J A_CAD_Map_Update_Redacted.pdf

Control Number: Stewart 2015-8

-1-

JUSTIFICATION AND APPROVAL

FOR OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

(Actions NTE $650K for other than Simplified Acquisition Procedures)

1. Agency/Contracting Activity: MICC – FORT STEWART

2. Description of Action: Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) Map Update Service

Nature: New Requirement Follow-on Requirement Mod to Existing Purchase Order/Contract Number:

Pricing: Firm-Fixed Price Time & Materials Cost

Funds: OMA Other Funds:

Name of Proposed Contractor(s): Intergraph Corporation Street Address: 170 Graphics Drive BLDG 15, Suites A-B City, State, Zip: Madison, Alabama 35758 Phone: 703-264-5770

3. Description of Services or Supplies:

The total estimated value of the proposed action is $200,765.45.

Intergraph Government Solutions (IGS) will provide technical services required to upgrade Directorate of Emergency Services (DES), CAD maps, with GIS information provided by Fort Stewart. The map upgrades will reflect changing conditions to support the Fort Stewart/ Hunter Army Airfield 9-1-1 Center operations.

4. Authority Actions other than simplified acquisition procedures (select one):

FAR 6.302-1: Only one responsible source and no other supplies or services will satisfy agency requirements, 10 USC 2304(c)(1)

5. Reasons for Authority Cited:

Intergraph is the only known source for updating the Intergraph CAD system. The file design necessary for the update is proprietary to IGS.

The only option available is to not update the CAD maps. This option is unacceptable as it will continually degrade the effectiveness of the Fort Steward and Hunter Army Airfield first responders as the dispatching system operated on increasingly unreliable map data.

6. Actions to Increase Competition:

Fort Stewart will continue to conduct research to investigate if there are other alternatives to updating the CAD maps.

X

Control Number: 15-0036

-2-

7. Market Research: A sources sought was issued on 24 JUN 2015. There were no response that could provide the service. This appeared to confirm the sole source nature of this requirement.

8. Procurement History:

Previous Purchase Order(s) or Contract(s): Yes No Purchase order or contract number: W9124M-13-F-0030 Was action competed? Yes No

If action was not competed, state the cited authority, summarize rationale, and describe the actions that were supposed to be taken to increase competition and the results thereof: The contract was a sole source IAW FAR 6.302-1: Only one responsible source. Ongoing market research was listed as an action used in an attempt to develop competition.

9. Additional Information to support the justification: N/A

10. Technical / Requirements Certification: I certify that the supporting data under my cognizance which is included in this abbreviated J&A is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

8/14/2015

11. Legal Review (if > $150K): I have reviewed this justification and find it legally sufficient.

8/17/2015

12. Fair and Reasonable Price Determination: As contracting officer, I hereby determine that the anticipated cost to the Government for this contract action will be fair and reasonable.

13. Contracting Officer’s Approval: I hereby certify that this justification is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. Based on the foregoing, I approve this sole source justification subject to availability of funds, and provided that the services and supplies herein described have otherwise been authorized for acquisition.

8/17/2015

X Geral Baxter

GERAL BAXTER

Contracting Officer Signed by: BAXTER.H.GERAL.1230007353