Questions and Answers.pdf
PDF 200 KB Posted
- Attached to
- High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 12505B24Q0063
About this file
This document is a solicitation for a high-performance liquid chromatography system. The USDA Agricultural Research Service Midwest Area is seeking to purchase a liquid chromatography system to be delivered to its facility in Madison, Wisconsin. The acquisition is set aside for small businesses with no more than 1,000 employees. Quotes are due by March 1, 2024 and will be evaluated based on technical acceptability and price. The contract will be a firm fixed price agreement with a 90-day period of performance beginning at award. The solicitation includes instructions for quote submission and states that award will be made to the technically acceptable, lowest priced offeror found responsible.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Provisions and Clauses.pdf | ||
| Statement of Work.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Ques�on) Your statement of work requires "a quaternary pump with an operational �low rate of
0.001 - 10 mL/min w/ integrated degassing function." We would like to know if a maximum �low rate of 5.00 mL/min would be acceptable? From our prior experience with these applications (sugars and organic acids), it would be unusual to see the �low rates for these analyses go above 2.5 mL/min. While we have systems in our portfolio that can handle higher �low rates, we feel the optimal con�iguration we can offer you based on the totality of speci�ications would be our Arc HPLC system that has an operational range of 0.001 - 5 mL/min. It is a quaternary pump, and has degassers built in. Would this be acceptable? Or would it be disquali�ied?
Answer) A maximum flow rate of 5.00 mL/min is acceptable.
Ques�on) Your statement of work requires "Connecting / disconnecting a sample loop must be possible without using any tools". This speci�ication while well-understood, is not applicable to our technology. This is because we use a �low-through needle style injector wherein the loop remains in place regardless of injection volume. Our instruments offer accurate/precise and reliable injection repeatability across the required range of 1-100 uL. However, the act of replacing a loop would in theory require tools This should be a very rare occurance. Is this deviation from the SOW enough to disqualify our offer?
Answer) Requiring tools to replace a sample loop does not disqualify your offer. However, it needs to be ar�culated in your offer.
Ques�on) Your statement of work requires "A variable wavelength detector functional in the wavelength range of 190-750 nm". Would a detector capable of 190-700 nm be excluded from consideration? If so, we will propose the more expensive photodiode array (PDA) detector which covers 190-800 nm range, with additional features. We would like to know if one would be preferred, or if it would be acceptable to submit quotes for both options.
Answer) A detector capable of 190–700 nm will not be excluded.
Ques�on) Your statement of work requires "a separation column(s) capable of separating citric, malic, quinic, shikimic, succinic, and tartaric acids... using dilute sulfuric acid as the elution buffer" For this requirement, the use of sulfuric acid may limit our options. We have demonstrated separations using for organic acids using phosphoric acid as the eluent buffer in conjunction with our charged-surface hybrid columns (CSH). How �lexible this requirement - if a superior solution could potentially be offered?
Answer) An alterna�ve combina�on of a separa�on column and elu�on buffer is acceptable.
Ques�on) Depending on when we receive answers to these questions, would it be possible to accept a slightly later submission of the �inal proposal to allow time for us to position the optimal solution for the scientist? What would be a reasonable extension period?
Answer) The answers were posted the same day as they were received. The close date of 3/1/2024 will remain.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .