W52P1J17R0059-0003.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. Contract ID Code Page Of

2. Amendment/Modification No.

3. Effective Date

4. Requisition/Purchase Req No.

5. Project No. (If applicable)

6. Issued By Code 7. Administered By (If other than Item 6) Code

8. Name And Address Of Contractor (No., Street, City, County, State and Zip Code)

9A. Amendment Of Solicitation No.

9B. Dated (See Item 11)

10A. Modification Of Contract/Order No.

10B. Dated (See Item 13) Code Facility Code

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning ____________ copies of the amendments: (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. Accounting And Appropriation Data (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS

It Modifies The Contract/Order No. As Described In Item 14.

A. This Change Order is Issued Pursuant To: The Changes Set Forth In Item 14 Are Made In

The Contract/Order No. In Item 10A.

B. The Above Numbered Contract/Order Is Modified To Reflect The Administrative Changes (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) Set

Forth In Item 14, Pursuant To The Authority of FAR 43.103(b).

C. This Supplemental Agreement Is Entered Into Pursuant To Authority Of:

D. Other (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return _______________ copies to the Issuing Office.

14. Description Of Amendment/Modification (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. Name And Title Of Signer (Type or print)

16A. Name And Title Of Contracting Officer (Type or print)

15B. Contractor/Offeror 15C. Date Signed 16B. United States Of America 16C. Date Signed

By (Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

PREVIOUS EDITIONS UNUSABLE

30-105-02 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

SEE SCHEDULE

X

No Cost

0003 2017FEB23

W52P1J

ARMY CONTRACTING COMMAND - RI

ROCK ISLAND, IL 61299-8000

BLDGS 60 & 62

HEATHER J. PETERSEN

EMAIL: HEATHER.J.PETERSEN.CIV@MAIL.MIL

W52P1J-17-R-0059

2017FEB02

X

X

/SIGNED/

2 signed

SEE SECOND PAGE FOR DESCRIPTION

1 6

CONTINUATION SHEET

Reference No. of Document Being Continued Page of

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION A - SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Buyer Name: HEATHER J. PETERSEN

Buyer Office Symbol/Telephone Number: CCRC-FB/(309)782-2456

Type of Contract 1: No Cost

Kind of Contract: Service Contracts

*** End of Narrative A0000 ***

The purpose of Amendment 0003 to Solicitation W52P1J-17-R-0059 is to:

1) Revise Section M Paragraph M.2.4(c)

From: M.2.4(c) Supply Functional Area: The RSE adequately details a realistic and feasible approach to deliver accurate services consistent with a Unit Supply Support Activity (SSA) and a cognizant property book office by providing for inventory management providing asset accountability and asset visibility through proper operation of the appropriate LIS for the equipment density listing provided at TE 1. The SSA approach must accurately address proper accountability, security, and other regulatory requirements specific to sensitive items including controlled cryptographic items, weapons, and night visions devices.

To: M.2.4(c) Supply Functional Area: The RSE adequately details a realistic and feasible approach to deliver accurate services consistent with a Unit Supply Support Activity (SSA) and a cognizant property book office by providing for inventory management providing asset accountability and asset visibility through proper operation of the appropriate LIS for the equipment density listing provided at Exhibit A. The SSA approach must accurately address proper accountability, security, and other regulatory requirements specific to sensitive items including controlled cryptographic items, weapons, and night visions devices.

2) As a result of this amendment the closing date and time remains unchanged at 10:00 am CT 06 March 2017.

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

*** END OF NARRATIVE A0004 ***

2 6

W52P1J-17-R-0059 0003

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

M.1 EVALUATION METHODOLOGY & BASIS FOR EXECUTION OF A BOA

M.1.1 The Government will execute a BOA to any offeror whose proposal complies with the RFP requirements and is determined to be

Technically Acceptable.

M.1.2 Compliance Review: The Government will compare the offeror's proposal to Section L in order to perform a compliance review. Any offeror's proposal determined non-compliant per the terms noted in Section L will not be evaluated and will not be further considered for execution of a BOA. Only offerors whose proposals are determined to be compliant will move to the Technical Factor evaluation process.

The Government reserves the right to waive the Compliance Review if it is in the Government's best interest.

M.1.3. Property Management Plan: A review of the Offerors property management plan will be conducted to determine the acceptability of the Offerors approach to satisfy the outcomes listed in FAR 52.245-1(f)(1) and the net-centric electronic approach to GFP traceability.

M.1.4 JV Agreement: The Government will verify the offeror provided a signed, legal JV agreement, if applicable.

M.1.5 Technical Factor Evaluation: Proposals determined to be compliant per the terms noted in Section L will be evaluated for the technical factor based upon the criteria provided in M.2 below. Only compliant proposals determined technically acceptable will receive a BOA. The Government intends to execute BOAs based upon the content of initial proposals and without negotiating with offerors after receipt of those initial proposals; as such, an offerors initial proposal should contain sufficient information to satisfy the technical requirements. The Government does reserve the right, however, to negotiate with offerors whose initial proposals are determined to be technically unacceptable if it is in the best interest of the Government to do so. If negotiations are determined to be in the

Governments best interest, the Government will only negotiate with those offerors whose proposals do not contain significant informational deficiencies. The Government will not negotiate with offerors whose proposals are determined to contain significant informational deficiencies; those offerors will be precluded from receiving a BOA. The Government will execute a BOA with any offeror whose proposal complies with the RFP requirements and is determined to be Technically Acceptable. As the BOA process (both the evaluation of proposals and the placement of BOAs), is not a competitive acquisition process, the source selection policies and procedures of FAR 15.3 do not apply.

M.2 Technical Factor

M.2.1 The Technical Factor will be evaluated only on proposals that pass Compliance review.

M.2.2 Evaluation of the Technical Factor consists of an evaluation of the offeror's proposed Technical Capability Statement (TCS);

Representative Support Element (RSE); Corporate Organizational Structure; and Experience.

The offeror's Technical proposal will be evaluated on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis. An offeror must receive an acceptable rating in

ALL evaluation criteria to receive an overall acceptable rating for the Technical Factor. The Technical Factor will be rated as follows:

Acceptable: The proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the RFP.

Unacceptable: The proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the RFP.

M.2.3 Technical Capability Statement (TCS). The Government will evaluate the offeror's TCS to determine if it provides for the ____________________________________ organizational capability to fully execute the Governments requirements by identifying the offerors core competencies and demonstrating how those cited core competencies relate to the EAGLE effort and the ability to create a dynamic organization fully capable of supporting the Governments requirements by applying those core competencies. To determine technical capability, as related to the EAGLE effort, the TCS will be evaluated for the following four (4) elements:

M.2.3(a) Team Identification / Self-Performance:

M.2.3(a)(1) The TCS details a realistic and feasible processes for mission analysis and application of its cited core competencies and previous experience which allow the offeror to properly determine which of the EAGLE efforts functional areas it can self-perform without the use of subcontractors. An Offeror that cannot self-perform one or more functional area(s) must clearly identify its subcontractors by company name and which functional area(s) they will be supporting. Entities identified to perform a specific functional area must provide corresponding experience as detailed in Section M.2.6.

Where the offeror has identified experience of a parent or affiliate company in the detailing of its own core competencies and previous experience, the TCS adequately demonstrates how the resources of the parent or affiliate company will be utilized in performance of the proposed effort.

3 6

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

NOTE: The standard for demonstrating that the resources of a parent or affiliate company at the BOA will not be the same standard as that utilized during the Step Three Task Order Past Performance evaluations.

M.2.3(a)(2) The TCS (regardless of the offerors demonstration of self-performance in one or more of the functional areas) details a realistic and feasible process for identifying, vetting, partnering, and leading subcontractors, as well as the offerors process for replacing and adding subcontractors if necessary due to non-performance or operational changes to the effort. The offerors process for replacing and adding subcontractors must be realistic and feasible to support timely changes.

M.2.3(b) Resource / Task Order Management: The TCS adequately details realistic and feasible methods that the offeror will employ to manage future task order requirements from time of award to completion of the effort. In describing the offerors resource/task order management, the TCS must provide, at a minimum, each of the following:

M.2.3(b)(1) A realistic, feasible, and detailed approach for planning, allocating, and controlling resources and costs for awarded task orders.

M.2.3(b)(2) A realistic, feasible, and detailed approach for scheduling, budgeting, and accumulating expenditures (hours and dollars), which includes the identification of expenditure and schedule problems, and the tracking of task order performance.

M.2.3(b)(3) A realistic, feasible, and detailed approach for accounting and collecting expenditure data for an extensive CLIN structure characterized by a large and increasing number of subCLINs for multiple tasks.

M.2.3(b)(4) A realistic, feasible, and detailed approach for timely incorporation of subcontractor(s) technical, schedule and financial performance data into the offeror's monthly reports for individual task orders.

M.2.3(b)(5) A realistic, feasible, and detailed approach for ensuring proper training, licensing, certification, and safety.

M.2.3(c) Flexible Staffing Approach: The TCS adequately demonstrates the offerors ability to effectively and efficiently support short term fluctuations in effort (increase/decrease), long-term increase to workload, and long-term decrease to workload (for future cost-plus-fixed-fee type efforts). In demonstrating this ability, the TCS must provide, at a minimum, each of the following:

M.2.3(c)(1) A realistic and feasible approach to cross-utilization / temporary reallocation that effectively and efficiently makes use of existing staffing to better support short term requirement changes; provides better and more timely support; reduces cost through more efficient staffing; ensures safety, training, and certification requirements are met; and, would not impact quality of the effort.

M.2.3(c)(2) A realistic and feasible approach to rapidly increase staffing during surges in effort that addresses both long-term and short-term increases in workload where cross-utilization or temporary reallocation is not appropriate.

M.2.3(c)(3) A realistic and feasible approach to effectively and efficiently reduce staffing to levels commensurate with decreased requirements during periods of protracted reductions in workload while also ensuring retention of a qualified workforce.

M.2.3(d) Transition-in Approach: The TCS must adequately demonstrate the offerors ability to provide seamless transition of requirements applicable to future task orders. The TCS must address the transitioning of efforts with outgoing contractors from Notice to Proceed (NTP) to successfully reaching a fully operational capability (FOC) and must provide, at a minimum, each of the following:

M.2.3(d)(1) A realistic and feasible approach to ensure open communication with the incumbent contractor and the Government, including timely periodic meetings documenting progress of transition matters (including GFP/GFE inventories and hiring actions).

M.2.3(d)(2) A realistic and feasible approach to conducting the proper hiring actions that are necessary to ensure there is no impact to the current operations (including pre-employment drug screenings, qualification verifications, and the requisition/issuance of

Department of the Army Contractor Common Access Cards (CAC), access badges, and security clearances).

M.2.4 Representative Support Element (RSE). The Government will evaluate the offerors RSE narrative to determine if it clearly ____________________________________ identifies and details a realistic and feasible approach to fully execute each of the PWS requirements noted below and is supported by the information provided in the offerors TCS and the offerors Labor Basis of Estimate (BOE):

M.2.4(a) Project Management Office (PMO): The RSE narrative adequately details a realistic and feasible approach to project management and control. The offeror adequately details a realistic and feasible approach to providing the appropriate staffing (labor categories) with the required knowledge, experience, and skills using the appropriate tools, and techniques needed to effectively manage all aspects of all three functional areas as well as the required human resources functions.

M.2.4(b) Maintenance Functional Area: The RSE adequately details a realistic and feasible approach to accurately deliver services to plan, organize, facilitate, direct, control and execute maintenance operations specifically associated with the sample equipment density listing provided at Exhibit A Equipment Density Listing. The RSE adequately addresses a realistic and feasible approach for carrying out preventive maintenance checks and services (PMCS); performing equipment classification; and, accomplishing scheduled as well as

4 6

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

unscheduled field and sustainment level maintenance on the density identified in Exhibit A Equipment Density Listing. The RSE must also adequately detail a realistic and feasible technical inspection process (initial and final), including its quality control process/procedures with an emphasis on achieving a successful first time pass rate. Additionally, the RSE accurately and correctly addresses the specific Army Logistics Information Systems (LIS) being utilized, security, and other regulatory requirements specific to sensitive items including controlled cryptographic items, weapons, and night visions devices.

M.2.4(c) Supply Functional Area: The RSE adequately details a realistic and feasible approach to deliver accurate services consistent with a Unit Supply Support Activity (SSA) and a cognizant property book office by providing for inventory management providing asset accountability and asset visibility through proper operation of the appropriate LIS for the equipment density listing provided at

Exhibit A. The SSA approach must accurately address proper accountability, security, and other regulatory requirements specific to sensitive items including controlled cryptographic items, weapons, and night visions devices.

M.2.4(d) Transportation Functional Area: The RSE narrative adequately details a realistic and feasible approach to deliver accurate services for Personal Property and Transportation Motor Pool (TMP) operations. The RSE must adequately address a realistic and feasible approach to providing accurate briefings to customers regarding personal property entitlements and responsibilities, the proper preparation of required documentation to initiate and schedule personal property shipments in accordance with Joint Travel Regulation

(JTR), Defense Transportation Regulation DoD 4500.9-R (DTR) Part IV, Personal Property Consignment Instruction Guide (PPCIG) and Service

Supplements. This approach must also adequately address realistic and feasible TMP services to include general administration, dispatching and control of the fleet. Further, the offerors approach must properly address proper training, licensing, safety and security for the execution of EAGLE operations.

M.2.4(e) Labor Basis of Estimate (BOE): The Government will evaluate the offerors its proposed labor basis of estimate in relation to the BOA PWS requirements associated with the PMO, maintenance, supply, and transportation functional areas identified at L.5.2.2(b)(1) through L.5.2.2(b)(4). The offeror's BOE must demonstrate a thorough understanding of the effort through its accurate analysis of the effort, realistic assumptions and appropriate staffing decisions in order to successfully perform the PWS requirements associated with the PMO, maintenance, supply and transportation functional areas identified at L.5.2.2(b)(1) through L.5.2.2(b)(4). The BOE must provide realistic and feasible specific labor categories required to perform the effort, the rationale for their selection, and must fully support the proposed Corporate Organizational Structure.

NOTE: For Technical evaluation purposes only, the Government will utilize the SCA Directory of Occupations (5th Edition) labor category definitions and offeror-provided position titles to determine if the proposed position title is appropriate for the PMO, maintenance, supply and transportation functional area elements identified at L.5.2.2(b)(1) through L.5.2.2(b)(4). Proposed position titles not identified in the SCA Directory of Occupations (5th Edition) must be adequately defined by the offeror in its RSE (see L.5.2.2(b)).

Additionally, proposing unrelated/not required labor categories will be considered a demonstrated lack of understanding of the _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ requirement resulting in an unacceptable rating.________________________________________________

M.2.5 Corporate Organizational Structure. The Government will evaluate the offerors Corporate Organizational Structure narrative to __________________________________ determine if it demonstrates a comprehensive, realistic, and feasible organizational overview and adequately identifies the following:

M.2.5(a) The tasks from the RSE that will be performed by the offeror and the tasks that will be performed by each of the proposed subcontractors.

M.2.5(b) The command and control relationship among the offeror and each subcontractor(s) proposed in the RSE, including the identification of any positions responsible for performing successful oversight of each of the primary task areas identified in Section

2.0 of the PWS as well as the overall effort (positions such as leads, supervisors, managerial and executive leadership positions), and, for management positions, the identification of responsibilities and roles in responding to issues that may arise during execution of the effort (e.g., assigned ISO 9000 management function).

M.2.5(c) An adequate, onsite independent quality control organization that reports directly to the corporate quality office.

M.2.6 Experience: The Government will evaluate the offerors and proposed subcontractors recent and relevant experience, through its __________ proposed Attachment 0003 Experience Matrix, to determine if the offeror would be able to successfully execute the requirements as identified at L.5.2.2(b)(2) through L.5.2.2(b)(4). In order to receive a technically acceptable rating for Experience, the offeror must submit at least one (1) [and no more than three (3)] recent and relevant contract reference for each of the three functional areas

(Maintenance, Supply and Transportation) for a total of no more than nine (9) contract references. Contract references will be evaluated based upon the definitions of recent and relevant provided in Section L.

Experience in each of the three functional areas may be demonstrated by recent and relevant contract references of the Prime or recent and relevant contract references of a parent company, affiliates, or subcontractors; as noted in M.2.3, however, if an offeror identifies recent and relevant experience of a parent company or affiliate company with a different CAGE code, the offerors TCS will be evaluated to determine whether the offeror has adequately demonstrated how the resources of the parent company or affiliate company will be utilized in the performance of the proposed effort.

If an offeror identifies experience of another company/legal entity (whether it be a parent company, an affiliate, or a company being proposed as a subcontractor), the offerors Experience Matrix (Attachment 0003) will be reviewed to ensure the offeror has verified that it has said company's permission to submit the contract reference information as part of its proposal. If the offeror does not have the

5 6

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

required permission, the reference will not be evaluated.

NOTE: The contract references identified in the offerors Attachment 0003 are to fulfill the experience for the BOA alone. The Task

Order RFPs will include specific Past Performance evaluation criteria; the references provided for experience may or may not meet the criteria for Past Performance references at the Task Order Level.

*** END OF NARRATIVE M0001 ***

6 6