Amendment_0002_Final.pdf

W40M USA HLTH CONTRACTING ACT

SOUTHERN REG CONTR OFC

POC: LORNIA J. VILLALOBOS

3551 ROGER BROOK DR BLDG 3600

FORT SAM HOUSTON TX 78234-6200

0011000505

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this Amendment is to extend the Solicitation due date to 8 September 2017, 12:00 Noon, CST. No late offors w ill be accepted.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 4

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 02-Sep-2017

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W81K00-17-T-0253

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

23-Aug-2017

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

02-Sep-2017

CODE

W40M USA HLTH CONTRACTING ACT

SOUTHERN REG CONTR OFC

3551 ROGER BROOK DR BLDG 3600

FORT SAM HOUSTON TX 78234-6200

W81K00 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE W81K00

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W81K00-17-T-0253

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

The following have been modified:

ADDENDUM TO 52.212-1

ADDENDUM TO 52.212-1

1. Technical proposal shall be not more than 20 pages.

2. Price. A unit price shall be submitted for each line item, as well as the extended price (i.e., unit price multiplied by quantity).

3. Potential contractors must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) to be eligible for award.

The SAM website is http://www.sam.gov. Offers are due by Friday, 8 September 2017, 12:00 PM, Central

Standard Time. Offers shall be submitted via e-mail to lornia.j.villalobos.civ@mail.mil and robyn.a.villafranco.civ@mail.mil.

4. Questions about the solicitation must be in writing and sent via email to lornia.j.villalobos.civ@mail.mil and robyn.a.villafranco.civ@mail.mil. NLT 26 Aug 2017 at 12:00 Noon CST. Responses to these questions will be posted to FBO via Solicitation Amendment.

5. Please provide completed provisions, as listed in the solicitation. Alternately, complete all provisions in SAM and provide confirmation of completion with offer.

6. Also provide the following items:

-DUNS#

-CAGE Code

-Delivery Time

-Contact Information (Name, Telephone Number, Fax Number, and Email)

-Any Shipping Cost

7. FAR 52.232-18 is incorporated into this contract. FY18 funds are not currently available for Option Year 1.

When funds become available, a contract modification will be executed to apply funding.

(m) The non-FAR Part 12 discretionary FAR and DFARS provisions included herein are incorporated into this solicitation either by reference or in full text. If incorporated by reference, see provision 52.252-1 herein for locations where full text can be found.

ADDENDUM TO 52.212-2

ADDENDUM TO 52-212-2

Award will be made using Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) process. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

mailto:robyn.a.villafranco.civ@mail.mil

Factor 1: Technical

Offerors must provide a copy of their Laerdal Certification or Laerdal partnership agreement as proof of their authorization to provide services on/for Laerdal equipment. This Factor will be rated as Acceptable/Unacceptable.

Evaluation Rating:

Acceptable - Offeror's submission meets the Government requirement

Unacceptable - Offeror's submission does NOT meet the Government requirement

FACTOR 2: Price

2a. The Government will evaluate price proposals on the basis of realism once the proposal has received an

“Acceptable” rating on technical capability and past performance. A proposal unrealistically low in price may be grounds for eliminating a proposal and will be determined by the Government to be indicative of failure to be consistent with the offeror's written technical capability approach and/or indicative of a failure to comprehend the complexity and risks of the proposed contractual requirement. Price will be evaluated using various price analysis techniques and procedures IAW FAR 15.404-1(b) including, but not limited to, comparison of proposed price received in response to the solicitation with a comparison to the Independent Government Cost Estimate (IGCE).

Price must be determined to be fair and reasonable.

2b. Options. The Government will evaluate offers by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of Options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option (s).

2c. Given that FAR 52.217-8 Option to Extend Services, provides that the government may exercise the Option to

Extend Services at the rates specified in the contract (i.e., the rates in effect when the Extension of Services option is exercised), for purposes of evaluating the Option to Extend Services, the Contracting Officer will consider the prices submitted for the base year and each option year, since those are the binding prices should the Option to

Extend Services be exercised.

Factor 3: Past Performance

The Government will consider any information from its own files and/or databases such as the Past Performance

Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), or from any other source it deems appropriate to evaluate Contractor Past Performance. Offeror's Past Performance will be evaluated as Acceptable/Unacceptable per the rating table below. If the offeror does not have a record of past performance, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of

Acceptability/Unacceptability, "unkonwn" shall be considered "Acceptable".

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RATING:

Acceptable

Based on the offeror's performance record, the

Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror's performance recod is unknown.

Unacceptable Based on the offeror's performance record, the

Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

(END OF ADDENDUM TO 52.212-2)

(End of Summary of Changes)