Additional Information 191NLE26Q0057.docx
DOCX document 165 KB Posted
- Attached to
- INL Colombia Training Ammunition Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 191NLE26Q0057
About this file
This is an Additional Information document providing clarifications and answers to offeror questions regarding solicitation 191NLE26Q0057 for INL Colombia Training Ammunition.
The document clarifies technical specifications and delivery requirements for three ammunition types: 9mm frangible (1,200,000 rounds), 7.62 Short Range Training Ammunition (50,000 rounds), and 5.56mm frangible (1,200,000 rounds). For the 7.62 SRTA, offerors must comply with the specific DODIC description; while 7.62x51 and .308 NATO are generally interchangeable, the solicitation requires the specific caliber requested. Jacketted frangible ammunition is acceptable and preferred. Offerors must base pricing on delivery to the Miami freight forwarder (Goldbelt Security, LLC), though providing alternative pricing for Bogota, Colombia delivery is permissible if properly authorized under ITAR and Commerce requirements. The 120-day delivery timeline applies whether shipment is to the Miami freight forwarder or final destination in Bogota. Risk of loss transfers to the freight forwarder upon delivery to Miami, though the contractor retains responsibility for meeting all export requirements. Partial shipments are acceptable only if the full shipment cannot be met by July and the partial shipment represents at least 50 percent of the order.
All packaging must comply with DOT hazardous materials regulations (49 CFR Parts 171-178), including UN/DOT hazard classification, labeling, and specialized explosive packaging requirements. The contractor bears full responsibility for all export licensing, ITAR compliance, Commerce requirements, and export documentation (including material safety data sheets and required licenses). While INL will facilitate Colombian National Police signature on required export documents, the contractor must procure new ammunition only from manufacturer-approved distribution channels and provide manufacturer's warranty documentation. All shipments must include packing lists and commercial invoices attached to the lead box, with proper consolidation to prevent damage or misdirection.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| PR15395912 SOW (TRAINING AMMUNITIONS) UPDATED 2.docx | DOCX document | |
| PR15395912 SOW (TRAINING AMMUNITIONS) UPDATED.docx | DOCX document | |
| PR15395912 SOW TRAINING AMMUNITIONS .pdf | ||
| 191NLE26Q0057 Signed.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Additional Information for Training Ammo:
The 7.62 SRTA AA37 must comply with the DODIC description bellow:
1. Most of the reputable US manufacturers of frangible ammunition manufacture 7.62x51 SRTA also labeled as the nato dimensions .308. I wanted to confirm this is deemed acceptable as 7.62x51 and .308 are universally interchangeable.
The issue is .308 has a higher velocity than 7.62. As this is 7.62 Short Range Linked training ammo I would say it has to be the specific DODIC requested.
2. Beyond standard manufacturer packaging, are there any specific requirements for:
· UN/DOT hazard classification and labeling (e.g., explosive classification),
· Palletization or containerization, or
· Any additional marking or documentation requirements beyond those outlined in the SOW?
The regulations are lengthy, I will mention something in regards to all applicable DOT Regulation for Air(as well as IATA) , Ground and Sea transport (IMDG) see below DOT requirement (CFR49 parts 173, 171, 172 & 178.).
The most strict is Air shipment, both Commercial and Military has about the same regulations, being commercial more strict IATA requires a few more things than DOT
DOT packing for explosives, regulated under 49 CFR 173.62, requires specialized, approved packaging to ensure safety during transport. It involves matching UN numbers to specific packing methods (PI 101–144), using compatible, sturdy materials that prevent shifting, and ensuring proper labeling. Generally, Class 1 explosives require Packing Group II standards.
Key Requirements for Explosive Packaging:
| • | 49 CFR 173.62: This section is the primary guide, providing a table that links explosives (by UN number) to authorized inner, intermediate, and outer packaging instructions. |
| • | Packing Instructions (PI): Specific instructions (e.g., PI 131 for detonators) dictate the required containers. |
| • | Compatibility: All cushioning and absorbent materials must be compatible with the explosive substance. |
| • | Preventing Movement: Packaging must hold explosives firmly to prevent shifting, which can cause initiation, while plastic containers must not generate static electricity. |
| • | Markings: Packages must bear the UN number, shipping name, and often "EX" approval numbers (e.g., EX20XXXXXX). |
| • | Special Permits: Certain explosives may require a DOT special permit (e.g., DOT-SP 8451) with specific container requirements |
Below the part of DOT regulation:
178.3 Marking of packagings.
(a) Each packaging represented as manufactured to a DOT specification or a UN standard must be marked on a non-removable component of the packaging with specification markings conforming to the applicable specification, and with the following:
(1) In an unobstructed area, with letters, and numerals identifying the standards or specification (e.g. UN 1A1, DOT 4B240ET, etc.).
(2) Unless otherwise specified in this part, the name and address or symbol of the packaging manufacturer or the person certifying compliance with a UN standard. Symbols, if used, must be registered with the Associate Administrator. Unless authorized in writing by the holder of the symbol, symbols must represent either the packaging manufacturer or the approval agency responsible for providing the most recent certification for the packaging through design certification testing or periodic retesting, as applicable. Duplicative symbols are not authorized.
(3) The markings must be stamped, embossed, burned, printed or otherwise marked on the packaging to provide adequate accessibility, permanency, contrast, and legibility so as to be readily apparent and understood.
https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-49/subtitle-B/chapter-I/subchapter-C/part-178
§ 178.503 Marking of packagings.
(a) A manufacturer must mark every packaging that is represented as manufactured to meet a UN standard with the marks specified in this section. The markings must be durable, legible and placed in a location and of such a size relative to the packaging as to be readily visible, as specified in § 178.3(a). Except as otherwise provided in this section, every reusable packaging liable to undergo a reconditioning process which might obliterate the packaging marks must bear the marks specified in paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(6) and (a)(9) of this section in a permanent form (e.g. embossed) able to withstand the reconditioning process.
https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-49/subtitle-B/chapter-I/subchapter-C/part-178/subpart-L/section-178.503#p-178.503(a)(5)
§ 173.22 Shipper's responsibility.
(a) Except as otherwise provided in this part, a person may offer a hazardous material for transportation in a packaging or container required by this part only in accordance with the following:
(1) The person shall class and describe the hazardous material in accordance with parts 172 and 173 of this subchapter, and
(2) The person shall determine that the packaging or container is an authorized packaging, including part 173 requirements, and that it has been manufactured, assembled, and marked in accordance with:
(i) Section 173.7(a) and parts 173, 178, or 179 of this subchapter;
(ii) A specification of the Department in effect at the date of manufacture of the packaging or container;
(iii) National or international regulations based on the UN Recommendations (IBR, see § 171.7 of this subchapter), as authorized in § 173.24(d)(2);
(iv) An approval issued under this subchapter; or
(v) An exemption or special permit issued under subchapter A of this chapter.
(3) In making the determination under paragraph (a)(2) of this section, the person may accept:
(i) Except for the marking on the bottom of a metal or plastic drum with a capacity over 100 L which has been reconditioned, remanufactured or otherwise converted, the manufacturer's certification, specification, approval, or exemption or special permit marking (see §§ 178.2 and 179.1 of this subchapter); or
(ii) With respect to cargo tanks provided by a carrier, the manufacturer's identification plate or a written certification of specification or exemption or special permit provided by the carrier.
(4)
(i) For a DOT Specification or UN standard packaging subject to the requirements of part 178 of this subchapter, a person must perform all functions necessary to bring the package into compliance with parts 173 and 178 of this subchapter, as identified by the packaging manufacturer or subsequent distributor (for example, applying closures consistent with the manufacturer's closure instructions) in accordance with § 178.2 of this subchapter.
(ii) For other than a bulk package or a cylinder, a person must retain a copy of the manufacturer's notification, including closure instructions (see § 178.2(c) of this subchapter). For a bulk package or a cylinder, a person must retain a copy of the manufacturer's notification, including closure instructions (see § 178.2(c) of this subchapter), unless permanently embossed or printed on the package. A copy of the manufacturer's notification, including closure instructions (see § 178.2(c) of this subchapter), unless permanently embossed or printed on the package when applicable, must be made available for inspection by a representative of the Department upon request for at least 90 days once the package is offered to the initial carrier for transportation in commerce. Subsequent offerors of a filled and otherwise properly prepared unaltered package are not required to maintain manufacturer notification (including closure instructions).
(iii) When applicable, a person must retain a copy of any supporting documentation used to determine an equivalent level of performance under the selective testing variation in § 178.601(g)(1) of this subchapter. Such documentation is to be retained by the person certifying compliance with § 178.601(g)(1), as prescribed in § 178.601(l), and retained as prescribed in paragraph (a)(4)(ii) of this section.
https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-49/subtitle-B/chapter-I/subchapter-C/part-173/subpart-B
3. Is jacketed frangible ok or do you want jacketless?
Yes, jacket frangible is OK, actually that is what we want.
4. Delivery Location & Pricing Basis The solicitation indicates delivery either to the INL warehouse in Bogotá or to the Government-designated freight forwarder in Miami, FL.
| • | Should offerors base pricing on delivery to the Miami freight forwarder ( YES) |
| • | Should offerors provide pricing for delivery to Bogotá, Colombia? (ANS … won’t hurt as long as all is properly authorized on both ends … i.e ITAR and Customs. ) |
| • | Alternatively, will the Government designate the final delivery location at time of award, with a single all-inclusive price expected? ANS, once in country ( Bogota Colombia) the distribution will be handled by INL with CNP. Offeror is 100% responsible for ITAR and or Commerce requirement) |
5. Delivery Terms / Risk of Loss Can the Government confirm the intended delivery terms (e.g., FOB Destination) and the point at which risk transfers to the Government, particularly for deliveries to the Miami freight forwarder? If delivered to Miami FF risk to shipment transfers to Miami FF, yet obligation for contractor to meet the export requirements remains with contractor.
6. Delivery Timeline Interpretation The solicitation specifies a delivery period of up to 120 days.
• Does this requirement apply to delivery to the Miami freight forwarder, or Final delivery to Bogotá, Colombia (if applicable)?
ANS: if to FF 120 days, if to Bogota 120 days.
7. Packaging & Hazardous Materials Requirements Beyond standard manufacturer packaging, are there any specific requirements for:
| • | UN/DOT hazard classification and labeling (e.g., explosive classification), |
| • | Palletization or containerization, or |
| • | Any additional marking or documentation requirements beyond those outlined in the SOW? |
See Export Information under #2
8. Export Documentation Support The SOW indicates contractor responsibility for export licensing. Can the Government confirm whether it will provide end-use documentation or other supporting materials required to facilitate export licensing (e.g., DSP-5 or equivalent), particularly when delivering to the Miami freight forwarder?
ANS: offeror is responsible for all export licensing … INL will facilitate having PN sign documents sent by contractor for CNP signature
9. Partial Shipments The SOW notes that partial shipments are not permitted unless approved. Under what circumstances, if any, would partial deliveries be considered acceptable? The SOW also asks for shipment dates per line item. Could you confirm?
ANS: Partial shipment is only acceptable if full shipment cannot be met by July and must be at least 50% of the order.
image1.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .