36C24719Q0462-002.docx

Project: FORKLIFT PM SERVICES

A. BASIS OF AWARD.

Award will be made to the lowest priced, technically acceptable responsible offeror, whose offer conforms to all stated terms, conditions, representations, certifications, and any other information required by this solicitation. Offers will be ranked by price first then evaluated for technically acceptable. If, the low-priced offer is found to be technically acceptable the evaluation process stops no other offer will be evaluated.

If necessary this process will be performed until there is a low priced technically acceptable offer. If no offer is technically acceptable the government will make a determination to re-solicit. Technical tradeoff will not be made and no additional credit will be given for exceeding the minimum requirements.

In the event an offeror’s quote is determined to be unacceptable in any of these factors, the entire quote will be considered unacceptable and the offeror will be ineligible for award.

**ALL factors must be rated ACCEPTABLE to be considered for award.

B. EVALUATION METHODOLOGY. The award decision will be based on the following:

1. Registered in www.sam.gov to receive Government contracts.

2. Verified in www.vip.vetbiz.gov as a Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDVOSB)

3. CONTRACTOR EXPERIENCE: Offeror must provide information to document their experience IAW SOW performing this type of service.

4. Price. All line items in the Price Schedule must include a price. The total evaluated price will consist of the offeror’s total proposed price, to include all Option Years.

Each factor will be scored as Acceptable or Unacceptable as defined below.

“Lowest Price, Technically Acceptable” Evaluation Standards

Acceptable All of the minimum acceptable criteria are clearly met by the offer. The offer meets the minimum performance and technical capability requirements defined in the solicitation.

Unacceptable Not all of the minimum acceptable criteria were met by the offer. An unacceptable offer contains one or more deficiencies that does not meet the performance and technical capability requirements defined in the solicitation.

The following table will be used for each proposal received to score each LPTA factor as to whether it is Acceptable or Unacceptable.

1. REGISTERED IN SAM

2. VERIFIED IN VIP AS SDVOSB

3. CONTRACTOR EXPERIENCE