Relevant_Contracts_Reference_Sheet.docx

The Offeror shall provide documentation outlining the Offeror’s past performance with contracts, as prime, subcontractor, teaming partner, and /or joint venture partner, which is the same or similar in nature, size, and complexity to the services being procured under this solicitation. The submittal shall include rationale supporting your assertion of relevance and how it was determined that the work performed previously was the same or similar in nature, size, and complexity to the work specified by this solicitation. Offerors are required to explain what aspects of the contracts are deemed relevant to the proposed effort, and to what aspects of the proposed effort they relate. Each Relevant Contracts Reference Sheet is limited to a maximum of 3 pages and shall include the following information:

1. Contract Number, Award Date and Contract type.

2. Price/Cost – original awarded and final (or projected final, if contract is current).

3. Contact Information – address and telephone number for the procuring contracting activity and contract administrative activity (if applicable). Name, telephone number, and e-mail address for the following:

· Contracting Officer (CO)

· Government Contracting Officer Representative (COR) or Commercial Technical Representative (CTR)

4. Relevancy Description – identify in specific detail for each contract listed, why or how you consider that effort relevant or similar to the effort required by this solicitation. In determining relevancy, consideration should be given, but not limited to, the extent of similarity between the service/support effort, complexity, dollar value, contract type, and the Offeror’s role as a subcontractor and/or teaming partner or other comparable attributes of past performance examples and the source selection requirements; and a measure of the likelihood that the past performance is an indicator of future performance.

5. Narrative explanation – On each contract listed describe the objectives achieved and the following data: any cost growth or schedule delays encountered. For any Government contracts which did not/do not meet original requirements with regard to cost, schedule, or technical performance, a brief explanation of the reason(s) for such shortcomings and any demonstrated corrective actions taken to avoid recurrence. Offerors may include a discussion of efforts accomplished by the Offeror to resolve problems encountered on prior contracts as well as past efforts to identify and manage program risk. Merely having problems does not automatically equate to a “No Confidence” rating, since the problems encountered may have been on a more complex program, or an Offeror may have subsequently demonstrated the ability to overcome the problems encountered. The Offeror is required to clearly demonstrate management actions employed in overcoming problems and the effects of those actions, in terms of improvements achieved or problems rectified.

6. Negative Performance Documentation – A copy of any cure notices, show cause letters or contract discrepancy reports received on each contract listed and a description of any corrective action by the Offeror.

Relevant Contracts Reference Sheet

Limited to a maximum of 3 pages per reference not including instructions

1. Contract Number:

Award Date:

Contract type:

2. Price/Cost – original awarded price (to include options):

Modified Price/Cost:

3. Contact Information - for the Government (or commercial) procuring contracting activity and contract administrative activity (if applicable):

CO

Name & Address:

Phone Number:

E-Mail Address:

COR or CTR Name & Address:

Phone Number:

E-Mail Address:

4. Relevancy description:

5. Narrative explanation:

6. Negative performance documentation: