W912BV18R0024_SATOC_(004).pdf

RFP NO: W912BV18R0024

US Army Corps of Engineers Tulsa District

8(a) SMALL BUSINESS INDEFINITE DELIVERY INDEFINITE

QUANTITY SINGLE AWARD TASK ORDER CONTRACT (IDIQ

SATOC) FOR DESIGN-BUILD AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES

OF VARIOUS MILITARY, CIVIL WORKS, AND INTERNATIONAL

AND INTERAGENCY SUPPORT (IIS) CUSTOMERS PRIMARILY

THE AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE GROUP AND OTHERS AT

TINKER AIR FORCE BASE, OK, AND CUSTOMERS WITHIN

SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION (SWD) BOUNDARIES AND TULSA

DISTRICT *

DESIGN-BUILD REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

MARCH 2018

BASIC SATOC SECTIONS SWT

i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

BASIC SATOC SECTIONS

DIVISION 00 - PROCUREMENT AND CONTRACTING REQUIREMENTS

00 11 00 00 21 00 00 22 00

00 22 20 00 45 00 00 72 00 00 73 00 00 90 00

STANDARD FORM (SF) 1442

INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS, EVALUATION CRITERIA

AND BASIS OF AWARD (PHASE 1 OF 2)

PHASE 2 DESIGN-BUILD SELECTION PROCEDURES AND BASIS OF AWARD

REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS

CONTRACT CLAUSES

SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

DESCRIPTION/SPECS/WORK STATEMENT

DIVISION 01 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

01 01 00.00 44 WORK PLAN REQUIREMENTS

01 33 16 DESIGN AFTER AWARD

01 42 00 SOURCES FOR REFERENCE PUBLICATIONS

01 45 00.15 10 RESIDENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CONTRACTOR MODE (RMS CM)

01 58 00.00 10 BULLETIN BOARD, PROJECT SIGN, AND SAFETY SIGN

01 74 19 CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION WASTE MANAGEMENT

(See Task Order for remainder of Division 01 sections.)

00 11 00 - 3

Section 00 11 00 - SF 1442 and CLIN Schedule

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES MAX

QUANTITY

UNIT UNIT PRICE MAX AMOUNT

0001 24,000,000 Each 2 PHASE DB8(A) SATOC Tinker AFB

FFP

This contract will primarily be used for Tulsa District Customer Tinker Air Force Base, but may encompass work in other states covered by the geographic region included in the SWD boundaries and other SWD customers. This contract is intended for multitasking of construction services for a wide variety of new construction, maintenance, repair, alteration and minor construction type tasks, including asbestos and lead-based paint abatement and other environmental remediation, for military Interagency and International Services, and civil works projects. The tasks include, but are not limited to, planning, design, total facility renovation, new construction, repairs and alterations, preventative maintenance, installation/construction of HVAC, plumbing, electrical, elevators, building envelope, fire protection, and antiterrorism/force protection, environmental abatement, and operations activities. This contract is intended to execute new construction, design-build or construction of real and personal property facilities, e.g., maintenance, repair, asbestos, and lead-based paint abatement, and major and minor construction situations relating to, but not limited to, architectural, civil, mechanical, plumbing, structural, electrical, heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC), instrumentation and ATFP.

This contract shall be in effect for a three (3) base period and NO option periods.

Construction services will be provided by the successful offeror on a task order basis. Task Orders will be firm fixed-price. The sum of all task orders shall not exceed $24 million for the three (3) year period..

FOB: Destination

MAX

NET AMT

BID SCHEDULE

SERVICES AND PRICES/COSTS

ITEM DESCRIPTION AMOUNT

0001 PROVIDE SERVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 01000 TO INVESTIGATE AND

SOLVE MAINTENANCE, REPAIR, AND REHABILITATION PROBLEMS AT

GOVERNMENT INSTALLATIONS AND FACILITIES. SERVICES WILL BE FURTHER

DEFINED AND WORK ACCOMPLISHED BY ISSUANCE OF INDIVIDUAL TASK ORDERS.

TASK ORDERS AND DELIVERY TERMS WILL BE NEGOTIATED IN ACCORDANCE

00 11 00 - 4

WITH PARAGRAPH 4 OF SECTION 01000 AND THE AMOUNTS SET FORTH IN THIS

BIDDING SCHEDULE.

0002 DIRECT COSTS TO BE DETERMINED

BY TASK ORDER

0003 LABOR BURDEN COSTS

(PERCENT OF DIRECT LABOR COSTS)* _Provided with Phase 2 Proposal__%

0004 EXTENDED OVERHEAD (FIELD OFFICE) TO BE DETERMINED

(APPLICABLE TO CONSTRUCTION WORK ONLY) BY TASK ORDER

0005 GENERAL AND ADMINSTRATIVE COSTS

(PERCENT OF DIRECT, LABOR BURDEN, AND

OVERHEAD COSTS)* Provided with Phase 2 Proposal__%

0006 PROFIT/FEE TO BE DETERMINED

BY TASK ORDER

* NEGOTIATED RATES SUBJECT TO ANNUAL REVIEW AND ADJUSTMENT IF NECESSARY.

SATOC IDIQ FOR D/B & CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 8(a)

00 21 00 ‐3

Section 00 21 00 - Instructions, Conditions & Notices to Offerors

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

SECTION 00 21 00

INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION

1.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK

1.2 GOVERNMENT SECURITY REQUIREMENTS

1.3 COPIES OF SOLICITATION DOCUMENTS AND AMENDMENTS

1.4 OFFEROR'S QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS

1.5 SMALL BUSINESS SIZE STANDARD/NAICS CODE

1.6 PROPOSAL EXPENSES AND PRE-CONTRACT COSTS

1.7 PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE

1.8 ACCURACY IN PROPOSALS

1.9 PROPOSAL SUBMITTALS

1.10 JOINT VENTURE PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS

1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION

1.1. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK

The SATOC is for design-build construction services to meet the requirements and time constraints for military, civil, and Interagency and International Services (IIS) customers within Southwestern Division (SWD) Boundaries, and mainly for Tulsa District customers.

00 21 00 ‐4

1.2. GOVERNMENT SECURITY REQUIREMENTS

The Offeror(s) must ensure that ALL mail sent to the Tulsa District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, either pre-contract or post-contract award, has a return mailing address on the outside of the envelope, package, box, etc. ANY MAIL addressed to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, including but not limited to bids, modifications to bids, proposals, revised proposals, bonds, correspondence, etc., will be REJECTED by the US Army Corps of Engineers mail room facility located at 2488 E. 81st Street, Tulsa, OK 74137-4290, if it does not contain a return mailing address. There will be no exceptions.

USACE Tulsa District Point of Contact is Nathan Kloeckler:

Phone: 918-669-7657 Email: Nathan.R.Kloeckler@usace.army.mil

1.3. COPIES OF SOLICITATION DOCUMENTS AND AMENDMENTS

Copies of the solicitation and amendments are available by INTERNET ACCESS ONLY. All solicitation documents will be posted through the Army’s Single Face to Industry (AFSI) to the Federal Business Opportunities (FBO) website at:

http://www.fbo.gov

Solicitation number: W912BV18R0024

It shall be the contractor’s responsibility to check the websites for any amendments. The offeror shall submit in the proposal all requested information specified in this solicitation. There will be no public opening of the proposals received as a result of this solicitation.

1.4. OFFEROR'S QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS

Questions and/or comments relative to the document should be submitted via Bidders Inquiry at:

https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=HomePagePublic.

Instructions for registering in the ProjNet Bidder Inquiry system are available on the above web site.

The Bidder Inquiry Key for this project is: PYE49Y-6YDT5U (Bidder’s Key will be issued by amendment)

Any information given to an offeror which impacts the solicitation and/or offer will be given in the form of a written amendment to the solicitation.

00 21 00 ‐5

Note: All questions and/or comments should be entered in Bidder’s Inquiry no later than 20 calendar days prior to the proposal deadline, so they may be given consideration or action taken prior to receipt of offers.

1.5. SMALL BUSINESS SIZE STANDARD/NAICS CODE

The small business size standard for NAICS Code 236220 is $36.5 Million.

1.6. PROPOSAL EXPENSES AND PRE-CONTRACT COSTS

This Request for Proposal (RFP) does not commit the Government to pay, as a direct charge, any costs incurred in the preparation and submission of a proposal.

1.7. PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE

The Government will not hold a pre-proposal conference for Phase 1.

During this conference, the requirements set forth in the solicitation will be reviewed and discussed, with part of the conference to include a question and answer period.

1.8. ACCURACY IN PROPOSALS

Proposals must set forth full, accurate, and complete information as required by this RFP, (including attachments). The penalty for making false statements is prescribed in 18 U.S.C. 1001.

1.9. PROPOSAL SUBMITTALS

The submittal method for proposals is electronic via AMRDEC SAFE web site or email:

https://safe.amrdec.army.mil/safe/.

The following email addresses must be entered for notification of proposal receipt and download availability:

punnie.chittchang@usace.army.mil nathan.r.kloeckler@usace.army.mil

Proposals will be received until the time and date shown on Standard Form SF 1442 or as amended on SF30. E-Mail proposals to:

Nathan.R.Kloeckler@usace.army.mil

00 21 00 ‐6

The Packaging Proposals shall be marked:

”Proposal for Solicitation Number: “W912BV18R0024”

1.10. JOINT VENTURE PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS

When proposing as a joint venture, all members of the joint venture shall sign the SF 1442 and the bid bond unless a written agreement by the joint venture is furnished with the proposal designating one firm with the authority to bind the other member(s) of the joint venture. In addition, a copy of the joint venture agreement shall be submitted with the proposal. Failure to comply with the foregoing requirements may eliminate the proposal from further consideration. If this is an 8(a) or HubZone joint venture, the offeror shall ensure that it complies with the applicable requirements of 13 CFR Part 124 and 13 CFR Part 126, respectively

DELIVERY INFORMATION

CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.215-1 Instructions to Offerors--Competitive Acquisition JAN 2017 52.217-5 Evaluation Of Options JUL 1990 52.222-5 Construction Wage Rate Requirements--Secondary Site of the

Work

MAY 2014

52.225-10 Notice of Buy American Requirement--Construction Materials

MAY 2014

52.225-12 Notice of Buy American Requirement - Construction Materials Under Trade Agreements

MAY 2014

00 21 00 ‐7

52.228-1 Bid Guarantee SEP 1996

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

52.222-23 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT FOR AFFIRMATIVE ACTION TO ENSURE EQUAL

EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY FOR CONSTRUCTION (FEB 1999)

(a) The offeror's attention is called to the Equal Opportunity clause and the Affirmative Action Compliance Requirements for Construction clause of this solicitation.

(b) The goals for minority and female participation, expressed in percentage terms for the Contractor's aggregate workforce in each trade on all construction work in the covered area, are as follows:

Goals for minority participation for each trade

Goals for female participation for each trade

14.8 6.3

These goals are applicable to all the Contractor's construction work performed in the covered area. If the Contractor performs construction work in a geographical area located outside of the covered area, the Contractor shall apply the goals established for the geographical area where the work is actually performed. Goals are published periodically in the Federal Register in notice form, and these notices may be obtained from any Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs office.

(c) The Contractor's compliance with Executive Order 11246, as amended, and the regulations in 41 CFR 60-4 shall be based on (1) its implementation of the Equal Opportunity clause, (2) specific affirmative action obligations required by the clause entitled "Affirmative Action Compliance Requirements for Construction,'' and (3) its efforts to meet the goals. The hours of minority and female employment and training must be substantially uniform throughout the length of the contract, and in each trade. The Contractor shall make a good faith effort to employ minorities and women evenly on each of its projects. The transfer of minority or female employees or trainees from Contractor to Contractor, or from project to project, for the sole purpose of meeting the Contractor's goals shall be a violation of the contract, Executive Order 11246, as amended, and the regulations in 41 CFR 60-4. Compliance with the goals will be measured against the total work hours performed.

(d) The Contractor shall provide written notification to the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Federal Contract Compliance, U.S. Department of Labor, within 10 working days following award of any construction subcontract in excess of $10,000 at any tier for construction work under the contract resulting from this solicitation. The notification shall list the --

(1) Name, address, and telephone number of the subcontractor;

(2) Employer's identification number of the subcontractor;

(3) Estimated dollar amount of the subcontract;

00 21 00 ‐8

(4) Estimated starting and completion dates of the subcontract; and

(5) Geographical area in which the subcontract is to be performed.

(e) As used in this Notice, and in any contract resulting from this solicitation, the "covered area" is [Contracting Officer shall insert description of the geographical areas where the contract is to be performed, giving the State, county, and city].

(End of provision)

52.252-1 SOLICITATION PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (FEB 1998)

This solicitation incorporates one or more solicitation provisions by reference, with the same force and effect as if they were given in full text. Upon request, the Contracting Officer will make their full text available. The offeror is cautioned that the listed provisions may include blocks that must be completed by the offeror and submitted with its quotation or offer. In lieu of submitting the full text of those provisions, the offeror may identify the provision by paragraph identifier and provide the appropriate information with its quotation or offer. Also, the full text of a solicitation provision may be accessed electronically at this/these address(es):

http://farsite.hill.af.mil/

(End of provision)

SECTION 00 22 00

PHASE 1 OF 2 PHASE DESIGN‐BUILD SELECTION PROCEDURES

1.0 OVERVIEW OF PHASE 1 AND PHASE 2 SELECTION PROCEDURES

1.1 Phase 1. The first phase consists of a process known in commercial design‐build as the “Request for Qualifications” or the acronym: “RFQ”. This solicitation refers to it as “Phase 1”. In Phase 1 of the 2 phase selection procedure, interested firms or joint venture entities (referred to as “Offerors”) submit specified performance capability proposals, demonstrating their capability to successfully execute design‐build construction and design‐bid‐build construction contracts resulting from this solicitation. The Government will evaluate the performance capability proposals in accordance with the criteria described herein and will select no more than five

(5) of the highest rated Phase 1 Offerors to compete for the SATOC contracts in Phase 2.

1.2 Phase 2. In Phase 2, the selected Offerors will submit proposals in accordance with the Section 00 22 20 PHASE

2 DESIGN‐BUILD SELECTION PROCEDURES AND BASIS OF AWARD.

1.3 Offerors will not be participating in a sealed bid procurement process under this acquisition method. Issuance of this Request for Proposal does not constitute an award commitment on the part of the Government.

1.4 Proposal Submissions and the Trade‐Off Process. This process permits tradeoffs among cost or price and non‐ cost factors and allows the Government to accept other than the lowest‐priced proposal. Offerors submit their performance and capability information for review and consideration by the Government. For those Offerors selected to complete during Phase 2, relative importance among technical factors are provided in Section 00 22 20 PHASE 2 DESIGN‐BUILD SELECTION PROCEDURES AND BASIS OF AWARD. The Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) reviews, evaluates, and rates the proposals against the source selection criteria in the RFP. A competitive range consisting of the most highly qualified technical Offerors will be established prior to discussion (if held). The SSEB will review, evaluate and rate the initial task order project technical proposals against the source selection criteria in the RFP for those Offerors included in the competitive range. Concurrently, the Government analyzes price proposals of Offerors utilizing the initial task order project cost proposal. Price will not be rated, but will be a factor in making the final best‐value determination for award. The Source Selection Authority (SSA) compares proposals to one another and determines the best value for the government. The perceived benefits of the higher priced proposal must merit the additional cost, and the rationale for tradeoffs must be documented.

1.5 Initial Task Order Project. Those Offerors selected to compete during Phase 2 of the solicitation shall submit Technical and Cost (Price) proposals for the initial task order as part of Phase 2 Proposal submittals. See Section 00 22 20 PHASE 2 DESIGN‐BUILD SELECTION PROCEDURES AND BASIS OF AWARD. The scope of work for an initial task order project will be provided to Phase 2 Offerors in Section 01 10 00 TASK ORDER STATEMENT OF WORK. The initial task order project cost proposal will be used to evaluate price for the basic SATOC contract. The best value initial task order may be awarded to one of the most highly‐rated contractors from the Phase 2 participants if it is in the best interest of the Government.

1.6 Task Orders. Fixed‐price task orders shall normally be issued bilaterally against this SATOC. Individual task orders, other than the initial task order, will be issued as sole source task orders. Generally, award will be made to the contractor if the proposal provides the best value to the Government, unless otherwise indicated. Source Selection decisions will not be subject to the Disputes Clause of this SATOC.

00 22 00 ‐ 1

1.7 Performance of Work. If the Contractor is awarded a contract, the contractor shall perform work in accordance with Section 00 90 00 DESCRIPTION/SPECS/WORK STATEMENT, with the Scope of Work provided with each Task Order (Section 01 10 00 TASK ORDER STATEMENT OF WORK), and with strict accordance with the terms and conditions specified within the RFP and each Task Order.

2.0 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

2.1 Who May Submit: Any legally organized 8(a) small business firm or Joint Venture may submit a proposal. The size standard for this solicitation is as shown in Section 00 45 00 REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS. Teaming arrangements between the Offeror and construction subcontractors will not be considered for this solicitation. Teaming arrangements with designers are acceptable.

2.2 Where to Submit: Offerors shall submit their proposal to the Tulsa District at the address shown in Section 00 21 00 INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS.

2.3 Submission Deadline. Proposals shall be received by the Tulsa District no later than the time and date specified in Block 10 of Standard Form 1442.

2.4 GENERAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

2.4.1 In order to effectively and equitably evaluate all proposals, the Contracting Officer must receive information containing sufficient detail to allow review and evaluation by the Government. Proposal clarity, organization, and cross‐referencing are mandatory. Failures to submit and organize proposals as requested may adversely affect an Offeror's evaluation. Offerors should provide sufficient detail and clearly define all items required in this section.

The Contracting Officer may remove any Offeror from further consideration during any phase of the procurement if the Offeror fails to meet the submittal requirements of the RFP or to reduce the competitive range for purposes of efficiency pursuant to FAR 15.306(c)(2).

2.4.2 Tabs. Proposal shall be organized and tabbed as shown in paragraph 3.0, “Phase I Proposal Submittal Summary”.

2.4.3 Page Formatting for Submissions.

2.4.3.1 Proposals shall be tabbed and labeled in a manner to afford easy identification from a Table of Contents.

Font size shall not be less than 10 point. Do not use condensed font. Each page shall be identified with the appropriate page number centered at the bottom of the page. Sheet size of the proposal contents shall be 8‐1/2 inches x 11 inches where sheets are prepared specifically for this proposal; however, if drawings, charts, or other graphics are submitted, sheets no larger than 11 inches x 17 inches and folded to 8‐1/2 inches x 11 inches shall be used; 11 x 17 inch sheets will be counted as two 8‐1/2 inch x 11 inch sheets.

2.4.3.2 A cover sheet shall be provided (see below). The second sheet shall be a Table of Contents. Offers that violate these rules unnecessarily delay the evaluation process and may be rejected by the Government after the initial evaluation without receiving any further consideration. The Government will not evaluate any information beyond the page limitation noted in the following paragraphs of this section.

00 22 00 ‐ 2

2.4.4 Electronic Format: The Offeror shall provide the complete proposal l in .pdf format using Adobe Acrobat software to print to a .pdf file. The “find” feature within Adobe must be functional to search the proposal text. Do not scan or copy the documents into a .pdf file. The text portion of the proposal shall be contained as a single .pdf file. Sections of the proposal shall be linked to the index in logical order.

2.4.5 Proposal revisions shall be submitted as page replacements with revised text readily identifiable, e.g., bold face print or underlining. The source of the revision, e.g., Error, Omission, or Clarification, or amendment shall be included and be annotated for each revision. Proposal replacement pages shall be numbered, shall be clearly marked “REVISED”, shall show the date of revision. A revised copy of the entire proposal in .pdf format shall be provided.

2.4.6 “Confidential” projects cannot be submitted to demonstrate capability unless all of the information required for evaluation as specified herein can be provided to the Government as part of the Offeror’s technical proposal.

Offerors that include in their proposals information that they do not want disclosed to the public for any purpose, or used by the Government except for evaluation purposes, must be clearly marked in accordance with the instructions at FAR 52.215‐1, “Instructions to Offerors—Competitive Acquisition”, paragraph (e), “Restriction on disclosure and use of data”.

3.0 PHASE 1 PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL SUMMARY

The Phase 1 proposal shall be tabbed and submitted in the following format. Submission Requirements and Evaluation Criteria for each Tab are included in the following paragraphs. All information shall be provided within these tabbed sections and shall not be included as an appendix or attachment. Cost information will limited to Bonding Capacity as part of the Phase I submittal.

00 22 00 ‐ 3

PROPOSAL COVER SHEET FORMAT:

Solicitation Number: W912BV18R0024

Title: 8(a) SMALL BUSINESS SET ASIDE INDEFINITE DELIVERY/INDEFINITE QUANTITY (IDIQ) SINGLE AWARD TASK ORDER CONTRACT (SATOC) FOR DESIGN‐BUILD CONSTRUCTION SERVICES FOR MILITARY, CIVIL, AND INTERAGENCY AND INTERNATIONAL SERVICE (IIS) CUSTOMERS PRIMARILY THE AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE GROUP AND OTHERS AT TINKER AIR FORCE BASE, OK, AND CUSTOMERS WITHIN THE

SOUTHWEST DIVISION BOUNDARIES AND TULSA DISTRICT

Name, address, email address(es),telephone and facsimile number(s) of Offeror.

Company CAGE code, DUNS number and Federal ID number.

Names, titles, telephone, email addresses and facsimile numbers of persons authorized to negotiate on the Offeror’s behalf with the Government in connection with this solicitation.

Name, title, and signature of person authorized to sign the proposal.

NOTE: Proposals signed by an agent shall be accompanied by evidence of that agent’s authority unless

Location Factor/ Description Relative Importance

TAB A N/A SF 1442

Proposal Data Sheet

Not Rated

TAB B Factor 1 Specialized Experience 1st Most important factor

TAB C Factor 2 Past Performance 2nd (slightly less important than Factor 1)

TAB D Factor 3 Design Support 3rd(slightly less important than Factor 4)

TAB E Factor 4 Management Effectiveness 4th (slightly less important than Factor 3)

TAB F N/A Financial Capacity Go/No Go

4.1 TAB A ‐ STANDARD FORM 1442 AND PROPOSAL DATA SHEET

4.2 Submission Requirements:

4.2.1 Submit the SF 1442, completed and signed by a person authorized by the Offeror.

4.2.2 Submit a completed Proposal Data Sheet. See the form at the end of this section.

4.3 Evaluation Criteria:

Above submission items are not rated.

5.1 0 TAB B – FACTOR 1 ‐ SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE

Offerors will be evaluated on their experience in two areas: experience with task‐order‐type contracts and experience in various types of construction‐related work, including new construction, alterations, renovations and repairs, and design‐build construction. The following list is indicative of the variety of work that may be performed by task orders under this contract:

00 22 00 ‐ 4

• SAFETY ‐ Life safety upgrades, inflammatory gases and substances, industrial safety, industrial hygiene, fire protection, airfield pavements, confined‐space entry, radioactive and laser operations, hazardous materials, protection of work sites and property, and protection of workers.

• CIVIL ‐ Ability to provide minor civil work (e.g., excavations, utility work, etc.) in support of plumbing, heating and air‐conditioning (HVAC) work.

• ARCHITECTURAL – Ability to provide architectural repairs and/or modifications in support of plumbing, heating and air‐conditioning (HVAC) work.

• ENVIRONMENTAL ‐ Removal and disposal of asbestos, lead‐based paint, underground storage tanks, lighting ballast, transformers and other hazardous materials to support plumbing, heating and air‐conditioning (HVAC) work.

• STRUCTURAL – Ability to provide structural engineering, repairs and/or modifications to support plumbing,

• INSTRUMENTATION ‐ Instrumentation for energy monitoring and control systems, direct digital control and fire protection.

• COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS ‐ Conventional communication systems and fiber optics to support plumbing,

• SECURITY ‐ Facility security systems; anti‐terrorism/force protection measures to support plumbing, heating and air‐conditioning (HVAC) work.

• ELECTRICAL ‐ Ability to provide electrical engineering, replacement, repairs and/or modifications to existing facilities in support of plumbing, heating and air‐conditioning (HVAC) work

• MECHANICAL – Ability to provide mechanical engineering and construction for replacement, repairs, and/or modifications to facility heating, ventilating, and air‐conditioning (HVAC), plumbing systems, and commissioning.

5.1 OFFEROR’S SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

5.1.1 The Contractor shall demonstrate recent, relevant experience on similar projects, using the Project Information Worksheet form (Attachment 2), at the end of the section. Offerors may identify state and local government and private contracts that are similar to the Government’s requirements as outlined in 00 90 00 DESCRIPTION/SPECS/WORK STATEMENT, paragraph 1.1. If the Offeror is a joint venture, each firm shall provide information, demonstrating experience relevant to their role on this project and in accordance with the Joint Venture Submission Requirements. Offerors shall provide project information on a minimum of five (5) but no more than ten (10) completed or substantially complete projects, of which three (3) projects submitted can be currently under construction and at least 50% complete, that reflect experience in the construction elements referenced in Section 00 90 00 DESCRIPTION/SPECS/WORK STATEMENT, paragraph 1.1. Project examples must include one (1) project with a contract value equal to or greater than $1,500,000 (may be any type of project with multiple disciplines); all other projects must have a contract value equal to or greater than $500,000. Provide two

00 22 00 ‐ 5

(2) projects that are heavily mechanical in nature; two (2) renovation projects in an occupied facility; one (1) design‐build new construction project. As a minimum, the Contractor shall provide the data specified in the attached “Project Information” Worksheet.

5.1.2 The Offeror may provide a supplemental narrative (not project lists), not to exceed one page, explaining how any corporate experience that is not directly related to the specific projects above is applicable to this project and how the Government will benefit.

5.1.3 Joint Ventures. If Offeror represents the combining of two or more companies for the purpose of this RFP, the proposal shall clearly identify the contractual responsibilities of each firm and the work to be performed by each;

describe the nature of the association; indicate whether the firms have experience working together in construction ventures, including how long and how many projects. In addition, each company, including joint venture, shall list their Government contract experience. Provide a copy of the Joint Venture Agreement. Prior to award of any contract, a copy of the Joint Venture Agreement will be required. If approval of the Joint Venture Agreement is required by the Small Business Administration (SBA), failure to timely provide an approved Small Business Administration Joint Venture Agreement may prevent award of a contract.

5.1.3.1 Offerors submitting proposals as a Joint Venture (JV) shall obtain a DUNS number and be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) as the offering Joint Venture. The Offeror must provide five (5) but no more than ten (10) "recent", "relevant" projects performed by the JV that reflect the JV's ability to perform the work required in this solicitation.

5.1.3.2 If the Offeror cannot provide a sufficient number of projects as the JV to meet the minimum requirement, the Offeror must provide those "recent", "relevant" projects that it has performed as the JV, and then supplement the record with additional "recent", "relevant" projects performed by each JV member in their individual capacities. In such instance, each JV member must satisfy a minimum requirement of three (3) projects, to include any performed as the JV.

5.1.3.3 If the JV has no "recent", "relevant" projects performed by the JV, then each member of the JV must provide three (3) to five (5) "recent", "relevant" projects performed by the JV member that reflect the JV member's experience commensurate with their role on this project or how their experience qualifies them for their role on this project. In such instances the combined experience projects, submitted by each member of the JV, shall not exceed the maximum number of projects stated in paragraph 5.1.1.

5.1.3.4 In addition to the examples of "Company Specialized Experience", the Joint Venture shall provide a brief narrative stating the roles that each partner of the Joint Venture will perform on this project and how the presented projects demonstrate the JV member's experience commensurate with their role on this project or how their experience qualifies them for their role on this project.

5.1.4 Total page count for Factor 1 shall not exceed 21 pages

5.2 EVALUATION CRITERIA

The Government will review the projects provided by the Offeror to evaluate and rate the recent relevant specialized experience of the Offeror with similar projects. Experience with task order contracts may be demonstrated by provision of individual task orders in the experience form that meets the submission requirements as outlined in paragraph 5.1.1. If the Offeror cannot provide suitable relevant experience and the

00 22 00 ‐ 6 evaluators consider the information provided indicates that the Offeror has no relevant experience, a determination will be made as to the risk this lack of corporate experience presents to the Government; and the proposal will be evaluated accordingly. The experience of individuals will not be evaluated under this factor.

The Government will evaluate the extent of recent, relevant experience of the Contractor in construction and/or design‐build projects. Experience on the similar projects identified in the project lists will receive more consideration than experience provided in the supplemental narrative. The Government will place greater importance on projects performed as a prime contractor than as a subcontractor.

To determine strengths and weaknesses, the agency will evaluate the following. This list is not all inclusive.

a. Projects designed for and constructed for the Corps of Engineers or other DoD components.

b. Projects involving design and construction using similar task order contracts.

c. Projects with a value of $1 million or greater.

d. Fully completed projects rather than substantially complete projects.

e. Projects completed after 2015.

f. Projects that demonstrate experience of the personnel proposed in Factor 4 in the same role as their proposed role on this project.

5.2.1 The Offeror must submit the requested information to demonstrate a record of recent, related experience which may include similar state or local government or private counterparts, as described in 00 90 00 DESCRIPTION/SPECS/WORK STATEMENT, paragraph 1.1. Recent experience includes projects well underway (see above criteria) or those completed and turned over within five (5) years of the proposal issue date for this RFP.

Joint Venture partners should each demonstrate experience commensurate with their role on this project or explain in the supplemental narrative how their experience qualifies them for their role on this project.

5.2.2 The Government reserves the right to verify the experience record of cited projects or other recent projects by reviewing the Corps of Engineers Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), other DOD or Government appraisal systems, or to interview owners or references. The Government may check any or all cited references to verify supplied information.

5.2.3 To receive credit for extent (amount) of experience, the Offeror shall demonstrate a history of recent, relevant experience. A firm will not receive credit under this factor for the relevant experience of key personnel proposed for this project. A firm will not receive credit under this factor for the relevant experience of Subcontractors proposed for this project.

5.2.4 The Government will consider extent of recent experience, degree of relationship of such experience to the projects as described in 00 90 00 DESCRIPTION/SPECS/WORK STATEMENT, paragraph 1.1, demonstrated familiarity with applicable codes and local conditions. Some examples of relevancy to this project may include, but not be limited to:

a. Number, size, type work, complexity, location.

00 22 00 ‐ 7

b. Dates (well under way or completed no more than 5 years preceding date of this solicitation).

c. Firm's role and extent of work self‐performed (brokering out all work and simply “placing the sidewalks” on a cited project are examples of less relevant experience).

5.2.5 Previous design‐build experience is not necessary for an acceptable rating. The Government may consider previous DB experience a strength. Similarly, the Government may consider previous recent teaming experience among the team members as value added. The more relevant the experience, the more credit will be given.

6.1 TAB C – FACTOR 2 – PAST PERFORMANCE

There is no page limit for this factor. For each of the projects submitted under Factor 1 the Offeror shall submit copies of Federal/DoD/Navy/Army/Air Force performance reviews or a copy of the PPQ‐0. No additional information may be submitted under this factor and inclusion of additional information will result in the contractor being found unacceptable and may result in the contractor being removed from further consideration.

Offerors shall be evaluated on the construction projects presented in Factor 1 completed or substantially complete (at least 50% complete) in the last five (5) years. Projects submitted should reflect Design‐Build and construction experience described in Section 00 90 00 DESCRIPTION/SPECS/WORK STATEMENT, paragraph 1.1. The Offeror’s past performance will be evaluated to determine technical capability to perform the proposed contract and how well it satisfied its customers. The information presented in the Offeror’s proposal, together with that from other sources available to the Government, will comprise the input for evaluation of this factor. The following elements will be evaluated:

Quality of Construction Timeliness of Performance Customer Satisfaction Subcontractor Management Documentation Safety Record

6.1 OFFEROR’S SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

For each of the projects submitted under Factor 1, to ensure the agency has all relevant past performance information, the Offeror shall submit copies of Federal/DoD/Navy/Army performance reviews that are likely already in the agency’s databases or likely within the agency’s arm’s reach (i.e., Contractor’s copy of CCASS or CPARS evaluations).

6.1.1 For each project under Factor 1 that does not have a CPARS evaluation, Offerors shall provide a Past Performance Questionnaire form PPQ‐0 (Attachment 4) to a representative of the owner that can provide the owner’ s opinion of the Offeror’ s past performance for the project. The Past Performance Questionnaire (Form PPQ‐0) and sample transmittal letter (Attachment 3) included in the solicitation are provided for the Offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project the Offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 1. Ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Offerors should organize all Past Performance Information based on the Factor 1 Projects, which normally have project titles and are numbered 1‐5, so that reviewers can match the owner’ s opinion with the corresponding Factor 1 project. There is no page limit for this factor.

00 22 00 ‐ 8

6.1.2 Form PPQ‐0 shall be utilized and Offerors shall submit the PPQ with their proposal submission to the Contracting Office designated proposal submission location. The Contract Specialist or Contracting Officer will not require the PPQ to be sent directly from the client. The Offeror may submit the completed PPQ‐0. Completed Past Performance Questionnaires should be submitted with your proposal. If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow‐up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’ s point of contact shown in Section 00 21 00 INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS and on the PPQ‐0 form via email prior to proposal closing date. If you have questions regarding the attached questionnaire, or require assistance, please contact the Contract Specialist shown in Section 00 21 00 INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO

OFFERORS.

6.1.3 While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

6.1.4 The Offeror is responsible for ensuring that the completed questionnaires are submitted by the closing date.

The Government may contact and interview the owner’ s representative on the Past Performance questionnaires, and reserves the right to interview other individuals acting for the owner’ s representative, if the owner’ s representative is not available.

6.1.5 The Government will evaluate the responses from the customers from which Past Performance Questionnaires have been received. The Government may contact and interview points of contact on the Past Performance Questionnaires. The Government reserves the right to interview other individuals acting for the listed references, if the listed reference is not available. In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance.

6.1.6 Past performance information may be obtained from any other sources available to the Government, to include, but not limited to, the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), Construction Contractor Appraisal Support System (CCASS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), or other databases; interviews with Program Managers, Contracting Officers, and Fee Determining Officials; and the Defense Contract Management Agency.

6.1.7 To improve accuracy of database searches, the Offeror will also provide the CAGE Codes for the prime contractor and all teaming partners,( i.e., design firms, key subcontractors, Joint Venture Partners) whose experience is being relied on in Factor 1.

6.1.8 The Government may contact references provided as part of Factor 1 – Specialized Experience, for information regarding the Offeror’s past performance on the project and for the purposes of assessing and verifying the scope of the work performed. Offerors should provide accurate, current, and complete contact information for references provided in the project descriptions.

00 22 00 ‐ 9

6.2 EVALUATION CRITERIA

The Government will perform a performance confidence assessment of the Offeror’s probability of successfully meeting the contract requirements. The Government will evaluate the Offeror's responsiveness to the solicitation regarding past performance using the sources identified above. New companies and Joint Ventures shall be evaluated on their own past performance, or that of its predecessor as defined in FAR clause 52.204‐20 Predecessor of Offeror, if relevant, to determine the company’s ability to perform satisfactorily under the elements of evaluation.

6.2.1 The Government will first assess and rate the relevancy of recent projects accomplished by the Offeror to the scope of this contract for overall application to the performance confidence assessment ratings described hereinafter. The past performance relevancy rating are described below:

6.2.1.1 Very Relevant. Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

6.2.1.2 Relevant. Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

6.2.1.3 Somewhat Relevant. Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort

6.2.1.4 Not Relevant. Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort

6.2.2 The Government will next consider how well the Offeror performed on the contracts. The Government will consider the currency and relevance of the information, source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in contractor performance. With respect to relevancy, past performance on projects with more relevance will typically be a stronger predictor of future success and have more influence on the past performance confidence assessment rating than past performance on projects of lesser relevance.

6.2.2.1 Substantial Confidence: Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

6.2.2.2 Satisfactory Confidence: Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort

6.2.2.3 Limited Confidence: Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

6.2.2.4 No Confidence: Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the Offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

6.2.2.5 Unknown Confidence (Neutral): No recent/relevant performance record is available or the Offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

6.2.3 Each entity (firm) will be rated on its own performance or that of its predecessor as defined in FAR clause 52.204‐20 Predecessor of Offeror, if relevant. If the Government does not obtain past performance information for the projects identified by the Offeror and cannot establish a past performance record for the Offeror through

00 22 00 ‐10 other sources, past performance will be rated neither favorably nor unfavorably. The performance confidence assessment will be considered “Unknown Confidence”.

Offerors may be provided an opportunity to address any negative past performance information about which the Offeror has not previously had an opportunity to respond. The Government will evaluate past performance based on the elements listed below:

• QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTION. Based on all information available, the Government will assess the quality of the actual construction undertaken and the standards of workmanship exhibited by the Offeror.

• TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE. The Government will evaluate all information available with respect to the Offeror completing past projects within the scheduled completion times.

• CUSTOMER SATISFACTION. The Government will evaluate all information available with respect to the Offeror’s past customer satisfaction, cooperation with customers, and interaction on past projects.

• SUBCONTRACTOR MANAGEMENT. The Government will evaluate all information available with respect to the Offeror’s management of subcontractors, including mitigation of conflicts and resolution of disputes at the lowest level. For large businesses, the Government will also evaluate compliance with subcontracting plans.

• DOCUMENTATION. The Government will evaluate all information available with respect to the Offeror’s level of meeting customer satisfaction on timeliness and quality of the documentation, reports, and other written materials completed by the Offeror on past projects.

• SAFETY RECORD. All information available with respect to the Offeror’s safety record, to include CCASS/CPARS rating for safety, lost time incident rate, safety incentive program, safety awards, and other indications of improvements in safety will be taken into consideration in evaluating the Offeror’s overall safety record.

7.1 TAB D – FACTOR 3 ‐ DESIGN SUPPORT

Design capability is an important element of this contract. Design work incidental to construction as well as design/build task orders may be issued under this contract. Offerors will be evaluated on the designers’ ability to support the design requirements for task orders issued under this contract based on their qualifications and experience.

There is no page limit for this factor. No additional information beyond that which is required by the submission requirements may be submitted under this factor and inclusion of additional information will result in the contractor being found unacceptable and may result in the contractor being removed from further consideration.

7.2 Offeror’s Submission Requirements. Qualifications and experience for the designers to be utilized in support of this contract shall be provided using Standard Form (SF) 330, Architect‐Engineer Qualifications. Offerors shall submit a complete SF 330, Parts I and II, for this factor, to include the specific information requested below for Part I, Blocks E, F and H. The Offeror shall document unequivocal teaming arrangements with its design firms(s). A copy of the teaming agreement(s) shall be included at the end of this section.

00 22 00 ‐11

7.2.1 Personnel Qualifications. Key design personnel for SF 330, Part I, Block E, are defined as: Architect, Mechanical Engineer, Civil Engineer, Structural Engineer, and Electrical Engineer. Minimum qualifications for each key designer are professional engineering or architect registration plus a minimum of 5 years design experience in his/her respective discipline. Minimum years of experience must be verifiable, with example projects that cover from the present back the minimum number of years, to include dates of work performed. Two resumes for each discipline (architecture, mechanical, electrical, civil, structural) are required to be submitted under Block E. All contractor and subcontractor working on this project must be U.S. citizens or documented U.S. workers and must be able to provide proof of U.S. citizenship or other authorized documentation (See Contract Clause 52.0000‐4515 Security Contract Language for All Corps of Engineers’ Unclassified Contracts). Individual Task Orders may require that all contractor and subcontractor personnel must be U.S. citizens.

7.2.2 Example Projects. Provide up to five (5) example projects in SF330, Part I, Block F, that demonstrate the designer’s ability to support the design requirements for the variety of work that may be performed under this contract. Refer to Factor 2 above for a list of the variety of work that may be performed under this contract.

7.2.3 CADD Capabilities. In SF330, Part I, Block H, describe your CADD and Building Information modeling (BIM) capabilities and experience with MicroStation version 747 and AutoCAD version 2015 and your ability to provide CADD files compatible with each of these CADD formats as well as BIM.

7.2.4 Team Experience. In SF330, Part I, Block H, discuss any prior work experience between the design team and the Offeror. Also discuss design team experience for the Corps of Engineers (COE) or other DOD agencies, and design experience within SWD geographic boundaries, particularly at or near major military installations.

7.2 Evaluation.

7.2.1 Personnel Qualifications. Resumes will be evaluated for qualifications and relevant technical experience to support the design requirements of this contract.

7.2.2 Example Projects. Projects will be evaluated and rated for relevancy compared to the variety of work that may be performed under this contract.

7.2.3 CADD Capabilities. The Government will review the designer’s CADD capabilities, experience, and compatibility with Microstation version 747, AutoCAD version 2015 and BIM capabilities.

7.2.4 Team Experience. Prior work experience between the design team and the Offeror or design…