Amendment1_Bliss_JOC.doc

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION 00 11 00 - STANDARD FORM (SF) 1442 AND CLIN SCHEDULE

The required response date/time has changed from 28-Aug-2013 02:00 PM to 30-Aug-2013 05:00 PM.

SECTION 00 22 11 - PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS, EVALUATION CRITERIA, AND BASIS OF AWARD ONE STEP - BEST VALUE, DESIGN-BUILD (SINGLE AWARD)

The following have been modified:

W9126G-13-R-0093, Amendment No. 0001

SECTION 00 22 11

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS, EVALUATION CRITERIA, & BASIS OF AWARD

W9126G-13-R-0093

Fort BLISS 8(a) Job Order Contract

I. BASIS FOR AWARD – GENERAL PRINCIPLES

Pursuant to FAR 15.101-2, the Contracting Officer has determined that “Best Value” will be achieved through selection of the technically acceptable proposal with the lowest evaluated price.

Award will be made on the basis of the lowest evaluated price of proposals meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for non-cost factors.

Tradeoffs are not permitted.

Proposals are evaluated for acceptability but not ranked using the non-cost/price factors.

Exchanges may occur (see FAR 15.306). However, the Contracting Officer intends to award without discussions.

PART II -- PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS

1. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND INSTRUCTIONS

a. REQUIREMENT FOR SEPARATE PRICE AND TECHNICAL PROPOSALS

(1) The Price Proposal and the Technical Proposal must be submitted as separate electronic files.

Ensure that each separate file is clearly marked to indicate its contents; and the identity of the offeror.

(2) Both the Price Proposal and the Technical Proposal must be received by the closing date and time set for receipt of proposals.

(3) No dollar amounts from the Price Proposal are to be included in the Technical Proposal.

(4) All information intended to be evaluated as part of the Technical Proposal must be submitted as part of the Technical Proposal. Do not merely cross-reference similar material in the Price Proposal, or vice versa. Also, do not include links to websites in lieu of incorporating information into your proposal.

(5) Do not include exceptions to the terms and conditions of the solicitation in either the technical or price proposal. Should the offer include any standard company terms and conditions that conflict with the terms and conditions of the solicitation, the offer may be determined "unacceptable" and thus ineligible for award. Should the offeror have any questions related to specific terms and conditions, these should be resolved prior to submission of the offer.

b. DISCUSSIONS. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors, in accordance with FAR 52.215-1, Instructions to Offerors—Competitive

Acquisitions. The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contract Officer later determines them to be necessary.

c. COST OR PRICING DATA. Offerors are not required to submit Cost or Pricing Data with their offers.

d. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS.

(1) Revisions to electronic proposals shall be highlighted or marked in such a way as to be easily identified and shall show the date of revision. The source of the revision, e.g., Error, Omission, or

Clarification, or amendment shall be included and be annotated for each revision.

(2) “Confidential” projects cannot be submitted to demonstrate capability unless all of the information required for evaluation as specified herein can be provided to the Government as part of the Offeror’s technical proposal. Offerors that include in their proposals information that they do not want disclosed to the public for any purpose, or used by the Government except for evaluation purposes, must be clearly marked in accordance with the instructions at FAR 52.215-1, “Instructions to Offerors—Competitive Acquisition”, paragraph (e), “Restriction on disclosure and use of data”.

(3) In the case of an Offeror that is part of a large, multi-segmented business concern, provide information directly pertaining to the specific segment of the business concern (i.e., the division, group, unit, etc.) that will perform work under the prospective contract.

e. SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE PRICE PROPOSAL

(1) Submit the Price Proposal in electronic format only.

(2) Size Restrictions and Page Limits. There are no page limits set for the price proposal. However, limit your response to information required by this solicitation. Excess information will not be considered in the Government’s evaluation.

(3) Format and Contents of the Price Proposal and List of Tabs. The Price Proposal shall be appropriately labeled as such and shall be organized as indicated in the following chart.

TAB

CONTENTS OF THE PRICE PROPOSAL

of Offerors (if the offeror does not have electronic certifications in ORCA)

(4) Detailed Submission Instructions for the Price Proposal

PROPOSAL COVER SHEET

TAB 1: The proposal cover sheet is required by FAR 52.215-1(2) (c) (i)-(v) and a scanned copy must be submitted by all offerors. This provision, titled “Instructions to Offerors—Competitive Acquisition,” and the format for the proposal cover sheet as shown here:

PROPOSAL COVER SHEET

1. Solicitation Number:

2. The name, address, and telephone and facsimile numbers of the Offeror

(and electronic address if available):

3. A statement specifying the extent of agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the solicitation and agreement to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the price set opposite each item. Statement to include any exceptions in technical or cost/price proposal or exceptions inherent in Offeror’s standard terms and conditions.

4. Names, titles, and telephone and facsimile numbers (and electronic addresses if available) of persons authorized to negotiate on the Offeror’s behalf with the Government in connection with this solicitation:

5. Name, title, and signature of person authorized to sign the proposal. Proposals signed by an agent shall be accompanied by evidence of that agent’s authority, unless that evidence has been previously furnished to the issuing office.

TAB 2: The SF 1449 is to be completed by all Offerors and duly executed with an original signature by an official authorized to bind the company in accordance with FAR 4.102. The electronic proposal shall include a scanned copy of this form. All amendments must be acknowledged by all Offerors in accordance with the instructions on the Standard Form 30, Amendment of Solicitation.

TAB 3: Section B, CLIN Schedule is to be completed in its entirety by all Offerors. See

Section Choose an item with attached notes, for further instructions.

TAB 4: All Offerors must have electronically completed the annual representations and certifications on the “Online Representations and Certifications Application” (ORCA) website or respond with the completed representations / certifications found in the solicitation.. The offerors are responsible for ensuring that these on-line representations and Certifications are updated as necessary to reflect changes, but at least annually to ensure that they are kept current, accurate and complete. Additionally, the offeror must also complete and return the “Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements of

Offerors” included in the solicitation. If the offeror is a Joint Venture, all participants must separately complete both the ORCA Representations and Certifications.

TAB 5: If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), include a copy of the JV Agreement. If a JV Agreement has not yet been finalized/approved, indicate its status. JV Agreements must clearly indicate the percentages of the JV participants, in particular the percent of the controlling party, and a clear delineation of responsibilities and authorities between the JV parties. If the Offeror is a Limited Liability

Company, include a copy of the Articles of Organization. If Offeror has an agreement, other than a JV, contractor shall provide a copy of the teaming agreement arrangements.

TAB 6: Bonding Letter. A Bonding Letter IS Required. A bonding letter from your surety company is sufficient to prove adequate financial resources to perform this contract capactiy. Include the bonding letter in the Price Proposal Section under Tab #6.

f. SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

(1) Submit the Technical Proposal in Electronic Format Only.

(2) Format and Contents of the Technical Proposal and List of Tabs. Each set shall be organized using the tabs specified in the following chart.

TAB CONTENTS OF THE TECHNICAL

PROPOSAL

TAB

CONTENTS OF THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

Factor #1

EXPERIENCE

(3) Page Limitations. The following page limitations are established for each factor described above:

Factor #1, EXPERIENCE - Limited to 5 pages (a maximum of 5 forms)

Demonstrate the experience of the offeror and/or proposed team, including sub-contractors, on projects same/similar to that described in the solicitation for same/similar services. The projects submitted should also demonstrate that the offeror and/or the team have performed a same/similar type of services at multiple sites simultaneously.

Same and or similar type services may be as follows:

Job Order Contracts

Multiple Award Task Order Contracts

Sustainment, Restoration, and Modernization (SRM) Type Projects

The Contractor shall complete a minimum of three (3), but no more than five (5) (AM#1) valued between $2,500.00 and $500,000.00 (/AM#1) “Experience Information” forms, attached at the end of this section, in response to this factor. All blocks must be filled in and all data should be accurate, current, and complete. All projects submitted must have been underway or completed with the last 3 years. At least two (2) of the projects provided must be valued at over $200,000.00.

NOTE: If any of the information required is not included in an Experience Information form, the referenced incomplete form will be deemed non-responsive and will not be evaluated by the Source Selection Evaluation Board If any of the information required is not included in the form then the contractor will be considered nonresponsive and evaluated as unacceptable.

EXPERIENCE INFORMATION

(To be completed by Contractor)

1. Contractor:

Name:

Address:

2. Contract /Task Order(TO) /Purchase Order (PO) Number:

3. Contract/TO/PO Dollar Value:

4. Contract/TO /PO Status: FORMCHECKBOX Active FORMCHECKBOX Complete

Completion Date (w/ extensions):

5. Project Title:

Location:

6. Project Description-- to include the role of the contractor on the project and specific responsibilities of the contractor in performance of the effort:

7. Project Owner or Project Manager for the Client – provide:

Name:

Address:

Telephone Number and E-mail:

FACTOR #2, PAST PERFORMANCE: Offerors are required to provide a minimum of three and no more than five examples of Past Performance generally relating to construction, JOC Type Contracts, MATOC Type Contracts, and or SRM Renovation Type Contracts. Each such example must have been completed no more than SIX (6) years before the issue date of the subject solicitation. Projects less than 75% complete shall not be considered. Ultimate determinations regarding percentage of completion will be based on input from the customer / User. Each example of Past Performance will be accompanied by a separate Past Performance Assessment Worksheet, which shall identify the Project, dollar amount and subject matter of the project, when the project was completed, the name, telephone number, and email address of the User / Customer / Contract Administrative Officer / Project Supervisor, and a copy of any and all project performance evaluations on said project. ACASS, CCASS, and CPARS will be used to validate past performance ratings on Department of Defense contracts and any other past performance information the Government deems necessary to evaluate a contractor’s past performance. The Government may contact references provided as part of Factor 1 – Experience, for information regarding the offeror’s past performance on the project and for the purposes of assessing and verifying the scope of the work performed. It is strongly recommended that offerors provide accurate, current, and complete contact information for references provided in the project descriptions. Firms without a history of past performance will be given a neutral rating.

NOTE: Do not request past performance questionnaires (PPQ) on projects that have final CCASS or ACASS evaluations. If a CCASS or ACASS evaluation exists and a PPQ is provided for the same project, the CCASS or ACASS evaluation will be reviewed as the official past performance record for the project, and the PPQ will not be considered by the Source Selection Board, Contracting Officer, or the Source Selection Authority (if applicable).

For USACE or other DoD projects which are underway but do not yet have an interim or final CCASS or ACASS evaluation, one PPQ per contract may be submitted; to be considered, the PPQ shall be signed by the Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO) for the contract.

*The Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) is provided at the end of this section.

PAST PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET

(To be completed for each project submitted)

CONSTRUCTION OR PRIME CONTRACTOR PROJECT #_______

Offeror:

Project and Location:

Owner:

Owner’s Point of Contact for Reference:

Telephone:

Explain Cost Growth, if any:

Date of Award:

Explain Time Growth, if any:

General Scope of Construction and Offeror’s Role:

Work Your Company Self-Performed:

Extent and Type of Work You Subcontracted Out:

Describe extent of relevancy of the project by checking all applicable boxes below and provide any additional narrative to support relevancy assessment (in terms of scope, magnitude and complexity as compared to the scope of the RFP). Higher relevancy will be assessed based on ability to meet multiple relevancy criteria listed below.

· Multi-discipline vertical construction

· Repair/renovation, addition, or alteration of an existing facility

· Construction value of at least $200 THOUSAND

· with at least 75% construction progress completed

· Prime Contractor

Your Performance Evaluation by Owner, if known :

Factor #3, PERSONNEL – Limited to 2 page for each resume provided.

The offeror must provide resume data for the following key personnel: Project Manager, Superintendent, CQC, SSHO.

Resume information to be provided shall be limited to no more than two (2) page per person and shall include the following information as a minimum:

(a) Name and title

(b) Project assignment

(c) Name of firm with which associated

(d) Years experience with this firm and with other firms

(e) Active professional registration, year first registered, if applicable

(f) Other experience and qualifications relevant to same/similar work required under this contract

(g) Education degree(s), years of experience, specialization, if applicable: A minimum of Six (6) Years Experience is required for a Site Superintendent and Project Manager.

(h) SSHO and CQC must provide copies of the certificate of completion of required training identifying date completed.

(i)The SSHO shall have the following level of experience:

1. A minimum of 5 years safety work on similar projects.

2. 30-hour OSHA construction safety class or equivalent within the last 5 years.

3. SSHO’s shall maintain competency through 24 hours of formal safety and health related course work every four years.

4. Competent person training as needed.

PERSONNEL WILL BE EVALUATED BASED ON THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA:

The Government will review the resumes provided in response to the Personnel Factor. Offerors must demonstrate all of the following minimum acceptability standards to receive an “ACCEPTABLE” on this factor. The offeror must demonstrate in all resumes that the key personnel proposed have:

A minimum of Six (6) Years Experience is required for a Site Superintendent.

A minimum of Six (6) Years Experience is required for a Project Manager.

CQC must provide copies of the certificate of completion of required training identifying date completed

(CQC training information can be found at the following link: http://www.swf.usace.army.mil/BusinessWithUs/ConstructionQualityManagementTraining.aspx)

SSHO shall have the following level of experience:

1. A minimum of 5 years safety work on similar projects.

2. 30-hour OSHA construction safety class or equivalent within the last 5 years.

3. An average of at least 24 hours of formal safety training each year for the past 5 years.

4. Competent person training as needed.

SSHO must provide copies of the certificate of completion of required training identifying date completed

CQC must provide copies of the certificate of completion of required training identifying date completed

NOTE: CQC System Manager must be a Graduate Engineer or a Graduate of Construction

Management with a minimum of 5 years construction quality control experience on construction similar to the assigned task order or a construction person with minimum of 10 years construction experience to include a minimum of 5 years experience in construction QC or construction similar to the assigned task order.

CQC and SSHO roles may be combined to an individual provided that they possess the minimum qualifications for CQC and SSHO. This person may be dual hated.

RESUME FORM - KEY PERSONNEL

(Complete one form for each key person)

1. NAME AND TITLE:

2. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT:

3. NAME OF FIRM WITH WHICH ASSOCIATED (city and state):

4. YEARS EXPERIENCE:

Total:________________

With current firm:_____________

5. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (state and discipline), IF APPLICABLE:

6. EDUCATION (degree and specialization), if applicable:

7. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.):

8. OTHER RELEVANT EXPERIENCE ON SAME/SIMILAR PROJECTS:

a.

(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (city and state):

(2) DATE COMPLETED:

(3) PROJECT DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE:

b.

(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (city and state):

(2) DATE COMPLETED:

(3) PROJECT DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE:

c.

(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (city and state):

(2) DATE COMPLETED:

(3) PROJECT DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE:

d.

(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (city and state):

(2) DATE COMPLETED:

(3) PROJECT DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE:

Factor #4, QUALITY CONTROL – Limited to 2 page.

Quality Control: Provide information on your team’s capabilities to assure quality control. Describe your quality control approach, corporate systems, and capabilities to maintain quality control of the execution of a JOC contract. The Offeror shall describe their understanding of JOC processes. Provide information how you will handle internal and external requests for information (RFIs), shop drawings, submittal reviews, progress meetings, site visits, contract completion, closeout, as-built, and completion documentation. Do not submit a quality control plan. After contract award, the successful Offeror will submit their Quality Control Plan for Government approval.

Part III. EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS

1. ELIGIBILITY FOR CONTRACT AWARD. In accordance with the FAR, no contract shall be entered into unless the contracting officer ensures that all requirements of law, executive orders, regulations, and all other applicable procedures, including clearances and approvals, have been met. This includes the FAR requirement that no award shall be made unless the contracting officer makes an affirmative determination of responsibility. To be determined responsible, a prospective contractor must meet the general standards in FAR Part 9 and any special standards set forth in the solicitation.

2. SOURCE SELECTION USING THE LOW-PRICED, TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE PROCESS. An evaluation for acceptability will be performance on each proposal in accordance with FAR 15.101-2(b)(3). The proposal that provides the lowest price and is otherwise technically acceptable in all factors will be selected for award. To be considered technically acceptable, no technical factor in the proposal may be determined to be unacceptable. The failure of a proposal to meet any of the factors will result in a technically unacceptable rating and preclude award.

3. BASIS OF AWARD. Award will be made on the basis of the lowest evaluated price of proposals meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for non-cost factors. Tradeoffs are not permitted. Proposals are evaluated for acceptability but not ranked using non-cost/price factors.

4. EVALUATION OF THE PRICE PROPOSALS

a. Price will be evaluated and considered but will not be scored or combined with other aspects of the proposal evaluation. The proposed prices will be analyzed for reasonableness. They may also be analyzed to determine whether they are realistic for the work to be performed, reflect a clear understanding of the requirements, and are consistent with the information provided by the Offeror. Additionally, all offers will be analyzed for unbalanced pricing.

b. The otherwise technically-acceptable, lowest-priced offeror may be required to confirm its price on either a CLIN, element, or total price basis, and/or provide additional information in support of their price, prior to contract award at the Government’s request and discretion.

c. Low price will be evaluated by normalizing the CLIN coefficients as follows:

0001 will be factored as 85% of the work.

0002 will be factored at 10% of the work.

0003 will be factored at 2.5% of the work.

0004 will be factored at 2.5% of the work.

Example

CLIN Coefficient Factor

0001 1.35 85% 1.1475

0002 1.41 10% 0.141

0003 1.21 2.5% 0.03025

0004 1.21 2.5% 0.03025

Normalized Number 1.349

1.349 will be used as a basis to evaluate the low coefficient from multiple offers

5. EVALUATION OF THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL. The Technical Proposal will be evaluated based on the following evaluation criteria:

GENERAL TECHNICAL CRITERIA

a. Material omission(s) may cause the technical proposal to be rejected as unacceptable.

b. Proposals which are generic, vague, or lacking in detail may be considered unacceptable. The offeror’s failure to include information that the Government has indicated should be included in the proposal may result in the offer being found deficient.

c. The Government cannot make award based on a deficient offer. Therefore, receipt of an

“UNACCEPTABLE” rating for any factor will make the offer ineligible for award, unless the

Government elects to enter into discussions with that Offeror and all deficiencies are remedied in a revised proposal.

7. 52.217-5 EVALUATION OF OPTIONS (JUL 1990) – (If applicable)

Except when it is determined in accordance with FAR 17.206(b) not to be in the Government's best interests, the Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. Evaluation of options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

(End of provision)

IV. EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS

a. ELIGIBILITY FOR CONTRACT AWARD. In accordance with the FAR, no contract shall be entered into unless the contracting officer ensures that all requirements of law, executive orders, regulations, and all other applicable procedures, including clearances and approvals, have been met. This includes the FAR requirement that no award shall be made unless the contracting officer makes an affirmative determination of responsibility. To be determined responsible, a prospective contractor must meet the general standards in FAR Part 9 and any special standards set forth in the solicitation.

b. SOURCE SELECTION USING THE LOW-PRICED, TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE PROCESS. An evaluation for acceptability will be performance on each proposal in accordance with FAR 15.101-2(b)(3). The proposal that provides the lowest price and is otherwise technically acceptable in all factors will be selected for award. To be considered technically acceptable, no technical factor in the proposal may be determined to be unacceptable. The failure of a proposal to meet any of the factors will result in a technically unacceptable rating and preclude award.

c. BASIS OF AWARD. Award will be made on the basis of the lowest evaluated price of proposals meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for non-cost factors. Tradeoffs are not permitted. Proposals are evaluated for acceptability but not ranked using non-cost/price factors.

d. EVALUATION OF THE PRICE PROPOSALS

1. Price will be evaluated and considered but will not be scored or combined with other aspects of the proposal evaluation. The proposed prices will be analyzed for reasonableness. They may also be analyzed to determine whether they are realistic for the work to be performed, reflect a clear understanding of the requirements, and are consistent with the information provided by the Offeror. Additionally, all offers will be analyzed for unbalanced pricing.

2. The otherwise technically-acceptable, lowest-priced offeror may be required to confirm its price on either a CLIN, element, or total price basis, and/or provide additional information in support of their price, prior to contract award at the Government’s request and discretion.

Other Award Factors: The Contracting Officer shall consider several factors in the selection process which are important, but not quantified, such as:

(1) Agreement by the offeror to all general and special contract provisions and clauses.

(2) Determination of responsibility of the contractor by the Contracting Officer in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Acquisition Regulation, Part 9.1. In order to be determined responsible, a prospective contractor must:

(a) Have adequate financial resources to perform the contract or the ability to obtain them.

(b) Be able to comply with the required or proposed delivery or performance schedule taking into consideration all existing commercial and Governmental business commitments.;

(c) Have a satisfactory performance record.

(d) Have a satisfactory record of integrity and business ethics.

(e) Have the necessary organization, experience, accounting and operational controls, and technical skills, or the ability to obtain them.

(f) Have the necessary production, construction, and technical equipment and facilities, or the ability to obtain them.

(g) Be otherwise qualified and eligible to receive an award under applicable laws and regulations.

e. EVALUATION OF THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL. The Technical Proposal will be evaluated based on the following evaluation criteria:

1. TAB 1: FACTOR 1, EXPERIENCE: Demonstrate the experience of the offeror and/or proposed team, including sub-contractors, on projects same/similar to that described in the solicitation for same/similar services. The projects submitted should also demonstrate that the offeror and/or the team have performed a same/similar type of services at multiple sites simultaneously.

The Contractor shall complete a minimum of three (3), but no more than five (5), “Experience Information” forms, attached at the end of this section, in response to this factor. All blocks must be filled in and all data should be accurate, current, and complete. All projects submitted must have been underway or completed with the last 3 years. At least two (2) of the projects provided must be valued at over $200,000.00, however they do not have to be same project and or similar project.

NOTE: If any of the information required is not included in an Experience Information form, the referenced incomplete form will be deemed non-responsive and will not be evaluated by the Source Selection Evaluation Board.

In order to be considered acceptable, Factor 1 submissions must meet the following criteria: (i) at least three past projects (but no more than five) must be submitted; (ii) at least three of the past projects submitted must be the same or similar to construction, JOC Type Contracts, MATOC Type Contracts, and or SRM Renovation Type Contracts that might be ordered under the advertised scope of work; (iii) at least two of the project must be valued at over $200,000 each.

Failure to demonstrate the minimal acceptability standards under this factor will result in an “UNACCEPTABLE” rating and possible elimination from further consideration for contract award.

2. TAB 2: FACTOR 2, PAST PERFORMANCE: Offerors are required to provide a minimum of three and no more than five examples of Past Performance generally relating to construction. Each such example must have been completed no more than SIX (6) years before the issue date of the subject Solicitation. Projects less than 75% complete as of the date of the Solicitation shall not be considered. Ultimate determinations regarding percentage of completion will be based on input from the customer / User. Each example of Past Performance will be accompanied by a separate Past Performance Information Sheet, which shall identify the Project, dollar amount and subject matter of the project, when the project was completed, the name, telephone number, and email address of the User / Customer / Contract Administrative Officer / Project Supervisor, and a copy of any and all project performance evaluations on said project. ACASS, CCASS, and CPARS will be used to validate past performance ratings on Department of Defense contracts and any other past performance information the Government deems necessary to evaluate a contractor’s past performance. The Government may contact references provided as part of Factor 1 – Experience, for information regarding the offeror’s past performance on the project and for the purposes of assessing and verifying the scope of the work performed. It is strongly recommended that offerors provide accurate, current, and complete contact information for references provided in the project descriptions.

In order to be considered acceptable, Factor 2 submissions must meet the following criteria: (i) at least three (but no more than five) examples of Past Performance must be submitted; (ii) at least three of the examples of Past Performance must have been completed no more than Six (6) years before the issue date of the Solicitation; (iii) “completed” examples of Past Performance must be at least 75% complete as of the date of the Solicitation; (iv) at least three of the examples of Past Performance must be supported by either written statements by the User / Customer / Contract Administrative Officer / Project Supervisor, or a written performance evaluation reflecting an overall rating of “Satisfactory” or above.

Failure to demonstrate the minimal acceptability standards under this factor will result in an “UNACCEPTABLE ” rating and possible elimination from further consideration for contract award.

Offerors without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance and will receive a “neutral/unknown” rating. For purposes of this evaluation, a neutral rating will be considered acceptable.

3. TAB 3: FACTOR 3, PERSONNEL: The Government will review the resumes provided in response to the Personnel Factor. Offerors must demonstrate all of the following minimum acceptability standards to receive an “ACCEPTABLE” on this factor. The offeror must demonstrate in all resumes that the key personnel proposed have:

4 year degree in construction management or equivalent is required for the Site Superintendent;

4 year degree related to the position they are assigned to for the Project Manager

CQC must provide copies of the certificate of completion of required training identifying date completed.

CQC training information can be found at the below link:

http://www.swf.usace.army.mil/BusinessWithUs/ConstructionQualityManagementTraining.aspx

SSHO shall have the following level of experience:

1. A minimum of 5 years safety work on similar projects.

2. 30-hour OSHA construction safety class or equivalent within the last 5 years.

3. An average of at least 24 hours of formal safety training each year for the past 5 years.

4. Competent person training as needed.

SSHO must provide copies of the certificate of completion of required training identifying date completed

CQC must provide copies of the certificate of completion of required training identifying date completed

4. TAB 4: FACTOR 4, QUALITY CONTROL: The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s capabilities and understanding of the contractually required quality control processes for construction and the Offeror’s understanding of the JOC contract.

f. MISCELLANEOUS EVALUATION FACTORS Other Award Factors: The Contracting Officer shall consider several factors in the selection process which are important, but not quantified, such as:

(1) Agreement by the offeror to all general and special contract provisions and clauses.

(2) Determination of responsibility of the contractor by the Contracting Officer in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Acquisition Regulation, Part 9.1. In order to be determined responsible, a prospective contractor must:

(a) Have adequate financial resources to perform the contract or the ability to obtain them.

(b) Be able to comply with the required or proposed delivery or performance schedule taking into consideration all existing commercial and Governmental business commitments.;

(c) Have a satisfactory performance record.

(d) Have a satisfactory record of integrity and business ethics.

(e) Have the necessary organization, experience, accounting and operational controls, and technical skills, or the ability to obtain them.

(f) Have the necessary production, construction, and technical equipment and facilities, or the ability to obtain them.

(g) Be otherwise qualified and eligible to receive an award under applicable laws and regulations.

IV. GENERAL TECHNICAL CRITERIA

a. Material omission(s) will cause the technical proposal to be rejected as unacceptable.

b. Proposals which are generic, vague, or lacking in detail may be considered unacceptable. The offeror’s failure to include information that the Government has indicated should be included may result in the proposal being found deficient if inadequate detail is provided.

c. The Government cannot make award based on a deficient offer. Therefore, receipt of an “UNACCEPTABLE” determination of acceptability for any factor will make the offer ineligible for award, unless the Government elects to enter into discussions with that Offeror and all deficiencies are remedied in a revised proposal.

V. 52.217-5 EVALUATION OF OPTIONS (JUL 1990)

Except when it is determined in accordance with FAR 17.206(b) not to be in the Government's best interests, the Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. Evaluation of options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

(End of provision)

Individual Evaluator Proposal Evaluation Worksheet

RFP No.

Offeror’s Name:

Factor Rating:

(Place X in Column)

Individual Evaluator Proposal Evaluation Worksheet

RFP No.

Evaluator’s Name:

Offeror’s Name:

Factor Risk

(Place X in Column) Low

Moderate

High

Unknown

Individual Evaluator Proposal Evaluation Worksheet

RFP No.

Offeror’s Name:

Factor Rating:

Individual Evaluator Proposal Evaluation Worksheet

RFP No.

Offeror’s Name:

Factor Rating:

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRRE Section

NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0)

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information

Firm Name:

CAGE Code:

Address:

DUNs Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: FORMCHECKBOX Prime Contractor FORMCHECKBOX Sub Contractor FORMCHECKBOX Joint Venture FORMCHECKBOX Other (Explain)

Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: FORMCHECKBOX Firm Fixed Price FORMCHECKBOX Cost Reimbursement FORMCHECKBOX Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work FORMCHECKBOX High FORMCHECKBOX Med FORMCHECKBOX Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information

Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: NAVFAC/USACE REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO USACE WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON USACE SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR. HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO USACE. PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFEROR FOR USACE POC INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

RATING

DEFINITION

NOTE

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

7. GENERAL

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):

End of Past Performance Questionnaire Section (End of Summary of Changes)

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04

EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Solicitation W9126G-13-R-0093, for the Fort Bliss JOC 8(a) set-aside for SBA areas of El Paso, Texas and the state of New Mexico only, hereby issues an amendment as follows:

a. Section 00 22 11, Factor #1, Experience, Paragraph 3, 1st Sentence, is replaced to read as follows: “The Contractor shall complete a minimum of three (3), but no more than five (5), “Experience Information” forms, attached at the end of this section, in response to this factor”.

A revised copy of Section 00 22 11 in its entirety is attached bearing the notation “W9126G-13-R-0093, Amendment No. 0001”

b. The Past Performance Questionnaire is replaced from two pages to a new total of seven (7) pages.

c. Closing date is extended to Friday, August 30, at 5 P.M. Central Time.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

PAGE OF PAGES

J

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

15C. DATE SIGNED

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code)

X

W9126G-13-R-0093

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

30-Jul-2013

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

Amendment 0001

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

22-Aug-2013

CODE

US ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, FORT WORTH

ATTN: CESWF-CT

819 TAYLOR ST, ROOM 2A17

FORT WORTH TX 76102-0300

W9126G

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

See Item 6

FACILITY CODE

EMAIL:

TEL: