Wed, Jan 24, 2018 12:42 PM Eric A. Dumpert and Nathan P. Lee Modification/Amendment

  • Changed the synopsis:

     

    Questions from Industry #11

    Q:  Kit Parts list (such as the example attached) since 1/23/2017; which should mnemonic the changes that have been received in the  Attachment A, the Engineering Data Requirements.

    If we don't receive updated Modification Kit Parts List, how will the supplier know, the USG's Modification kit parts list, and the potential suppliers kit parts list are exactly the same. Does the USG have the latest Modification Kit Parts list for each kit?A:  The USG has provided the most updated MKPL as part of the TDP. LM is still developing the final MKPL. The USG anticipates that any additional changes will be minor, and included in Attachment A rather than an updated MKPL/TDP. There is still a possibility that if the changes to the MKPL are significant enough the USG will eventually modify the MKPL and update the TDP. Proposals should only reflect what is in the latest TDP provided.

    Q: Tape PN P5374-3, that's utilized on the MK5420 series kits, states 31 each on all four kit variations. Please confirm that's 31 labels, since this tape comes in a package of 10K labels.

    A: Yes, it is 31x individual P5374-3 labelsThe Government will not be exteing the RFP close date.

Mon, Jan 22, 2018 1:01 PM Eric A. Dumpert and Nathan P. Lee Modification/Amendment

  • Changed the synopsis:

    Questions from Industry #10

    Q: Can you please provide me with a copy of FPS-3009  "F-16 Prime and Topcoat Application"?  This document is referenced within FPS-3001G.

    A: The specification is not necessary.

    Q: If we don't receive updated Modification Kit Parts List, how will the supplier know, the USG's Modification kit parts list, and the potential suppliers kit parts list are exactly the same. Does the USG have the latest Modification Kit Parts list for each kit?

    A: The USG has provided the most updated MKPL as part of the TDP. LM is still developing the final MKPL. The USG anticipates that any additional changes will be minor, and included in Attachment A rather than an updated MKPL/TDP. There is still a possibility that if the changes to the MKPL are significant enough the USG will eventually modify the MKPL and update the TDP. Proposals should only reflect what is in the latest TDP provided.Again, the Government does not expect to extend this Solicitation beyond its current close date of 25 Jan 2018 at 10:00 MST.

Fri, Jan 19, 2018 5:49 PM Eric A. Dumpert and Nathan P. Lee Modification/Amendment

  • Changed the synopsis:

    Questions from Industry #9

    Proposal close date has been extended to 25 January 2018 10:00 MST to allow the Government to answer one additional question. The answer will be posted Monday. The Government does not believe the answer will have any impact on a contractor's proposal, but the Government will allow the extension to ensure the questions is properly vetted.

    Q:  Are the changes to the Attachment A's related to adding sources only?

    A:  Yes, that is all that changed.

    Q:  What changed in the latest Attachment A on 16 January 2018

    A: Only the qualified sources were updated.

    Q: Could the Government please confirm that INCLUDING the Offeror's company name in the all Volumes, including the Technical Volume, is acceptable?

    A: Please propose in accordance with Section L as written. Company name/logos can appear in the proposal.

    Q: Will you please send me the most recent updated kit files for the F-16 SLEP quotation? They have not been included with the TDP packages. They will need to be updated to reflect the most recent changes regarding quantities and/or part changes.

    A: All of the kit files are current. Any changes to the MKs can be found in the corresponding Attachment A.

    Q: We just received yesterday another kit change (attached for MK5420B), which has several Parts list updates. When does the Air Force plan to have Lockheed update the individual Kit Parts List, to mirror all the changes to date?

    A: There has been no changes to MK's. Only changes are on the attachment A's. And the most recent change is just the approved sources list.

    Q: Shouldn't Lockheed be required to provide the latest kit configuration Parts List for all 20 Kit PN's.  The original TDP for each Kit provided a Parts List. How does the Air Force plan to valid the 14 Kit PN's for the initial FY18 requirement; is the Air Force creating your only Parts List for each of the 20 kit PN's.

    A: The latest kit configuration is in the current data package.

    Q: Please provide updated Parts List that would be utilized by both the Air Force and the Kit supplier, to elevate any kit errors. Too many changes have been made to the kits to ensure 100% accuracy. We would also request an extension be granted, until such time as the updated Parts List are received.

    A: The parts list have had only minor clarification changes, so an extension, in this case, will not be warranted.

    Q: Can you please provide me with a copy of FPS-3009  "F-16 Prime and Topcoat Application"?  This document is referenced within FPS-3001G. A: Information cannot be obtained until Monday, therefore, the Government has decided to extend the proposal to 25 Jan 2018 MST

  • Changed the due date:

    Jan 25, 2018 Jan 23, 2018 (adds 2 days)

Fri, Jan 12, 2018 3:51 PM Eric A. Dumpert and Nathan P. Lee Modification/Amendment

  • Changed the synopsis:

    Correected Pricing Attachment. The latest is version 4

  • Added files:

    SLEP_Pricing_Attachment_version_4 SLEP_Pricing_Attachment_version_4.xlsx SLEP_Pricing_Attachment_version_4

Thu, Jan 11, 2018 6:18 PM Eric A. Dumpert and Nathan P. Lee Modification/Amendment

  • Changed the synopsis:

    Questions from Industry #8

    Q:  Is this specification available? If it is, please provide a copy.

    This document is sub-doc listed within NDTS-1101 "J"

    LMA-PG001 Requirements for ETCH/Cleaning Prior to Penetrant Inspection

    A:  The spec, LMA-PG001, is not available.  It is not required.

    For some background NDTS-1101 spec, which is required and provided in the

    TDP, references LMA-PG001 for some alternate procedures.  We use NDTS-1101 a

    lot for all of our parts procurements in DLA and no one has ever asked for

    or needed LMA-PG001.

    Note: Updated attachment A is being provided to TDP requesters