Purchase Order HSSS0105P0152

<p>The awarding agency issued a purchase order on August 16, 2005, with a ceiling value of $12,300.00. The order carries no set-aside designation and is priced under other than firm-fixed or cost-reimbursable terms. Performance is scheduled for completion by September 30, 2005.</p>

This purchase order contract, awarded on March 23, 2006, with an ultimate completion date of April 22, 2006, carries a ceiling value of $2,000. The contract was issued without a set-aside designation, indicating it was awarded through open competition. The procurement utilized a purchase order contract type with other pricing arrangements, suggesting a streamlined acquisition approach for this relatively low-dollar requirement. While specific details regarding the prime contractor, soliciting...

<p>The awarding agency issued a purchase order to a small business contractor on August 30, 2005, with a ceiling value of $24,500. The order carries a Total Small Business set-aside. The contract type is listed as Purchase Order with Other pricing. No statement of work, place of performance, or period of performance detail is present in the source.</p>

<p>This is a $2,359.56 purchase order awarded by a U.S. government agency to a very small business prime contractor. The contract has an ultimate completion date of September 21, 2005 and was awarded on August 22, 2005. The contract type is a Purchase Order with an &quot;Other&quot; pricing type. No additional information about the specific products or services being delivered under this contract was provided.</p>

<p>The Department of Defense awarded a purchase order to a small business contractor on August 1, 2005, with a ceiling value of $5,425.00 under a total small business set-aside. The order carries an ultimate completion date of August 26, 2005. Contract type is Purchase Order under pricing type Other, with contract identification 05-AOD/PMB-PR-TBP02.</p>

This federal contract award was made by a U.S. government agency to a prime contractor. The contract was set aside for small businesses and has a ceiling value of $8,800.00. It was awarded on May 31, 2005 as a purchase order, with an ultimate completion date of November 24, 2005. The pricing type is listed as &quot;Other&quot;. Without additional details on the original solicitation, the specific products or services being delivered under this contract cannot be determined. This award may be...

<p>The Department of Defense awarded a purchase order to a small business contractor on February 18, 2005, with a ceiling value of $11,630.00 under a Total Small Business set-aside. The order carries an ultimate completion date of January 11, 2006. No additional detail regarding scope, place of performance, or specific requirements is present in the source material.</p>

This federal contract award was made by a U.S. government agency to a small business prime contractor. The contract has a ceiling value of $1,513.00 and was awarded on October 17, 2005, with an ultimate completion date of November 16, 2005. The contract type is a Purchase Order, with an unspecified pricing type. The award indicates it is a Total Small Business set-aside. Without additional details on the original solicitation, the specific products or services being delivered under this contract...

This federal contract award is a purchase order issued on July 30, 2005, with an ultimate completion date of August 6, 2005. The contract carries a ceiling value of $15,000 and was awarded without a set-aside designation, meaning it was competed among all eligible contractors. The contract type is classified as a purchase order with pricing structured as &quot;Other,&quot; indicating a non-standard pricing arrangement outside typical fixed-price or cost-plus categories. Without additional...

This Purchase Order contract was awarded on November 16, 2005, with an ultimate completion date of August 11, 2007. The contract carries a ceiling value of $5,100, representing a relatively modest procurement. No set-aside designation was applied to this award, indicating it was competed among all eligible contractors without restrictions based on small business status or other socioeconomic criteria. The contract utilizes an &quot;Other&quot; pricing type, suggesting a non-standard pricing...