629-18-114 Phase 1 RFI Register 07092024.docx
DOCX document 30 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Z1DZ--Project #629-18-114 Expand Distributed Antenna System (DB) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 36C25624R0010
About this file
This document is a Request for Information (RFI) regarding a federal contract opportunity numbered 36C25624R0010 to expand a Distributed Antenna System. The key details are:
The RFI provides responses to six questions related to the submission requirements for Factor 3 - Past Performance in the proposal. Regarding the past performance examples, the RFI clarifies that offerors can submit a combination of projects from the prime contractor and the A/E firm, with a maximum of 5 total projects. Past performance evaluations can be provided through CPARS or the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) format, and these submissions will count towards the 30-page proposal limit. The minimum construction value for past performance examples is $10 million, and the minimum A/E design fee is $1 million, depending on the type of submission (Design/Build, A/E, or Construction). The government has indicated that it will not lower these minimum thresholds at this time.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 50
Z1DZ--Project #629-18-114 Expand Distributed Antenna System (DB) has more files on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Source Selection Sensitive Information—See FAR 2.101 & 3.104 Project No. 629-18-114; Expand Distributed Antenna System 36C25624R0010
| Question |
| Answer |
RFI #1 – On page 15, under “Submission Criteria” for Factor 3, it states: “If the contractor does not possess Design-Build (D-B) experience, provide a minimum of one (1) and a maximum of five (5) projects completed by the A-E firm…in addition to the one (1) to five (5) projects submitted for the prime contractor.” If the prime contractor does not possess Design/Build experience, is the offeror to submit up to 5 examples from the A/E firm along with up to 5 examples for the prime contractor for a potential maximum of 10 projects (5 design, 5 construction), or is it a combination of the two to get to a MAXIMUM of 5 projects total?
Phase 1 proposals shall not exceed 30 pages. It is on the offeror how they wish to present their proposals within the 30 page limitation.
RFI #2 – On page 15, under “Submission Criteria” for Factor 3, regarding Past Performance Evaluations, it states: “Separately provide any completed Past Performance Evaluations, if any...Offerors shall prepare and forward…Exhibit B (PPQ) for all the projects listed by contractor…” If the offeror has existing CPARS for submitted projects, can CPARS satisfy the criteria for Past Performance Evaluation, or must the Past Performance Questionnaire be submitted for each project example?
CPARS may be used to satisfy the past performance factor. Past Performance Questionnaires not received on behalf of the offer will not be penalized during the evaluation. The government reserves the right to review all sources of past performance history.
RFI #3 – Do Past Performance Evaluations, whether PPQ or CPARS (if allowed), count towards page limit?
If PPQs or CPARS are submitted with a given proposal, then the submitted information will be counted towards the page limitations. PPQs that are submitted by a third party will not count towards page limitations.
RFI #4 – For past performance examples, do the projects need to meet both the minimum construction value ($10,000,000) AND AE value ($1,000,000) to be considered acceptable? Or is it a
This answer depends based on the submission type –
a) Design/Build Submission: Both will need to be met.
b) AE Submission: AE firm design fee will need to be met.
c) Construction Submission: Construction firm will need to be met.
| RFI #5 – 1) Regarding past performance, is the AE value of a project example considered the Design Fee of an AE firm for a construction project? 2) Or is it the value of the total project that the AE firm performed work? |
| 1) It is the fee on an AE contract – all encompassing (as detailed in a SF330. |
2) NA
| RFI #6 – Would the government consider lowering the threshold for the minimum values for both Construction and AE for Factor 3? |
| No changes will be made to these figures at this time. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .