Amendment 0001-Questions and Answers.docx
DOCX document 21 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Dilution Refrigerator for TKIDs work Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 1333ND24QNB680256
About this file
This document contains a set of Questions and Answers related to a solicitation for a Dilution Refrigerator. The key details are:
The solicitation requires a dilution refrigerator to be used on a neutron beamline. An inverted design is not acceptable, but a top-down design is acceptable. The refrigerator must have the optical windows and sample space volume centered at 1,194mm above ground level, which is a hard specification. The split between the two sections of the outer vacuum can/shield can be below the 4K plate, closer to the cold plate. The solicitation requires a minimum of 3 additional channels for user application on the thermometry to handle cryogenic temperature sensors. A pump out port is required on the gas handling system, but a dedicated OVC pump is not needed. The RF lines require a break at 4K to allow for user-installed amplifiers/electronics. The government will perform the vibration isolation verification testing, not the supplier.
The solicitation number is 1333ND24QNB680256, issued by the Department of Commerce National Institute of Standards and Technology. The original due date of June 17, 2024 has been extended to June 24, 2024 due to government fiscal year-end restrictions.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1333ND24QNB030255 RFQ.docx | DOCX document | |
| Statement of Work TKIDS.docx | DOCX document | |
| 1333ND24QNB030255 RFQ.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Questions and Answers Question 1: The Technical Requirements fall within the range of two potential standard systems. Option 1 would be an inverted, tabletop design. Is an inverted design acceptable for the end application? An alternative option (Option 2) would follow a top-down design. Is a top-down design acceptable for the end application?
NIST Answer: An inverted design is not acceptable for the end application due to concerns about later installation on a neutron beam. A top-down design is acceptable (and desired) for the end application.
Question 2: SOW section: III. A. a. v. and III. A. b. iv. -- You are asking for the optical windows and sample space volume to be centered at 1,194mm above ground level. Is this a hard specification? We can raise the frame if it is needed.
NIST Answer: Yes, this is a hard specification as the dilution refrigerator will be used on a neutron beamline at a later point and this is required for mating to the beamline. Raising the frame to achieve this is acceptable.
Question 3: SOW section: III. A. a. vii. You are asking that the split between the 2 sections of the OVC cans / Shield should be near or at 4K plate. Our standard section split is below 4K plate, closer to Cold Plate, is this acceptable ?
NIST Answer: This is acceptable.
Question 4: SOW section: III. A. e. ii. You are asking for a minimum of 3 additional channels for user application on the thermometry. Could you confirm these 3 channels should be able to handle thermocouple and Cernox type temperature sensors ?
NIST Answer: These additional channels should be able to handle cryogenic temperature sensors such as Cernox or Rox.
Question 5: SOW section: III. A. f. iv. You are asking that the gas handling system shall include capability to evacuate the vacuum jacket, do you need that turbo pumping station to be included or you are asking for the pump out port to be present on the gas handling system. Please confirm if you want the OVC pump included or not.
NIST Answer: We are asking for the pump out port to be present on the gas handling system. We do not require an OVC pump to be included.
Question 6: SOW section: III. A. h. iii. You are asking that the coaxial cable shall be install in such a way as to allow for user installed amplifers/electronics at the 4K stage. Do you need a break at 4K on the RF lines so you can route the RF lines to your electronics ?
NIST Answer: Yes, we need a break at 4K on the RF lines so they can be routed to electronics mounted at 4 K.
Question 7: SOW section: X. 6. You are asking for verification of vibration isolation specifications during performance test, could you confirm you will do the measurement of the vibrations yourself and it is not expected from the supplier to conduct those tests ?
NIST Answer: We will perform this verification ourselves. We do not expect the supplier to conduct these tests.
Question 8: The Due date for quotations is listed as the morning of June 17th, 2024. Due to the summer months, we are coordinating around several staff travelling to conferences, site visits, and on vacation. Would it be acceptable to extend the submission deadline to June 30th, 2024?
NIST Answer: Due to Government restrictions on spending by the end of the fiscal year we can only extend an additional week to June 24, 2024 @ 11am at this time.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .