36C24822R0077 0002_1.docx

SUBJECT*

FY22: Tier 2- Proj: 675-22-809 - Repurpose Lakemont CPAC Datacenter

GENERAL INFORMATION

BASE NOTICE TYPE

Network Contracting Office 8 (NCO 8) Miami VA Healthcare System 1201 NW 16th Street Miami FL 33125

POINT OF CONTACT*

Contracting Officer Duwane B. Snyder Duwane.Snyder@va.gov 305-339-0404

PLACE OF PERFORMANCE

Orlando VA Mecidal Center

Lakemont Campus

2500 S. Lakemont Avenue

Orlando FL

COUNTRY

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

AGENCY’S URL

URL DESCRIPTION

AGENCY CONTACT’S EMAIL ADDRESS

EMAIL DESCRIPTION

DESCRIPTION

Modification to a Previous Notice Modification to a Previous Notice Please see answers to Vendor’s questions.

Modification to a Previous Notice

5. PROJECT NUMBER (if applicable)

CODE

7.

ADMINISTERED BY

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER

CODE

6. ISSUED BY

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NUMBER

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED

PAGE OF PAGES

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED

BPA NO.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

FACILITY CODE

CODE

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified f or receipt of Offers

E. IMPORTANT:

is extended,

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning __________ copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

(REV. 11/2016)

is required to sign this document and return ___________ copies to the issuing office.

is not, A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET

FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

15C. DATE SIGNED

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO

AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER

Contractor

16C. DATE SIGNED

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore cha nged, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

STANDARD FORM 30

PREVIOUS EDITION NOT USABLE

Prescribed by GSA - FAR (48 CFR) 53.243 (Type or print) (Type or print) (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

(Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (If other than Item 6) (Specify type of modification and authority) (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.)

(If required)

(SEE ITEM 11)

(SEE ITEM 13)

(X)

CHECK

ONE

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE

CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer) 675-22-809 36C248 Department of Veterans Affairs Network Contracting Office 8 (NCO 8) Miami VA Healthcare System 1201 NW 16th Street Miami FL 33125 36C248 Department of Veterans Affairs Network Contracting Office 8 (NCO 8) Miami VA Healthcare System 1201 NW 16th Street Miami FL 33125 To all Offerors/Bidders

36C24822R0077 04-29-2022

X X X

The purpose of this Amendment is to provide answers to vendor's RFIs.

PLEASE SEE CONTINUATION PAGE

Page 1 of

CONTINUATION PAGE

Please see below the answers to vendor’s RFIs.

36C24822R0077 Project 675-22-809 Repurpose Lakemont CPAC Datacenter Questions and Answer

Question #2: The SAM.gov advertisement is listed as a Pre-Solicitation. However, you posted an amendment today clarifying the site visit in Phase 2. Please clarify if the advertisement on Sam.gov is an active solicitation or still in pre-solicitation.

Answer #2: Please see answer to FRI #1

Question #3: I saw that sources sought RFIs were extended until tomorrow. For this design-build project, is the magnitude $150-250k or $1mm-2mm? I’ve seen conflicting information and this will help in our evaluation of this project.

Answer #3: The magnitude of the project is $150,000.00 - $250,000.00.

Question #4: The original solicitation mentions Attachment F – Floor Plan but I have not seen this attachment posted anywhere. Would you be able to share this with me?

Answer #4: Please see the below attachments.

Question #5: So this amendment seems to have attachments B and D.

It does not have the following attachments:

Attachment A., wage rate Attachment C - Price Matrix.

Attachment E - Past Performance Questionnaire.

Attachment F 675-22-809 Floor Plan Answer #5: The Wage Determination is available at www.sam.gov. Please see below for the remaining attachments.

Question #6: Please clarify if a superintendent can be a triple hat to cover the requirements of SSHO and QA/QC?

Answer #6: Yes.

Question #7: If no to the question above, will the SSHO need to be full-time for this project?

Answer #7: See answer to question #6

Question #8: Please provide attachment F – Floor Plan.

Answer #8: Please see below.

Question #9: Please provide electrical as-builts for the space.

Answer #9: To be provided in Phase II.

Question #10: Please provide plumbing as-builts for the space.

Answer #10: To be provided in Phase II.

Question #11: provide mechanical as-builts for the space.

Answer #11: To be provided in Phase II.

Question #12: Please provide structural and architectural as-builts for the space.

Answer #12: To be provided in Phase II.

Question #13: Please provide the latest Asbestos survey for the area.

Answer #13: To be provided during Phase II.

Question #14: Please identify the approximate square footage of the space.

Answer #14: Approximately 650 SF.

Question #15: Please identify if the existing Fire Suppression system is a wet or dry type.

Answer #15: Contractor to site verify. Ceiling is currently exposed.

Question #16: Will interior design be provided by the VA or will the design team need to propose final finishes throughout the scope of work

Answer #16: Interior design to be completed by the VA.

Question #17: Will the contractor be responsible to relocate any of the data systems that are currently installed?

Answer #17: YES.

Question #18: Will the contractor be responsible to relocate any equipment that may be currently installed?

Answer #18: YES.

Question #19: The solicitation has listed 107 days for the design duration and 60 days for the construction duration. Current market conditions for long lead items like doors, hardware and light fixtures extend beyond the listed construction duration. Will the VA consider extending the construction duration to allow ample time for acquisition of material?

Answer #19: YES.

Attachment C Base Offer Cost Breakdown

Project Number:

Date:

Project Title

Project Location

Offeror Name

Offeror Street

Offeror City

State

Zip

Overhead/Profit Subtotals :

ATTACHMENT E

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ)

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

Phone Number (include area code):

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number (include area code):

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify): Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yyyy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yyyy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yyyy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yyyy):

8. Client’s Signature:

Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

unsatisfactory rating.

contract Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

contract Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

Contractor Information (Firm Name):

Client Information (Name):

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

M

U

N

M

U

N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

E

VG

S

M

U

N

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

M

U

N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?

M

U

N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort

S

M

U

N

c) Government Property Control

S

M

U

N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel

S

M

U

N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns

S

M

U

N

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines

S

M

U

N

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?

E VG S M U N

Contractor Information (Firm Name): Client Information (Name):

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client

E

VG

S

M

U

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.

Yes

No

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

E

VG

S

M

U

N

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

VG

S

M

U

N

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below)

Yes

No

d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.

VG

S

M

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):

Attachment F image1.png image2.png image3.png image4.png image5.png image6.png image7.png image8.png image9.png image10.png image11.png image12.png image13.png image14.png image15.png image16.png image17.png image18.png image19.png image20.png image21.png image22.png image23.png