Project Grant 2244805

Award Date 4/1/23
Completion Date 3/31/25
Dollars Obligated $225K
Federal Grant Program
47.075
Assistance Type
Project Grant
Place of Performance
Hadley, MA 01035, USA
Similar Awards
This two-year, $275,000 Project Grant from the National Science Foundation's Division of Social and Economic Science will fund research under the Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences program (CFDA 47.075) to advance semantic network analysis of evaluative exchanges that shape scientific arguments. The grantee, Stanford University, will systematically represent the hierarchical logical dependencies of scientific arguments, discern expressions of epistemological value, and develop a method to...
The National Science Foundation awarded a $501,890 Project Grant to The Regents of the University of Colorado under the Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences federal grant program (CFDA 47.075) to assess bias and idiosyncrasies in elite scientific peer review. The University of Colorado will produce and make publicly available multiple comprehensive anonymized datasets spanning submitted manuscripts and reviews from two elite general science journals over multiple years and fields. The...
This Project Grant award from the National Science Foundation (NSF) Division of Information and Intelligent Systems, under CFDA 47.070 Computer and Information Science and Engineering, provides $200,000 in funding to George Mason University to develop improved methods and concepts to guide the development and application of new digital technologies that could be used in peer review processes for evaluating scientific publishing and funding outcomes. The research team will seek to compare...
This $575,000 Project Grant from the National Science Foundation's Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences program will fund the development of a data-driven framework for studying scientific consensus and debate. Over a three-year period from August 2022 to July 2025, researchers at Northeastern University will create a corpus of exemplar scientific debates by analyzing millions of published documents. They will then develop and validate quantitative indicators of debate at the topic level,...
This Project Grant award in the amount of $250,000 was provided by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under the Mathematical and Physical Sciences (CFDA 47.049) federal grant program. The funding will support research at Loyola Marymount University to develop advanced network analysis methods for studying the evolution of online social discourse and topic clusters in large-scale knowledge graphs. The project aims to create interpretable network-based similarity metrics and solvers that can...
This $353,434 Project Grant award from the National Science Foundation's (NSF) Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences (CFDA 47.075) program will fund a research project titled "Many Languages, One Network: Cross-Linguistic Semantic Priming Effects in 45 Languages and Large Language Models". The project, awarded to Harrisburg University of Science & Technology, aims to build a large-scale dataset to understand how recognizing one word can improve recognition of another...
The National Science Foundation (NSF) awarded a $307,284 Project Grant under the Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences (CFDA 47.075) program to Regents of the University of Michigan Office of Research and Sponsored Projects (doing business as University of Michigan) to conduct a collaborative research study titled "HNDS-R: Stepping Out of Flatland: Complex Networks, Topological Data Analysis, and the Progress of Science." The 3-year project, beginning September 1, 2023, will use...
This National Science Foundation (NSF) Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences (CFDA 47.075) Project Grant award of $400,000 will develop new techniques for the analysis of social network data. The research will combine machine learning innovations with statistical theory to advance exploratory, comparative, and semiparametric network analysis methods. The project aims to build on existing approaches and create new kernel-based techniques for social network regression and modeling. Broader...
This Project Grant award of $224,036 from the National Science Foundation (NSF) Integrative Activities program (CFDA 47.083) supports the development of deep generative models and algorithms for analyzing and visualizing scientific texts. Led by New Mexico State University (NMSU), the project aims to create tools to help researchers manage information overload and accelerate scientific progress by enabling more efficient browsing, searching, and extraction of insights from research articles. The...
This $117,053 three-year Project Grant from the National Science Foundation's STEM Education program (CFDA 47.076) supports the development and evaluation of interventions to increase diversity, equity, and inclusion in the scientific peer review process. The awardee, a consortium led by Indiana University including Columbia University and California State University San Bernardino, will design and deliver training to both graduate students navigating peer review and the reviewers/editors who...

This $225,000 National Science Foundation project grant supports research at the University of Massachusetts Amherst from April 2023 through March 2025 under the federal Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences program (CFDA 47.075).

The research aims to advance semantic network analysis to better understand how evaluative exchanges shape scientific arguments during peer review. It will systematically depict the exchange process and variation across fields by representing hierarchical logical dependencies of scientific arguments, discerning expressions of epistemological value, and developing a method to identify such evaluations intertextually. Analyzing tens of thousands of exchanges and nearly 100,000 scholarly texts using natural language processing techniques, the research seeks to discover the semantic structure of scientific arguments and how they vary within and across disciplines, understand the latent inter-textual structure of scientific arguments and how responding scientists forge counterarguments, and examine conditions under which scientists change their minds. Insights from this work could help participants in the peer review process and enable social scientists to systematically study evaluative exchanges more generally.

Generated 1/6/24, 6:58 PM