Delivery Order FA820717D0001-FA820726FB004

<p>The Air Force Materiel Command issued a delivery order to The Boeing Company on September 28, 2025, for missile guidance set repair, with a ceiling value of $129.1 million and an ultimate completion date of September 27, 2026.</p> <p>Place of performance is Hill Air Force Base, Utah. The order is priced on a cost-plus-award-fee basis. No set-aside was used for this delivery order.</p>

<p>The Air Force Materiel Command issued a delivery order to The Boeing Company on March 4, 2026, for radiation testing at the Little Mountain Test Facility in Layton, Utah, with a ceiling value of $416,422.</p> <p>The order is cost-plus-fixed-fee and runs through March 4, 2027. Place of performance is Layton, UT 84041. No set-aside was used.</p>

<p>The Aeronautical Systems Center issued a delivery order to The Boeing Company on March 11, 2025, for B-52 engineering services with a ceiling value of $4.316 million.</p> <p>Place of performance is Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. The order carries a cost-plus-fixed-fee pricing structure and is scheduled for ultimate completion on June 5, 2026. No set-aside was used for this delivery order.</p>

<p>The Department of the Air Force issued a delivery order to The Boeing Company on March 31, 2025, with a ceiling value of $1,174.12 under a parent indefinite delivery contract. Place of performance is Berkeley, Missouri. The order represents a lump sum settlement increase and carries firm fixed price terms. Ultimate completion is scheduled for March 3, 2026.</p>

This is a cost-plus-fixed-fee delivery order awarded by the Space and Missile Systems Center, part of the U.S. Air Force, to The Boeing Company. The $170,994.00 contract is for Boeing to conduct high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) acceptance testing and pre-verification testing on power upgrades to the Electronic Attack System (EAS) Satellite Communications (SATCOM) Facility. The work will be performed in Layton, Utah and has an ultimate completion date of August 31, 2025. Boeing is the...

The Air Force Sustainment Center issued a delivery order to The Boeing Company on June 8, 2023, for B-52 engineering services with a ceiling value of $32.8 million under a cost-plus-fixed-fee pricing structure. Place of performance is Oklahoma City, OK. The delivery order is scheduled for ultimate completion by May 8, 2026. No set-aside was used for this order. Boeing's Legacy Wichita Division is performing the work, which encompasses engineering services supporting the B-52 Stratofortress...

This is a Delivery Order contract awarded by the Space and Missile Systems Center, a unit of the U.S. Air Force Materiel Command, to The Boeing Company for HARDNESS MAINTENANCE/HARDNESS SURVEILLANCE (HM/HS) AND HIGH ALTITUDE ELECTROMAGNETIC PULSE (HEMP) TESTING on AIRCRAFT ALERTING COMMUNICATION EMP (AACE) TERMINALS at the Little Mountain Test Facility. The $370,934.00 Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract has a period of performance through March 31, 2026. It does not have a set-aside designation. The...

<p>Air Force Materiel Command issued a delivery order to The Boeing Company on February 28, 2019, with a ceiling value of $38,800 for ICBM Cryptography Upgrade (ICU) II testing. Place of performance is Layton, Utah. The order is priced on a cost-plus-fixed-fee basis with an ultimate completion date of February 28, 2026. No set-aside was used.</p>

<p>The Air Force Sustainment Center issued a delivery order to The Boeing Company on March 27, 2024, with a ceiling value of $81,214.74 for display unit flight equipment.</p> <p>Place of performance is Berkeley, Missouri. The order is scheduled for ultimate completion on February 28, 2026. Pricing is fixed price with economic price adjustment. No set-aside was used for this order.</p>

<p>The Air Force Sustainment Center issued a delivery order to The Boeing Company on May 23, 2024, with a ceiling value of $6,205.01 for computer digital equipment and services. Performance is located in Berkeley, MO, with an ultimate completion date of December 31, 2026.</p> <p>The delivery order is issued under a fixed-price contract with economic price adjustment. No set-aside was used.</p>