4-04. N267520JA - Reference Form.pdf

PDF 146 KB Posted

Attached to
Program Management Services State and local contract opportunity
Solicitation number
N267520JA
Issued by
Lee County, Fruitville CDP, Florida

About this file

This is a Reference Request Form for the School District of Lee County, Florida, related to Invitation to Negotiate (ITN) No. N267520JA for Program Management Services. Proposers responding to this solicitation are required to submit client references from a minimum of three (3) prior engagements demonstrating experience providing program management services. Client references must be submitted via email to JoniMA@leeschools.net with a deadline of 2:00 PM EST on February 25, 2026. References may include no more than one reference from the School District of Lee County. Completed reference forms must be included as a separate file in the Bonfire procurement system and submitted by both the client and the proposer.

The reference form requires clients to evaluate proposers across multiple performance dimensions, including service duration, project scope and size, contract type, performance requirements and outcomes, goal achievement and cost savings realized, staff knowledge and expertise, principal representative performance, staff-client dynamics, service satisfaction levels, response time, and recommendation likelihood. Ratings are provided on a five-point scale with five representing excellent performance and one representing unacceptable performance. Clients must complete and return the questionnaire directly to the School District with a copy to the proposer by the specified deadline.

View the file

Other files for this state and local contract opportunity

Other files attached to Program Management Services, newest first.
File Type Posted
1-01. N267520JA - Specifications.pdf PDF
3-03. N267520JA - Fillable Forms.pdf PDF
2-02. N267520JA - Proposal Response Form.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

REFERENCE REQUEST FORM INSTRUCTIONS

CLIENT TO COMPLETE AND RETURN VIA EMAIL

The School District of Lee County, Fort Myers, Florida

JoniMA@leeschools.net

Instructions to Proposer: Complete the Proposer/Vendor Name and distribute this form to a minimum of three (3) clients. Clients must submit completed form and send to both the Proposer and the District JoniMA@leeschools.net.

Completed References must be included with your proposal as a separate file in Bonfire (Euna Procurement).

EMAIL REFERENCE REQUEST FORM

ITN No. N267520JA, Program Management Services

CLIENT TO COMPLETE AND RETURN VIA EMAIL TO THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF LEE COUNTY

REQUESTING AGENCY: SCHOOL DISTRICT OF LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA

PROPOSER’S NAME:

CLIENT AGENCY/FIRM PROVIDING REFERENCE:

CLIENT’s INDIVIDUAL NAME:

EMAIL ADDRESS: PHONE:

In response to Invitation to Negotiate No. N267520JA, the School District of Lee County requires interested Proposers to submit client references for a minimum of three (3) prior engagements for which the Proposer has served in this capacity.

Instructions to Proposers: Complete the Proposer’s Name and distribute this form to a minimum of three (3) clients and request the form be completed and returned in compliance with the Instructions to Client References (below).

Proposer’s clients shall email the completed Reference Form to JoniMA@leeschools.net, and references shall only be accepted from the Proposers client’s email address. References may include no more than one reference from the School District of Lee County.

Instructions to Client References: Complete this reference questionnaire and return it no later than 2:00 PM EST, February 25, 2026, via email, to JoniMA@leeschools.net.

1. Is the Proposer currently providing services for your organization or have they provided support for this service in the past 3 years? Yes No For what duration were the services provided?

2. What services were provided by the Proposer to the organization?

3. What was the size of the project/services?

4. Were the services provided as part of a performance-based contract, or another type of contract?

5. Describe the performance requirements or measure of success, and the successful and less than successful services delivered.

6. Was the Proposer able to meet the stated goals? Describe the type and amount of savings realized as a result of the Proposer’s services?

7. Please rate the Proposers knowledge and expertise of the individual’s assigned to the project. (5 being excellent, 1 being unacceptable)

8. Please list Proposers principal representatives involved in the project. Please rate them individually. Comment on the skills, knowledge, behaviors or other factors based on the rating. (5 being excellent, 1 being unacceptable)

Name: Rating:

Name: Rating:

Name: Rating:

Name: Rating:

Comments:

9. Please rate the dynamics/interaction between the Proposer’s staff and the Client the staff. (5 being excellent, 1 being unacceptable)

10. Which aspect(s) of the Proposers services are most satisfied?

11. Which aspect(s) of the Proposers services are least satisfied?

12. Please rate the satisfaction with the Proposers response time to questions and/or issues. (5 being excellent, 1 being unacceptable)

13. Would you recommend the Proposers services again?

Email completed form to JoniMA@leeschools.net, and copy the Proposer before 2:00 PM EST on February 25, 2026.

PROPOSERS NAME:
CLIENT AGENCYFIRM PROVIDING REFERENCE:
CLIENTs INDIVIDUAL NAME:
EMAIL ADDRESS:
PHONE:
For what duration were the services provided:
What services were provided by the Proposer to the organization 1:
What services were provided by the Proposer to the organization 2:
What was the size of the projectservices:
Were the services provided as part of a performancebased contract or another type of contract 1:
Were the services provided as part of a performancebased contract or another type of contract 2:
services delivered:
1 being unacceptable:
Name:
Rating:
Name_2:
Rating_2:
Name_3:
Rating_3:
Name_4:
Rating_4:
Name_5:
Rating_5:
Name_6:
Rating_6:
Comments 1:
Comments 2:
Comments 3:
Comments 4:
Comments 5:
1 being unacceptable_2:
10 Which aspects of the Proposers services are most satisfied:
1:
2:
11 Which aspects of the Proposers services are least satisfied:
1_2:
2_2:
being unacceptable:
13 Would you recommend the Proposers services again:
Check Box1: Off
Check Box3: Off
Text4:
Text5:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .