W911YN18Q5012.pdf
PDF 391 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Replace Automatic Entry Gates Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W911YN-18-Q-5012
About this file
SOLICITATION W911YN-18-Q-5012
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| SOW_-_Automatic_Entry_Gates_6JUN18.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FFP CONSTRUCTION PROJECT: REPLACE AUTOMATICE ENTRY GATES, CAMP BLANDING FL 32091
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL PARTS, TOOLS, MATERIALS, LABOR, TRAVEL, EXPERTISE, AND SUPERVISION NECESSARY TO
COMPLETE THE WORK AS DESCRIBED IN THE ATTACHED STATEMENT OF WORK.
THIS PROJECT IS BEING SOLICITED AS TOTAL SMALL BUSINESS SET ASIDE. THE NORTH AMERICAN INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION (NAICS)
CODE IS 238990 AND THE SIZE STANDARD IS $15M.
FAILURE TO SUBMIT AN OFFER ON ALL LINE ITEMS SHALL RESULT IN A REJECTION OF YOUR QUOTE.
SEE FAR CLAUSE 52.211-10 - PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE IS 45 DAYS
PROJECT MAGNITUDE IS BETWEEN $25,000 AND $100,000.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH FAR CLAUSE 52.236-27 AN ORGANIZED SITE VISIT WILL BE SCHEDULED UPON REQUEST.
YOU MUST BE REGISTERED IN THE SYSTEM FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT (SAM), PER FAR CLAUSE: 52.204-7 SYSTEM FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT (OCTOBER 2016) IN SECTION 00100, IN ORDER TO RECEIVE AN AWARD. THE SAM WEBSITE IS LOCATED AT WWW.SAM.GOV.
STACY L. BRENENSTALL 904-741-7442
NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".
10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS
NEGOTIATED
19-Jul-2018
(RFP)
(IFB)
CALL:
Automatic Entry Gates Replacement
B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)
See Item 7
2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION
SEALED BID
3. DATE ISSUED
9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME
SOLICITATION
NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)
Prescribed by GSA
FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)
11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______10 calendar days and complete it w ithin ________45 calendar days after receiving aw ard, X notice to proceed. This performance period is X mandatory, negotiable. (See _________________________
12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?
(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)
X YES NO
13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:
A. Sealed offers in original and __________2 copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specif ied in Item 8 by ___________ local time ______________17 Aug 2018 (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.
shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.
B. An offer guarantee X is, is not required.
C. All offers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.
D. Offers providing less than _______ calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.
SOLICITATION, OFFER,
AND AWARD
(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)
1. SOLICITATION NO.
IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.
4. CONTRACT NO.
7. ISSUED BY CODE
125TH FIGHTER WING, FLANG
14300 FANG DRIVE
JACKSONVILLE FL 32218-7933
W911YN
PAGE OF PAGES
1 OF
CODE
(Title, identifying no., date):
12B. CALENDAR DAYS
10:00 AM (hour)
Sealed envelopes containing offers
5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.
SRM-FY18-002
8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)
904-741-7443FAX:TEL: SEE ADMINISTERED BY TEL: FAX:
W911YN18Q5012 42
20B. SIGNATURE
(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK
TO SIGN
NSN 7540-01-155-3212
SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)
CODE FACILITY CODE
17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specif ied below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.
the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)
AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES
18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.
19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS
(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)
AMENDMENT NO.
DATE
20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN
OFFER (Type or print)
AWARD (To be completed by Government)
21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:
22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA
24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM
(4 copies unless otherwise specified)
CODE
(Insert any number equal to or greater than
20C. OFFER DATE
25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO
10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)
CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY
(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)
See Item 14
(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS
30B. SIGNATURE
29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)
document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .
gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.
30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
30C. DATE
(Type or print)
TEL: EMAIL:
31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE
BY
CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE
(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT
(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER
Section 00010 - Solicitation Contract Form
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD SF 1442 and SF 1442 BACK
SECTION 00010 - SCHEDULE, NOTES
SECTION 00100 - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS
SECTION 00600 – REPRESENTATIONS & CERTIFICATIONS
SECTION 00700 - CONTRACT CLAUSES
SECTION 00800 – SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS
ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
0001 1 Job Replacement of three gates
FFP
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL PARTS, TOOLS, MATERIALS,
LABOR, TRAVEL, EXPERTISE, AND SUPERVISION NECESSARY TO
REMOVE AND REPLACE THREE GATES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
ATTACHED STATEMENT OF WORK.
FOB: Destination
SIGNAL CODE: A
PSC CD: Z2QA
NET AMT
ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
0002 1 Each
CMRA
FFP
CONTRACTOR MANPOWER REPORTING IAW THE SOW
FOB: Destination
SIGNAL CODE: A
PSC CD: Z2QA
NET AMT
INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE TERMS
Supplies/services will be inspected/accepted at:
CLIN INSPECT AT INSPECT BY ACCEPT AT ACCEPT BY
0001 Origin Government Origin Government 0002 Origin Government Origin Government
DELIVERY INFORMATION
CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /
CAGE
0001 POP 14-SEP-2018 TO
29-OCT-2018
N/A F6UGRH - 202ND RED HORSE
SQUADRON
KRISTINA E. GATSON
5629 STATE ROAD 16 WEST
BLDG 4220
CAMP BLANDING
STARKE FL 32091
904-741-7732 FOB: Destination
F6UGRH
0002 POP 14-SEP-2018 TO
29-OCT-2018
N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)
FOB: Destination
F6UGRH
Section 00100 - Bidding Schedule/Instructions to Bidders
INSTRUCTION TO OFFERORS
SECTION 00100
SOLICITATION PROVISIONS
A. ELIGIBILITY FOR CONTRACT AWARD
In accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), no contract shall be entered into unless the Contracting Officer ensures that all requirements of law, executive orders, regulations, and all other applicable procedures, including clearances and approvals, have been met. This includes the FAR requirement that no award shall be made unless the Contracting Officer makes an affirmative determination of responsibility. To be determined responsible, a prospective contractor must meet the general standards in Part FAR 9 and any special standards set forth in the solicitation.
B. SOURCE SELECTION USING LOWEST PRICE TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE (LPTA)
The LPTA process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition because the best value is expected to result from selection of the lowest evaluated price proposal with acceptable non-priced proposal (Technical and Past Performance). EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD The solicitation requires the evaluation of Price (Factor 1) and Non-Priced Factors (Factor 2 – Specialized Technical Experience, and Factor 3 – Past Performance). In accordance with FAR Part 15, award will be made on the basis of the lowest evaluated price satisfying the requirements of the non-priced evaluation factors set forth in the solicitation. The Offeror that submits the lowest complete and reasonable price with an acceptable non-priced proposal will be selected for contract award. To be considered technically acceptable, an Offeror’s proposal must be rated “Acceptable” under all non-priced factors and sub-factors.
C. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS, AND FORMAT
The Government will not reimburse any costs incurred or associated with preparation and submission of any responses to this solicitation. Oral explanations or instructions to Offerors are not binding. Any information given to an Offeror which impacts the solicitation and/or offer will be given in the form of a written amendment to the solicitation. In accordance with Section 00100 of the Solicitation, any and all amendments to the solicitation will be distributed via the Federal Business Opportunities website. It is the Offeror’s responsibility to acknowledge any and all amendments in its proposal submission.
Offerors should not modify the terms and conditions of the solicitation in either the price or non-priced proposal or add conditions, exceptions, or qualifications to their offers. Should an Offeror include terms and conditions that conflict with the terms and conditions of the solicitation, that offer may be determined to be Unacceptable for award.
Any questions related to specific terms and conditions contained within the solicitation should be submitted via email not later than (NLT) the date specified in Section 00010, Attachment A, Instructions For Technical Inquires and Questions, prior to submission of an offer. Notwithstanding the above, the Offeror must clearly describe in its proposal (Price and Non-Priced) any modifications to the contractual terms and conditions of the solicitation contained in its offer.
Offerors that include information in their proposals they do not want disclosed to the public for any purpose, or used by the Government except for evaluation purposes, must clearly mark their proposals in accordance with the instructions at FAR clause 52.215-1, Instructions to Offerors-Competitive Acquisition, paragraph (e), Restriction on Disclosure and Use of Data, in Section 00100 of the Solicitation.
Offerors shall place the following notification on the bottom of each page of their proposals: “SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104. DO NOT DISCLOSE ANY SOURCE SELECTION
INFORMATION TO ANY UNAUTHORIZED PERSON.”
Use of the words “will”, “shall”, or “must” indicates a mandatory requirement for which failure to comply, at the time and date for submission of proposals, shall result in the Offeror’s proposal being disqualified from consideration for award, unless the Government elects to established a competitive range and initiate discussions, thereby providing a means by which appropriate corrections by the Offeror(s) involved can be made. Failure to comply with pricing or non-pricing requirements that are annotated with the words “should” or “may” can result in an Unacceptable rating.
1. REQUIRED REGISTRATIONS
Failure to have an active and completed registration in System for Award Management (SAM):
http://www.sam.gov/ database will determine an Offeror ineligible for award and removed from competition. An Acceptable offer with incomplete or expired registrations at the time of award may not be eligible for a contract. In such instances, the Government will award to the next Acceptable offer who is eligible for award.
Information contained within an Offeror’s registration must be current and valid. The responsibility of maintaining current information contained in an Offeror’s registration rests solely on the Offeror.
If an Offeror is a joint venture (JV), the JV entity must have a valid registration representing the JV as one business/firm/entity; this is applicable to SAM. The Government will not accept separate registrations and licenses for each separate entity representing the JV.
2. PROPOSAL CONTENT
The Offeror’s proposal shall be submitted in hard copy. The RFP shall provide the Government address and receipt date for proposal submittal. Information required with an Offeror’s priced and non-priced factors and sub-factors are described under Basis of Award and Evaluation Factors.
Offerors are required to submit proposals with the content specified herein. Proposals without the specified content may be determined Unacceptable and removed from the competition. The Government will not make assumptions concerning intent, capabilities, or experiences. Clear identification of proposal details shall be the sole responsibility of the Offeror. The Government reserves the right to reject incomplete proposals after initial evaluation without further consideration.
The proposal shall be divided into volumes as indicated below. Each set of volumes shall be submitted separately.
Each volume shall be marked with the Offeror’s name, the solicitation number, the volume number. Each respective original or copy shall be separately bound or placed in a three ring binder. See Attachment 6 – Proposal Format.
All proposals shall contain the evaluation requirements stated herein and every proposal shall also contain: Table of Contents, List of Tables (if required), List of Figures (if required), List of Appendixes, and Name/Address/Telephone Number/e-mail address of the Offeror. Proposal clarity, organization, and cross-referencing are mandatory. No material (information not physically part of proposal) shall be incorporated by reference. The Offeror shall submit in the proposal the requested information specified herein.
Offerors shall verify that the information for all forms submitted are current, correct, and complete, including names of points of contact, email addresses, and telephone numbers.
The Government will not evaluate any material that exceeds the page limits specified within each evaluation factor.
Elaborately prepared proposals are not required, and any material in excess of what is requested, such as corporate marketing information, will not be considered. Failing to submit or completely fill out attachments properly may result in rejection of the offer without further evaluation. Therefore, Offerors are urged to follow instructions and raise questions through inquiries if instructions are not understood. Do not include references to material or information not found within its respective volumes. Information submitted in the wrong volumes could lead to an Offeror’s proposal being determined Unacceptable if materially incomplete in any aspect.
Written proposals are due no later than what is stated in Block 13 of the SF1442 to the address specified in Block 7 of the SF 1442.
DO NOT INCLUDE PRICING INFORMATION IN THE NON – PRICED FACTORS’ PACKAGES
VOLUME ONE (Factor 1) – Price: (1 Original)
Prices will be evaluated to determine fair and reasonableness in accordance with FAR 15.402(a). In order to ensure reasonableness of the offered price, the Source Selection Authority/Contracting Officer may use different analytical techniques in accordance with FAR 15.404-1.
VOLUME TWO (Factor 2) – Specialized Technical Experience (1 Original, 3 Copies):
Responses to Each Sub-Factor shall be organized in Volume Two.
NOTE: Page Limitations Not to Exceed 150 pages to include all Sub-Factors.
Information exceeding the page limits set forth will not be evaluated.
VOLUME THREE (Factor 3) – Past Performance Package (1 Original):
Responses shall be organized in Volume Three.
D. DEBRIEFING OF UNSUCCESSFUL OFFERORS
The Contracting Officer will ensure Offerors are debriefed, if requested, in accordance with FAR Subparts 15.5.
E. BASIS OF AWARD
Subject to the provisions contained herein, award will be made to one (1) Offeror who is deemed responsible in accordance with the FAR; who conforms to the solicitation requirements; provides the lowest evaluated price and whose proposal, judged by an overall assessment of the evaluation criteria and other considerations specified in this solicitation, meets the technically acceptable standard for the non-price factors.
To be considered acceptable (non-priced factors), no non-priced factors/subfactors in the proposal may be rated as “unacceptable”. The failure of a proposal to meet all of the requirements under any non-priced factor/sub-factor will result in an unacceptable rating and Offeror will be precluded from award.
The Government intends to award a contract without discussions, but reserves the right to hold discussions if the Government determines that to do so would be in its best interests.
Joint Ventures: A joint venture is defined as a legal business entity formed between two or more companies to undertake the performance activities of a contract together.
Offerors proposing as joint ventures shall provide evidence that the joint venture as a legal entity has been duly formed. Joint ventures shall include a copy of the legal joint venture agreement signed by an authorized officer from each of the firms comprising the joint venture, with the chief executive of each entity identified. The Government will not evaluate the capability of any firms that are not included in the joint venture agreement.
If submitting a proposal as a joint venture, the experience of each of the joint venture partners can be submitted for the joint venture entity. The experience of either joint venture partner will be considered the experience of the joint venture entity. Page and project form limits apply to the joint venture as a whole, i.e., a submission limitation of three (3) projects under the experience factor is not an allowance of three (3) projects for each of the joint venture partners. Prospective Offerors that submit proposals may not change their joint venture firms, if selected for award.
Subcontractors: If any portion of the work provided under Factor 3 is subcontracted, clearly identify that work as such and provide the required experience of that subcontractor as it relates to work the subcontractor is performing.
Provide a letter of commitment using Attachment 2 for any subcontractor proposed to be used. Prime contractor will not be allowed to substitute a subcontractor’s experience for its own; unless the subcontractor will be a team member in this requirement.
F. EVALUATION FACTORS
FACTOR ONE – PRICE
Submission Requirements
The Offeror’s volume for this factor shall be fully completed. Offeror completeness addresses the extent to which the elements of the price proposal are consistent with the requirements of the RFP.
This volume will also include price and price related information:
a. Standard Form 1442 (Solicitation, Offer and Award) and Section 00010 (Line Items and Pricing Schedule) Include the completed Standard Form 1442 for the RFP, along with the completed Pricing Schedule. The total cost for the construction will be considered for evaluation, including all options and alternates (if applicable).
b. Section 00101, Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors.
c. In accordance with FAR Clause 52.228-1, Bid Guarantee (Original bid guarantee).
d. Small Business Subcontracting Plan (Other than Small Businesses Only). The Offeror shall provide a Small Business Subcontracting Plan that contains all the elements required by AFARS Appendix DD, FAR 52.219-9, and DFARS 252.219-7003 in Section 00700. The Small Business Subcontracting Plan is not a requirement for evaluation in source selection, but rather a requirement for award to an Other than Small Business Only. The apparent successful Offeror's Small Business Subcontracting Plan shall be assessed in accordance with AFARS Appendix DD and FAR 52.219-9 requirements and must be determined as “acceptable” by the Contracting Officer in the event of an award. The Small Business Subcontracting Plan is a materiel requirement of the solicitation and any resultant contract. A Subcontracting Plan deemed as “unacceptable” may preclude an offeror from being eligible for contract award. Small Business Past Performance will be evaluated for this acquisition in accordance with Section 00100 of this solicitation.
Small Business Subcontracting Goals have not been identified for this procurement. Contractors should propose subcontracting goals that are meaningful, realistic, and challenging with positive percentage goals for the specific procurement. A goal is defined as a number GREATER THAN ZERO that results from the offeror expending good faith effort to use small business subcontractors (as defined in FAR Par 19) to the maximum practicable extent.
Goals proposed less than 5% for Small Disadvantage Businesses shall be supported and require approval at one level above the Contracting Officer.
e. Attachment 4, Proposal Data Sheet.
f. Attachment 5, Determination of Responsibility.
Evaluation Method:
Price is not rated. It will be evaluated for fairness and reasonableness through the use of a price analysis in accordance with FAR 15.404-1(b). The price analysis will also check for the appearance of unbalanced line item prices. Additionally, Offerors’ priced proposals maybe evaluated for price realism to determine if there are proposals that are unrealistically low in terms of overall price or reflective of an inherent lack of management and/or technical competence or comprehension of the requirements. Therefore, Offerors are advised that their business decision to submit a low-priced proposal can be considered in assessing their understanding or the risk associated with their proposal.
Prices will be reviewed for minor or clerical errors. If necessary, Offerors will be afforded an opportunity to resolve any such errors. Any exchange with Offerors under this subparagraph shall be for the purpose of clarification (FAR
15.306(a)) and shall not constitute negotiations as defined at FAR 15.306(d). In the event of discrepancy between a unit price and the extended amount, the unit price shall be controlling.
NON-PRICED EVALUATION FACTORS
All non-priced factors and sub-factors must receive an ACCEPTABLE rating to be considered for award.
Offeror shall provide the number of similar construction projects requested within each sub-factor. If the Offeror provides more than requested similar construction projects, only the number of requested projects, in sequential order, will be evaluated. All other projects will not be evaluated.
Projects submitted must be completed within the time frame stated within each sub-factor. The period is from the date of issuance of this solicitation.
FACTOR 2: SPECIALIZED TECHNICAL EXPIERIENCE
Submission Requirements
Using Attachment 1, Demonstrated Experience, provide gate construction projects that demonstrate experience performing said sub-factors:
SUB-FACTOR A – Successfully completed three (3) gate installations with slide gate operators with openings of at least 25’ within the last five (5) years.
SUB-FACTOR B – Successfully installed at least five (5) proxy card entry systems within the last five (5) years.
SUB-FACTOR C – Must have experience installing access control software on at least five (5) projects within the last five (5) years.
NOTE: It is not necessary that all the sub-factors above be performed on the same project.
If any portion of the work provided as specialized technical experience was performed by the Parent Company and/or subsidiary of the Offeror, clearly identify that work as such and provide the required experience of the Parent Company and/or Subsidiary as it relates to work the Parent Company and/or subsidiary will be performing on the requirements described herein. Using Attachment 2 – Letter of Commitment from Key Subcontractors, provide a letter of commitment, as defined above, from the proposed Parent Company and/or subsidiary of the Offeror, if such company will be part of the Contractor’s team. The letter shall be on the Parent Company and/or subsidiary letterhead.
Any demonstrated experience (to include subcontractors) provided here for consideration in this factor, should also have a corresponding submission in the Past Performance factor. If Past Performance information is not provided for a demonstrated experience, that demonstrated experience will not be evaluated.
A letter of commitment must be provided for any proposed major subcontractor.
Evaluation Method
The purpose of the technical factor is to assess whether the Offeror’s proposal will satisfy the Government’s minimum requirements. This factor will be rated on an Acceptable or Unacceptable basis.
The Government will only review the number of construction projects listed within each sub-factor. Any projects submitted in excess of the number of projects requested for each sub-factor, under Specialized Technical Experience, will not be considered.
FACTOR 2: DEFINITIONS
The Offeror shall demonstrate recent and relevant experience on same or similar civil construction projects to that of the solicitation requirements using the Demonstrated Experience Form (Attachment 1).
Recent is defined as: Gate construction projects that are substantially completed no later than the time frame within each sub-factor preceding the date of the solicitation advertisement date.
Same or similar is defined as construction projects having the following:
Size: A project with a contract value of under $100,000. All submitted project experience must meet the size requirement.
Scope: A project requiring a similar level of activities and complexity.
Joint Venture: If the Offeror is a joint venture, the projects must have been performed by the Joint Venture submitting the offer.
A major subcontractor is defined as any subcontractor that has been identified under Factor 2. Additionally, a major subcontractor can be identified as one that is crucial for the successful completion of the project.
A letter of commitment is defined as a letter from a major subcontractor on official Company letterhead (1) addressed to the prime contractor, (2) identifying the work they intend to perform, and (3) stating that they are willing to be bound to perform the identified work if the prime receives this contract. Failure to provide a letter of commitment from a proposed major subcontractor will cause any non-priced factor to be rated Unacceptable, if applicable.
FACTOR 3 PAST PERFORMANCE
Submission Requirements
Offerors shall submit one Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ), (see Attachment 3), completed and signed by an Owner of the Project (Client) point of contact or “POC” for each of the projects submitted under Factor 2. If a project submitted under Factor 2 was completed by the Offeror’s major subcontractor, the Offeror is responsible for coordinating with their major subcontractor and submitting a completed Past Performance Questionnaire on their major subcontractor’s behalf. All pages of each Past Performance Questionnaire must be initialed and dated on the bottom right-hand corner by the POC. Failure to provide a completed and signed Past Performance Questionnaire for each project as described above may cause this Factor to be rated Unacceptable. If a Construction Contractor Appraisal Support System (CCASS) or a Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) record is available for any of the projects submitted under Factor 2, the CCASS or CPARS record may be submitted in lieu of the completed Past Performance Questionnaire or an official Performance Evaluation from a non-Federal agency.
The Owner of the Project (Client) or “POC” is defined as the entity that took ownership of the project after construction was complete.
If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from the Owner of the Project (Client), before the proposal due date, the Offeror shall complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the Questionnaire (Blocks 1-8) that contains contract and client information for the submitted project. Note: it is the Offeror’s responsibility to ensure that the client’s point of contact information is current and correct. The client point of contact reflected in (Blocks 1-
8) should also be familiar with the past performance they are being asked to verify and informed that they will be contacted by the Government to verify past performance.
The Government reserves the right to obtain copies of all CCASS or CPARS records contained in the CCASS or CPARS database for the Offeror or Offeror’s major subcontractors.
SMALL BUSINESS PAST PERFORMANCE
The Government will evaluate the extent to which the Offeror complied with FAR 52.219-8, Small Business Utilization, and FAR 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan (if applicable) on the projects submitted for the past performance factor.
In order to evaluate offerors past performance in meeting FAR 52.219-8, Small Business Utilization, per section 00700 of this solicitation, ALL offerors shall provide: 1) any recent and relevant small business utilization performance assessment information that is NOT addressed in the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) only if it demonstrates past performance that would not otherwise be attained from CPARS, 2) recent and relevant history of payments to small businesses.
In order to evaluate offerors past performance in meeting FAR 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan (if applicable) the recent and relative small business subcontracting plan information will be retrieved from the electronic Subcontract Reporting System(eSRS).
Evaluation Method:
Past Performance. The past performance evaluation is an assessment of the Offeror’s probability of meeting the minimum past performance solicitation requirements. This assessment is based on the Offeror’s record of relevant and recent past performance information that pertain to the products and/or services outlined in the solicitation requirements. All Past Performance Ratings must be equivalent to “Satisfactory” or better to be considered, “Acceptable.”
Past performance shall be used as an evaluation factor within the LPTA process. Therefore, past performance will be rated on an “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable” basis using the ratings.
Past performance should be initially evaluated to determine whether the Offeror’s present/past performance is recent, and relevant or not relevant to the effort to be acquired. The criteria to establish what is recent and relevant shall be unique to each LPTA source selection. Therefore, the solicitation shall establish the criteria for recent and relevant in relation to the specific requirement being procured. In establishing what is relevant for the acquisition, consideration should be given to what aspects of an Offeror’s contract performance history would give the most confidence that the Offeror will satisfy the requirements of the contract that is contemplated to be awarded as a result of the evaluation of proposals in the current procurement.
The past performance evaluation should determine how well the Offeror performed on the prior contracts. The past performance evaluation performed in support of a current source selection does not establish, create, or change the existing record and history of the Offeror’s past performance on past contracts; rather, the past performance evaluation process gathers information from customers on how well the Offeror performed those past contracts.
Offeror whose predominant (>50%) CPARS and PPQ rating are less than Satisfactory may be rated Unacceptable.
The Government may consider past performance information from individual contract references and in the aggregate. In evaluating Past Performance, the Government reserves the right to use information provided by the offeror, Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) and any additional information obtained from other sources known or identified by the Government. The Government may augment questionnaire responses through dialogue with persons completing the questionnaire. Assessment may include Government site visit(s) and surveys of sources to validate performance information.
SMALL BUSINESS PAST PERFORMANCE (if applicable)
The Government will evaluate the extent to which the Offeror complied with FAR 52.219-8, Small Business Utilization, and FAR 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan (if applicable) on the projects submitted for the past performance factor.
The extent to which the Offeror complied with FAR 52.219-8, Small Business Utilization will be evaluated based on the following:
1. Reporting of small business performance in the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System
(CPARS)
2. History of prompt payments to small businesses
3. Small business participation/utilization reporting
The extent to which the Offeror complied with FAR 52.219-9 Small Business Subcontracting Plan will be evaluated based on the following:
1. Achievement of subcontracting goals
2. Compliance with small business subcontracting plan requirements
3. eSRS reporting
NOTE: In the case of an Offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the Offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. Therefore, the Offeror shall be determined to have unknown (or “neutral”) past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, shall be considered “acceptable.”
d. ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 1 – Demonstrated Experience (The space provided may not be sufficient. If this is the case, Offerors are encouraged to provide additional information on supplemental pages attached to the collection sheet.)
Attachment 2 – Letter of Commitment from Key Subcontractors
Attachment 3 –Past Performance Questionnaire for Construction Project
Attachment 4 – Proposal Data Sheet
Attachment 5 – Determination of Responsibility
Attachment 6 – Proposal Format
ATTACHMENT 1
Relevant Technical Experience
Provide the following information to show examples of construction projects your company and/or its team members (i.e. major subcontractors) constructed within the timeframes listed in Factor 2 indicating experience with construction projects of similar type and scope. Use one form per project. NOTE: Use additional pages as necessary to provide the information requested.
Type of Project Represented
Your Firm’s Name
Project Name and Contract Number, Location of Project and Conditions, Owner, General Scope.
Describe how this project is relevant and similar to the elements of the solicited project. Use additional pages as necessary to provide this information, and to address all required elements of the sub-element/sub-factors.
Your Role (Prime, Joint Venture, or Subcontractor, etc.) and Work Your Company Self-Performed:
Construction Cost:
Extent and Type of Work You Subcontracted Out
Dates Construction: Began__________ Completed__________
Your Performance Evaluation by Owner and Awards and Recognitions (if any)
Were You Terminated or Assessed Liquidated Damages? (If either is “Yes”, attach an Explanation) Owner’s Point of Contact for Reference (Name and Company)
Current Telephone Number and email address of Owner Reference
Any unusual conditions/requirements
Problems encountered and corrective action taken to successfully complete the project
ATTACHMENT 2
LETTER OF COMMITMENT OF KEY SUBCONTRACTOR (USE SUBCONTRACTOR’S
COMPANY LETTERHEAD)
TO: Name of Offeror
SUBJECT: Letter of Commitment for Proposed Contract for_________________________________
Dear Sir or Madam:
I hereby make the unequivocal commitment that, in the event of an award of a contract to (Fill in name of Offeror), that (insert name of subcontractor firm, not …. Individual) will fulfill the duties of (state specific items of work to be performed on this project)
Sincerely, (Authorized Subcontractor Official) Date:________________
ATTACHMENT 3
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT
1. Contractor Information
Firm Name: CAGE Code:
Address: DUNs Number:
Phone Number:
Email Address:
Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:
2. Work Performed As: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:
If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone#):
3. Contract Information:
Contract Number:
Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):
Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify) Contract Title:
Contract Location:
Award Date: (mm/dd/yy):
Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):
Actual Completion Date: (mm/dd/yy):
Explain Differences:
Original Contract Price (Award Amount):
Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):
Explain Differences:
4. Project Description:
Complexity of Work: High Med Routine How this project is relevant to project of submission: (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)
5. Client Information Name:
Title:
Phone Number:
Email Address:
6. Describe the client’s role in the project:
7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):
8. Client’s Signature:
PLEASE PROVIDE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS YOUR
EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE
1. QUALITY:
a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N
b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance E VG S M U N
c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance
E VG S M U N
d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)
E
VG
S
M
U
N
2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:
a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)
b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract
E VG S M U N
3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:
a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U N
b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes;
responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)
c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?
E VG S M U N
d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N
4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR
a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?
E VG S M U N
b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort E VG S M U N
c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N
d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U N
e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N
f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines E VG S M U N
g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes
E VG S M U N
h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)
E VG S M U N
5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?
E VG S M U N
b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client
c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back- up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)
d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.
Yes No
e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.
Yes No
f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.
Yes No
6. SAFETY/SECURITY
a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes:
following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)
b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.
7. GENERAL
a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).
b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues) E VG S M U N
c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below) Yes No
d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.
Legion:
E – Excellent VG – Very Good S – Satisfactory M – Marginal U – Unacceptable N – Not Acceptable
ATTACHMENT 4
PROPOSAL DATA
SHEET
Solicitation:
W911YN18Q5012
Name of Firm:
Address:
Phone:
E-mail:
DUNS # (used for accessing the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS). Also provide any other assigned number that identifies the member firm(s) Construction Contractor Appraisal Support System CCASS/CPARS databases. If a separate DUNS has been created for a joint venture (J-V) it must also be submitted. If the firm is a joint venture, list the individual firms and briefly describe the nature of the association.
Provide DUNS for each.
Provide DUNS for any firm identified as a major subcontractor for which demonstrated experience has been submitted under Factor 2. Also, list the firm and briefly describe the nature of the association.
Firm 1:
Firm 2:
Firm 3:
Nature of Association:
AUTHORIZED NEGOTIATORS. FAR 52.215-11
The Offeror represents that the following persons are authorized to negotiate on its behalf with the Government in connection with this Request for Proposals (RFP).
[List names, titles, and telephone number of the authorized negotiator.] Name of Person Authorized to Negotiate:
Negotiator's Address:
Negotiator's Telephone:
Negotiator’s E-mail:
ATTACHMENT 5
DETERMINATION OF RESPONSIBILITY
The following information is provided to assist the contracting officer in determining whether or not the proposed contractor meets the general standards of responsibility enumerated at FAR 9.104-1, DFARS 209.104- 1, and FAR 9.104-1 General Standards. To be determined responsible, a prospective contractor must --
(a) HAVE ADEQUATE FINANCIAL RESOURCES TO PERFORM THE CONTRACT, OR THE ABILITY TO OBTAIN THEM (SEE 9.104-3(b))
Banking References Provide letters from the banking references to confirm this information.
*1st bank's name:
Telephone #:
Address:
Person:
Title:
Length of time with bank:
Credit Rating:
Number/type of accounts:
Amount in each account (# of figures):
Credit line: Secured/Unsecured Outstanding loans: Secured/Unsecured Comments:
*2nd bank's name:
Telephone #:
Address:
Person:
Title:
Length of time with bank:
Credit Rating:
Number/type of accounts:
Amount in each account (# of figures):
Credit line: Secured/Unsecured Outstanding loans: Secured/Unsecured
*** Provide letters from the banking references to confirm this information.
(b) HAVE A SATISFACTORY RECORD OF INTEGRITY AND BUSINESS ETHICS
Trade References
*1st company:
Telephone #:
Address:
Name:
Title:
Length of time with company:
Credit line:
Average monthly business:
High credit:
Payment history:
Takes discounts:
*2nd Company:
Telephone #:
Address:
Name:
Title:
Length of time with company:
Credit line:
Average monthly business:
High credit:
Payment history:
Takes discounts:
Workman's Compensation Experience Modification Rate (EMR):
2015: 2016: 2017:
(e) HAVE THE NECESSARY PRODUCTION, CONSTRUCTION, AND TECHNICAL
EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES, OR THE ABILITY TO OBTAIN THEM (SEE 9.104-
3(b))
(f) BE OTHERWISE QUALIFIED AND ELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE AN AWARD UNDER
APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS
W911YN18Q5012
ATTACHMENT 6
PROPOSAL FORMAT
PROPOSAL IN RESPONSE TO SOLICITATION NO:
OFFEROR’S NAME: [Offeror enter]
OFFEROR’S ADDRESS: [Offeror enter]
OFFEROR’S POINT OF CONTACT (POC): [Offeror enter]
POC’s TELEPHONE: [Offeror enter] POC’s FAX: [Offeror enter] POC’s EMAIL: [Offeror enter]
THIS OFFER IS SUBMITTED IN SEPARATE VOLUMES AS FOLLOWS: [Offeror check each applicable item and enter NA for non-applicable items.]
Volume One (Price) is submitted in 1 Original.
Volume Two (Specialized Technical Experience) is submitted in 1 Original and 3 Copies. There is no pricing information in this package.
Volume Three (Past Performance) is submitted in 1 Original. There is no pricing information in this package.
CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
52.204-7 System for Award Management OCT 2016 52.204-16 Commercial and Government Entity Code Reporting JUL 2016 52.204-22 Alternative Line Item Proposal JAN 2017 52.222-5 Construction Wage Rate Requirements--Secondary Site of the
Work
MAY 2014
52.225-10 Notice of Buy American Requirement--Construction Materials
MAY 2014
CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT
52.222-23 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT FOR AFFIRMATIVE ACTION TO ENSURE EQUAL
EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY FOR CONSTRUCTION (FEB 1999)
(a) The offeror's attention is called to the Equal Opportunity clause and the Affirmative Action Compliance Requirements for Construction clause of this solicitation.
(b) The goals for minority and female participation, expressed in percentage terms for the Contractor's aggregate workforce in each trade on all construction work in the covered area, are as follows:
Goals for minority participation for each trade
Goals for female participation for each trade
21.8 6.9%
These goals are applicable to all the Contractor's construction work performed in the covered area. If the Contractor performs construction work in a geographical area located outside of the covered area, the Contractor shall apply the goals established for the geographical area where the work is actually performed. Goals are published periodically in the Federal Register in notice form, and these notices may be obtained from any Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs office.
(c) The Contractor's compliance with Executive Order 11246, as amended, and the regulations in 41 CFR 60-4 shall be based on (1) its implementation of the Equal Opportunity clause, (2) specific affirmative action obligations required by the clause entitled "Affirmative Action Compliance Requirements for Construction,'' and (3) its efforts to meet the goals. The hours of minority and female employment and training must be substantially uniform throughout the length of the contract, and in each trade. The Contractor shall make a good faith effort to employ minorities and women evenly on each of its projects. The transfer of minority or female employees or trainees from Contractor to Contractor, or from project to project, for the sole purpose of meeting the Contractor's goals shall be a violation of the contract, Executive Order 11246, as amended, and the regulations in 41 CFR 60-4. Compliance with the goals will be measured against the total work hours performed.
(d) The Contractor shall provide written notification to the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Federal Contract Compliance, U.S. Department of Labor, within 10 working days following award of any construction subcontract in excess of $10,000 at any tier for construction work under the contract resulting from this solicitation. The notification shall list the --
(1) Name, address, and telephone number of the subcontractor;
(2) Employer's identification number of the subcontractor;
(3) Estimated dollar amount of the subcontract;
(4) Estimated starting and completion dates of the subcontract; and
(5) Geographical area in which the subcontract is to be performed.
(e) As used in this Notice, and in any contract resulting from this solicitation, the "covered area" is CAMP
BLANDING , STARKE, FLORIDA LOCATED IN CLAY COUNTY
(End of provision)
52.236-27 SITE VISIT (CONSTRUCTION) (FEB 1995)
(a) The clauses at 52.236-2, Differing Site Conditions, and 52.236-3, Site Investigations and Conditions Affecting the Work, will be included in any contract awarded as a result of this solicitation. Accordingly, offerors or quoters are urged and expected to inspect the site where the work will be performed.
(b) An organized site visit has been scheduled for: TBD
52.252-1 SOLICITATION PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (FEB 1998)
This solicitation incorporates one or more solicitation provisions by reference, with the same force and effect as if they were given in full text. Upon request, the Contracting Officer will make their full text available. The offeror is cautioned that the listed provisions may include blocks that must be completed by the offeror and submitted with its quotation or offer. In lieu of submitting the full text of those provisions, the offeror may identify the provision by paragraph identifier and provide the appropriate information with its quotation or offer. Also, the full text of a solicitation provision may be accessed electronically at this/these address(es):
https://farsite.hill.af.mil
52.252-3 ALTERATIONS IN SOLICITATION (APR 1984)
Portions of this solicitation are altered as follows:
None at this time.
Section 00600 - Representations & Certifications
252.203-7005 Representation Relating to Compensation of Former DoD
Officials
NOV 2011
52.204-8 ANNUAL REPRESENTATIONS…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it.