4. Section M.pdf

SECTION M

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

A. INTRODUCTION

1. This acquisition will utilize Lowest Priced procedures restricted to technically qualified

“Approved Source” offeror(s) This acquisition shall use price as the only evaluated factor.

2. The government intends to award the requirement(s) represented in this solicitation to one awardee. However, the Government reserves the right to award no contract at all.

B. EVALUATION FACTORS AND PROCEDURES:

1. The government shall evaluate proposals based on the evaluation factor below.

a. Factor 1 – Price

i. Evaluation Base: Standard FORM 1447

ii. The Offeror’s price will be evaluated based upon the Total Evaluated Price

(TEP). The Offeror’s Price Proposal will be evaluated for the criteria of Price

Reasonableness and Balance.

a) Price Reasonableness: The proposed price will be evaluated for

Price Reasonableness. For a price to be reasonable, it will represent a price to the Government that a prudent person would pay when consideration is given to prices in the market.

Normally, price reasonableness is established through adequate price competition, but may also be determined through cost and price analysis techniques as described in FAR 15.404. For additional information see FAR 31.201-3.

b) Balance: The Government may also determine a proposal unacceptable should the proposed prices be unbalanced.

Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total evaluated price, the price of one or more items/Contract Line

Item Numbers (CLINS) is significantly overstated or understated as indicated by the application of price analysis techniques as those defined by FAR 15.404-1.

c) Total Evaluated Price (TEP): A TEP will be calculated to be used for evaluation of offers to determine the lowest priced proposal. The TEP calculation will be a summation of all

Contract Line Item Pricing.

2. Solicitation Requirements, Terms, and Conditions:

a. In addition to meeting Factor 1, the government expects all offerors to meet all solicitation requirements, to include terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and required delivery schedules.

b. Furthermore, all Offeror’s shall be identified as an approved source in the Government’s

Screen Analysis Worksheet Form 762 and listed on the APPROVED_SOURCES. Pdf prior to contract award.

c. Offerors not identified on the APPROVED_SOURCES.pdf attachment are encouraged to contact the aforementioned government representative to obtain technical prequalification information. However, per FAR 9.202(e), the government reserves the right to not to delay contract award in order to provide a potential offeror with an opportunity to demonstrate its ability to meet the standards.

3. The process for the evaluation and contractor responsibility determination of proposals is as follows:

a. This award will be made to the offeror that is listed as an approved source and submitted the proposal with the lowest Total Evaluated Price

b. Past Performance record and history will be assessed as one of the multiple standards required for a successful offeror to be determined responsible as described in FAR 9.104.

Contractors shall meet the required delivery dates, as well as the terms and conditions in this solicitation, to be determined responsible.