Attachment_.docx
DOCX document 14 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Motion Picture Licensing Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 1630DC-18-R-00026
About this file
The purpose of this amendment is to add the Attachment A to the RFP for Motion Pictures License Services. The due date for proposals remain September 5, 2018 by 2:00 PM, E.T. Zone.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RFP_1630DC-18-R-00026.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment – PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
1. Complete name of the firm being evaluated in this questionnaire. If the firm being evaluated is a subcontractor on a proposal team, please provide the name of the prime Contractor who is submitting the proposal.
1. Complete name of government agency, commercial firm or other organization providing this reference.
1. Complete address
1. Contract number or other manner of referring to contract
1. Date work was begun
1. Date work was completed
1. Contract price
1. Final amount invoiced or amount invoiced to date
1. Technical point of contact (name, address, telephone no. and email address) Contracts point of contact (name, address, telephone no. and email address)
1. Location of work (country, state or province, county, city)
1. Description of contract work
Past Performance Questionnaire
1. To what extent did the Contractor adhere to contract delivery schedules?
Considerably surpassed minimum requirements Exceeded minimum requirements Met minimum requirements Less than minimum requirements
COMMENTS:
1. To what extent were the Contractor’s reports and documentation accurate and complete?
Considerably surpassed minimum requirements Exceeded minimum requirements Met minimum requirements Less than minimum requirements
COMMENTS:
1. To what extent was the Contractor able to solve contract performance problems without extensive guidance from customer’s counterparts?
Considerably successful Generally successful Little success No success
COMMENTS:
1. To what extent did the Contractor display initiative in meeting requirements?
Displayed considerable initiative Displayed some initiative Displayed little initiative Displayed no initiative
COMMENTS:
1. Did Contractor commit adequate resources, in a timely fashion, to the contract to meet the requirements and to successfully solve problems?
Provided abundant resources Provided sufficient resources Provided minimal resources Provided insufficient resources
COMMENTS:
1. To what extent was the Contractor effective in interfacing with Government staff?
Extremely effective Generally effective Generally ineffective Extremely ineffective
COMMENTS:
1. What was the overall performance of the Contractor?
Excellent Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
COMMENTS:
Cost Management:
1. To what extent did the Contractor meet the proposed estimates?
Less than estimated cost Comparatively equal to estimate Exceeded the costs Considerably surpassed estimate
COMMENTS:
1. To what extent were there cost overruns?
No cost overruns Little cost overruns Some cost overruns Considerable cost overruns
COMMENTS:
File details come from the government source that posted it.