 - Proposal Format Table, Row beginning L.5.8 - Last Column

N/A Added: or OfferorNamePrice.xlsx

47 Section L.4.1, Table 22 - Proposal Format Table, Row beginning L.5.8.2, third column

Single file (or combined) per evidence submitted

Single file per offer

48 Section L.4.1, last two paragraphs (multiple changes)

Part 1: “**” and “++” that preceded the last two paragraphs of the section

Part 2: (End of Section L.4.1)

Part 1: Removed the “**” and “++” that preceded the last two paragraphs of the section and combined the last paragraphs into one paragraph.

Part 2: Removed (End of Section L.4.1) 49 Section L.5.1.2 “is row 128” “are rows 153 to 159”

50 Section L.5.1.3, 3rd paragraph The model is not a fill-in-the-blank form, and the Offeror must remove all instructional language

The model is not a fill-in-the-blank form, and the Offeror may remove all instructional language.

51 Section L.5.1.4 (g) For a populated CTA, financial responsibility documents must be submitted for the CTA itself

For a populated CTA, financial responsibility documents must be submitted for the CTA and each member of the CTA.

52 Section L.5.1.5 (f)(5) A list and description of at least one project per capability, resource, or experience that the Offeror has previously performed with the Meaningful Relationship entity for which the Offeror claims a Meaningful Relationship credit

A list and description of at least one project (involving the claimed capability, resource, or experience) that the offeror has previously performed with the Meaningful Relationship entity for which the Offeror claims a Meaningful Relationship credit.

53 Section L.5.2.1 (d) N/A Added to end of paragraph: For a collection of task orders or BPA calls under one IDIQ, submitted as a single relevant experience project, the start date should be the earliest Period of Performance (POP) in the collection and the end date should be the last POP date in the collection. Each Task Order or BPA Call must have a year or more of performance.

54 Section L.5.2.3.1 (a) When multiple FPDS-NG Reports are available, the most recent report must be submitted as well as any previous reports necessary for verification of claimed scoring elements

When multiple FPDS-NG Reports are available, the most recent report must be submitted as well as any previous FPDS-NG reports necessary for verification of claimed scoring elements.

55 Section L.5.2.3.1(b), last sentence (multiple changes)

Part 1: The Attachment J.P-4 must include the CO’s direct telephone number and direct email address.

Part2: N/A

Part 1: The Attachment J.P-2 must include the CO’s direct telephone number and direct email address.

Part 2: Added: No copy of the SOW or PWS is required for Federal Contracts.

56 Section L.5.2.3.1 (e) Offerors may use work performed as a subcontractor on Federal projects.

However, only use the value and scope of the work subcontracted, as delineated in the project verification requirements under L.5.2.3.1, may be claimed

Offerors may use work performed as a subcontractor on Federal projects.

However, only use the value and scope of the work subcontracted, as delineated in the project verification requirements under L.5.2.4.2, may be claimed.

57 Section L.5.2.3.1 (f) N/A Added: (f) Offerors combining Task Orders or BPA Calls under one IDIQ, to form a single relative experience project, must provide all listed evidence for each Task Order or BPA Call in the grouping, except the CPAR must be for the overarching IDIQ.

58 Section L.5.2.3.2 (multiple changes) Part 1: N/A

Part 2: N/A

Part 1: Added: (d) Since Non-Federal Contracts do not have CPARs available for Past Performance, Attachment J.P-6 must be submitted, signed by a Corporate Officer.

Part 2: Added: (f) Offerors combining Task Orders or BPA Calls under one IDIQ, to form a single relevant experience project, must provide all listed evidence for each Task Order or BPA Call in the grouping, except the CPAR must be for the overarching IDIQ

59 Section L.5.2.3.4 N/A Added to end of paragraph: NOTE: If Task Orders or BPA Calls under one IDIQ are combined as a single relevant experience project, credit can only be earned for a single Federal Government Customer even if Task Orders or BPA Calls were placed on behalf of multiple agencies. (NOTE this was answered in

GR01-003.)

60 Section L.5.2.3.5 N/A Added as the last paragraph: If Task Orders or BPA Calls under one IDIQ are combined as a single relevant experience project, credit can only be earned for a single Cost-Reimbursement type contract for each group of combined Task Orders or BPA Calls, even if the multiple Task Orders or BPA Calls under the IDIQ were Cost-Reimbursement type contracts.

61 Section L.5.2.3.6, third paragraph, second sentence (multiple changes)

Part 1: If the FPDS-NG report indicates that the principal place of performance was not a foreign location, then the Offeror must provide a copy of the contract SOW or documents from the contract that detail the foreign location(s) at which work was performed, contract award form and an authorized signature as described in L.5.2.3.1 and L.5.2.3.2).

Part 2: N/A

Part 1: If the FPDS-NG report indicates that the principal place of performance was not a foreign location, then the Offeror must provide Attachment J.P-2 signed by the Cognizant Government Official and a copy of the contract SOW or documents from the contract that detail the foreign location(s) at which work was performed, contract award form and an authorized signature as described in L.5.2.3.1

Part 2: Added as last paragraph: If Task Orders or BPA Calls are combined as a project, credit can be earned if a single Task Order or BPA Call in the group of combined Task Orders or BPA Calls had work performed in a foreign location that meets the requirements in this section

62 Section L.5.2.4, second paragraph N/A Paragraph added: Other Transaction Agreements (OTA), grants, cooperative agreements issued for research and development, prototyping development, and production can be submitted when the Emerging Technology Relevant Experience contains an Emerging Technology as listed in section L.5.2.4.1

63 Section L.5.2.4.2(c) N/A Added last sentence: For OTAs, include a copy of the OTA, grant, or cooperative agreement in lieu of PWS, SOW or SOO.

64 Section L.5.2.4.2 (d) In addition to the project verification requirements under Section L.5.2.3.2…

In addition to the project verification requirements under Section L.5.2.4…

65 Section L.5.2.4.3, first paragraph The Offeror may receive additional points for demonstrating Breadth and Depth through submitting multiple different Emerging Technology Relevant Experience projects. A maximum of eleven (11) Emerging Technology Projects may be submitted under L.5.2.4.1 for Emerging Technology points: one (1) different Emerging Technology Experience for each of the eleven (11) Emerging Technology Categories, for a maximum aggregate total of 1,500 points. 500 Points will be awarded for demonstrating at least two different ET categories and 1000 additional points will be awarded for demonstrating at least five different ET categories

The Offeror may receive additional points for demonstrating Breadth and Depth through submitting multiple different Emerging Technology Relevant Experience projects. A maximum of eleven (11) Emerging Technology Projects may be submitted under L.5.2.4.1 for Emerging Technology points:

* 500 Points will be awarded for demonstrating two (2) to four (4) different ET categories.

* 1000 points will be awarded for demonstrating five (5) to seven (7) different ET categories.

* 1,500 points will be awarded for demonstrating eight (8) or more different ET categories.

66 Section L.5.2.4.4 (multiple changes) Part 1: N/A

Part 2: (9) Non-Government Award Form (Must explicitly identify the Contractor, Non-Government Customer, Dollar Value, and the date the customer awarded/signed)

Part 3: N/A

Part 4: NOTE: If a Project does not include the Statement of Work (SOW), or Performance Work Statement (PWS), from the contract that describes the general scope, nature, complexity, and purpose of the supplies or services the customer acquired under the contract, or an index to those specific written passages in the SOW that support the claim of having performed the Emerging Technology, the associated points will not be earned.

Part 1: Added: (b) For both Federal and Non-Federal projects, A copy of the Statement of Work (SOW), or Performance Work Statement (PWS), from the contract that describes the general scope, nature, complexity, and purpose of the supplies or services the customer acquired under the contract.

Additionally, the Offeror must provide an index to those specific written passages in the SOW or use Symphony Tagging that support the claim of having performed the Emerging Technology as determined by the Offeror’s subjective review. If a Statement of Objectives (SOO) clearly indicates the Emerging Technology being claimed, the SOO may be submitted. If the SOO is not clear, then the contractor generated SOW/PWS must be submitted along with the SOO.

NOTE: If a Project does not include the Statement of Work (SOW), or Performance Work Statement (PWS), from the contract that describes the general scope, nature, complexity, and purpose of the supplies or services the customer acquired under the contract, or an index to those specific written passages in the SOW that support the claim of having performed the Emerging Technology, the associated points will not be earned.

Part 2: Removed: (9) Non-Government Award Form ...

Part 3: Added: (d) For a Non-Federal project only, Non-Government Award Form must explicitly identify the Contractor, Non-Government Customer, Dollar Value, and the date the customer awarded or signed the contract.

Part 4: Removed Note from end of section.

67 Section L.5.2.4.4 (c) “Note” following paragraph (c) and placed that note under paragraph (b).

Deleted Note after paragraph (c), replaced the note under paragraph (b)

68 Section L.5.3.2, second paragraph The Past Performance Rating Template must be completed and signed by either a Contracting Officer, Contracting Officer’s Representative, or Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative with cognizance over the submitted Project

The Past Performance Rating Template must be completed and signed by either a Contracting Officer or a Corporate Officer with cognizance over the project for the ordering activity

69 Section L.5.4.1 - first paragraph If claiming credit for this scoring element, the Offeror must provide verification from the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA), Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA), any Cognizant Federal Agency (CFA), or a Certified Public Accountant (CPA), of an acceptable accounting system in a single pdf file format to include the following information

If claiming credit for this scoring element, the Offeror must provide verification of an adequate accounting system from the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA), the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA), a Cognizant Federal Agency (CFA), or an acceptable accounting system from a Certified Public Accountant (CPA), in a single pdf file format, to include the following information

70 Section L.5.4.1 (a) (a) Part 1- Provide the UEI and CAGE Code of the Business Entity that is being credited, and name, address, phone number, and email of the representative at their cognizant DCAA and DCMA Offices or CFA or CPA.

(a) Part 1- Provide the UEI and CAGE Code of the Business Entity that is being credited, and the name, address, phone number, and email of the representative at DCAA, DCMA, CFA, or the CPA, as applicable.

71 Section L.5.4.1 - paragraph (b)(2), first sentence

A copy of the Offeror’s official Accounting System audit report from DCAA verifying the approval of the accounting system.

A copy of the Offeror’s official Accounting System audit report from DCAA verifying the adequacy of the accounting system.

72 Section L.5.4.2 (a) (a) Part 1- Provide the UEI and CAGE Code of the Business Entity that is being credited, and POC information that includes the name, address, phone number, and email of the representative at their Cognizant DCMA or CFA or CPA that determined approval.

(a) Part 1- Provide the UEI and CAGE Code of the Business Entity that is being credited, and POC information that includes the name, address, phone number, and email of the representative at the DCMA or CFA or CPA that determined approval.

73 Section L.5.4.2 - paragraph (b), last sentence

The offer shall make reference to the page number and paragraph of the CPSR audit or letter that determined the approval of the purchasing system.

The offer shall make reference to the page number and paragraph of the CPSR report that determined the adequacy of the purchasing system.

74 Section L.5.4.2 - paragraph (c), first sentence

Or if audited by a CPA, a copy of a signed letter on the CPA’s Letterhead stating that the Purchasing System has been audited and found acceptable in accordance with DCMA Contractor Purchasing System Review (CPSR) Guidebook.

Or if audited by a CPA, a copy of a signed letter on the CPA’s Letterhead stating that the Purchasing System has been reviewed and found acceptable in accordance with DCMA Contractor Purchasing System Review (CPSR) Guidebook.

75 Section L.5.4.2 (c), last sentence The Offeror must certify that there have been no material changes to the purchasing system since the last audit of its accounting system

The Offeror must certify that there have been no material changes to the purchasing system since the last audit of its purchasing system.

76 Section L.5.4.3 - First Paragraph … and/or Approved Billing in a single pdf file format to include the following information

… and/or Approved Billing Rates in a single pdf file format to include the following information

77 Section L.5.4.3 -(b)(1) …Approved Billing Rate had been reviewed, approved, and/or determined acceptable.

…Approved Billing Rate had been reviewed, approved, and/or determined acceptable at the time of proposal submission

78 Section L.5.4.5 - first paragraph If claiming credit for this scoring element, the Offeror must provide verification from the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA), or Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA), or Cognizant Federal Agency (CFA) or Certified Public Accountant (CPA) of an audited and accepted estimating system in a single pdf file format to include the following information:

If claiming credit for this scoring element, the Offeror must provide verification of an approved estimating system from Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA), Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA), a Cognizant Federal Agency (CFA), or an acceptable estimating system from a Certified Public Accountant (CPA), in a single pdf file format, to include the following information:

79 Section L.5.4.5 - paragraph (a) Part 1- Provide the UEI and CAGE Code of the Business Entity that is being credited, and the point of contact information that includes the name, address, phone number, and email of the representative at DCAA, DCMA, CPA, or CFA that determined approval.

Part 1- Provide the UEI and CAGE Code of the Business Entity that is being credited, and the point of contact information at DCAA, DCMA, or CFA including the name, address, phone number, and email of the representative that determined approval.

80 Section L.5.4.5 - paragraph (b) Part 2- Provide a copy of the Offeror’s official audit report, if available and/or official letterhead from DCAA, DCMA or CFA verifying the acceptability of the estimating system that has been audited and determined acceptable for budgeting and planning controls, and generating estimates of costs and other data included in proposals submitted to customers in the expectation of receiving contract awards.

Part 2- Provide a copy of the Offeror’s official DCAA audit report deeming the estimating system acceptable, or an official letter from DCMA or a CFA verifying the acceptability of the estimating system that has been audited and approved. The offer shall reference the page number and paragraph of the audit report or letter that verifies the adequacy of the estimating system.

81 Section L.5.4.5(c), last sentence The Offeror must certify that there have been no material changes to the accounting system since the last audit of its accounting system.

The Offeror must certify that there have been no material changes to the estimating system since the last audit.

82 Section L.5.4.6, third sentence The official appraisal must be current (active, not expired) as of the initial solicitation close date.

The official appraisal must be current (active, not expired) as of the date proposals are due.

83 Section L.5.4.7 ISO 9001:2015 Certification

The official certification must be current (active, not expired) as of the date the solicitation is released.

The official certification must be current (active, not expired) as of the date proposals are due.

84 Section L.5.4.8 ISO/IEC 20000-1:2018 Certification

The official certification must be current (active, not expired) as of the date the solicitation is released.

The official certification must be current (active, not expired) as of the date proposals are due.

85 Section L.5.4.9 ISO/IEC 27001:2013 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Certification

The official certification must be current (active, not expired) as of the date the solicitation is released.

The official certification must be current (active, not expired) as of the date proposals are due.

86 Section L.5.5.1, second paragraph, last sentence

For a Populated Joint Venture, financial responsibility documents must be submitted for the Joint Venture itself

For a Populated Joint Venture, financial responsibility documents must be submitted for the Joint Venture and each member of the Joint Venture.

87 Section L.5.7.1 N/A Added as the first sentence in the section: The Offeror will receive 1,750 points for reporting of Scope 1 or Scope 2 or Scope 3 emissions.

88 Section L.5.8, fourth paragraph A Price Proposal submission must include a completed Attachment J.P-8, A3 Price Template and as required an Attachment J.P-18, A3 Labor Rate Attestation

A Price Proposal submission must include a completed Attachment J.P-8, A3 Price Template and Attachment J.P-18, A3 Labor Rate Attestation.

89 Section M.4.2 (multiple changes) Part 1: N/A

Part 2: N/A

Part 1: Added: (m) GSA Form 527

Part 2: Added: (n) Labor Rate Attestation

90 Section M.4.2 (k) Organizational Conflict of Interest Form Organizational Conflict of Interest Plan

91 Section M.6, Cell changes related to [L.5.4.1 through L.5.4.5] Systems - One Cell below “Accounting System and Audit Information”, second column

DCMA / DCAA Certified DCMA / DCAA / CFA Audited and Adequate

92 Section M.6, Cell changes related to [L.5.4.1 through L.5.4.5] Systems - Two Cells below “Accounting System and Audit Information”, second column

CFA / CPA Audited and Approved CPA Audited and Acceptable

93 Section M.6, Cell changes related to [L.5.4.1 through L.5.4.5] Systems - One Cell below “Approved Purchasing System”, second column

DCMA / DCAA Certified DCMA / CFA Reviewed and Approved

94 Section M.6, Cell changes related to [L.5.4.1 through L.5.4.5] Systems - Two Cells below “Approved Purchasing System”, second column

CFA / CPA Audited and Approved CPA Reviewed and Acceptable

95 Section M.6, Cell changes related to [L.5.4.1 through L.5.4.5] Systems - One Cell below “Acceptable Estimating System”, second column

DCMA / DCAA Certified DCMA / DCAA / CFA Audited and Approved

96 Section M.6, Cell changes related to [L.5.4.1 through L.5.4.5] Systems - Two Cells below “Acceptable Estimating System”, second column

CFA / CPA Audited and Approved CPA Audited and Acceptable

97 Section M.8.2 (See Section L.8.2) (See Section L.5.8.2)