Am_0003.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICAITON NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicble)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICIATION NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a)By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment your desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPIRATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc. ) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION ( Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

Amendment No. 0003 Oct 7, 2016

U.S ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, OMAHA DISTRICT

CONTRACTING OFFICE

1616 CAPITOL AVE.

OMAHA, NE 68102-4901

See Item 6

W9128F-16-R-0079

Sep 12, 2016

DORMITORY, FY16 SGBP150907

See attached documentation for content of the amendment revisions

Date for receipt of Proposals is 13 OCT 2016 at 1400 hours

Government Point of Contact: Denise Cramer (402) 995-2057

07 OCT 2016

Am #0003 - 1

Am #0003 - 2 (Continuation of SF30)

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

Omaha District, Corps of Engineers

1616 Capitol Avenue Omaha, Nebraska 68102-4901

:NOTICE: Failure to acknowledge : Solicitation No. W9128F-16-R-0079 :all amendments may cause rejec-:

:tion of the offer. See FAR : Date of Issue: 12 SEP 2016 :52.215-1 of Section 00 21 00. : Date of Receiving Proposals:

13 OCT 2016

Amendment No. 0003

7 OCT 2016

SUBJECT: Amendment No. 0003 to Request for Proposal Solicitation Package for Design and Construction of DORMITORY, FY16 SGBP150907.

TO: Prospective Offerors and Others Concerned

1. The specifications and drawings for subject project are hereby modified as follows (revise all specification indices, attachment lists, and drawing indices accordingly).

a. Specifications. (Descriptive Changes)

(1) Section 01 81 00 Page 3, paragraph 1.2, fifth subparagraph, delete last sentence “Comprehensive Interior Design package is required including interior furniture and accessories.”

(2) Section 01 83 00 Page 10, paragraph 1.3.1.3, delete last sentence “Exterior sidewalks shall consist of concrete with a 28-day compressive strength of 4500 psi with #4 bars at 16" to 20".

(3) Section 01 84 00 Page 9, paragraph 1.4.1, subparagraph

“Solid Surface Material”, delete last sentence “Provide plastic laminate cabinetry with wood grain pattern in dorm module kitchens.”

(4) Section 23 08 00.00 10 Page 3, paragraph 1.3.2, delete first sentence “Formal LEED certification...(EA) Prerequisite 1, Fundamental Commissioning.” and substitute the following:

“The Contractor is required to provide documentation that meets the LEED Energy & Atmosphere (EA) Prerequisite 1, Fundamental Commissioning.”

b. Specifications (New and/or Revised and Reissued). Delete and substitute or add specification pages as noted below. The substituted pages are revised and reissued with this amendment. For convenience, on the revised specification pages, changes have been identified by highlighting text. (All portions of reissued specification pages shall apply whether or not changes thereon have been indicated.)

Am #0003 - 3 (Continuation of SF30)

Pages Deleted Pages Substituted or Added 00 22 00 00 22 00 01 86 10 01 86 10 01 86 26 01 86 26

c. Drawings (Not Reissued). The following drawing(s) are revised as indicated below with a revision date of 7 OCT 2016. These drawing(s) are not reissued with this amendment.

(1) Sheet I-102, PUBLIC AREA FURNITURE PLAN, delete GENERAL NOTE 3 “3. RANGE, REFRIGERATOR, WASHER...AN EXHAUST FAN.” and substitute the following: “3. NOT USED.”

2. This amendment is a part of the proposing papers and its receipt shall be acknowledged on the Standard Form 1442. All other conditions and requirements of the request for proposal remain unchanged. If the proposals have been mailed prior to receiving this amendment, you will notify the office where proposals are received, in the specified manner, immediately of its receipt and of any changes in your proposal thereby occasioned.

a. Hand-Carried Proposals shall be delivered to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District, Contracting Division, 1616 Capitol Avenue, Omaha, Nebraska 68102-4901.

b. Mailed Proposals shall be addressed as noted in Item 8 on Page 00 10 00-1 of Standard Form 1442.

3. Offers will be received until 2:00 p.m, local time at place of receiving proposals, 13 OCT 2016.

Attachments:

Specification Pages listed in 1.b., above Drawings listed in 1.d., above

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District 1616 Capitol Avenue Omaha, Nebraska 68102-4901

07 OCT 2016

NEP/2160

This page was intentionally left blank for duplex printing.

W9128F-16-R-0079

Section 00 22 00 Page 1 Am #0003

SECTION 00 22 00

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS, EVALUATION CRITERIA AND BASIS OF AWARD

1.0 OVERVIEW

2.0 BASIS OF AWARD

3.0 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

4.0 PROPOSAL INFORMATION AND RELATED EVALUATION FACTORS, SUBFACTORS AND ELEMENTS

4.1. VOLUME 1 – TECHNICAL

4.2. VOLUME 2 – PAST PERFORMANCE

4.3. VOLUME 3 – PRICE AND PRO-FORMA INFORMATION

5.0 VOLUME 1 – TECHNICAL

5.1. TAB 1- FACTOR 1 – SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE

5.2. TAB 2- FACTOR 2 – CONTRACT DURATION AND SUMMARY SCHEDULE

5.3. TAB 3- FACTOR 3 – ORGANIZATION TECHNICAL APPROACH

5.4. TAB 4- FACTOR 4 – KEY PERSONNEL EXPERIENCE AND CAPABILITIES

5.5 TAB 5- FACTOR 5 – SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION PLAN

6.0 VOLUME 2 –PAST PERFORMANCE

6.1 TAB 1– PAST PERFORMANCE

7.0 VOLUME 3 – PRICE AND PRO FORMA INFORMATION

7.1. GENERAL

7.2. TAB 1 – PRICE (STANDARD FORM 1442, PROPOSAL DATA SHEET AND CONTRACT LINE ITEM

SCHEDULE)

7.3. TAB 2 – EVIDENCE OF BONDABILITY

7.4. TAB 3– REQUIRED PRE-AWARD INFORMATION

7.5. TAB 4 – SUBCONTRACTING PLAN

8.0 EVALUATION PROCEDURES

8.1. SOURCE SELECTION EVALUATION BOARD (SSEB)

8.2. EVALUATIO N

8.3. DEFINITIONS

8.4. EVALUATIO N RATING SYSTEM

8.5. PAST PERFORMANCE CONFIDENCE ASSESSMENT RATING SYSTEM

Section 00 22 00 Page 2

ATTACHMENTS

1 - COMPANY SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE CONSTRUCTION OR PRIME CONTRACTOR

2 - COMPANY SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE DESIGN FIRM OR IN-HOUSE DESIGN CAPABILITY

3 - COMPANY SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE KEY SUBCONTRACTOR (OR PRIME IF WORK NOT TO BE

SUBCONTRACTED)

4 - PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION TELEPHONE INTERVIEW QUESTIONNAIRE

5 - KEY PERSONNEL RESUME

6 - LETTER OF COMMITMENT FOR KEY PERSONNEL

7 - LETTER OF COMMITMENT FOR (DESIGN FIRM OR KEY SUBCONTRACTOR)

8 - PROPOSAL DATA SHEETS

9 - INDIVIDUAL (VERIFIABLE) SUBCONTRACT FORM

Section 00 22 00 Page 3

1.0 OVERVIEW

1.1. This is a “Best Value” solicitation for the Design and Construction of the Offutt AFB Dormitory, Omaha, NE. The Government will evaluate the proposals in accordance with the criteria described herein, and award a firm-fixed-price contract to the responsible offeror whose proposal conforms with all the terms and conditions of the solicitation and whose proposal is determined to represent the overall best value to the Government.

1.2. PROPOSAL FORMAT

The Packaging that contains the Proposals shall be sealed and marked:

“Proposals for Solicitation No. W9128F-16-R-0079, to be opened by Contracting Personnel Only”

Written materials: 8 ½” x 11” format in bound volumes using 10 point or larger font size and using 3-ring binders. For each volume, provide a title sheet on the cover, table of contents and labeled tabs matching this documents’ Table of Contents. Provide a title sheet within each volume identifying the prime, consortium, or joint venture’s name, address, telephone, fax and email address and point of contact. Include the signature, title and contact information of the official that can bind the firm.

Volume number and tab section submitted shall appear in the bottom right corner of each page (along with the revision number and revision date for the amended page, if necessary)

Number of copies: Submit one original and four (4) copies of Volume 1 and 2 as well as two CD’s in read-only format, preferably using .PDF files. Submit Volume 3 in a sealed envelope (Include original and one copy).

2.0 BASIS OF AWARD

2.1. The Contracting Officer will award a firm-fixed-price contract to that responsible Offeror whose proposal the Source Selection Authority has determined conforms to the solicitation, is fair and reasonable, and offers the best overall value to the Government, considering all non-price factors described herein, and price. All evaluation factors, other than price, when combined, are considered significantly more important than price; however, the Contract award should not exceed the cost limitation described in Section 00 21 00 for this project. The intent of this solicitation is to obtain the best proposal within the cost limitation. There is no obligation to approach or match the cost limitation in the offer. After the Government individually evaluates and rates each proposal, the Contracting Officer/Source Selection Authority will select the Offeror whose proposal represents the best value to the Government in accordance with evaluation criteria and basis for award stated in the solicitation. The Government reserves the right to accept other than the lowest priced offer or to reject all offers. The Government will not award a contract to an Offeror whose proposal contains a deficiency, as defined in FAR 15.001. If there is a lower priced, conforming offer(s), the Contracting Officer/Source Selection Official must determine that the added value of a more expensive proposal (within the cost limitation) would justify award to that offeror.

3.0 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

3.1. Proposals should be submitted initially on the most favorable terms from a price and technical standpoint. Do not assume that offerors will be contacted or afforded an opportunity to clarify, discuss or revise their proposals.

3.2. Firms formally organized as design-build entities, design firms and construction contractors that have associated specifically for this project, consortia of firms or any other interested parties may submit proposals. Associations may be as joint ventures or as key team subcontractors. Any legally organized Offeror may submit a proposal, provided that the Offeror or Offeror’s subcontractor has or will have professional architects and engineers, registered in the appropriate technical disciplines and provided that the requirements specified in Contract clause, “Requirements for Registration of Designers”, are met. All designs must be under the direct supervision of appropriately licensed professionals for each discipline involved.

3.3. Submit proposals in tabbed, three-ring binders. Note that the Government will not evaluate any material that exceeds the page limits, where indicated below.

Section 00 22 00 Page 4

4.0 PROPOSAL INFORMATION AND RELATED EVALUATION FACTORS AND SUBFACTORS

4.1. VOLUME 1 –TECHNICAL

Factor

Location

Description

Relative Importance

FACTOR 1 TAB 1 Specialized Experience Most Important Factor

FACTOR 2

TAB 2

Proposed Contract Duration and Summary Schedule

2nd Most Important Factor Factors 2, 3 and 4 are approximately equal and more important than factors 5, 6, & 7.

FACTOR 3

TAB 3

Organization/Technical Approach

FACTOR 4

TAB 4

Key Personnel Capabilities and Experience

FACTOR 5

TAB 5 Small Business Participation

3rd Most Important Factor Factor 5 is more important than Factors 6 & 7.

4.2. VOLUME 2 – PAST PERFORMANCE

FACTOR 6

TAB 1

Past Performance

4th Most Important Factor Factor 6 is more important than Factor 7.

4.3. VOLUME 3 – PRICE AND PRO FORMA INFORMATION

FACTOR 7

TAB 1

Price (Standard Form 1442, Proposal Data Sheet And Contract Line Item Schedule)

All evaluation factors other than price, when combined are significantly more important than price.

TAB 2 Evidence of Bondability Not Rated

TAB 3 Required Pre-Award Information Not Rated

TAB 4 Subcontracting Plan Go/ No-Go

NOTE: 8(a) Joint Venture Offeror or Offeror submitting Proposal as HubZone Joint Venture shall submit evidence from Offerors SBA Servicing Agency that the Offeror has notified and discussed the proposed joint venture for this specific project with the appropriate SBA Representative or Business Opportunity Specialist.

Section 00 22 00 Page 5

5.0 VOLUME 1 – TECHNICAL

5.1. VOLUME 1 –TAB 1 –FACTOR 1 - SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE

5.1.1. Submission Requirements:

[*Am-2] The Offeror shall submit ONLY two (2) projects performed by the lead design entity and ONLY two (2) projects performed by the prime construction entity (total of 4). Limit one (1) page per project submitted, with one additional page allowed for describing past teaming experience between current team members, for a maximum of five (5) pages. All projects submitted should demonstrate experience on similar building and site improvement projects of similar or greater value and scope ($15,000,000 - $18,000,000;

40,000 – 60,000 SF facility).

[*Am-2] Similar Commercial or Institutional type buildings: Apartment Building, Hotel, or College Dormitory Project information shall CLEARLY include:

- Summaries for each project submitted

- LEED certification level/status

- Contract award amount and final construction cost

- Location

- Date when the project was started

- Original contract finish date and actual finish date

- All summaries shall contain the name, address, telephone and email of a representative of the owner (as well as one alternate individual not affiliated with your firm) familiar with your firm’s experience on the project that can verify the experience cited.

- Please do not include extraneous information that was not requested.

The Offeror should demonstrate recent, relevant design and construction experience on similar building projects using, Construction – Specialized Experience Form (Attachment 1) and Designer – Specialized Experience Form (Attachment 2). Offerors may identify state and local government and private contracts that are similar to the Government’s requirements set forth in the RFP. If the Offeror is a joint venture, each firm shall provide information, demonstrating experience relevant to their role on this project. Submit projects that are currently well underway (design complete and at least 50% construction progress completed) or completed and turned over no longer than five (5) years preceding the date of this Solicitation. If the Offeror has multiple functions or divisions, limit the project examples to those performed by the division or unit submitting the offer or by the team member. Offerors may list government, private or commercial customers. If projects were design-build, so identify them.

5.1.1.1. The Offeror should describe any previous teaming experience between current team members, if not described in the project list. The above information is limited to projects that are well underway or that have been completed and turned over no longer than the past five (5) years preceding the issue date of this solicitation.

5.1.2. Evaluation Criteria:

5.1.2.1. The Government will evaluate the extent of recent, relevant experience (projects of similar value and scope) of the construction and design entities in design, construction or design-build, as relevant to their role on this project. Experience on similar projects will be rated more favorably. Federal Government project experience will be rated inherently more important than non-Federal Government project experience. (Note: After award, the Section 00 73 00 Special Contract Requirement Key Personnel, Subcontractors and Outside Consultants will apply to the selection, which establishes the minimum quality standard. No substitution will be allowed without adequate justification and approval by the Contracting Officer.)

5.1.2.2. Projects that are not “well underway” as defined above in paragraph 5.1.1. will be considered less relevant and may be rated less favorably. Projects completed and turned over more than five (5) years before the proposal issue date will be considered less relevant and may be rated less favorably. Joint Venture partners should each demonstrate experience commensurate with their role on this project or explain in the supplemental narrative how their experience qualifies them for their role on this project.

Section 00 22 00 Page 6

5.1.2.3. The Government reserves the right to verify the experience record of cited projects or other recent projects by reviewing the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) or through interviewing owners or references. The Government may check any or all cited references to verify supplied information.

5.1.2.4. To receive credit for extent (amount) of experience, the Offeror and its proposed design firm(s) shall demonstrate a history of recent, relevant experience. A firm will not receive credit under this factor for the relevant experience of key personnel proposed for this project while employed at a different firm.

5.1.2.5. The Government will consider extent of recent experience, degree of relationship of such experience to this project, demonstrated familiarity with applicable codes and local conditions.

5.1.2.6. Previous design-build experience is not necessary for an acceptable rating. The Government may consider previous D-B experience a strength. Similarly, the Government may consider previous recent teaming experience among the team members as a strength, even if on different type design and/or construction projects than this project. The more relevant the experience, the more favorably it may be rated.

5.1.2.7. The Offeror should demonstrate qualifications and experience in sustainable design and development and design, based on project experience on projects that have achieved US Green Building Council’s LEED certification. A more favorable rating may be given if both the constructor and the design entities demonstrate qualifications and experience on LEED.

5.2. VOLUME 1 - TAB 2 –FACTOR 2 - PROPOSED CONTRACT DURATION AND SUMMARY

SCHEDULE

5.2.1. Submission Requirements:

5.2.1.1. Proposed Contract Duration: The offeror shall propose the contract duration in the appropriate Contract Line Item Number in the CLIN Schedule and should not exceed the benchmark performance duration specified in the CLIN.

5.2.1.2. Summary Schedule: Submit a summary level schedule for integrated design and construction.

Schedules or diagrams may be provided separately in a size that is easily read, but shall be bound and clearly labeled as Tab B. This summary schedule will, after contract award, be replaced with a project schedule as required by Section 01 32 01.00 10: Project Schedule. The schedules shall be task oriented, indicating the number of calendar days, after notice to proceed, by which milestones are to be achieved. Offeror may use a critical path or other method of (h)is/er choice; however, schedules shall be graphically represented. The proposed project schedule shall reflect the proposed contract duration.

Give attention to the following features:

(a) Provide a narrative, describing the design packaging plan for separate design packages, based on the offeror’s plan for fast tracking. Describe all design and construction to be “fast-tracked” (See section 01 78 25: Building Information Modeling). If long lead item equipment must be ordered prior to completion of a design phase, describe the requirement in the narrative and show the required ordering date in the schedule.

(b) Show the design phase, including events associated with coordinating the interim and final design submittals for each package and the proper handling of the review comments for each design package (See section 01 78 25).

(c) Show the overall construction phase for facility, for the site work and for utilities. Show fast track starts for design packages, but it isn’t necessary to show the detailed breakdown construction (e.g., by trades) of each facility, site work and utilities.

(d) Show schedule line items for environmental permits and notifications and utility connection permits.

(e) Show turnover of facility. Identify any proposed phased turnovers. The time to complete the facility and turnover to the Government must consider the requirement for the Contractor’s CQC completion inspection and the subsequent joint Contractor-Government turnover inspection.

(f) Show as-built submissions (See section 01 78 02.00 10: Project Closeout).

(g) Constraints: Offeror must demonstrate the capability and flexibility to plan and schedule the complete project to meet the proposed contract completion period. Clearly identify any constraints on the schedules presented (e.g., labor or material availability, permits, weather). Indicate the anticipated overall critical path on the schedule.

Section 00 22 00 Page 7

5.2.2. Evaluation Criteria:

5.2.2.1. Proposed Contract Duration: Unless changed during negotiations, this duration will become the contractually binding performance period. The Government will evaluate the performance period, as proposed by the Offeror in the Contract Line Item Schedule. In assessing the reasonableness of the proposed contract duration, the Government may take into account how well the proposed summary schedule supports the proposed duration. Evaluators will use their independent judgment concerning logic, constraints and typical construction durations. The Government will rate the proposed duration matching the benchmark duration as “acceptable”. A proposed duration that is longer than the proposed benchmark duration will be viewed as less favorable than a duration that meets the benchmark. The Government will consider an unreasonably condensed contract duration, which places additional cost or schedule risk on the Government or which may create a risk of contract or performance failure, as a significant weakness or a deficiency, depending upon the evaluators' judgment. No advantage will be considered between proposals for differences less than 21 calendar days.

5.2.2.2. Summary Schedule: The Government will evaluate the summary schedule for integrated design and construction. The length of the schedule must match the proposed performance duration. A Schedule unreasonably shorter than the proposed contract duration may indicate the Offeror is placing additional risk on the Government for any delays between the scheduled completion date and the required performance completion period. Offerors shall include field overhead costs in the contract price for the full proposed performance duration. The Government will evaluate the schedule to assess the strength of understanding of the project scope, restrictions which must be considered in the schedule e.g., permitting (see Section 01 10 00), long lead items, etc. The Government will evaluate the strength of understanding of events associated with coordinating design submittals, reviews and incorporating review comments, the offeror's capability to schedule the complete project within the proposed performance duration and the realism of the schedule. The Government will evaluate the design packaging plan for logic, reasonableness, how it facilitates meeting the proposed contract duration and how it facilitates the Government’s ability to timely perform its design reviews. The packaging plan should minimize risk to the Contractor and to the Government for tear-out and coordination for reviews.

A schedule that offers advantage(s) to the Government over one that merely indicates an adequate understanding of the scope, restrictions, major milestones and general understanding of the various events that can affect start and completion of construction will be rated more favorably.

5.3. VOLUME 1 - TAB 3 – FACTOR 3 – ORGANIZATION TECHNICAL APPROACH

5.3.1. Submission Requirements:

5.3.1.1. Provide information that describes the offeror’s organization and intended technical approach to executing the design-build contract per the detailed requirements herein. Demonstrate an understanding of the risk management process associated with the design-build process. Limit the information to ten (10) pages or less. Clearly but concisely describe the organizational and technical approach to project management and execution.

5.3.1.2. Organization. List the design and construction entities and describe their resources and how their resources will be utilized, their roles and responsibilities and any contractual arrangements that have been established. Clearly describe any teaming or joint venture arrangements, including a clear description of each entity’s roles and responsibilities on the project. A copy of the teaming or joint venture agreement(s) may be appended to the plan (not included in the page limitation). Include a simple organizational chart, illustrating the organization, including the proposed quality control group(s).

Present a matrix of responsibilities for each entity in executing the key work breakdown structure activities of the project, including design and construction activities for each major feature (i.e., site work, utilities and each building). Identify the design firm(s) chosen for the project, if not to be self-performed. Identify the specific entities chosen as key subcontractors for mechanical and electrical installation. The Offeror shall document unequivocal teaming arrangements with its design entity (ies) and key subcontractors (see attachment 7). Describe the proposed management structure for the team, describing the how the design and construction process will be managed and the authorities and the delegations of authority within the team. Include a key personnel organization chart that clearly depicts the key positions and the names of the personnel, their firm affiliations and their job locations and their job/position title within the organization. The key personnel organization chart shall be consistent with the corporate organization chart, with the matrix of responsibilities assigned to the D-B team entities, and with the list of key personnel to be provided under the Tab, “KEY PERSONNEL CAPABILITIES

A N D EXPERIENCE”.

Section 00 22 00 Page 8

5.3.1.3. Technical Approach for Design and Construction. Describe the technical approach to design and construction of the facility. Include any considerations of fast-tracking design and construction, panelized construction, pre-engineered components, stick-built framing, etc. The Government is looking for ways to streamline construction and manage labor and other resource constraints in an effort to reduce costs. Factory built room modules or similar assemblies shall not be utilized.

5.3.1.4. Collaborative Approach for Design-build. Describe interactions within the team and with the Corps of Engineers during the design. Discuss how the configuration management system will track and control design evolution and changes during design for quality control. Describe the role of the construction team members during design. Describe the type of Building Information Modeling (BIM) system to be used on the project (See section 01 78 25 and Attachments of that Document for CADD/BIM requirements and for Contractor Electives for additional consideration, as described below in the evaluation criteria) and how the team intends to develop and use the model. Submit a draft Project Execution Plan (PxP) to further illustrate the collaborative development of the Building Information Model. Describe the role and interaction of the design team with the construction team during construction, addressing, as a minimum, maintaining configuration management of the design during construction, including control and approval of revisions to the accepted design; requests for information; shop drawing and submittal reviews and approvals; progress meetings; site visits, if any;

contract completion, closeout, as-built and completion documentation.

5.3.1.5. Planning and Scheduling. Describe the time control capabilities and systems to be used to plan design and construction and how the schedule will be used to manage design and construction.

Discuss internal procedures for handling delays to minimize time growth and “schedule creep”.

5.3.1.6. Self-Performed Work: Generally describe the items the offeror will self-perform to comply with the requirements in Section 00 73 00 for self-performed work.

5.3.1.7. Quality Control. Describe the team’s quality control approach, corporate systems and capabilities to maintain quality control of the design and construction. Describe the proposed quality control organization, including the proposed staffing plan. There is no need to submit a quality control plan as the successful offeror will provide that after award. The Government is interested in demonstrable capabilities to assure and control quality and how the offeror can achieve or exceed the contract’s minimum quality control system requirements. In addition to the required designer-of-record (DOR) roles specified within the RFP for maintaining integrity of the design, describe any other DOR involvement in the quality control process, if any.

5.3.2. Evaluation Criteria

5.3.2.1. The Government will evaluate the strengths, weaknesses and any deficiencies in the plan. The

Government will evaluate the firm’s understanding of D-B (and the requirements described in the Division 01 requirements of the Solicitation) and the capability to execute the project. Specific evaluation considerations are listed below.

5.3.2.2. Organization. The Government will evaluate the clarity and strength of the overall organization and how well it is organized, structured and staffed, and the contractor’s ability to exercise management control over their subcontractors, to execute the entire scope of work. This factor will be rated as unsatisfactory if the Offeror has not selected and committed to use its design entity (ies). Joint venture participants’ contribution to the organization shall be commensurate with their skills and background.

The Government will evaluate proposals more favorably if previous teaming experience is demonstrated with proposed team members.

5.3.2.3. Technical Approach for Design and Construction. The Government places a higher value on an offer that provides proposed methods to streamline construction and manage labor and other resource constraints, in an effort to reduce costs, including such things as fast-tracking, panelization, and standard designs. The Government will also consider whether the approach reduces on-site craft labor and susceptibility to inclement weather delays.

5.3.2.4. Collaborative Approach for Design-Build. The use of 3-dimensional (3D) Building Information Model

(BIM) technology in the design process is a requirement. The BIM requirements are described in Section 01 78 25, “Building Information Modeling’. The Government will evaluate the integration of the design and construction entities and the staff during design and construction. The constructor must be actively involved in the design process, not just leaving it up to the designer (see Special Contract Requirement (SCR: “Constructor’s role during Design”). The Offeror must have an effective configuration management system to control and track revisions to the design. The Government will

Section 00 22 00 Page 9 evaluate the Offeror’s understanding of the design process and the roles of the designers of record and the Government reviewers. The Government will evaluate the role of the designer in maintaining design integrity throughout the process, including its key roles during construction. The Government places greater value in collaborative development of the Building Information Model as early as possible during the design and construction process. A team that includes subcontractors (e.g., the key subcontractors for electrical and mechanical, the fire protection subcontractor, fabricators, and other major subcontractors and suppliers) during design development, prior to release of the applicable design packages for construction, so that systems and trade coordination can reduce interferences, increase constructability and efficiency of construction operations will be rated more favorably. A team that includes one or more BIM “Contractor Electives”, as described in Section 01 78 25 and Attachments will be rated more favorably.

5.3.2.5. Planning and Scheduling. The Government will evaluate the offeror’s scheduling capabilities to manage an integrated design-build schedule. Teams that provide 4-D Schedule modeling with demonstrated experience in BIM will be rated more favorably.

5.3.2.6. Quality Control. The Government will evaluate the offeror’s capabilities and understanding of the contractually required quality control processes for both design and construction. The Government places value upon continued participation by the designers of record during the construction quality control process. The Government will evaluate the adequacy of the staffing plan to cover all required tasks and responsibilities.

5.4. VOLUME 1 - TAB 4 –FACTOR 4 - KEY PERSONNEL CAPABILITIES AND EXPERIENCE

5.4.1. Submission Requirements:

Provide a consolidated list of key personnel with name, position title, date and description of project responsibility for each. Indicate whether each individual has had a significant role in any of the cited project examples. For each person provide a brief resume, using the Key Personnel Resume form at the end of this Section (Attachment 5).

Include the

- Prime contractor's project manager responsible for design and construction.

- For construction, include the quality control manager and the general superintendent (in charge of self-performed work).

- For design include the design manager, the BIM manager, and the designers of record for architecture, interior design, landscape architecture, structural, civil, geotechnical, fire protection, electrical, communications, and mechanical/plumbing.

Where projects are located in states that require a separate registration for design of structures, the structural designer of record must be registered in that state. The Communications designer shall be a Building Industry Consulting Services International (BICSI) Registered Communications Distribution Designer (RCDD) with at least 2 years related experience. The interior designer of record shall be certified, licensed, registered, or NCIDQ certified interior designer. The landscape architect of record shall be registered to practice in that particular professional field involved in a State or possession of the United States. The fire protection engineer of record shall be a registered professional engineer (P.E.) who has passed the fire protection engineering written examination administered by the National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveys (NCEES), or a registered P.E. in a related engineering discipline with a minimum of 5 years experience, dedicated to fire protection engineering that can be verified with documentation, and shall meet the requirements of UFC 3-600-01. The minimum experience for the BIM manager is 3 years as a BIM manager utilizing required software and systems. All other designers of record must be registered in accordance with contract clause: 52.236-25, Requirements for Registration of Designers. The minimum experience requirements for the Project Manager is at least 5 years construction and construction management experience. The minimum experience requirements for the Quality Control Manager are at least 5 years construction and construction management experience managing projects with multiple subcontractors and familiarity with scheduling. The Project Manager and the Quality Control Manager shall be a registered professional engineer (P.E.), a Registered Architect (R.A.) or have a degree in Engineering, Architecture, Construction Engineering, or Construction Management. The minimum experience requirements for the Design manager are at least 5 years of design experience. The minimum experience requirements for the superintendent are at least 5 years experience as superintendent, managing multiple trades and subcontractors. Offeror shall provide unequivocal letters of commitment from all proposed key personnel not currently employed by the team members.

Use the form letter (Attachment 6) at the end of this section.

5.4.2. Evaluation Criteria:

The Government will evaluate the required information to determine how well the offeror identifies and demonstrates that its key personnel meet or exceed minimum qualifications necessary, which includes previous satisfactory

Section 00 22 00 Page 10 experience in similar type work, to manage, control and perform the design, and to perform construction.

Performance of key personnel proposed for this project may be taken into account when it comes to the attention of the Government. Evaluate how well the Offeror demonstrates that it has the necessary structure and experienced, qualified personnel within its organization to effectively manage, control, administer and execute the integrated design and construction operations, quality control program and subcontracts. This shall be achievable with other projected on-going work. Previous design-build experience will be evaluated more favorably. Evaluate whether designers of record are registered (a requirement), experienced and qualified, and that the structural designer of record is properly registered in the state if the project is located in a state with separate structural engineering registration. If alternates are proposed for key positions, the evaluation rating will consider the lesser qualified or experienced person, if there is a difference. Team members experience on projects submitted under Sub-factor 1 will be rated more favorably. Team members experience on previous Government projects will be rated more favorably. Team members experience on Military projects will be rated more favorably. Team members experience on projects at Offutt AFB, NE will be rated more favorably.

5.5. VOLUME 1 - TAB 5 –FACTOR 5 – SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATIO N PLAN

5.5.1 UTILIZATION OF SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS

5.5.1.1. Submission Requirements:

All Offerors (both Large and Small Businesses) are required to complete a Small Business Participation Plan. Offerors shall propose their best efforts when projecting the level of participation of Small Businesses (as a Small Business prime and/or Small Business subcontractors) for the anticipated performance of this contract.

Large Business primes may achieve the Small Business participation goals through subcontracting to Small Businesses.

Small business primes may achieve Small Business participation goals through their own performance/participation as a prime and through subcontracting to other Small Businesses.

a. Check the applicable size and categories for the PRIME Offeror only (check all applicable boxes):

☐ Large Prime;

☐ Small Business Prime; also categorized as a

☐ Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB) / 8(a)

☐ Woman-Owned Small Business (WOSB)

☐ Historically Underutilized Zone (HUB Zone) Small Business

☐ Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDVOSB)

b. Submit the total percentage of work to be performed by both Large and Small Business. Include the percentage of work to be performed both by the Prime and anticipated Subcontractors. Example: If the Prime proposes a task order price of $1,000,000 (including all options), and Small Business(es) will provide $250,000 in services/supplies as a prime or subcontractor, the % planned for Small Businesses is 25%; and 75% for large business, equaling 100%.

Total Percentage planned for Large Business(es) %

Total Percentage planned for Small Business(es) %

c. Indicate the total percentage of participation to be performed in each Small Business subcategory. Small businesses that qualify in multiple Small Business categories may be counted in each category in determining the overall Small Business percentage Example: Victory Prop Mgt (WOSB and SDVOSB) performing 2%; and Williams Group (SDB, HubZ and WOSB) performing 3%. Results equate to: SDB 3%; HubZone 3%; WOSB 5%; SDVOSB

2%; VOSB 2%;).

SDB / 8(a): _________%

HUB Zone Small Business: _________%

Section 00 22 00 Page 11

WOSB: _________%

SDVOSB: _________%

d. List principle supplies/services to be performed by Small Businesses:

Example: If a Small Business qualifies also as a WOSB and a SDVOSB, and you can add them to each category below in which they qualify.

Identify Type of Service/Supply

Small Business (SB):

Identify Type of Service/Supply SDB / 8(a):

WOSB:

HUB Zone Small Business:

SDVOSB:

e. Describe the extent of commitment to use each of the identified Small Business. Offerors do not need to submit copies of commitment instruments in their proposals. Rather, identify what types of commitments are in place with each company —i.e. a written contract, letter of commitment, verbal agreement, joint venture, mentor-protégé agreement, including how long agreement in place. Large Business must comply with DFARS 215.304(c)(i)C.

Name of Company Type of Commitment:

f. Past Performance Data submitted should demonstrate past performance of small business utilization for each of the project examples submitted in Tab 1. Past performance of the Offerors in complying with requirements of the clauses at FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns and 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan; and the extent of participation of such firms in terms of the value of the total acquisition.

Small Business Offerors: The solicitation includes the clause 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns.

Evaluation shall include the past performance of offerors in complying with requirement of that clause for projects submitted in Tab 1.

Other Than Small Business Offerors: The solicitation includes the clause 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan. Evaluation shall include the past performance of offerors in complying with requirements of that clause for projects submitted in Tab 1.

Section 00 22 00 Page 12

5.5.1.2 Evaluation Requirements:

All Offerors will be evaluated on the level of proposed participation of U.S. Small Businesses in the performance of this acquisition (as Small Business prime Offerors or Small Business subcontractors). The government will evaluate:

a. The extent to which such firms, as defined in FAR Part 19, are specifically identified in its proposal.

b. The extent of commitment to use such firms.

c. Identification of the complexity and variety of the work small firms are to perform.

d. The extent of participation of Small Business prime Offerors and Small Business subcontractors in terms of the percentage of planned subcontracting’ dollars.

e. The extent to which the Offeror meets or exceeds previous acquisition Small Business subcontracting and participation goals.

All offerors will be evaluated either acceptable or unacceptable .

Acceptable: Proposal indicates an adequate approach and understanding of small business objectives.

Unacceptable: Proposal does not meet small business objectives.

[*Am-3]

5.5.1.3. Definitions [*Am-3]

(1) Small Business Concern: see FAR Clause 52.219-8.

(2) Other than Small Business Concerns are all other entities including large business concerns, state and local governments, non-profit organizations, public utilities, educational institutions and foreign-owned firms that are awarded federal contracts for performance within the United States.

(3) “Small Business Subcontracting Goals” represents the minimum level for small business performance in the indicated small business category.

(4) Subcontract means any agreement (other than one involving an employer-employee relationship) entered into by a Federal Government prime Contractor or subcontractor calling for supplies or services required for performance of the contract or subcontract.

(5) Good Faith Effort entails evidence that an “Other than Small” concern has provided maximum practicable opportunity for SBC members by complying with its subcontracting plan, subcontracting responsibilities with supporting documentation prescribed by 13 CFR §125.3 – Subcontracting assistance.

(6) Contractor Team Arrangements as used in this solicitation, resultant proposals and contracts means an arrangement in which (1) Two or more companies form a partnership or joint venture to act as a potential prime contractor; or (2) A potential prime contractor agrees with one or more other companies to have them as its subcontractor for the requirement indicated in this solicitation. See FAR Part 9.6.

(7) Joint Venture for the purpose of this solicitation is an association of individuals and/or concerns with interests in any degree or proportion by way of contract, express or implied, consorting to engage in and carry out no more than three specific or limited-purpose business ventures for joint profit over a two year period, for which purpose they combine their efforts, property, money, skill, or knowledge; but generally not on a continuing or permanent basis for conducting business.

[*Am-3]

5.5.1.4. Joint Ventures and Affiliation [*Am-3]

(1) The joint venture is viewed as a business entity in determining power to control its management. For the purpose of this solicitation, a joint venture entity cannot submit more than three offers over a two year period, starting from the date of the submission of the first offer.

(2) The Contracting Officer may determine if the relationship between a prime contractor and its subcontractor is a joint venture, and that affiliation between the two exists.

(3) A joint venture of two or more business concerns may submit an offer as a small business in response to this solicitation without regard to affiliation so long as each concern is small under the size standard corresponding to the NAICS code assigned to the solicitation.

(4) Parties to a joint venture are affiliates if any one of them seeks SBA financial assistance for use in connection with the joint venture.

(5) A joint venture of two or more business concerns may submit an offer as a small business for a Federal

Section 00 22 00 Page 13 procurement without regard to affiliation as long as each concern is small under the size standard corresponding to the NAICS code assigned to the solicitation. The completed approved joint venture agreement must be submitted with the initial offer to the solicitation.

(6) Relevant Joint Venture Requirements:

a) Section 8(a) Joint Venture: see 13 CFR §124.513,

b) HUBZone Joint Venture: see FAR Part 19.1303(c),

c) Service Disabled Veteran Owned SB Joint Venture: see FAR Part 19.1403(c).

6.0 VOLUME 2 –PAST PERFORMANCE

6.1. VOLUME 2 – TAB 1 – PAST PERFORMANCE

6.1.1. Submission Requirements:

Submit past performance evaluations and ratings for each project the Offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 1 - Volume 1 - Tab 1 Specialized Experience.

If available, submit CPARS, Construction Contract Administration Support System (CCASS) or Architect- Engineer Contract Administration Support System (ACASS) Performance Evaluations ratings. For projects which were designed and/or constructed for other government entities, submit the performance appraisal sheets used by that government entity if available. For projects cited in Volume 1 - Tab 1 Specialized Experience not covered in the CPARS/ CCASS / ACASS database or other Government Design Performance Rating System, submit a Past Performance Questionnaire (Attachment 4).

6.1.1.1. CPARS/CCASS/ACASS Evaluations

Firms are requested to retrieve their CPARS/CCASS/ACASS past performance information directly f r o m Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) available at:

http://www.cpars.gov or the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) at http://www.ppirs.gov for CCASS completed before 27 June 2014 and for merged CPARS/CCASS completed after 27 June 2014. PPIRS is an electronic repository of performance information collected by all the major federal performance reporting systems. Logging onto PPIRS will require the following:

All firms must have purchased and installed a Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) certificate.