Attachment_3_Past_Performance_Survey.pdf

PDF 91 KB Posted

Attached to
Polio and VPD Field Officer Support Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
2016-N-17867
Issued by
Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Office of Acquisition Services

About this file

Attachment 3 - Past Performance Information Survey

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Polio and VPD Field Officer Support, newest first.
File Type Posted
Amendment_0004.pdf PDF
RFP_2016-N-17867_Amendment_0002.pdf PDF
Q A_for_RFP_2016-N-17867__080516.pdf PDF
Attachment_2_Consent_Letter.docx DOCX document
RFP_2016-N-17867_Amendment_0001.pdf PDF
Attachment_3_Past_Performance_Survey.doc DOC document
amendment_0001.pdf PDF
RFP_2016-N-17867_072216.pdf PDF
Attachment_1_Performance_Evaluation_Report.pdf PDF
Attachment_2_Consent_Letter.pdf PDF
Attachment_6_List_of_WHO_countries.pdf PDF
Attachment_4_ACH_Vendor_Enrollment_Form.pdf PDF
Attachment_5_QualityAssuranceSurveillancePlan_-_VFSO.pdf PDF
Show all 13

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment 3

Past Performance Survey

Please email completed surveys to:

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)

Procurement and Grants Office

ATTN: Tim Barnes

2920 Brandywine Road, Mailstop K-75

Atlanta, Georgia 30341

Email: krz3@cdc.gov Phone: (770) 488-2883

The below contractor has submitted a proposal to provide services in support of the Centers for Disease Control and

Prevention in response to a recent solicitation. This contractor has identified your contract listed below as one for evaluation of past performance. Please complete this Past Performance Survey and email it to the above POC by the proposal due date in the solicitation.

Contractor Information:

a. Contractor Name:___________________________________________________________________________

b. Program Name:____________________________________________________________________________

c. Contract Number: __________________________________________________________________________

d. Contract Type: _____________________________________________________________________________

e. Contract amount:____________________________________________________________________________

f. Period of performance:________________________________________________________________________

g. Description and Location of work:

TO BE COMPLETED BY REFERENCE

a. Name of person completing this questionnaire: __________________________________________________

b. Signature of person completing this questionnaire: __________________________________________________

c. Your role with respect to the contractor (e.g., Contracting Officer/Contract Manager, COR/COTR, Program

Manager, etc.): _______________________________________________________________________________

d. Agency/company: ________________________________________________________________________

e. Telephone with area code: ________________________________________________________________

f. Fax number with area code: ________________________________________________________________

g. Date questionnaire completed: ________________________________________________________________

Objective Measurable Performance Indicators mailto:krz3@cdc.gov

Excellent: Performance consistently exceeded contract requirements, customer expectations, and provided significant, unique or worthwhile features or benefits.

Good: Performance consistently met, and occasionally exceeded, contract requirements and customer expectations. Demonstrated an understanding of the requirements, provided an acceptable management and technical approach, and provided complete responses to customer needs.

Satisfactory: Met the performance level of the contract.

Marginal: Usually met the contract performance level, however at a marginal level. Performance could have been improved and occasionally fell short of customer expectations.

Poor: Performance did not meet customer expectations and/or contract requirements.

Please answer each of the following questions with a rating based on the objective measurable performance indicators listed above. Commentary to explain any rating can be noted in the margins or on an attachment.

1. Evaluate the contractor’s labor force in terms of overall qualifications to perform the work required.

Excellent Good Satisfactory Marginal Poor

2. Evaluate the stability of the contractor’s work force as affected by employee turnover and contract vacancies.

Excellent Good Satisfactory Marginal Poor

3. Evaluate how well the contractor conducted work in a smooth and responsive manner during the initial startup or transition period. Please indicate whether the work was transitioned from Government responsibility or another contractor’s responsibility.

Excellent Good Satisfactory Marginal Poor

Previous Contractor Responsibility Previous Government Responsibility

4. Evaluate the contractor’s adherence to task schedules and mission requirements.

Excellent Good Satisfactory Marginal Poor

5. Evaluate the contractor’s ability to provide world-wide technical assistance and support and capacity building for global activities and programs.

Excellent Good Satisfactory Marginal Poor

6. Evaluate the contractor’s responsiveness to technical direction.

Excellent Good Satisfactory Marginal Poor

7. Evaluate the responsiveness and quality of the contractor’s reports and documentation.

Excellent Good Satisfactory Marginal Poor

8. Evaluate the contractor’s ability to solve business management problems without extensive guidance from the procuring agency.

Excellent Good Satisfactory Marginal Poor

9. Evaluate the contractor’s ability to overcome program, technical, or schedule difficulties without extensive guidance from the procuring agency.

Excellent Good Satisfactory Marginal Poor

10. Evaluate the contractor’s willingness and ability to integrate as a team and work cooperatively with the existing work force (Government and/or other contractors).

Excellent Good Satisfactory Marginal Poor

11. Evaluate the contractor’s cost reporting and estimating system.

Excellent Good Satisfactory Marginal Poor

12. Evaluate the contractor’s overall performance.

Excellent Good Satisfactory Marginal Poor

13. Would you be willing to have this contractor do additional work for your Organization in the future?

Yes_____ No______

Other Informational Comments:

Pro:

Con:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .