PPQ_0001.pdf
PDF 198 KB Posted
- Attached to
- BICA-INSTALL/REMOVE DOCK SYSTEM Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 140P1422Q0032
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Sol_140P1422Q0032_Amd_0002.pdf | ||
| B03_40569388_Wage_Determination_-_Bighorn_County_MT_0001.pdf | ||
| B03_40569388_Wage_Determination_-_Bighorn_County_WY_0001.pdf | ||
| Sol_140P1422Q0032_Amd_0001.pdf | ||
| Sol_140P1422Q0032.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE
(1) Contractor/Name & Address (City and State):
(2) Type of Contract: Fixed Price_______ Cost Reimbursement________Other (Specify)_______________
(3) Title of Project/Contract Number: ________________________________________________________
(4) Description of Work:
(5) Complexity of Work: High________Medium_________ Routine___________
(6) Location of Work: ____________________________________________________________________
(7) Date of Award: _____________________________________________________________________
(8) Status: Active___________(Provide percent complete) Complete_________(Provide completion date)
(9) Name and telephone number of Owner’s Technical Representative:
QUALITY OF PRODUCT/SERVICE:
(10) Evaluate the contractor’s performance in complying with contract requirements, quality achieved and overall technical expertise demonstrated.
Excellent
Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Remarks:
(11) To what extent were the contractor’s reports and documentation accurate, complete and submitted in a timely manner?
Excellent
Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
(12) To what extent was the contractor able to solve contract performance problems without extensive guidance from other counterparts?
Excellent
Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Remarks:
(13) How well did the contractor manage and coordinate subcontractors, supplies, and the labor force?
Excellent
Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Remarks:
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:
(14) To what extent were the end users satisfied with:
TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:
(15) To what extent did the contractor meet the required schedules?
(16) If given the opportunity, would you work with this contractor again?
Yes___________ No_______________ Not Sure___________
Other Remarks:
Completed Substantially Ahead of Schedule
Completed on Schedule with no Time Delays
Competed on Schedule with Minor Delays
Under Extenuation Circumstances
Experienced Significant Delays without
Justification
Quality Cost Schedule
Exceptionally Satisfied
Highly Satisfied
Satisfied
Somewhat Dissatisfied
Highly Dissatisfied
(17) Use the space below to provide other information related to the contractor’s performance. This may include the contractor’s selection and management of subcontractors, flexibility in dealing with contract challenges, their overall concern for the Owner’s interest, project awards received, etc.
Remarks:
Send completed form to:
Email: Stacy_Vallie@nps.gov mailto:krystal_bourlier@nps.gov
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .