PPQ_0001.pdf

PDF 198 KB Posted

Attached to
BICA-INSTALL/REMOVE DOCK SYSTEM Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
140P1422Q0032
Issued by
Department of the Interior National Park Service Intermountain Region

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to BICA-INSTALL/REMOVE DOCK SYSTEM, newest first.
File Type Posted
Sol_140P1422Q0032_Amd_0002.pdf PDF
B03_40569388_Wage_Determination_-_Bighorn_County_MT_0001.pdf PDF
B03_40569388_Wage_Determination_-_Bighorn_County_WY_0001.pdf PDF
Sol_140P1422Q0032_Amd_0001.pdf PDF
Sol_140P1422Q0032.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE

(1) Contractor/Name & Address (City and State):

(2) Type of Contract: Fixed Price_______ Cost Reimbursement________Other (Specify)_______________

(3) Title of Project/Contract Number: ________________________________________________________

(4) Description of Work:

(5) Complexity of Work: High________Medium_________ Routine___________

(6) Location of Work: ____________________________________________________________________

(7) Date of Award: _____________________________________________________________________

(8) Status: Active___________(Provide percent complete) Complete_________(Provide completion date)

(9) Name and telephone number of Owner’s Technical Representative:

QUALITY OF PRODUCT/SERVICE:

(10) Evaluate the contractor’s performance in complying with contract requirements, quality achieved and overall technical expertise demonstrated.

Excellent

Good

Satisfactory

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Remarks:

(11) To what extent were the contractor’s reports and documentation accurate, complete and submitted in a timely manner?

Excellent

Good

Satisfactory

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

(12) To what extent was the contractor able to solve contract performance problems without extensive guidance from other counterparts?

Excellent

Good

Satisfactory

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Remarks:

(13) How well did the contractor manage and coordinate subcontractors, supplies, and the labor force?

Excellent

Good

Satisfactory

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Remarks:

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

(14) To what extent were the end users satisfied with:

TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

(15) To what extent did the contractor meet the required schedules?

(16) If given the opportunity, would you work with this contractor again?

Yes___________ No_______________ Not Sure___________

Other Remarks:

Completed Substantially Ahead of Schedule

Completed on Schedule with no Time Delays

Competed on Schedule with Minor Delays

Under Extenuation Circumstances

Experienced Significant Delays without

Justification

Quality Cost Schedule

Exceptionally Satisfied

Highly Satisfied

Satisfied

Somewhat Dissatisfied

Highly Dissatisfied

(17) Use the space below to provide other information related to the contractor’s performance. This may include the contractor’s selection and management of subcontractors, flexibility in dealing with contract challenges, their overall concern for the Owner’s interest, project awards received, etc.

Remarks:

Send completed form to:

Email: Stacy_Vallie@nps.gov mailto:krystal_bourlier@nps.gov

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .