W911PT-17-R-0025_AMD_0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Amendment 0001 to Solicitation W911PT-17-R-0025

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 5

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 02-Aug-2017

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W911PT-17-R-0025

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

01-Aug-2017

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

02-Aug-2017

CODE

ACC-WARREN CCTA-HDT

CCTA-HDW-B

WARREN MI 48397-5000

W911PT 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W911PT-17-R-0025

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

AMD 0001

SOLICITATION AMD 0001

The purpose of Amendment 0001 to Solicitation W911PT‐17‐R‐0025 is to include the following:

A one day site visit to Watervliet Arsenal (WVA) is scheduled on 08 August 2017 (Tuesday) at 10:00 AM (Eastern Standard Time). The site visit will allow potential offerors to see the grounds at the depot and gain an understanding of the tasks that will be asked of them under this effort.

Potential offerors will be able to ask any questions, or raise any concerns during the visit. Watervliet will insure that technical representatives are there to address all of the questions asked.

Anyone interested in attending the event shall coordinate in advance with Mr. Andrew Zielinsky at mailto:

andrew.j.zielinsky.civ@mail.mil and Mr. Erik Pakosz erik.j.pakosz.civ@mail.mil. Each manufacturer will be allowed to bring no more than two (2) representatives to the site visit. Those two attendees must submit their names, driver's license number, date of birth, job title, phone number, and email address, to Mr. Zielinsky and Mr. Pakosz in advance in order to be approved for the event. Failure to supply this information and failure to request approval to attend the event, will result in denial to attend. No walk‐in's on the day of will be allowed to attend without submitting the information to Mr. Zielinsky and Mr. Pakosz. Representatives who are attending must be a United States citizen and must have a form of identification (i.e. a Drivers License).

The information must be sent in no later than close of business on 04 Aug 2017 (Friday).

Attendance of this site visit is mandatory to be considered for award. Anyone who does not attend will not be considered for award. There will be NO exceptions to this rule.

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS

SECTION L:

Proposal Documentation Requirements:

Documents the offeror must submit:

L.1 A signed copy of the cover sheet of the solicitation. Signature must be made by an employee authorized to commit the offeror.

L.1.1 The solicitation document with all amendments, if applicable, acknowledged, and all required fill ins completed.

L.1.2 Provide evidence that the offeror attended the mandatory site visit held at Watervliet Arsenal. A sign in sheet validated by the Erik Pakosz can validate that the visit was attended. Evaluation of this document will be based on Acceptable/Not Acceptable basis. Failure to submit the above document will result in a Not Acceptable rating.

SECTION L INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS:

L.2 PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS: The proposal should be accompanied by an electronic cover letter (letter of transmittal) which is to be included in the proposal as submitted through the Federal Business Opportunities (FedBizOpps) bid response system to identify all enclosures being transmitted with the proposal. Extreme care and attention should be given to ensure that all necessary items are included in the proposal and that the Government receives the proposal on time.

L.2.1 CLAUSE FILL-INS: Some clauses require the offeror to fill in information. A completed copy of clause 52.212-3, Offeror Representations and Certifications - Commercial Items, must be included with your proposal.

L.3 ADDITIONAL TECHNICAL CAPABILITY: The offeror shall support its responses by electronically submitting supporting documentation where indicated in section L.

L.4 PRICE INFORMATION: The offeror shall legibly fill-in, in U.S. Dollars, the Unit Price column and the total amount column for all CLINs 0001, 0002, 0003, 0004, 0005, 0006, 0007 & 0008.

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS

SECTION M:

EVALUATION

M.1 BASIS of AWARD:

M.1.1 The Government plans to award a single Firm Fixed Price C-Type Contract with a one year period of performance for the Construction Projects for buildings 21, 35, 36, 40, 115, 120, 121-122 and 126 at WVA. The Government reserves the right to make no award as a result of this solicitation, if upon evaluation none of the proposals meet attendance of the mandatory site visit requirement at an acceptable price. Selection of the successful Offeror(s) shall be made to an offeror who is deemed responsible, proposes the lowest Total Evaluated Price, and who has also provided proof of attendance of the site visit. Proposals will be evaluated as follows:

M.1.2 EVALUATION: The evaluation will be conducted in accordance with FAR 12.6 (Streamlined Procedures for Evaluation and Solicitation for Commercial Items). Each proposal will be evaluated to determine a total evaluated price, which will include an assessment of price reasonableness. An evaluation of the attendance to the site visit on an Acceptable/Not Acceptable basis will only be conducted on the offeror with the lowest total evaluated price. In order to be considered for award, the Offeror's proposal must be rated acceptable (attended site visit). Should the lowest total evaluated priced Offeror's proposal be assessed as Not Acceptable under any of the requirements cited in Section L.1.2, it may be determined ineligible for award and the next lowest priced offeror's proposal may be evaluated, continuing until the lowest-priced Offeror is found with an acceptable proposal. Award will be made to the proposal with the lowest total evaluated price which was also rated Acceptable under the Site Visit Factor.

The Evaluation Factors are:

(a) Attendance of the Mandatory Site Visit

(b) Price The Technical Factor includes one sub-Factors, Mandatory Site Visit (Sub-Factor 1).

M.2 Rejection of Offers M.2.1 Offerors must carefully ready understand, and provide all the information requested in Section L. If there are parts of the Section L instructions the Offeror does not understand, the Offeror may submit a question to the Contract Specialist for clarification. Questions will be answered using a Question and Answer (Q&A) form that will be posted on FBO.

M.2.1.1 The proposal fails to meaningfully respond to the Proposal Preparation Instructions specified in Section L of this solicitation. Examples of failure to meaningfully respond include:

M.2.1.1.1 A proposal merely offers to perform work according to the solicitation terms or fails to present more than a statement indication its capability to comply with the solicitation terms and does not provide an elaboration as specified in Section L of this solicitation;

M.2.1.1.2 A proposal fails to provide any of the data and information required by Section L;

M.2.1.1.3 A proposal provides some data but omits significant material data and information required by Section L;

M.2.1.1.4 A proposal merely repeats the contract PWS without elaboration.

M.2.1.2 The proposal takes exception to the attachments or other solicitation terms and conditions.

M.2.1.3 The proposal is unbalanced as to price. An unbalanced offer is one which is (a) based on prices significantly high or low for one given period versus another period; or (b) the price of one or more contract line item is significantly over or understated as indicated by the application of price analysis techniques. There must be a direct relationship between the effort expended and its cost or price for each year and each CLIN. The PCO may reject a proposal which is deemed unbalanced.

M.2.1.4 The proposal offers a product or service that does not meet all stated material requirements of the solicitation.

M.3 Evaluation

M.3.1 Evaluation Process. Selection of the successful Offeror shall be made following an assessment of each proposal, based on the response to the information called for in Section and against the solicitation requirements and the evaluation criteria described herein.

M.3.2 The Price Factor evaluation will consider the Total Evaluated Price to the Government as defined in M.3.5.

The Total Evaluated Price will include an assessment of price reasonableness.

M.3.3 Reasonableness exists when the offered price does not exceed what would be incurred by a prudent person in the conduct of competitive business. Price reasonableness will be evaluated using one or more techniques identified in FAR 15.404 to determine if the total price proposed is reasonable toward accomplishing the solicited requirement.

The Government may reject a proposal which it considers unreasonable.

M.3.4 If an offeror fails to submit prices for all separately priced CLINs, the proposal may be considered unacceptable and the Government may reject the proposal.

M.3.5 The total evaluated price is calculated in Section B. To determine the Total Evaluated Price, the prices for CLINs 0001-0008 for the buildings will be added together to provide a Total Evaluated Price. The offeror with the lowest Total Evaluated Price will proceed to an evaluation of the other factor.

M.3.6 Unbalanced Pricing. Offerors should note that pricing will be carefully reviewed to detect proposals that are unbalanced. Unbalanced pricing may increase performance risk and could result in payment of unreasonably high prices. Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable Total Evaluated Price, the price of one or more contract line items or periods is significantly over or understated as indicated by the application of cost or price analysis techniques. An offer may be rejected if the contracting officer determines that the lack of balance poses an unacceptable risk to the Government.

M.3.7 The Mandatory Site Visit will be evaluated to determine that the offeror attended the visit. The offeror must provide documentation that proves they were present for the visit and have it validated by the Erik Pakosz.

M.3.8 Proposals will be evaluated as follows. STEP 1 – Each proposal will be evaluated to determine the total evaluated price. The Government will identify the proposal with the lowest Total Evaluated Price. STEP 2 – The proposal with the lowest Total Evaluated Price (STEP 1) will be evaluated against the Mandatory Site Visit Factor (Technical Sub-Factor 1). Provided that the proposal is determined to be Technically Acceptable under the Mandatory Site Visit factor, the proposal will be selected for award. If the proposal is determined to be Unacceptable under Technical Sub-Factor 1, the Proposal will not be considered for award and the Government will return to STEP 1, to begin the process with the next lowest total evaluated priced proposal.

M.3.9 Award without Discussions. This RFP includes FAR 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors Competitive Acquisition, in Section L which advises Offerors that the Government intends to make award without conducting discussions. Where award will be made with discussions, exchanges with Offerors are limited to Clarifications as defined in FAR 15.306(a). Therefore, the Offerors initial proposal should contain the Offerors best terms with respect to the price and non-price factors. However, under FAR52.212-1, the Government reserves the right to hold discussion if necessary.

M.3.1 Determination of Responsibility and Eligibility for Award: Per FAR 9.103, contracts will be placed only with contractors that the Contracting Officer determines to be responsible. The prospective Offeror, in order to qualify as a source for this acquisition, must be able to demonstrate that it meets standards of responsibility set forth in FAR

9.104 including provisions for small business contained in 9.104-3(d) if applicable. In addition, the Government may assess the Offeror's financial ability to meet the RFP requirements. The Government reserves the right to conduct a Pre-award Survey on any or all Offerors (or its Subcontractors) to aid the Contracting Officer in the evaluation of each Offeror's proposal and ensure that a selected offeror is responsible. No award can be made to an Offeror who has been determined not responsible by the Contracting Officer. To ensure that the Offeror meets the responsibility criteria of FAR 9.101, the Government may:

a. Perform a Pre-award Survey or arrange a visit to the Offerors facility. The offeror's refusal to authorize the Government to visit the offeror's facility may result in a determination that the offeror is not responsible.

b. Ask the Offeror to provide technical, production, quality, and financial information. If the Offeror does not provide the Government with the data as requested within 7 days from receipt of the request, or if the Offeror refuses to have the Government visit its facility, the Contracting Officer may determine the offeror to be not responsible. If the Government visits the offeror's facility, the offeror shall ensure that it has current data relevant to its proposal available for the Government to review.

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 15-Aug-2017 12:00 PM to 17-Aug-2017 12:00 PM.

The Acquisition Set Aside has changed from Small Business to 8(a) Program.

(End of Summary of Changes)