W912PL-16-R-0020_Amendment03.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICAITON NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicble)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICIATION NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a)By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment your desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPIRATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc. ) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION ( Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

0003 22Aug16

USACE, Los Angeles District ATTN: Contracting Division East Region Branch 915 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 930 Los Angeles, CA 90017

W912PL-16-R-0020

21Jul16

Replace Hydrant Fuels System, Nellis AFB, NV

The purpose of this amendment is to extend the closing date from August 25, 2016 to August 29, 2016 at 2:00 PM and other changes as follows:

See continuation sheet.

W912PL-16-R-0020

SF30 Continuation Sheet

1. Remove and Replace SF1442 with attached

2. Remove and Replace Pricing Schedule 00 10 00 with attached

3. Incorporation 52.219‐8 into Section 00 70 00 as attached

4. Incorporation of General Decision Number NV160022 15Jul16 NV22 into Section 00 45 00 as attached

5. Inclusion of Geotech Report dated July 25, 2014 as attached

6. Inclusion of Sheet C‐416A‐08‐12‐2016 as attached

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NUMBER 2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID (IFB)

NEGOTIATED (RFP)

3. DATE ISSUED PAGE OF PAGES

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by the offeror.

4. CONTRACT NUMBER 5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NUMBER 6. PROJECT NUMBER

7. ISSUED BY CODE 8. ADDRESS OFFER TO

9. FOR INFORMATION CALL

A. NAME B. TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

SOLICITATION

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS (Title, identifying number, date):

11. The Contractor shall begin performance within calendar days and complete it within calendar days after receiving award, notice to proceed. This performance period is mandatory, negotiable. (See .)

12A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

YES NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and copies to perform the work required are due at the place specified in Item 8 by (hour) local time (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers will be publicly opened at that time. Sealed envelopes containing offers shall be marked to show the offeror’s name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

B. An offer guarantee is, is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the (1) work requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due will not be considered and will be rejected.

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

Designed using Perform Pro, WHS/DIOR, Oct 96

1442-103 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85) (EG)

Prescribed by GSA - FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(d)De

W912PL-16-R-0020

X

21 July 2016 1 OF

USACE, Los Angeles District Contracting Division, East Region Branch C/O Christina M. Chavez 915 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 930 Los Angeles, CA 90017

As instructed in the Request for Proposal Letter

Christina M. Chavez 213-452-3246

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Los Angeles District is soliciting for award of a construction contract for a new Type III Hydrant Fuel System meeting the design requirements of the Department of Defense “Pressurized Hydrant Fueling System, Type III, July 2010”, and other design requirements of UFC 3-460-01 – Fuel Facility Design. The project will provide for fueling and defueling capability at three (3) bomber aircraft parking positions via hydrant hose trucks (HHTs). Additionally, fueling capability for twenty-five (25) revetment positions for fighter aircraft will be provided via hose end pantographs with non-lubricated swivel joints, for Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) at Nellis Air Force Base, NV.

THIS PROJECT IS AN UNRESTRICTED PROCUREMENT WITH HUBZONE PRICE EVALUATION PREFERENCE. This will be a Competitive Request for Proposal (RFP), using BEST VALUE LOWEST PRICE TECHINICALLY ACCEPTABLE (LPTA) procedures resulting in a firm fixed-price contract.

Estimated cost range for this project is between $25,000,000 and $100,000,000.

Solicitation W912PL-16-R-0020 and all amendments for this acquisition will be posted on FedBizOpps (FBO) (www.fbo.gov). THE GOVERNMENT INTENDS TO ISSUE THIS SOLICITATION AND ALL AMENDMENTS THROUGH THE USE OF THE INTERNET (WEB ONLY). No additional media (CD ROMs, Floppy Disks, Faxes, or paper) will be provided unless the Government determines that it is necessary.

ALL OFFERORS/BIDDERS ARE ALSO ADVISED THAT THIS PROCUREMENT MAY BE DELAYED, CANCELLED OR REVISED AT ANY TIME DURING THE SOLICITATION EVALUATION NEGOTIATION AND/OR FINAL AWARD PROCESS

10 950

X X *Section 00 73 00

X 10

0 *

X l1ctpcmc Cross-Out l1ctpcmc Cross-Out l1ctpcmc Typewritten Text 29Aug16 l1ctpcmc Typewritten Text

2:00 PM

l1ctpcmc Typewritten Text

AMEND 0003

l1ctpcmc Typewritten Text l1ctpcmc Cross-Out

OFFER (Must be fully completed by offeror)

STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK (REV. 4-85)

14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR (Include ZIP Code) 15. TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include area code)

16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS (Include only if different than Item 14)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the work required at the prices specified below in strict accordance with the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in writing within calendar days after the date offers are due. (Insert any number equal or greater than the minimum requirement stated in 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation - give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN OFFER (Type or print) 20B. SIGNATURE 20C. OFFER DATE

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24.SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

ITEM 25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) ( ) 41 U.S.C. 253(c) ( )

26. ADMINISTERED BY 27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BYCODE

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT (Contractor is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.) Contractor agrees to furnish and deliver all items or perform all work requirements identified on this form and any continuation sheets for the consideration stated in this contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be governed by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and

(c) the clauses, representations, certifications, and specifications incorporated by reference in or attached to this contract.

29. AWARD. (Contractor is not required to sign this document.) Your offer on this solicitation is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award consummates the contract, which consists of (a) the Government solicitation and your offer, and (b) this contract award. No further contractual document is necessary.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

(Type or print)

30B. SIGNATURE 30C. DATE

31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY

DUNS NO.: TAX ID NO.:

CAGE CODE NO.:

SEE PRICING SCHEDULE

USACE

Las Vegas Resident Office P.O. Box 9744 Nellis AFB, NV 89191

USACE, Finance Center

ATTN: CEFCO-AO-D

5722 Integrity Drive Millington, TN 38054-5005 l1ctpcmc Typewritten Text

AMEND 0003

Replace Hydrant Fuel System W912PL-16-R-0020 Nellis Air Force Base, NV

Contract Line Item Pricing Schedule (00 10 00) - 3 Amendment 0003

SECTION 0010 00 CONTRACT LINE ITEM PRICING SCHEDULE

Item No. Description of Item Estimated

Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount

BASE BID ITEMS

0001 All work complete for the new Fuel Transfer line from the

Kinder-Morgan Area

JA

0002 All work complete for the two (2) new 10,000 BBL Jet A Operating Fuel Storage Tanks, excluding Option Item 0014

– Option 7.

0003 All work complete for the new pump shelter, pump control room and filtration equipment, excluding CLIN Item 0013 - Option 6

0004 All work complete for three (3) bomber refueling pits and twenty-one (21) Refueling Pantographs, excluding CLIN item 0015 - Option 8.

0005 All work complete for Two (2) Jet-A Truck Fillstands and Fillstand Canopy Footings, excluding CLIN Option Item 0008 – Option 2.

0006 All work complete for remainder of work, excluding Basic Items 0001, 0002, 0003, 0004 and 0005 and Option Items listed below.

0007 CY cost for additional excavation required 100 CY $________

TOTAL BASE BID LINE ITEMS 0001 – 0006).

OPTION ITEMS

0008 Option Item 1 - All work complete for demolition and removal of existing Fuel Farm (See Sheets G-005A and C- 411A of the drawings)

0009 Option Item 2 - All work complete for Canopy over the Two (2) Jet A Truck Fillstands, excluding Basic Item for footings (CLIN Item 0005).

0010 Option Item 3 - All work complete for Hydrant Hose Truck (HHT) Check-Out Pad, Equipment and Piping, excluding asphalt paving in Basic Item 0006.

0011 Option Item 4 - Additional amount to add four (4) fuel truck parking positions.

0012 Option 5 - Additional amount to provide a 10-inch diameter pantograph flush line in lieu of 2-inch diameter relief line up to and including Revetment Position 5, with flush line equipment and relief line connections to 21 pantograph positions (See Section 00 20 00, Note 4)

0013 Option 5A - Additional amount to extend the 10-inch diameter flush line up to and including Revetment Position 1, with associated connections to the last four pantograph positions (See Section 00 20 00, Note 4)

0014 Option 6 - Additional amount to provide emergency generator and concrete pad, in lieu of electrical connections for a portable generator in the exterior wall of the pump control room

0015 Option 7 - Additional amount to provide Automatic Tank Gauging (ATG) System Equipment and associated wiring, excluding tank stilling wells and empty conduit included with CLIN Item 0002

0016 Option 8 - Additional amount to add Fueling Pantographs and Piping to Parking Positions 1 through 4 in the Revetment Area (See Section 00 20 00, Note 4)

0017 Option 9 – All work complete for removal and disposal of fuel contaminated soil exceeding 100 ppm within the Revetment Area. Any soil encountered with visual staining, and/or olfactory evidence of petroleum contamination shall be stockpiled and tested for contamination using real-time field screening data to monitor contamination levels.

Contractor shall be responsible for segregation of materials;

as appropriate sampling media for laboratory analyses, proper disposal and notification to regulatory agencies.

Stockpiling, protection from weather and testing is part of Basic CLIN Item 0006.

CY

TOTAL AMOUNT BASE BID PLUS OPTIONS

Replace Hydrant Fuel System W912PL-16-R-0020

Contract Line Item Pricing Schedule (00 10 00) - 4 Amendment 0003

Replace Hydrant Fuel System W912PL‐16‐R‐0020

Amendment 0003

52.219-8 UTILIZATION OF SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS (OCT 2014)

(a) Definitions. As used in this contract--

HUBZone small business concern means a small business concern that appears on the List of Qualified HUBZone Small Business Concerns maintained by the Small Business Administration.

Service-disabled veteran-owned small business concern--

(1) Means a small business concern--

(i) Not less than 51 percent of which is owned by one or more service-disabled veterans or, in the case of any publicly owned business, not less than 51 percent of the stock of which is owned by one or more service-disabled veterans; and

(ii) The management and daily business operations of which are controlled by one or more service-disabled veterans or, in the case of a service-disabled veteran with permanent and severe disability, the spouse or permanent caregiver of such veteran.

(2) Service-disabled veteran means a veteran, as defined in 38 U.S.C. 101(2), with a disability that is service-connected, as defined in 38 U.S.C. 101(16).

Small business concern means a small business as defined pursuant to Section 3 of the Small Business Act and relevant regulations promulgated pursuant thereto.

Small disadvantaged business concern, consistent with 13 CFR 124.1002, means a small business concern under the size standard applicable to the acquisition, that--

(1) Is at least 51 percent unconditionally and directly owned (as defined at 13 CFR 124.105) by--

(i) One or more socially disadvantaged (as defined at 13 CFR 124.103) and economically disadvantaged (as defined at 13 CFR 124.104) individuals who are citizens of the United States; and

(ii) Each individual claiming economic disadvantage has a net worth not exceeding $750,000 after taking into account the applicable exclusions set forth at 13 CFR 124.104(c)(2); and

(2) The management and daily business operations of which are controlled (as defined at 13.CFR 124.106) by individuals, who meet the criteria in paragraphs (1)(i) and (ii) of this definition.

Veteran-owned small business concern means a small business concern--

(1) Not less than 51 percent of which is owned by one or more veterans (as defined at 38 U.S.C. 101(2)) or, in the case of any publicly owned business, not less than 51 percent of the stock of which is owned by one or more veterans; and

(2) The management and daily business operations of which are controlled by one or more veterans.

Women-owned small business concern means a small business concern--

(1) That is at least 51 percent owned by one or more women, or, in the case of any publicly owned business, at least 51 percent of the stock of which is owned by one or more women; and

(2) Whose management and daily business operations are controlled by one or more women.

(b) It is the policy of the United States that small business concerns, veteran-owned small business concerns, service-disabled veteran-owned small business concerns, HUBZone small business concerns, small disadvantaged

Amendment 0003 business concerns, and women-owned small business concerns shall have the maximum practicable opportunity to participate in performing contracts let by any Federal agency, including contracts and subcontracts for subsystems, assemblies, components, and related services for major systems. It is further the policy of the United States that its prime contractors establish procedures to ensure the timely payment of amounts due pursuant to the terms of their subcontracts with small business concerns, veteran-owned small business concerns, service-disabled veteran-owned small business concerns, HUBZone small business concerns, small disadvantaged business concerns, and women-owned small business concerns.

(c) The Contractor hereby agrees to carry out this policy in the awarding of subcontracts to the fullest extent consistent with efficient contract performance. The Contractor further agrees to cooperate in any studies or surveys as may be conducted by the United States Small Business Administration or the awarding agency of the United States as may be necessary to determine the extent of the Contractor's compliance with this clause.

(d)(1) Contractors acting in good faith may rely on written representations by their subcontractors regarding their status as a small business concern, a veteran-owned small business concern, a service-disabled veteran-owned small business concern, a small disadvantaged business concern, or a women-owned small business concern.

(2) The Contractor shall confirm that a subcontractor representing itself as a HUBZone small business concern is certified by SBA as a HUBZone small business concern by accessing the System for Award Management database or by contacting the SBA. Options for contacting the SBA include--

(i) HUBZone small business database search application Web page at http://dsbs.sba.gov/dsbs/search/dsp_searchhubzone.cfm; or http://www.sba.gov/hubzone;

(ii) In writing to the Director/HUB, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Washington DC 20416; or

(iii) The SBA HUBZone Help Desk at hubzone@sba.gov.

(End of clause)

Amendment 0003

General Decision Number: NV160022 07/15/2016 NV22

Superseded General Decision Number: NV20150022

State: Nevada

Construction Type: Heavy

County: Clark County in Nevada.

EXCLUDES NEVADA TEST SITE (NTS), NATIONAL TEST AND TRAINING

RANGE (NTTR) AND TONOPAH TEST RANGE (TTR)

Note: Under Executive Order (EO) 13658, an hourly minimum wage of $10.15 for calendar year 2016 applies to all contracts subject to the Davis-Bacon Act for which the solicitation was issued on or after January 1, 2015. If this contract is covered by the EO, the contractor must pay all workers in any classification listed on this wage determination at least $10.15 (or the applicable wage rate listed on this wage determination, if it is higher) for all hours spent performing on the contract in calendar year 2016. The EO minimum wage rate will be adjusted annually. Additional information on contractor requirements and worker protections under the EO is available at www.dol.gov/whd/govcontracts.

Modification Number Publication Date 0 01/08/2016 1 06/03/2016 2 07/15/2016

* CARP1780-011 07/01/2016

Rates Fringes

CARPENTER (Form Work Only).......$ 38.33 15.36

ZONE PAY:

0 to 40 miles radius from intersection of Maryland Parkway and Charleston Blvd in Las Vegas: Free Zone

40 to 60 miles radius: $2.50 additional per hour

Over 60 miles radius: $4.25 additional per hour

Laughlin Area: $2.00 additional per hour

* CARP1827-001 07/01/2016

Rates Fringes

MILLWRIGHT.......................$ 36.69 21.17

ZONE PAY:

Zone 1: Las Vegas within 20 miles from Maryland Parkway and

Amendment 0003

Charleston/Reno within 15 miles from County Courthouse:

Free Zone Zone 2: Las Vegas 20 to 40 miles/Reno 15 to 35 miles: 1.50 additional per hour.

Zone 3: Las Vegas 40 miles/Reno over 35 miles: $3.25 additional per hour.

ELEC0357-007 06/01/2016

Rates Fringes

ELECTRICIAN......................$ 43.83 19.21

ZONE PAY:

(A) The area bound by a 25 mile radius from the intersection of Main Street and Fremont Street in Las Vegas is hereby established a Free Zone.

(B) The area bound by a 25-55 mile radius from the intersection of Main and Fremont Street shall receive $2.50 per hour at a straight time rate for Zone Pay.

(C) The area outside of 55 miles radius from Main Street and Fremont Street shall receive $3.50 per hour at the straight time rate of Zone Pay.

ENGI0012-012 08/01/2015

Rates Fringes

POWER EQUIPMENT OPERATOR

(03) Skid Loader/Bobcat.....$ 40.02 26.00

(04) Backhoe, Roller, Trackhoe....................$ 40.13 26.00

(06) Bulldozer, Scraper.....$ 40.42 26.00

(08) Mechanic, Excavator....$ 40.92 26.00

(10) Grader/ Blade..........$ 39.92 26.00

Add $2.00 per hour to wage rates:

20 miles to 40 miles from the City Hall of Las Vegas Add $3.00 per hour to wage rates:

40 Miles to 60 Miles from the City Hall of Las Vegas Add $3.50 per hour:

Over 60 Miles from the City Hall of Las Vegas

IRON0118-004 07/01/2015

Rates Fringes

IRONWORKER (Ornamental, Reinforcing, and Structural).....$ 33.97 28.92

LABO0872-007 07/01/2014

Amendment 0003

Rates Fringes

LABORER

(1) Form Stripping..........$ 24.81 22.48

(3) Mason Tender-Cement Concrete....................$ 25.12 22.48

(8) Flagger.................$ 23.31 22.48

PAIN0159-002 07/01/2015

Rates Fringes

PAINTER..........................$ 36.38 15.24

PLAS0797-007 07/01/2014

Rates Fringes

CEMENT MASON/CONCRETE FINISHER...$ 35.18 13.70

SHEE0088-003 08/01/2014

Rates Fringes

SHEET METAL WORKER (Including HVAC Duct Installation and Metal Roof)......................$ 41.41 23.57

Zone 1: 0 to 30 miles $0.00 Zone 2: 30 to 50 miles $2.50 Zone 3: 50 to 100 miles (including Laughlin) $3.50 Zone 4: over 100 miles $5.00

TEAM0631-005 07/01/2014

Rates Fringes

TRUCK DRIVER

GROUP 1.....................$ 27.19 22.31

GROUP 2.....................$ 27.29 22.31

GROUP 3.....................$ 27.50 22.31

GROUP 4.....................$ 27.68 22.31

ZONE PAY:

ZONE 1: All work within 30 road miles of City Hall in Las Vegas shall be considerered a Free Zone.

ZONE 2: All work 30 to 50 road miles from City Hall in Las Vegas shall receive $1.50 additional per hour.

ZONE 3: All work 50 to 70 road miles from City Hall in Las Vegas shall receive $2.50 additional per hour.

ZONE 4: ALL work over 70 road miles from City Hall in Las

Amendment 0003

Vegas shall receive $3.50 additional per hour.

CLASSIFICATIONS

GROUP 1: Flatbed; Dump Truck less than 12 yds.

GROUP 2: Dump trucks 12 yds but less than 16 yds.

GROUP 3: Dump trucks 16 yds up to and including 22 yds.

GROUP 4: Dump trucks over 22 yds.

SUNV2007-029 09/19/2007

Rates Fringes

CARPENTER, Excludes Form Work....$ 25.43 8.79

LABORER: Common or General......$ 20.93 0.00

LABORER: Concrete Saw (Hand Held/Walk Behind)................$ 23.92 0.00

LABORER: Landscape..............$ 18.51 0.00

LABORER: Pipelayer..............$ 21.73 8.31

OPERATOR: Backhoe Loader Combo............................$ 30.15 10.31

OPERATOR: Crane.................$ 28.54 9.75

OPERATOR: Loader................$ 38.10 0.00

PIPEFITTER.......................$ 28.79 9.23

WELDERS - Receive rate prescribed for craft performing operation to which welding is incidental.

Unlisted classifications needed for work not included within the scope of the classifications listed may be added after award only as provided in the labor standards contract clauses (29CFR 5.5 (a) (1) (ii)).

The body of each wage determination lists the classification and wage rates that have been found to be prevailing for the cited type(s) of construction in the area covered by the wage determination. The classifications are listed in alphabetical

Amendment 0003 order of "identifiers" that indicate whether the particular rate is a union rate (current union negotiated rate for local), a survey rate (weighted average rate) or a union average rate (weighted union average rate).

Union Rate Identifiers

A four letter classification abbreviation identifier enclosed in dotted lines beginning with characters other than "SU" or "UAVG" denotes that the union classification and rate were prevailing for that classification in the survey. Example:

PLUM0198-005 07/01/2014. PLUM is an abbreviation identifier of the union which prevailed in the survey for this classification, which in this example would be Plumbers. 0198 indicates the local union number or district council number where applicable, i.e., Plumbers Local 0198. The next number, 005 in the example, is an internal number used in processing the wage determination. 07/01/2014 is the effective date of the most current negotiated rate, which in this example is July 1, 2014.

Union prevailing wage rates are updated to reflect all rate changes in the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) governing this classification and rate.

Survey Rate Identifiers

Classifications listed under the "SU" identifier indicate that no one rate prevailed for this classification in the survey and the published rate is derived by computing a weighted average rate based on all the rates reported in the survey for that classification. As this weighted average rate includes all rates reported in the survey, it may include both union and non-union rates. Example: SULA2012-007 5/13/2014. SU indicates the rates are survey rates based on a weighted average calculation of rates and are not majority rates. LA indicates the State of Louisiana. 2012 is the year of survey on which these classifications and rates are based. The next number, 007 in the example, is an internal number used in producing the wage determination. 5/13/2014 indicates the survey completion date for the classifications and rates under that identifier.

Survey wage rates are not updated and remain in effect until a new survey is conducted.

Union Average Rate Identifiers

Classification(s) listed under the UAVG identifier indicate that no single majority rate prevailed for those classifications; however, 100% of the data reported for the classifications was union data. EXAMPLE: UAVG-OH-0010 08/29/2014. UAVG indicates that the rate is a weighted union average rate. OH indicates the state. The next number, 0010 in the example, is an internal number used in producing the wage determination. 08/29/2014 indicates the survey completion date for the classifications and rates under that identifier.

Amendment 0003

A UAVG rate will be updated once a year, usually in January of each year, to reflect a weighted average of the current negotiated/CBA rate of the union locals from which the rate is based.

WAGE DETERMINATION APPEALS PROCESS

1.) Has there been an initial decision in the matter? This can be:

* an existing published wage determination

* a survey underlying a wage determination

* a Wage and Hour Division letter setting forth a position on a wage determination matter

* a conformance (additional classification and rate) ruling

On survey related matters, initial contact, including requests for summaries of surveys, should be with the Wage and Hour Regional Office for the area in which the survey was conducted because those Regional Offices have responsibility for the Davis-Bacon survey program. If the response from this initial contact is not satisfactory, then the process described in 2.)

and 3.) should be followed.

With regard to any other matter not yet ripe for the formal process described here, initial contact should be with the Branch of Construction Wage Determinations. Write to:

Branch of Construction Wage Determinations Wage and Hour Division U.S. Department of Labor 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20210

2.) If the answer to the question in 1.) is yes, then an interested party (those affected by the action) can request review and reconsideration from the Wage and Hour Administrator (See 29 CFR Part 1.8 and 29 CFR Part 7). Write to:

Wage and Hour Administrator U.S. Department of Labor 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20210

The request should be accompanied by a full statement of the interested party's position and by any information (wage payment data, project description, area practice material, etc.) that the requestor considers relevant to the issue.

3.) If the decision of the Administrator is not favorable, an interested party may appeal directly to the Administrative Review Board (formerly the Wage Appeals Board). Write to:

Amendment 0003

Administrative Review Board U.S. Department of Labor 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20210

4.) All decisions by the Administrative Review Board are final.

END OF GENERAL DECISION

Replace Hydrant Fuel System 1400820 100% Backcheck Submittal

Nellis AFB, NV January 5, 2016

Robert and Company Atlanta, Ga

APPENDIX 3

FINAL GEOTECHNICAL REPORT

GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION

PROPOSED TYPE III HYDRANT SYSTEM

NELLIS AIR FORCE BASE

CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA

Project No. 20143373E1

July 25, 2014

Prepared for:

Robert and Company

2233 Park Avenue, Suite 205 Orange Park, Florida 32073

Prepared by:

Geotechnical & Environmental Services, Inc.

7150 Placid Street Las Vegas, Nevada 89119

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.

1.1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE

1.2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

1.3. SITE DESCRIPTION

DISCUSSION ................................................................................................................................... 3 2.

2.1. GEOLOGY

2.2. SEISMICITY

2.3. MAPPED SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS

2.4. FIELD EXPLORATION

2.4.1. RESISTIVITY SURVEYS

2.4.2. REFRACTION MICROTREMOR (ReMi) SURVEY

2.4.3. EXPLORATORY BORINGS

2.5. ENCOUNTERED SUBSURFACE MATERIALS AND CONDITIONS

2.5.1. FILL

2.5.2. NATIVE SOIL

2.5.3. GROUNDWATER

2.6. LABORATORY TESTING

CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................................... 8 3.

RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................................................... 9 4.

4.1. EARTHWORK

4.1.1. SITE GRADING

4.1.2. STRUCTURAL FILL AND BACKFILL SUITABILITY

4.1.3. FILL PLACEMENT

4.1.4. OBSERVATION AND TESTING

4.2. EXCAVATION CONSIDERATIONS

4.2.1. TEMPORARY EXCAVATIONS

4.2.2. CEMENTED SOIL

4.3. GROUNDWATER CONSIDERATIONS

4.4. MATERIAL VOLUME CHANGES

4.5. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES

4.6. FOUNDATIONS

4.6.1. SPREAD FOOTINGS

4.6.2. MAT FOUNDATIONS AND CONCRETE SLABS-ON-GRADE

4.6.3. STORAGE TANK BOTTOM PLATE SUPPORT

4.7. SEISMIC SITE CLASS

4.8. LATERAL EARTH PRESSURES

4.9. PIPELINE DESIGN

4.9.1. MODULUS OF SOIL REACTION (E')

4.9.2. VERTICAL LOADS AND FOUNDATIONS

4.10. EXTERIOR CONCRETE FLATWORK

4.11. RECOMMENDED NON-DEDICATED PAVEMENT SECTIONS

4.12. CONCRETE AND CORROSIVITY

4.13. DRAINAGE AND MOISTURE PROTECTION

LIMITATIONS ................................................................................................................................. 24 5.

REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................... 25 6.

TABLES

Table 2.4.1. Field Resistivity Test Results Table 2.4.3. Exploratory Borings Table 2.2.1. Spectral Response Accelerations and Site Coefficients Table 4.9.1. Estimates of Subgrade Modulus, E' Table 4.11.-1 Recommended Asphalt Concrete Pavement Sections Table 4.11.-2 Recommended Portland Cement Concrete Pavement Sections

APPENDIX A – SUBSURFACE STUDY

APPENDIX B – LABORATORY TEST RESULTS

APPENDIX C – DESIGN FIGURES

APPENDIX D – SITE SEISMIC SURVEY RESULTS

July 25, 2014

GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION

PROPOSED TYPE III HYDRANT SYSTEM

NELLIS AIR FORCE BASE

CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA

INTRODUCTION 1.

This report presents the results of a geotechnical evaluation performed by Geotechnical &

Environmental Services, Inc. (GES) for Robert and Company for the Proposed Type III Hydrant

System project to be constructed at Nellis Air Force Base (AFB) in Clark County, Nevada. Figure

A-1 presents a vicinity map showing the approximate location of the site within the Las Vegas

Valley. The following sections present the purpose and scope of our geotechnical evaluation, project description and site description. Our services for this project were performed in general accordance with our proposal dated January 27, 2014.

1.1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE

The purpose of this geotechnical evaluation was to provide general subsurface information and recommendations to aid in the design and construction of the proposed Type III Hydrant System project. The scope of this study included a review of referenced geologic literature and maps, a subsurface exploration, soil sampling, laboratory testing of selected soil samples, engineering evaluations, and preparation of this report.

1.2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Our understanding of the project is based on a review of historical aerial photographs, information provided by Robert and Company personnel and our experience and familiarity with similar projects in the vicinity. Our design recommendations are based on the 2012 International

Building Code, the Southern Nevada Amendments (SNA) to the 2012 International Building

Code (IBC), the Unified Facilities Criteria, and the Uniform Standard Specifications for Public

Works’ Construction, Off-Site Improvements (USS).

We understand that the proposed project will include the construction of a fueling facility to support

25 existing aircraft revetment positions and three bomber positions. We understand that the project is being constructed through the US Army Corps of Engineers. Based on review of the site plan provided to us, we understand that the new facility will consist of two 420,000 gallon

(10,000 BBL) fuel operating tanks with concrete containment, a pump house/control room, PRT/HSV, generator, truck fill stands, paved truck parking and access roads, and approximately

6,000 linear feet of underground pipeline. We understand that each operating tank will be

July 25, 2014 supported on a ring wall foundation and will be approximately 50 feet in diameter. The ground surface in the tank area is anticipated to be raised several feet from the existing ground surface elevation. We anticipate that the pump house/control room will be a single-story structure constructed of reinforced concrete masonry unit (CMU) block with relatively light structural loads less than approximately 5 kips per linear foot supported by continuous spread footings. The truck parking will be constructed of Portland cement concrete (PCC) with vehicle parking and new access roads being constructed of asphalt concrete near existing grades.

1.3. SITE DESCRIPTION

The project site is located within Nellis AFB, Nevada, within APNs 140-10-101-001, 140-10-701-

001, 140-10-302-001, and 140-10-302-002, southeast of the existing revetment positions located in the southeast portion of the Air Force base, west of the existing Kinder Morgan fuel reservoir tanks.

Existing Kinder Morgan fuel tanks were located near the eastern portion of the project site. Chain-link fencing lined the southeast perimeter of the site. A dirt road, oriented northwest-southeast was observed near the southwest portion of the site. A gravel road oriented east-west connected the existing Kinder Morgan fuel tanks with the existing main asphalt concrete paved roadway located parallel to the existing air field. Debris was observed in the northern central portion of the site, north of the gravel road. Overhead lighting structures were observed adjacent to the existing airfield. Other various infrastructure associated with the Air Force base was observed near and within the project site. Several drainage features transect the site in north-south and east-west directions; the site generally drains toward the southwest; however, localized areas within the site have no apparent drainage outlet and evidence of previous water ponding was observed.

At the time of our exploration the majority of the site was vacant. The northern portion of the project site appeared to have been graded with little vegetation. Scattered desert vegetation, including small shrubs, was observed throughout other portions of the site. Severe desiccation cracking was observed throughout the site with cracks up to approximately 18-inches deep predominantly in the southern portion of the project site. Some of these deeper cracks appeared to be associated with desiccation of near-surface soils; however, deepening and widening of some of the cracks appeared to be associated with additional erosion from precipitation and associated particle migration, or possibly in part from burrowing animals. Some cracks extended up to 18 inches, or more, below the ground surface and appeared intermittently, sometimes along relatively linear alignments.

July 25, 2014

DISCUSSION 2.

The following sections describe geology, seismicity, mapped subsurface conditions, field explorations, encountered subsurface materials and conditions, and laboratory testing.

2.1. GEOLOGY

The subject site is located in the northeast portion of the Las Vegas Valley, a fault-bounded graben structure surrounded by mountain ranges. The Las Vegas Valley is physiographically characteristic of the Basin and Range Province with generally northwest-trending parallel mountain ranges and an intervening basin. Unlike many basins within the Basin and Range

Province which are internally draining, the Las Vegas Valley is unique in that the basin drains through the Las Vegas Wash to Lake Mead and the Colorado River.

Tertiary and Quaternary unconsolidated alluvial deposits, derived from the surrounding mountain ranges, fill the valley. These deposits may be up to 4,000 feet thick near the center of the valley. The surrounding mountain ranges are comprised of sedimentary and igneous rocks.

Alluvial fan deposits, consisting of sand and gravel, slope down from the mountain fronts towards the valley floor. Sediments are typically less coarse, grading from fine sand and silt to clay near the valley bottom. Beds of amorphous and crystalline gypsum are common. Zones of calcareous cemented deposits (caliche) are present at various locations and depths throughout the valley.

2.2. SEISMICITY

The U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Earthquake Catalog lists about 800 events of magnitude greater than or equal to 4 with epicenters within about 120 miles of Las

Vegas. Only 19 events greater than or equal to magnitude 4 are estimated to have occurred during the 1881 through 1938 period in the southern Nevada region.

After about 1947, nuclear testing began at the Nevada Test Site. Therefore, many of the recorded earthquakes after about 1947 may be due to nuclear blasts occurring more than about 60 miles from the subject site. Several hundred earthquakes occurred from 1936 to 1965 near Hoover

Dam, presumably due to filling of the Lake Mead reservoir, with 24 of these events reportedly greater than or equal to magnitude 4.

July 25, 2014

Based on a review of referenced geologic maps and literature, the nearest mapped Quaternary-age (last 1.6 million years) tectonic faults are the Eglington fault, which geologists have debated may also be potentially active, and Frenchman Mountain fault, which are located approximately 8 miles northwest, and 1-1/2 miles east of the site, respectively. The nearest mapped Holocene active fault (i.e., a fault that has moved within the last 10,000 years) is the Black Hills fault, located approximately 19 miles south of the site (USGS). The nearest mapped fissure zone is located approximately 5-1/2 miles west of the site near Alexander Road and North 5th Street, and the nearest mapped fault within the Las Vegas Valley (DePolo, 2000) is approximately ½ mile southeast of the site. Based on the results of our review of available literature, it is our opinion that the potential for fault-related surface rupture at the site is negligible.

2.3. MAPPED SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS

Based on review of the Clark County Soil Guidelines Map (CCBD, 1998), the project site is located near a previously mapped Special Geotechnical Consideration Area containing potential drainage areas or recent sediment deposits, and may also have solubility, clay swell, corrosion, gypsum salt, expansive or hydro-collapsible potential. Based on review of the Clark County Expansive Soil

Guidelines Map (CCDDS, 2006), the project site is located in a Special Geotechnical Consideration

Area having low to moderate swell potential (up to 8 percent).

The subject site is located on the referenced Geologic Map of the Las Vegas Northeast

Quadrangle (Matti et al., 1993) within a geologic unit of intermittently active alluvium (Qai) mapped as slightly to moderately consolidated, pink to pale-brown sand and pebble to cobble conglomerate mainly on between-channel alluvial flats and less commonly in incised washes.

2.4. FIELD EXPLORATION

GES evaluated the subsurface conditions in proposed improvement areas by performing soil resistivity surveys, performing a refraction microtremor (ReMi) survey, and excavating exploratory borings.

2.4.1. RESISTIVITY SURVEYS

On April 28, 2014, resistivity surveys were performed at the project site. Resistivity tests were performed at the planned tank locations at the project site to aid in assessing the corrosion potential of the on-site soils to metal. The tests were performed with a Ground Tester Model

6470 soil resistance meter by AEMC Instruments using the Wenner array in general accordance

July 25, 2014 with ASTM G 57. Electrode spacing of 5, 10, 20, 30 and 40 feet were used for the tests to measure the apparent resistivity to an approximate depth of 40 feet below existing grade. A second resistivity array was run approximately perpendicular to the first, at each tank location.

Where the second array was performed, the array directions will be indicated under Test

Location in the table below. The locations of the resistivity tests are provided on the Exploration

Locations Map in Appendix A, and the results are presented in the table below along with corresponding corrositivity ratings (Roberge, 2006).

Table 2.4.1. Field Resistivity Test Results

Resistivity Test No.

Test Location

Electrode Spacing (ft)

Apparent Resistivity (Ohm-cm)

Corrosivity Rating

R-1 (North to South)

Eastern Tank

40 1,615 Highly Corrosive

30 1,364 Highly Corrosive

20 1,747 Highly Corrosive

10 4,663 Corrosive

5 2,888 Highly Corrosive

R-1 (East to West)

Eastern Tank

40 1,750 Highly Corrosive

30 2,483 Highly Corrosive

20 2,004 Highly Corrosive

10 1,600 Highly Corrosive

5 3,566 Corrosive

R-2 (North to South)

Western Tank

40 2,348 Highly Corrosive

30 1,385 Highly Corrosive

20 1,256 Highly Corrosive

10 1,829 Highly Corrosive

5 2,155 Highly Corrosive

R-2 (East to West)

Western Tank

40 1,650 Highly Corrosive

30 1,455 Highly Corrosive

20 1,373 Highly Corrosive

10 1,751 Highly Corrosive

5 2,432 Highly Corrosive

2.4.2. REFRACTION MICROTREMOR (ReMi) SURVEY

Relatively deep subsurface information was obtained at the project site on May 2, 2014, by performing a refraction microtremor (ReMi) survey. The ReMi survey is a non-destructive, geophysical, surface based test utilized to characterize the shear-wave velocity profile of the subsurface materials to a depth of approximately 100 feet or more. The test uses passive energy wave sources of vibrations from traffic, construction, airplanes, etc. The results of the ReMi survey are included in Appendix D. The locations of the explorations and ReMi survey array were recorded by GES staff using a hand held GPS unit at the time the explorations were

July 25, 2014 performed. The approximate location of the ReMi array is shown on the Exploration Location Map in Appendix A.

2.4.3. EXPLORATORY BORINGS

Eighteen exploratory borings (B-1 through B-18) were drilled to depths of between approximately

10 and 50 feet below the existing ground surface on April 28, through May 2, 2014. The total footage drilled was approximately 400 lineal feet. The approximate locations and depths of the borings are described in the table below.

Table 2.4.3. Exploratory Borings

Structure Number of

Borings Depth of Borings

(feet) Total Footage

(feet)

Operating Tanks (2)* 4 50 200

Pumphouse/Control Room 2 25 50

Truck Fillstands (2) 2 25 50

Truck Parking 2 10 20

Roads 3 10 30

Pipeline 5 10 50

Total 400

* One boring at center and one at ringwall of each tank

Prior to drilling borings B-9, B-10, and B-11, the locations were potholed to a depth of approximately 5 feet using a vacuum extractor (air-knife) to assess whether underground utilities were present. No driven samples were obtained in the borings within the zone potholed with the air-knife.

GES staff directed and supervised the subsurface explorations, while maintaining detailed logs of the subsurface conditions, classifying the soils encountered, and obtaining soil samples. The soils encountered were classified in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System

(USCS). A Key to Symbols and Terms utilized on the exploration logs is presented on Figure A-3.

The exploration logs are presented in Appendix A.

The explorations were drilled with truck-mounted Diedrich D-120 and Mobile B-90 drill rigs using 6-inch nominal outside diameter hollow stem augers. Ring-lined soil samples and penetration blow counts were obtained with a 3-inch outside diameter ring-lined drive sampler in general accordance with ASTM D 3550. The sampler was driven with a 140-pound automatic trip hammer falling about

30 inches. The penetration resistance (blow counts) measured by driving the sampler was used to evaluate the density and consistency of the in-place soil. Bulk samples were also obtained at

July 25, 2014 selected subsurface intervals. The explorations were backfilled with bentonite chips (below encountered groundwater levels) and with soil cuttings.

Approximate exploration locations are presented on Figure A-2. The exploration locations were recorded by GES staff using a hand held GPS unit at the time the explorations were performed.

Ground surface elevations at the boring locations were estimated based on Google Earth data and are provided on the boring logs in Appendix A.

2.5. ENCOUNTERED SUBSURFACE MATERIALS AND CONDITIONS

The following sections describe the fill, native soil, and groundwater encountered in the explorations. Detailed information regarding subsurface materials and conditions are presented on the boring logs in Appendix A.

2.5.1. FILL

Fill was penetrated in exploratory borings, B-17 and B-18, to depths of approximately 5 and 8 feet within an existing roadway berm. The encountered fill was composed primarily of dry, medium dense, clayey gravel with sand underlain by moist, very stiff lean clay. Documentation of fill placement and compaction in the area was not available. Without documentation to indicate that the fill soils were placed under the supervision of a geotechnical engineer, the existing fill soils at the site are considered uncontrolled. The term uncontrolled fill soils refers to artificial fill which was placed without engineering observation, testing, or documentation and is considered unsuitable in its present condition for the support of the proposed improvements.

2.5.2. NATIVE SOIL

The native subsurface soils encountered in the borings were generally observed as layers of dry to moist, very stiff lean clay and fat clay with varying amounts of sand. Some medium dense, clayey sand, dense well graded gravel, and dry silt were also encountered in the borings.

Weakly cemented soil was encountered at a depth of approximately 5 feet below the ground surface in boring B-15.

2.5.3. GROUNDWATER

Groundwater was encountered in borings B-1, B-2, B-3, and B-4 at a depth of approximately 35 feet. A review of water wells listed on the State of Nevada Department of Conservation & Natural

Resources, Division of Water Resources website indicates that historical groundwater levels

July 25, 2014 measured in wells in the same township, range, and section as the project site (S20-E62-10) are deeper than approximately 42 feet below the ground surface. Groundwater levels should be anticipated to fluctuate due to seasonal precipitation, groundwater withdrawal and recharge, irrigation practices, and potential future dewatering efforts within and/or near the subject site. A detailed evaluation of possible groundwater fluctuations was beyond the scope of this study.

2.6. LABORATORY TESTING

The laboratory testing program included tests to classify and to evaluate engineering and physical properties of the on-site soils. The tests were performed on samples obtained from the on-site native soils.

The test results are presented in Appendix A on the exploration logs and on test reports presented in Appendix B. Detailed descriptions of the laboratory tests performed are also presented in

Appendix B.

CONCLUSIONS 3.

Based on the results of our field exploration and laboratory testing programs, it is our opinion that there are no known geologic or geotechnical conditions that would prevent development of the site.

It is also our opinion that there are some geotechnical considerations that will affect site development including the presence of fill soils, surface cracks, hydro-collapse potential of native soils, and chemical corrosivitiy of native soils, as described below.

Based on cracks observed at the ground surface and the results of the laboratory testing, overexcavation of 36 inches, or more, of the near surface materials at the site should be performed to remove…