Past Performance Questionaire.docx

DOCX document 23 KB Posted

Attached to
7G21--621-22-704 - EHRM NextGen Wifi Upgrade Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
36C24924R0067
Issued by
Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Veterans Integrated Service Network 9

About this file

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for the federal contract opportunity 7G21--621-22-704 - EHRM NextGen Wifi Upgrade at the James H. Quillen VAMC in Mountain Home, Tennessee. The Questionnaire is to be completed by the assigned assessor, who is requested to provide an overall rating of the contractor's past performance in the areas of quality of service, schedule, and business relations. The assessor is also asked to provide a recommendation on whether they would be willing to award another contract to the contractor. The contract opportunity is being solicited by the NCO 9 Network Contracting Activity. The solicitation number is 36C24924R0067, and the requirement is for an EHRM NextGen Wi-Fi Upgrade at the James H. Quillen VAMC.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Show all 17

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT 2: PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SUBJECT: Past Performance Questionnaire for Project 621-22-704 - EHRM NextGen Wi-Fi Upgrade at the James H. Quillen VAMC, in Mountain Home, Tennessee.

PAST PERFORMANCE INSTRUCTIONS

The NCO 9 Network Contracting Activity has issued a solicitation to EHRM NextGen Wi-Fi Upgrade at the James H. Quillen VAMC, in Mountain Home, Tennessee.

Past performance information will be used to evaluate proposals received. Section A is to be completed by the Offeror. Section A of the enclosed questionnaire lists the contractor who has identified your office as a source to evaluate their past performance. Section A also authorizes release of this information to NCO 9 Network Contracting Activity.

The Offeror must provide this entire document to each of its assessors. The Assessor shall only submit past performance questionnaires directly to the Contract Specialist-Robert Glenn Jr by way of email at Robert.glenn2@va.gov.

Section B in its entirety is to be completed by the assessor(s). An individual assessor knowledgeable of the contractor’s quality of supplies and services rendered is requested to verify, complete the questionnaire, and submit to the Contracting Office. If evaluating more than one contract for the same contractor, use a separate questionnaire for each contract being evaluated.

Because this information is critical to the evaluation process, your time and effort in providing your assessment is greatly appreciated. The questionnaire should be completed as soon as possible but not later than June 17, 2024, at 2:00PM EDT. Assessor is requested to send electronically to (Robert.glenn2@va.gov). Assessor: Please do not send this information to the Offeror being evaluated.

Thank you in advance for your cooperation and expeditious response to this request.

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SECTION A: Contractor Information (to be completed by the contractor for who past performance information is being collected, prior to forwarding to assessors)

Solicitation Number

Project/Requirement

Customer/Agency

1. Prospective Government Contractor’s ______________________________________

Name and Address:______________________________________
______________________________________

2. Contractor Point of Contact: ___________________________________________

3. Phone number (with area code): ___________________________________________

4. Assessor Contract Award number: _________________________________________

5. Description of Services provided under contract: ______________________________

6. Contract award date: ___________ Contract Amount: Initial ___________Final ____

7. Period of Performance or Delivery Date: _________________________

ASSESSOR INFORMATION:

Assessor Name

Title

Phone Number/Email Address

8. Authorization is hereby granted to provide the information requested in this questionnaire to NCO 9 Network Contracting Activity, Murfreesboro, Tennessee

(Signature)

_______________________________________________________________________
(Name and Title of Authorizing Official)(Date)

SECTION B: Assessors Information (to be completed by assessors.)

RATING SCALE Definitions Past Performance Evaluation Ratings

Rating
Description
ACCEPTABLE
Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the

Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the Offeror’s performance record is unknown. (See note below.)

UNACCEPTABLE
Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the

Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

The questions on the survey (see below) shall be rated in accordance with the definitions provided in the Rating Scale. Any unsatisfactory or marginal rating shall be supplemented with an explanation in the space provided.

QUALITY OF SERVICE

1. Rate the contractor’s compliance with contractual requirements.

ACCEPTABLE ___ UNACCEPTABLE ___

2. Overall rating of contractor quality of service.

PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:

SCHEDULE

3. Delivery of service was within required time specified by contract requirements.

4. Rate the contractor’s ability to control cost and submit invoices.

Are invoices complete, accurate, and timely?

BUSINESS RELATIONS

5. Overall rating of contractor’s business practices (e.g. maintaining A positive working relationship, business ethics, timely and effectively Resolution of any problems, etc.)

ACCEPTABLE ___ UNACCEPTABLE ___

6. Rate the working relationship between contractor’s management, and your company (i.e. contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, commitment of customer satisfaction; concern for the interest of the customer).

7. Rate the contractor's ability to submit required reports and/or invoices in a timely manner.

8. Rate the contractor’s responsiveness to customer complaint resolution.

9. Overall rating of contractor’s business relations.

How would you feel about awarding another contract to this contractor?

______Would not hesitate to award another contract to this contractor.
______Would most likely award another contract to this contractor.

______ Would think twice about awarding another contract to this contractor, but would do so if no better alternative existed.

______ Do not wish to award another contract to this contractor.

______ Would not award another contract to this contractor.

PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:

Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance (quality, schedule, business relations,) on contract being assessed.

ACCEPTABLE
UNACCEPTABLE

VII. General Comments:

ASSESSOR:

Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.

Role
Period of Involvement

Contract Specialist/Contracting Officer

Technical Project Lead/Project Officer

OTHERS

__________________________________________________________________
(Signature)(Date)
_________________________________________________________________
(Typed or Printed Name)(Organization Name)

(Phone Number)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .