W912PL-16-R-0021_AMENDMENT0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICAITON NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicble)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICIATION NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a)By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment your desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPIRATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc. ) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION ( Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable Amendment 0001

1 36

0001 6 Sep 2016

W912PL

U.S Army Corps of Engineers,Los Angeles Dist CESPL-CT-E, East Region Branch 915 Wilshire Blvd.

Los Angeles, CA 90017

U.S Army Corps of Engineers,Los Angeles Dist CESPL-CT-E, East Region Branch 915 Wilshire Blvd.

Los Angeles, CA 90017

W912PL-16-R-0025

4 August 2016

1. Remove and Replace the following Sections/Documents: 00 20 00; 00 22 00; 00 22 16; Cover Page; SF 1442

2. Add Following As-Built Drawings: Comm Cabling; Comm Site Plan; Elec Site Plan; Elect Site Plan 2; Feeder Schedule.

3. Proposal Due Date is 13 September 2016, 2:00 PM (PDT)

RFP No. W912PL-16-R-0021

AMENDMENT 0001

U.S. ARMY CORPS

OF ENGINEERS

LOS ANGELES DISTRICT

FY16 HC-130J AGE COVERED STORAGE

DAVIS-MONTHAN AFB, AZ

Request for Proposal

HUBZONE Set-Aside

Best Value Lowest Price Technically Acceptable

(LPTA)

Construction Solicitation and Specifications

September 2016

PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1

HC-130J AGE Covered Storage Davis-Monthan AFB

Pima County, Arizona W912PL-16-R-0021

PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS

DIVISION 00 – PROCUREMENT AND CONTRACTING REQUIREMENTS

SF 1442 SOLICITATION, OFFER AND AWARD AM0001

00 10 00 CONTRACT LINE ITEM PRICING SCHEDULE

00 20 00 INSTRUCTIONS FOR PROCUREMENT AM0001

00 21 16 INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS

00 22 00 SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS AM0001

00 22 16 SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS AM0001

00 45 00 REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS

00 70 00 CONDITIONS OF THE CONTRACT

00 73 00 SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS

00 73 46 WAGE RATES

DIVISION 01 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

01 00 00 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

01 02 00 BRAND NAME OR EQUAL

01 03 00 INSURANCE

01 08 00 PERMITS

01 20 00 INTERFACE WITH OTHER WORK

01 31 00 PROJECT MEETINGS

01 32 01 PROJECT SCHEDULE

01 33 00 SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES

01 35 26 GOVERNMENTAL SAFETY REQUIREMENTS

01 42 00 SOURCES FOR REFERENCE PUBLICATIONS

01 43 00 AIRFIELD SAFETY (SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS)

01 45 01 QUALITY CONTROL

01 45 02 QUALITY CONTROL SYSTEM (QCS)

01 51 00 UTILITIES

01 53 00 TEMPORARY FENCING

01 54 00 SECURITY

01 57 00 TRAFFIC CONTROL

01 57 20 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

01 58 00 PROJECT IDENTIFICATION

01 58 50 STAGING AREAS

01 62 35 RECYCLED / RECOVERED MATERIALS

01 72 00 AS-BUILT DRAWINGS

01 72 80 TRANSFER AND ACCEPTANCE OF MILITARY REAL PROPERTY

01 74 19 CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION WASTE MANAGEMENT

DIVISION 02 - EXISTING CONDITIONS

02 41 00 DEMOLITION

DIVISION 03 - CONCRETE

03 10 00 ALKALI-SILICA REACTIVITY REDUCTION FOR NON-PAVEMENT

CONCRETE

03 11 13 STRUCTURAL CONCRETE FORMWORK

03 15 13 EXPANSION JOINTS, CONTRACTION JOINTS, AND WATERSTOPS

03 20 01 CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT

03 31 00 CAST-IN-PLACE STRUCTURAL CONCRETE

03 40 00.00 10 PLANT-PRECAST CONCRETE PRODUCTS FOR BELOW GRADE

CONSTRUCTION

PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 2

Pima County, Arizona W912PL-16-R-0021

DIVISION 05 - METALS

05 05 23.13 10 ULTRASONIC INSPECTION OF WELDMENTS

05 05 23.16 STRUCTURAL WELDING

05 12 00 STRUCTURAL STEEL

05 30 00 STEEL DECKS

05 40 00 COLD-FORMED METAL FRAMING

DIVISION 07 – THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION

07 41 13 METAL ROOF PANELS

DIVISION 09 - FINISHES

09 90 00 PAINTS AND COATINGS

DIVISION 26 - ELECTRICAL

26 00 00.00 20 BASIC ELECTRICAL MATERIALS AND METHODS

26 20 00 INTERIOR DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM

26 41 00 LIGHTNING PROTECTION SYSTEM

DIVISION 31 - EARTHWORK

31 00 00 EARTHWORK

31 11 00 CLEARING AND GRUBBING

DIVISION 32 - EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS

32 01 19 FIELD MOLDED SEALANTS FOR SEALING JOINTS IN RIGID

PAVEMENTS

32 11 16 BASE COURSE FOR RIGID PAVING

32 13 11 CONCRETE PAVEMENT FOR AIRFIELDS AND OTHER HEAVY-DUTY

PAVEMENTS

DIVISION 33 - UTILITIES

33 11 00 WATER DISTRIBUTION

33 51 15 NATURAL-GAS DISTRIBUTION

33 71 02 UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION

33 82 00 TELECOMMUNICATIONS OUTSIDE PLANT (OSP)

-- End of Project Table of Contents --

(See ).

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair) IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

9. FOR INFORMATION

CALL:

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid and "bidder".

SOLICITATION

1. SOLICITATION NO.

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO.

CODE

6. PROJECT NO.

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO

4. CONTRACT NO.

7. ISSUED BY

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS (Title, identifying no., date)

11. The contractor shall begin performance

12a. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES", indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12b.)

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

a. Sealed offers in original and

b. An offer guarantee

c. All offers are subject to the (1) work requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

d. Offers providing less than

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA - FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(d) calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due will not be considered and will be rejected.

is, is not required.

local time containing offers shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

(date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers will be publicly opened at that time. Sealed envelopes copies to perform the work required are due at the place specified in Item 8 by (hour) award, YES NO notice to proceed. This performance period is mandatory negotiable.

calendar days and complete it within calendar days after receiving

a. NAME b. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

12b. CALENDAR DAYS

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID (IFB)

NEGOTIATED (RFP)

3. DATE ISSUED PAGE OF PAGES

W912PL-16-R-0021

USACE, LOS ANGELES DISTRICT, CESPLCT

CONTRACTING DIVISION

915 Wilshire Blvd.

Los Angeles, CA 90017

FY16 HC-130J AGE COVERED STORAGE

This project is for the construction of storage canopies and concrete pavement for Aerospace Ground Equipment (AGE) between the existing AGE Maintenance Facility and the Parts Store Facility. The project includes lighting, electrical utilities and water.

In accordance with FAR 36/DFARs 236, the estimated construction price range for this project is: Between $1,000,000 and

$5,000,000.

HUBZONE Set-Aside Competitive Procurement

NOTE: Contractor must be registered with the central contractor registration at https://www.sam.gov in order to receive a

Government contract.

SEE ITEM 7

OTSE A. ADIKHAI 213-452-3248

1 208/04/2016

09/13/2016

Section 00 73 00

17. The offeror agrees to perform the work required at the prices specified below in strict accordance with the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted calendar days after the date offers are due. (Insert any number equal to or greater than the minimum requirement by the Government in writing within stated in Item 13d. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13d.)

OFFER (Must be fully completed by offeror)

AMOUNTS

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE.

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR (Include ZIP Code)

CODE FACILITY CODE

15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS (Include only if different than Item 14.)

20a. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN OFFER (Type or print)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT

26. ADMINISTERED BY

30a. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

(Type or print)

31c. DATE

STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85) BACK

31b. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BY

31a. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.) Your offer on this solicitation is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award consummates the contract, which consists of (a) the Government solicitation and your offer, and (b) this contract award. No further contractual document is necessary.

30b. SIGNATURE 30c. DATE

28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT (Contractor is required to sign this document and return and deliver all items or perform all work requirements identified on this form and any continuation sheets for the consideration stated in this contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be governed by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certifications, and specifications incorporated by reference in or attached to this contract.

copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees to furnish

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

ITEM 25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) ( ) 41 U.S.C. 253(c) ( )

20b. SIGNATURE 20c. OFFER DATE

CAGE: DUNS:

Section 00 20 00 – Page 1 Amendment 0001

00 20 00 INSTRUCTIONS FOR PROCUREMENT

1. EVALUATION: The Government intends to issue a contract resulting from the Request for Proposal (RFP) to the responsible Offeror whose proposal represents the Best Value to the Government by using the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) procedure as described in Sections 00 22 00 and 00 22 16.

2. Award of all Base Bid will be made to one offeror. Prices must be submitted on all individual items of the Price Schedule. Offeror must propose on all items. Failure to do so may cause the proposal to be determined Awardable.

3. Performance Period: The Offeror shall complete and propose on all Base Bid items in the Price Schedule to correspond with the completion time in calendar days after receipt of Notice To Proceed (NTP) as specified in Section 00 73 00, Special Contract

Requirements, Clause 52.211-10, Commencement, Prosecution and Completion of Work.

4. If a modification to a price is submitted which provides for an adjustment to the total amount, the application of adjustment to each item in the Price Schedule must be stated. If it is not stated, the offeror agrees that the adjustment shall be applied on a pro rata basis to every item in the Price Schedule.

5. The Offeror shall distribute his indirect costs (overhead, profit, bond, etc.,) over all items in the

Price Schedule. The Government will review the submitted Price Schedule for any unbalancing of the items. Any submitted Price Schedule determined to be unbalanced may cause the offeror to be ineligible for contract award.

6. The Job (J.A) line items are not “estimated quantity” line items and therefore are not subject to the Variation in Quantity contract clause.

7. For the purpose of initial evaluation of offers, the following will be utilized in resolving arithmetic discrepancies found on the face of the Price Schedule as submitted by the offeror:

a. Obviously misplaced decimal points will be corrected;

b. In case of discrepancy between the unit price and the extended price, the unit price will govern;

c. Apparent errors in extensions of unit prices will be corrected;

d. Apparent errors in addition of lump sum and extended prices will be corrected.

8. The Contract Clause 52.232-27, "Prompt Payment for Construction Contracts" requires that the name and address of the contractor official, to whom payment is to be sent, be the same as that in the contract or in a proper Notice of Assignment.

Section 00 20 00 – Page 2 Amendment 0001

9. Payment of Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) is the mandatory method of payment.

The Contractors attention is directed to Contract Clause No. 52.232-33 "Mandatory

Information for Electronic Funds Transfer" located in Section 00 73 00.

10. PROGRESS PAYMENT REQUESTS made by the Contractor pursuant to the provisions of

Contract Clause, PAYMENTS UNDER FIXED-PRICE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS, shall be submitted on ENG FORM 93 to the administration office as designated in Block 26, Standard Form 1442 Back, Solicitation, Offer and Award. ENG FORM 93 shall be submitted to that office on the 20th day of each month in appropriate form and certified. Photocopies of the form shall be furnished on that same date to the Corps of Engineers offices designated at the

Pre-Construction Conference.

11. Principal Contracting Officer. The Contracting Officer who signs this contract will be the

Principal Contracting Officer for this contract. However, any Contracting Officer assigned to the Los Angeles District, Contracting Division within his authority, may take formal action on this contract when the Principal Contracting Officer is unavailable and the action needs to be taken.

12. Amounts and prices shall be indicated in either words or figures, NOT BOTH.

13. Offeror is cautioned to check Price Schedule carefully prior to submission. If the Price Schedule contains unit prices, they should be round off to the second decimal point only NOT

EXTENDED FURTHER.

14. The Offeror shall furnish all design and engineering effort, plant, labor, material, equipment, etc., necessary to perform all work in strict accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in the contract in include all attachments thereto.

15. T he process permits trade-off between price and technical (non-cost) factors and allows the Government to accept other than the lowest priced offer. The award decision will be based on a comparative assessment in proposals against all source selection criteria in the solicitation

16. Contractor is required to fill in CAGE CODE and DUNS NUMBER (Reference

Section 00 70 00, entitled System Acquisition Management (SAM) in Block No 15 on Standard Form 1442, Name and Address Block (Cage Code under Cage and

DUNS No. under Duns respectively).

17. PLEASE NOTE: The Contractor agrees to attend any Post Award conference convened by the contracting activity or contract administration in accordance with Federal

Acquisition Regulation subpart 42.5.0

Section 00 20 00 – Page 3 Amendment 0001

18. CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS. In accordance with the provisions of Subpart 36.201(Evaluation of Contractor Performance) of the Federal

Acquisition Regulation (FAR), construction contractor’s performance shall be evaluated throughout the performance of the contract. The United States Army Corps of Engineers

(USACE) follows the procedures outlined in Engineering Regulation 415-1-17 to fulfill this FAR requirement for construction contracts awarded at or above $700,000.00, the

USACE Contracting Officer Representative (COR) will evaluate contractor’s performance and prepare a performance report using the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting

System (CPARS), which is now a web-based system. After an evaluation (interim or final) is written up by the USACE, COR the contractor will have the ability to access, review and comment on the evaluation for a period of 30 days. Accessing and using

Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) requires specific software, called PKI certification, which is installed on the user’s computer. The certification is a Department of Defense requirement and was implemented to provide security in electronic transactions. The certification software could cost approximately

$110 - $125 per certificate per year and is purchased from an External Certificate

Authorities (ECA) vendor. Current information about the PKI certification process and for contacting vendors can be found on the web site:http://www.cpars.navy.mil/.If the

Contractor wishes to participate in the performance evaluation process, access to

CPARSCASS and PKI certification is the sole responsibility of the Contractor.

19. PLEASE NOTE: ALL PROSPECTIVE OFFERORS MUST BE REGISTERED IN

SYSTEM FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT (SAM)

https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/

20. The Offeror shall acknowledge that it understands the contract requirements for sustainable construction and that the final project will achieve a minimum LEED Silver certification rating prior to project closeout. If the offeror proposes a higher LEED rating than silver, the proposal shall describe whether or not it involves additional costs and clearly indicate if such costs would detract from other factors herein, such as functionality, quality of materials, systems, and site work, etc.

21. Section 00 70 00, Clause 52.219-4 NOTICE OF PRICE EVALUATION PREFERENCE

FOR HUBZONE SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS (JAN 2011) Cessation of Small

Disadvantaged Business Price Evaluation Adjustment. In accordance with DoD Class Deviation

2010-00006, the SDB Price Evaluation Adjustment referenced in FAR 52.219-4 in Section 00 70

00 does not apply to this solicitation.

http://www.cpars.navy.mil/ https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/

Section 00 22 00 – Page 1 Amendment 0001

SECTION 00 22 00

SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS

I GENERAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT

II GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

III SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE PRICE PROPOSAL

IV SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

V PROPOSAL COVER SHEET

VI PERFORMANCE ASSESSEMENT REPORT (PAR)

VII SAMPLE COVER LETTER

VIII NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

Section 00 22 00 – Page 2 Amendment 0001

SECTION 00 22 00

SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS

I. GENERAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

In order to effectively and equitably evaluate all offers, the Contracting Officer must receive sufficiently detailed information that clearly responds to the technical evaluation factors listed in Section 00 22 16.

Offerors shall submit their proposal packages in accordance with the instructions outlined in Section 00 22 00, Instructions to Proposers.

Each Offeror must submit their responses to the technical evaluation factors in a Technical Proposal and Price Proposal. The Technical Proposal and Price Proposal must be submitted as separate distinct volumes. Both the Technical Proposal (Volume II) and a Price Proposal (Volume I) must be received by the closing date and time set for receipt of proposals.

No dollar amounts or pricing information from the Price Proposal are to be included in the responses to the technical evaluation factors.

All information intended by the Offeror to be evaluated must be submitted as part of the Technical Proposal.

II. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS:

All written portions: Use only 8 ½ by 11 inch paper, unless another size is specifically authorized elsewhere in this section for a particular submission. Do not use 11” X 14” or 11” X 17” size sheets (e.g.

fold-outs) unless specifically authorized in this section for a particular submission. Do not use a font size smaller than 12, an unusual font style such as script, or condensed print.

Three-ring binders are preferred. Do not use spring clamps or exceed the recommended capacity of the fastener or binder. Do not use plastic multi-hole/spiral binding systems, heat binding systems, or other systems which do not facilitate the ready insertion of additional pages.

“Confidential” projects cannot be submitted to demonstrate capability unless all of the information required for evaluation as specified herein can nonetheless be provided to the Government as part of the Offeror’s Technical Proposal. Offerors that include in their proposals information that they do not want disclosed to the public for any purpose, or used by the Government except for evaluation purposes, must be clearly marked in accordance with the instructions at FAR 52.215-1, “Instructions to Offeror— Competitive Acquisition”, paragraph (3), “Restriction on disclosure and use of data”.

The Corps of Engineers recognizes that submittals by the Offeror may contain confidential or proprietary information; however, the Government reserves the right to make inquiries into the information disclosed. The submission of false or misleading information may be grounds for disqualification of the proposal.

Offeror(s) shall submit their proposal packages to the Los Angeles District Corps of Engineers (COE) in accordance with Section 00 22 00.

III. SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE PRICE PROPOSAL (VOLUME I):

Number of Sets of the Price Proposal: Submit One (1) original hard copy and one electronic copy on

CD.

Format and Contents of the Price Proposal/List of Tabs:

Section 00 22 00 – Page 3 Amendment 0001

The Price Proposal shall be appropriately labeled as such and shall be organized as indicated in the following chart.

TAB CONTENTS OF THE PRICE PROPOSAL

TAB #1

Proposal Cover Sheet

SF1442 Solicitation, Offer, and Award

TAB #2 The Completed Pricing Schedule (Section 00 10 00)

TAB #3 A Bid Guarantee (e.g., Standard Form 24, “Bid Bond”)

IV. SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL (VOLUME II):

Number of Sets and Pages of the Technical Proposal: Submit original and two (2) additional sets of the written Technical Proposal, with each set separately packaged. In addition, submit one complete copy of the technical proposal on Compact Disk (CD) using a searchable “.pdf” file format. The Technical Proposals shall be in 8-1/2" x 11" format, bound as a single document, with single-sided or double-sided pages being acceptable. Condensed print is not permitted. The Proposals shall be separated with section tabs, and the tabs shall clearly identify the contents of each section. The Maximum number of pages for the Technical Proposal is thirty (30) pages single sided or fifteen (15) pages double sided. The Table of Contents, section tabs, resumes up to five (5) pages single sided and the Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) will not be included in the above page count. Each page shall be sequentially numbered for that section.

Format and Contents of the Technical Proposal/List of Tabs: The original and all copies of the technical proposal will be appropriately labeled as such. Each set shall be organized using the tabs specified in the chart below. The tabs directly correlate to the evaluation factors identified in Section 00 22 16.

TAB CONTENTS OF THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

TAB #1 FACTOR 1: EXPERIENCE ON SIMILAR CONTRACTS

TAB #2 FACTOR 2: PAST PERFORMANCE

TAB #3 FACTOR 3: CORPORATE MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE

TAB #4 FACTOR 4: SCHEDULE

Detailed Submission Requirements for the Technical Proposal: Submit detailed responses to the evaluation factors under each of the tabs as follows:

FACTOR #1 EXPERIENCE ON SIMILAR CONTRACTS

This factor will evaluate the offeror for its experience in successful completion of projects of similar scope, magnitude and complexity completed within the past five years. Projects completed over five years ago may

Section 00 22 00 – Page 4 Amendment 0001 be submitted to demonstrate ability, but they will carry little weight in the evaluation and will not be used to meet the standard for acceptability.

Evaluation Factor: Offeror shall identify all projects of a similar scope, magnitude and complexity it has successfully completed within the past five years. Offeror shall demonstrate experience in the construction of similar type facilities. Provide a description of the project, total dollar value of the contract at the time of award and at the time of completion, and the name, address and telephone number of the owner. In the case of a federal, state or local government project, provide the name, address, and telephone number of the contracting officer. Offeror may include projects completed by predecessor companies, as long as the relationship of the predecessor company is clearly documented in the proposal.

Standard for Acceptability: This standard is met when the offeror can demonstrate successful completion of two or more projects of similar scope, magnitude and complexity within the past five years. At least one of the projects must have been completed by the construction contractor.

FACTOR #2 PAST PERFORMANCE

This factor will assess the offeror’s past performance, evaluate whether the offeror’s past performance is relevant or not relevant to that effort to be acquired, and determine contractor capability to successfully perform the proposed effort.

Evaluation Factor: The following are the minimum requirements that are key to successful contract performance to demonstrate contractor capability to perform the proposed effort. The criteria to establish what is recent and relevant and how well the Contractor performed on the contracts will be based upon the efforts of similar scope, magnitude, and complexity of projects successfully completed within the past five years (projects in Tab #1) and projects substantially completed. In the event of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or of whom information on past performance is not available, the offeror will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on this factor.

1. Identify all contracts, including Federal, State, local government and private/commercial, for efforts similar to the Government requirement of similar scope, magnitude, and complexity which are either successfully completed within the past five years (Tab #1) or substantially completed.

Past performance on State, local, and private/ commercial contracts will be evaluated equally with past performance on Federal contracts. Offeror(s) are encouraged to provide information regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience or subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement when such information is relevant to this solicitation. Important Note: See paragraph 5. below regarding required consent for release of subcontractor past performance information. For each project, submit the following information in the formats provided at the end of this Section:

a. Furnish a Performance Assessment Report for each referenced contract. If an official written performance evaluation/rating was not received, so indicate. A past performance questionnaire must be sent to the reference if a written performance evaluation/rating is not included in the proposal as an attachment to the Performance Assessment Report.

The Offeror(s) is also encouraged to submit any letters of appreciation or similar correspondence that the Contractor received from the Owner/Customer at the time of contract performance/completion. However, the Offeror(s) is neither required nor requested to have the Owner/Customer write such a letter for the purpose of this solicitation. Formats for the Performance Assessment Report has been provided at the end of this Section titled: Performance Assessment Report.

b. The Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included in the solicitation is provided for the offeror to submit to the client for each project the offeror includes in its proposal (if no official written performance rating or evaluation is not available) for Factor 2 for PAST PERFORMANCE where a written performance evaluation/rating is not included in the proposal as an attachment to the performance assessment report. Ensure correct phone

Section 00 22 00 – Page 5 Amendment 0001 numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Complete PPQ should be submitted with your proposal. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contact and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government point of contract, Mr. Otse Adikhai via email at otse.a.adikhai@usace.army.mil prior to proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. Also include performance recognition documents received within the last five (5) years such as awards, award fee determinations, customer letters of commendation, and any other forms of performance recognition. The Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) will not be included in the page count. Formats for the Past Sample Cover Letter and Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) has been provided at the end of this Section titled: Sample Cover Letter and Performance Questionnaire (PPQ).

2. In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information available for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), included Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting Systems (CPARS), using all CAGE/DUNS number of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owners representatives(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the offeror.

3. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

4. “Confidential” projects cannot be submitted unless all of the information required for evaluation purposes as specified herein can nonetheless be provided to the Government as part of the Offeror(s) technical proposal. Offeror(s) that include in their proposals information that they do not want disclosed to the public for any purpose, or used by the Government except for evaluation purposes, must be clearly marked in accordance with the instructions at FAR 52.215- 1, “Instructions to Offeror(s)—Competitive Acquisition”, paragraph (e), “Restriction on disclosure and use of data”.

5. Release of Subcontractor Past Performance Information. Past performance information pertaining to a proposed subcontractor cannot be disclosed to the Offeror(s) by the Government without the proposed subcontractor’s consent. Therefore, if subcontractor past performance information is being utilized by the Offeror(s), the Offeror(s) must also submit as part of its technical proposal the subcontractor’s consent to release of its past performance information by the Government to the Offeror(s). If there is a problem with the proposed subcontractor’s past performance, the prospective prime contractor can be notified, but no details can be discussed without the proposed subcontractor’s permission.

Standard for Acceptability: This standard is met when the offeror can demonstrate an overall satisfactory performance rating for each recent, relevant project within the last 5 years.

FACTOR #3 CORPORATE MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE

Proposals will be evaluated as to the offeror’s ability to satisfy all contract requirements within its Corporate Management Structure. The Government will review the corporate decision-makers support for the construction contract execution team and the construction management structure.

mailto:Christina.chavez@usace.army.mil

Section 00 22 00 – Page 6 Amendment 0001

Evaluation Factor: The offeror must demonstrate their ability to manage and control this contract. The offeror must provide an organization chart that shows the corporate organization and reporting chain for key personnel and details the communications flow for the proposed team and the customer. The offeror shall provide resumes for persons directly responsible for carrying out the day to day operations of this contract, including project manager, site superintendent, construction quality control manager, and safety manager.

The resumes should be detailed enough to show adherence to the RFP requirements and/or abilities to perform the job by specifically describing education, professional qualifications and years of relevant experience. The offeror must explain its present workload and the availability of a team to execute the contract. The offeror must explain a succession plan for replacement of key personnel, including project manager, site superintendent, construction quality control manager, and safety manager.

Standard for Acceptability: This standard is met when the Offeror provides an organization chart that clearly shows authorities and lines of communications, the resumes provided show that the staff is qualified and meets the RFP requirements (where applicable), the present workload for the Offeror is discussed, the availability of the proposed team is discussed, and a replacement plan for key personnel is provided.

FACTOR #4 SCHEDULE

The Offeror shall provide a narrative that includes, as a minimum, discussion of proposed sequence of work activities, bid item phasing, interim and final acceptance. Offers shall include a schedule bar chart reflecting the major construction activities with the completion period from the applicable contract Notice to Proceed (NTP). The proposal schedule shall be graphically presented, and may be on a maximum paper size of 11" x 17". The schedule shall reflect the major construction milestones, and the sequence of work required for this project. The schedule shall indicate start/finish dates of events, and durations. A detailed network analysis is not required as a proposal submittal item. The schedule must show a logical approach of the activities and durations to accomplish each bid item and each option.

Offerors are cautioned that if they do not meet the schedule completion times shown in Section 00 73 00-3, Clause 52.211-10, of this Request for Proposals their Technical Proposals may be rated Unacceptable for this factor.

Offerors are cautioned that schedules showing shortened government review times for submittals may cause the Schedule evaluation factor to be rated unacceptable.

Offerors are cautioned that the schedule submitted as part of this factor is preliminary in nature and only for use in the evaluation of the logic of the means and methods for accomplishing the contract. As such, the proposed schedule shall not change RFP requirements, and acceptance of the offeror’s proposal does not indicate or include acceptance of changes to the basic RFP that may be present in the proposed schedule.

Standard for Acceptability: This standard is met when the Offeror provides a schedule narrative that shows completion within the RFP required time frame and discusses the major milestones for the project, and provides a bar chart schedule that is clear and logical.

Section 00 22 00 – Page 7 Amendment 0001

V. Proposal Cover Sheet:

The proposal cover sheet is required by FAR 52.215-1(c)(i)-(v). This provision, titled “Instructions to Offerors—Competitive Acquisition,” has been provided in full text in Section 00 21 16. The format is as follows:

PROPOSAL COVER SHEET

1. Solicitation Number: W912PL-15-R-0009

2. The name, address, and telephone and facsimile numbers of the Offeror and electronic address (if available):

3. A statement specifying the extent of agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the solicitation and agreement to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the price set opposite each item.

4. Names, titles, and telephone and facsimile numbers (and electronic addresses if available) of persons authorized to negotiate on the Offeror’s behalf with the Government in connection with this solicitation:

5. Name, title, and signature of person authorized to sign the proposal. Proposals signed by an agent shall be accompanied by evidence of that agent’s authority, unless that evidence has been previously furnished to the issuing office.

Section 00 22 00 – Page 8 Amendment 0001

PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT

(To be completed by Offeror)

1. Contractor (Firm being evaluated):

Name: Address:

2. Contract Number/ Task Order (TO) (if Applicable):

3. Solicitation Type: Negotiated or Sealed Bid

4. Contract/TO Type: Fixed-Price Cost, Reimbursement, Hybrid (explain)

5. Routine Difficult (low to high) Complexity of Work 1 2 3 4 5

6. Contract/TO Dollar Value:

7. Contract/TO Status: Active, Complete, Completion Date (w/ extensions):

8. Description, location & relevancy of work:

9. Warranty or other problems encountered and how resolved

10. Name, Address, Telephone Number and E-mail of the Procuring Contracting Officer and/or the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) (and other references, e.g., Administrative Contracting Officer, if applicable):

11. Check one of the following blocks:

A written performance evaluation was received for this project and is attached.

A written performance evaluation was not received for this project. A Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) has been sent to the reference(s) listed in Block 10, with a letter requesting that the completed questionnaire be returned directly to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers by the closing date for this solicitation.

Section 00 22 00 – Page 9 Amendment 0001

SAMPLE COVER LETTER

Date

SUBJECT: NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire

Name and Address of Reference

Ladies and Gentlemen:

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District, is conducting a review of our past performance history as part of an upcoming source selection acquisition.

Please complete the attached NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire to aid the Government in its evaluation of our past performance and FAX it directly to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, ATTN:

Otse Adikhai at 213-452-3248. If you prefer, you may provide the requested information by email to Otse. A. Adikhai @usace.army.mil.

The Government is requesting receipt of this information by 10:00 a.m. on XX August 2016.

You are advised that it is Government policy that the identity of sources providing past performance information will not be released outside the Government.

We appreciate your efforts to help the Government fairly evaluate our record of past performance. Should you have any questions related to this matter, please contact Otse Adikhai at 213-452-3248.

Sincerely, Contractor

Attachment mailto:tracey.i.daggy@usace.army.mil mailto:tracey.i.daggy@usace.army.mil

Section 00 22 00 – Page 10 Amendment 0001

NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0)

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information Firm Name: CAGE Code:

Address: DUNs Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work High Med Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire ws completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: NAVFAC/USACE REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO USACE WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON USACE SOLICITATIONS.

CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR. HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO USACE. PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFEROR FOR USACE POC INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

Section 00 22 00 – Page 11 Amendment 0001

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner.

There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U) Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable No information or did not apply to your contract

Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

Section 00 22 00 – Page 12 Amendment 0001

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance

E VG S M U N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes;

responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?

d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort E VG S M U N

c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

Section 00 22 00 – Page 13 Amendment 0001

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.

Yes No

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues)

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below)

d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):

Section 00 22 16…