SQS.pdf

For the best experience, open this PDF portfolio in

Acrobat X or Adobe Reader X, or later.

Get Adobe Reader Now!

http://www.adobe.com/go/reader

JUSTIFICATION FOR QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS

FAR 9.202(a) Policy and DoD 4120.24-M Defense Standardization Program, Policy and Procedures

5 Mar 2019 Section A & Section B & Section D

RMSC: C (AFMCI 21-113, Contract Maintenance Program for Depot Maintenance Activity Group)

SECTION A: ITEM IDENTIFICATION

Application: M3P AN/MST-T1(V)

SECTION B:

1. JUSTIFICATION FOR ESTABLISHING A QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENT

a. Criticality: Repair/overhaul of this ECM Receiver Chassis Assembly requires engineering source approval by the engineering support activity 415 SCMS/GUMBB in order to maintain the quality of the part. Failure to procure this ECM Receiver Chassis Assembly from a fully qualified repair source can result in structural or functional deficiencies that will degrade the mission capability of the M3P AN/MST-T1(V).

b. Complexity, Repair Processes, and/or Material Considerations: N/A

c. Form, Fit, Function, and Interface: The qualification requirements specified herein are necessary to verify the structural and/or functional integrity and/or fit, form, and interface of the ECM Receiver Chassis Assembly being procured.

2. REASON WHY QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENT MUST BE DEMONSTRATED PRIOR TO ANY CONTRACT

AWARD

a. Completion of the specified pre-contract award qualification requirements are necessary to assure the government that the offeror is capable of repairing the ECM Receiver Chassis Assembly in compliance with the applicable technical specification/data within the schedule and economic constraints of our contracts. There are significant technical and schedule risks which can only be minimized by a completion of the requirements prior to contract award.

b. Qualification Requirement Cost Estimate: Estimated likely costs for testing and evaluation, which will be incurred by the potential offering party to become qualified are $0.

c. Qualification Time Completion Estimate: It is the estimate of the engineering support activity that completion of this qualification effort should require 60 days. This is based on complexity of the ECM Receiver Chassis Assembly and other factors.

SECTION D: SIGNATURES

Item Description NSN Part Number ECM Receiver Chassis Assembly 5865-01-491-4911 3050916-101 ECM Receiver Chassis Assembly 5865-01-498-3439 3050916-102 ECM Processor Card 5998-01-491-4132 3050917-101

X Chief of Contracting Office (COCO)

415 SCMS/GUMBB Lead Engineer Engineer Support Activity (ESA)

415 SCMS/GUMAD Engineer

REPAIR QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS

Multiple NSN’s

5 Mar 2019 Supporting Information

Qualification Requirement Cost Estimate Estimate the likely cost for testing and evaluation which will be incurred by the potential offeror to become qualified. This is a requirement of FAR 9.202(a)(1)(ii) and 10USC2319(b)(3) (The following categories may not apply in all cases. The product engineer should identify the costs applicable to the project and indicate N/A on all sections that do not apply.)

Total cost is $ 0.00 Section A. Shipping, if required, use DD Form 1654, Evaluation of Transportation Cost Factors to develop the information. Refer any questions to the Procurement Contracting Officer for cost estimation.

N/A

Section B. Dimensional/Electronic Verification. Contact the science/engineering laboratory to obtain cost estimates (bids) for tests such as:

$ 0.00

a. Chemical N/A

b. Metallurgical $ 0.00

(1) Destructive N/A

(2) Non-Destructive N/A

c. Dimensional N/A

d. Electronic N/A

e. Mechanical N/A

f. Non-Destructive Inspection N/A Section C. Nuclear Hardness [This includes cost of shock, vibration, and Electro-Magnetic Pulse (EMP)]. Contact Systems Engineering Integration and Test Division for hourly rate.

Section D. Form, Fit, Function and Interface. Contact your organizational Production Management Specialist (PMS) to obtain information on the same or similar item where work has been accomplished in the past using AFMC Form 206, Temporary Work Request.

Section E. Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) Qualification Testing (If required) $ 0.00

a. Laboratory Costs (Costs are directly dependent on the type of testing to be accomplished and the location and duration of the testing. For example, landing gear laboratory testing is normally accomplished on a dynamometer and costs vary from $25,000 to $500,000 depending on the depth of testing. Aircraft and missile testing will vary as the requirement dictates and the cost will have to be identified by the source of testing).

b. Flight/Data Reduction & Analysis Costs. N/A Section F. Travel by Contractor to Test Site (if required) $ 0.00

a. Lodging N/A

b. Per Diem N/A

c. Rental Cars N/A

d. Incidentals (Verified) N/A Section G. SAR Package Development/Evaluation Cost: A potential new source’s development of a Source Approval (SAR) package may cost as much as:

In addition, the cost incurred for Government evaluation of their SAR may be as much as: N/A Evaluation cost may be born by the government if it is in the best interest of the Government to qualify alternate sources.

5 Mar 2019 Section C 1/3

SECTION C:

1. QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS THAT MUST BE SATISFIED TO BECOME A QUALIFIED SOURCE

a. Prequalification Notice: The offeror shall notify the appropriate government Small Business Office or, if responding to a solicitation, the contracting officer in the appropriate government contracting office, of intent to qualify as a source for this ECM Receiver Chassis Assembly.

b. Facilities, Testing, and Inspection Capabilities: The offeror must certify to the government that they have, or have access to, the required facilities and equipment to repair, inspect, test, package, and store the item. These items are used on AN/MST-T1(V) system and can only be verified using in the AN/MST-T1(V) system or equivalent.The offeror shall make their facilities, equipment, tooling, and personnel available for evaluation and inspection by the government.

The contractor must have in their possession the following source code in order to perform testing on the ECM. Currently only the OEM and SwRI has the source code in their possession.

c. Data Verification: The offeror must verify that they have a complete data package. This verification must include a complete list of all procedures, drawings, and specifications, including change notices, in the offeror’s possession including, at a minimum the reference documents in the following table.

The offeror may also be required to produce copies of all applicable procedures, drawings, or specifications.

d. Repair Process Verification: The offeror must repair this item to conform to the government requirements as prescribed within the ESA-approved engineering/technical data package. The offeror must show compliance with Unique Identification (UID) requirements in accordance with DFARS 211.274 as prescribed within the ESA-approved engineering/technical data package. The offeror must provide, at their own expense, data showing the results of all quality, performance, and environmental evaluations conducted by the offeror to show compliance with the government requirements as prescribed by 415 SCMS/GUMBB. The offeror shall also identify its sources for materials and its standards for internally used processes.

e. Test and Evaluation and/or Verification: The offeror, at their own expense, shall prepare and submit to 415 SCMS/GUMBB for their prior approval, a qualification test plan/procedure detailing how they intend to verify compliance with all performance, environmental, mechanical, and quality assurance requirements identified by ESA-approved engineering/technical data package.

f. Qualification Article Verification: N/A

Item Description NSN Part Number Reference Docs ECM Receiver Chassis Assembly 5865-01-491-4911 3050916-101 3050916 Cage: 66948 ECM Receiver Chassis Assembly 5865-01-498-3439 3050916-102 3050916 Cage: 66948 ECM Processor Card 5998-01-491-4132 3050917-101 3050917 Cage: 66948

5 Mar 2019 Section C 2/3

g. Qualification Requirement Cost Estimate: Estimated likely costs for testing and evaluation,

h. Qualification Time Completion Estimate: It is the estimate of the engineering support activity of the ECM Receiver Chassis Assembly and other factors.

i. Qualification Time Limitation: An offeror may not be denied the opportunity to submit and have considered an offer for a contract if the offeror can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the contracting officer that the offeror (or its product) meets these standards for qualification or can meet them before the date specified for award of the contract. The award will not be delayed to provide the vendor with an opportunity to demonstrate its ability to meet the standards specified in this qualification requirement.

j. Evaluation of Proposals Not Previously Qualified: The offeror must be fully qualified in order to be eligible for a contract award. Therefore, the offeror must fulfill all of the requirements stated, in writing, in the qualification requirement before the date specified for award of the contract. Once all requirements are met, the offeror will be listed as an approved repair source for this item. Approval, however, does not guarantee subsequent contract award.

5 Mar 2019 Section C 3/3

2. SOURCE QUALIFICATION WAIVER REQUIREMENTS

Sources who meet any of the following Source Qualification Waiver Criteria (QWC) may apply for a waiver of all or part of the qualification requirements. If a waiver is granted and the offeror is awarded a contract, the offeror may still be required to provide a post-contract award first article exhibit to verify production capability:

a. QWC1: The potential source submits written certification that the articles have been supplied to the government or original equipment manufacturer (e.g., DD Form 250, Material Inspection and Receiving Report, Purchase Order invoice, etc).

b. QWC2: The potential source is qualified on the right-hand article and requests to be qualified on the left-hand article. If the right-and left-hand articles are mirror images of each other, then approval can generally be given.

c. QWC3: A source qualified to provide an assembly is usually qualified to provide subassemblies, major components, and items of that assembly.

d. QWC4: A source qualified to provide earlier dash numbers of a basic P/N may be qualified to provide other dash numbers of that same basic P/N, provided there is no increase in complexity, criticality, or other relevant requirements.

e. QWC5: A source qualified to provide a similar or like item can be qualified to provide the required item. However, for approval, the engineering authority must verify that there is no increase in complexity, criticality, or other requirements over that of the similar item. At a minimum, the source shall provide a complete set of drawings for the similar item and written proof, such as purchase orders, shipping documents, etc., to show that the similar item was provided to the original equipment manufacturer or DoD.

f. QWC6: A source previously qualified to provide an item, but which has been purchased, sold, merged, absorbed, reformed, split, etc., may qualify if it can be established that the qualification is currently with the requester and that the requester has the same or equivalent facilities, tooling, equipment, personnel, and utilizes the original forging, castings, etc., in the repair process.

Item Description:

NSN:

ECM Processor Card:

Estimate the likely cost for testing and evaluation which will be incurred by the potential offeror to become qualified This is a requirement of FAR 9202a1ii and 10USC2319b3 The following categories may not apply in all cases The product engineer should identify the costs applicable to the project and indicate NA on all sections that do not apply:

Total cost is:

NA:

000:

a Chemical:

b Metallurgical:

1 Destructive:

2 NonDestructive:

c Dimensional:

d Electronic:

e Mechanical:

f NonDestructive Inspection:

NA_2:

NA_3:

NA_4:

b FlightData Reduction Analysis Costs:

Section F Travel by Contractor to Test Site if required:

a Lodging:

b Per Diem:

c Rental Cars:

d Incidentals Verified:

NA_5:

Item Description_2:

NSN_2:

Reference Docs:

ECM Processor Card_2:

2019-03-07T08:02:23-0700

NGUYEN.THI.D.1515727392

2019-03-07T09:44:34-0700

KLEMM.VAL.REID.1286909821

2019-03-11T16:25:07-0600

SCHMIDT.MELINDA.M.1144943801

a. Criticality: Repair/overhaul of this IFF Interface Circuit Card Assembly requires engineering source approval by the engineering support activity 415 SCMS/GUMBB in order to maintain the quality of the part. Failure to procure this IFF Interface Circuit Card Assembly from a fully qualified repair source can result in structural or functional deficiencies that will degrade the mission capability of the M3P AN/MST-T1(V).

to verify the structural and/or functional integrity and/or fit, form, and interface of the IFF Interface Circuit Card Assembly being procured.

assure the government that the offeror is capable of repairing the IFF Interface Circuit Card Assembly in compliance with the applicable technical specification/data within the schedule and of the IFF Interface Circuit Card Assembly and other factors.

IFF Interface Circuit Card Assembly 5998-01-651-2676 201309205-10 IFF Interface Circuit Card Assembly 5998-01-651-4973 3050904-102 offeror to become qualified. This is a requirement of FAR 9.202(a)(1)(ii) and 10USC2319(b)(3)

(1) Destructive N/A

(2) Non-Destructive N/A

c. Dimensional N/A

d. Electronic N/A

e. Mechanical N/A

f. Non-Destructive Inspection N/A the location and duration of the testing. For example, landing gear laboratory testing is normally accomplished on a dynamometer and costs vary from $25,000 to $500,000 depending on the

a. Lodging N/A

b. Per Diem N/A

c. Rental Cars N/A

d. Incidentals (Verified) N/A contracting office, of intent to qualify as a source for this IFF Interface Circuit Card Assembly.

verified using in the AN/MST-T1(V) system or equivalent.The offeror shall make their facilities, equipment, tooling, and personnel available for evaluation and inspection by the government.

The offeror may also be required to produce copies of all applicable procedures, drawings, or specifications.

offeror must show compliance with Unique Identification (UID) requirements in accordance with DFARS 211.274 as prescribed within the ESA-approved engineering/technical data package. The offeror must provide, at their own expense, data showing the results of all quality, performance, and environmental evaluations conducted by the offeror to show compliance with the detailing how they intend to verify compliance with all performance, environmental, IFF Interface Circuit Card Assembly 5998-01-651-2676 201309205-10 201309205 Cage: 98747 IFF Interface Circuit Card Assembly 5998-01-651-4973 3050904-102 3050904 Cage: 66948 contracting officer that the offeror (or its product) meets these standards for qualification or can meet them before the date specified for award of the contract. The award will not be delayed waiver of all or part of the qualification requirements. If a waiver is granted and the offeror is awarded a contract, the offeror may still be required to provide a post-contract award first article exhibit to verify minimum, the source shall provide a complete set of drawings for the similar item and written

Item Description:

NSN:

Estimate the likely cost for testing and evaluation which will be incurred by the potential offeror to become qualified This is a requirement of FAR 9202a1ii and 10USC2319b3 The following categories may not apply in all cases The product engineer should identify the costs applicable to the project and indicate NA on all sections that do not apply:

Total cost is:

NA:

000:

a Chemical:

b Metallurgical:

1 Destructive:

2 NonDestructive:

c Dimensional:

d Electronic:

e Mechanical:

f NonDestructive Inspection:

NA_2:

NA_3:

NA_4:

b FlightData Reduction Analysis Costs:

Section F Travel by Contractor to Test Site if required:

a Lodging:

b Per Diem:

c Rental Cars:

d Incidentals Verified:

NA_5:

Item Description_2:

NSN_2:

Reference Docs:

2019-03-07T08:17:58-0700

NGUYEN.THI.D.1515727392

2019-03-07T10:00:01-0700

KLEMM.VAL.REID.1286909821

2019-03-11T16:22:34-0600

SCHMIDT.MELINDA.M.1144943801

Application: M3P AN/MST-T1(A)

a. Criticality: Repair/overhaul of this IFF Interface Circuit Card Assembly requires engineering source approval by the engineering support activity 415 SCMS/GUMBB in order to maintain the quality of the part. Failure to procure this IFF Interface Circuit Card Assembly from a fully qualified repair source can result in structural or functional deficiencies that will degrade the mission capability of the M3P AN/MST-T1(A).

to verify the structural and/or functional integrity and/or fit, form, and interface of the IFF Interface Circuit Card Assembly being procured.

assure the government that the offeror is capable of repairing the IFF Interface Circuit Card Assembly in compliance with the applicable technical specification/data within the schedule and

MCP Processor CCA 5998-01-672-2576 201718970-70 MCP Processor CCA 5998-01-540-5204 3050917-102 offeror to become qualified. This is a requirement of FAR 9.202(a)(1)(ii) and 10USC2319(b)(3)

(1) Destructive N/A

(2) Non-Destructive N/A

c. Dimensional N/A

d. Electronic N/A

e. Mechanical N/A

f. Non-Destructive Inspection N/A the location and duration of the testing. For example, landing gear laboratory testing is normally accomplished on a dynamometer and costs vary from $25,000 to $500,000 depending on the

a. Lodging N/A

b. Per Diem N/A

c. Rental Cars N/A

d. Incidentals (Verified) N/A contracting office, of intent to qualify as a source for this IFF Interface Circuit Card Assembly.

package, and store the item. These items are used on AN/MST-T1(A) system and can only be verified using in the AN/MST-T1(A) system or equivalent.The offeror shall make their facilities, equipment, tooling, and personnel available for evaluation and inspection by the government.

The offeror may also be required to produce copies of all applicable procedures, drawings, or specifications.

offeror must show compliance with Unique Identification (UID) requirements in accordance with DFARS 211.274 as prescribed within the ESA-approved engineering/technical data package. The offeror must provide, at their own expense, data showing the results of all quality, performance, and environmental evaluations conducted by the offeror to show compliance with the detailing how they intend to verify compliance with all performance, environmental, MCP Processor CCA 5998-01-672-2576 201718970-70 201718970 Cage: 98747 MCP Processor CCA 5998-01-540-5204 3050917-102 3050917 Cage: 66948 contracting officer that the offeror (or its product) meets these standards for qualification or can meet them before the date specified for award of the contract. The award will not be delayed waiver of all or part of the qualification requirements. If a waiver is granted and the offeror is awarded a contract, the offeror may still be required to provide a post-contract award first article exhibit to verify minimum, the source shall provide a complete set of drawings for the similar item and written

Item Description:

NSN:

MCP Processor CCA:

MCP Processor CCA_2:

Estimate the likely cost for testing and evaluation which will be incurred by the potential offeror to become qualified This is a requirement of FAR 9202a1ii and 10USC2319b3 The following categories may not apply in all cases The product engineer should identify the costs applicable to the project and indicate NA on all sections that do not apply:

Total cost is:

NA:

000:

a Chemical:

b Metallurgical:

1 Destructive:

2 NonDestructive:

c Dimensional:

d Electronic:

e Mechanical:

f NonDestructive Inspection:

NA_2:

NA_3:

NA_4:

b FlightData Reduction Analysis Costs:

Section F Travel by Contractor to Test Site if required:

a Lodging:

b Per Diem:

c Rental Cars:

d Incidentals Verified:

NA_5:

Item Description_2:

NSN_2:

Reference Docs:

MCP Processor CCA_3:

MCP Processor CCA_4:

2019-03-07T08:55:41-0700

NGUYEN.THI.D.1515727392

2019-03-07T09:55:13-0700

KLEMM.VAL.REID.1286909821

2019-03-11T16:23:37-0600

SCHMIDT.MELINDA.M.1144943801

a. Criticality: Repair/overhaul of this Single Board Computer requires engineering source approval by the engineering support activity 415 SCMS/GUMBB in order to maintain the quality of the part. Failure to procure this Single Board Computer from a fully qualified repair source can result in structural or functional deficiencies that will degrade the mission capability of the M3P

AN/MST-T1(V).

to verify the structural and/or functional integrity and/or fit, form, and interface of the Single Board Computer being procured.

assure the government that the offeror is capable of repairing the Single Board Computer in compliance with the applicable technical specification/data within the schedule and economic constraints of our contracts. There are significant technical and schedule risks which can only be minimized by a completion of the requirements prior to contract award.

of the Single Board Computer and other factors.

Single Board Computer OLD: 5998-01-491-0370 3050776-101 Single Board Computer NEW: 5998-01-673-3993 201718970-10 Single Board Computer OLD: 5998-01-498-4620 3050776-102 Single Board Computer NEW:5998-01-673-6506 201718970-30 Single Board Computer OLD: 5998-01-510-5647 3050926-101 Single Board Computer NEW: 5998-01-376-3119 201718970-90 Single Board Computer 5998-01-498-8983 3050776-103 Single Board Computer 5998-01-673-3117 201718970-50 offeror to become qualified. This is a requirement of FAR 9.202(a)(1)(ii) and 10USC2319(b)(3)

(1) Destructive N/A

(2) Non-Destructive N/A

c. Dimensional N/A

d. Electronic N/A

e. Mechanical N/A

f. Non-Destructive Inspection N/A the location and duration of the testing. For example, landing gear laboratory testing is normally accomplished on a dynamometer and costs vary from $25,000 to $500,000 depending on the

a. Lodging N/A

b. Per Diem N/A

c. Rental Cars N/A

d. Incidentals (Verified) N/A contracting office, of intent to qualify as a source for this Single Board Computer.

verified using in the AN/MST-T1(V) system or equivalent.The offeror shall make their facilities, equipment, tooling, and personnel available for evaluation and inspection by the government.

The offeror may also be required to produce copies of all applicable procedures, drawings, or specifications.

offeror must show compliance with Unique Identification (UID) requirements in accordance with DFARS 211.274 as prescribed within the ESA-approved engineering/technical data package. The offeror must provide, at their own expense, data showing the results of all quality, performance, and environmental evaluations conducted by the offeror to show compliance with the detailing how they intend to verify compliance with all performance, environmental, Single Board Computer OLD: 5998-01-491-0370 3050776-101 3050776 Cage: 66948 Single Board Computer NEW: 5998-01-673-3993 201718970-10 201718970 Cage: 98747 Single Board Computer OLD: 5998-01-498-4620 3050776-102 3050776 Cage: 66948 Single Board Computer NEW:5998-01-673-6506 201718970-30 201718970 Cage: 98747 Single Board Computer OLD: 5998-01-510-5647 3050926-101 3050926 Cage: 66948 Single Board Computer NEW: 5998-01-376-3119 201718970-90 201718970 Cage: 66948 Single Board Computer 5998-01-498-8983 3050776-103 3050776 Cage: 66948 Single Board Computer 5998-01-673-3117 201718970-50 201718970 Cage: 98747 of the Single Board Computer and other factors.

contracting officer that the offeror (or its product) meets these standards for qualification or can meet them before the date specified for award of the contract. The award will not be delayed waiver of all or part of the qualification requirements. If a waiver is granted and the offeror is awarded a contract, the offeror may still be required to provide a post-contract award first article exhibit to verify minimum, the source shall provide a complete set of drawings for the similar item and written

Item Description:

NSN:

Single Board Computer:

Single Board Computer_2:

Single Board Computer_3:

Single Board Computer_4:

Single Board Computer_5:

Single Board Computer_6:

Single Board Computer_7:

Single Board Computer_8:

Estimate the likely cost for testing and evaluation which will be incurred by the potential offeror to become qualified This is a requirement of FAR 9202a1ii and 10USC2319b3 The following categories may not apply in all cases The product engineer should identify the costs applicable to the project and indicate NA on all sections that do not apply:

Total cost is:

NA:

000:

a Chemical:

b Metallurgical:

1 Destructive:

2 NonDestructive:

c Dimensional:

d Electronic:

e Mechanical:

f NonDestructive Inspection:

NA_2:

NA_3:

NA_4:

b FlightData Reduction Analysis Costs:

Section F Travel by Contractor to Test Site if required:

a Lodging:

b Per Diem:

c Rental Cars:

d Incidentals Verified:

NA_5:

Item Description_2:

NSN_2:

Reference Docs:

Single Board Computer_9:

Single Board Computer_10:

Single Board Computer_11:

Single Board Computer_12:

Single Board Computer_13:

Single Board Computer_14:

Single Board Computer_15:

Single Board Computer_16:

2019-03-07T08:10:42-0700

NGUYEN.THI.D.1515727392

2019-03-07T09:46:22-0700

KLEMM.VAL.REID.1286909821

2019-03-11T16:24:16-0600

SCHMIDT.MELINDA.M.1144943801

7 Mar 2019 Section A & Section B & Section D

1. National Stock Number (NSN): 5998-01-498-8206

2. Part Number (P/N): 3050945-120

3. Noun: Transition Module

4. Application: M3P, AN/MST-T1(V), Mini-MUTES

a. Criticality: Repair/overhaul of this Transition Module requires engineering source approval by the engineering support activity 415 SCMS/GUMAD in order to maintain the quality of the part.

Failure to procure this Transition Module from a fully qualified repair source can result in structural or functional deficiencies that will degrade the mission capability of the M3P, AN/MST-T1(V), Mini-MUTES to verify the structural and/or functional integrity and/or fit, form, and interface of the Transition Module being procured.

assure the government that the offeror is capable of repairing the Transition Module in compliance with the applicable technical specification/data within the schedule and economic of the Transition Module and other factors.

NSN: 5998-01-498-8206

P/N: 3050945-120 Noun: Transition Module Application: M3P, AN/MST-T1(V), Mini-MUTES

7 Mar 2019 Supporting Information offeror to become qualified. This is a requirement of FAR 9.202(a)(1)(ii) and 10USC2319(b)(3)

(1) Destructive N/A

(2) Non-Destructive N/A

c. Dimensional N/A

d. Electronic N/A

e. Mechanical N/A

f. Non-Destructive Inspection N/A the location and duration of the testing. For example, landing gear laboratory testing is normally accomplished on a dynamometer and costs vary from $25,000 to $500,000 depending on the

a. Lodging N/A

b. Per Diem N/A

c. Rental Cars N/A

d. Incidentals (Verified) N/A

P/N: 3050945-120

7 Mar 2019 Section C 1/3 contracting office, of intent to qualify as a source for this Transition Module.

verified using in the AN/MST-T1(V) system or equivalent. The offeror shall make their facilities, equipment, tooling, and personnel available for evaluation and inspection by the government.

The contractor must have in their possession the following software in order to perform testing on the Transition Module 6465-0038.

including change notices, in the offeror’s possession including, at a minimum Harris (66948) drawing 3050945. The offeror may also be required to produce copies of all applicable procedures, drawings, or specifications.

offeror must show compliance with Unique Identification (UID) requirements in accordance with DFARS 211.274 as prescribed within the ESA-approved engineering/technical data package. The offeror must provide, at their own expense, data showing the results of all quality, performance, and environmental evaluations conducted by the offeror to show compliance with the government requirements as prescribed by 415 SCMS/GUMAD. The offeror shall also identify its sources for materials and its standards for internally used processes.

submit to 415 SCMS/GUMAD for their prior approval, a qualification test plan/procedure

P/N: 3050945-120

7 Mar 2019 Section C 2/3 of the Transition Module and other factors.

contracting officer that the offeror (or its product) meets these standards for qualification or can meet them before the date specified for award of the contract. The award will not be delayed

P/N: 3050945-120

7 Mar 2019 Section C 3/3 waiver of all or part of the qualification requirements. If a waiver is granted and the offeror is awarded a contract, the offeror may still be required to provide a post-contract award first article exhibit to verify minimum, the source shall provide a complete set of drawings for the similar item and written

NA:

Total cost is:

NA_2:

000:

a Chemical:

b Metallurgical:

1 Destructive:

2 NonDestructive:

c Dimensional:

d Electronic:

e Mechanical:

f NonDestructive Inspection:

NA_3:

NA_4:

NA_5:

b FlightData Reduction Analysis Costs:

Section F Travel by Contractor to Test Site if required:

a Lodging:

b Per Diem:

c Rental Cars:

d Incidentals Verified:

NA_6:

2019-03-07T09:15:01-0700

NGUYEN.THI.D.1515727392

2019-03-07T09:57:40-0700

KLEMM.VAL.REID.1286909821

2019-03-11T16:23:07-0600

SCHMIDT.MELINDA.M.1144943801

RMSC: B (AFMCI 21-113, Contract Maintenance Program for Depot Maintenance Activity Group)

1. National Stock Number (NSN): 5840-01-510-5640FD

2. Part Number (P/N): 3050770-101

3. Noun: Radar Data Processor

4. Application: AN/MST-T1(V), Mini-MUTES

a. Criticality: Repair/overhaul of this Radar Data Processor requires engineering source approval by the engineering support activity 415 SCMS/GUMAD in order to maintain the quality of the part.

Failure to procure repair services for this Radar Data Processor from a fully qualified repair of the AN/MST-T1(V), Mini-MUTES to verify the structural and/or functional integrity and/or fit, form, and interface of the Radar Data Processor being procured.

assure the government that the offeror is capable of repairing the Radar Data Processor in compliance with the applicable technical specification/data within the schedule and economic of the Radar Data Processor and other factors.

NSN: 5840-01-510-5640FD

P/N: 3050770-101 Noun: Radar Data Processor Application: AN/MST-T1(V), Mini-MUTES

7 Mar 2019 Supporting Information offeror to become qualified. This is a requirement of FAR 9.202(a)(1)(ii) and 10USC2319(b)(3)

(1) Destructive N/A

(2) Non-Destructive N/A

c. Dimensional N/A

d. Electronic N/A

e. Mechanical N/A

f. Non-Destructive Inspection N/A the location and duration of the testing. For example, landing gear laboratory testing is normally accomplished on a dynamometer and costs vary from $25,000 to $500,000 depending on the

a. Lodging N/A

b. Per Diem N/A

c. Rental Cars N/A

d. Incidentals (Verified) N/A

P/N: 3050770-101

7 Mar 2019 Section C 1/3 contracting office, of intent to qualify as a source for this Radar Data Processor.

verified using in the AN/MST-T1(V) system or equivalent. The offeror shall make their facilities, equipment, tooling, and personnel available for evaluation and inspection by the government.

including change notices, in the offeror’s possession including, at a minimum Harris (66948) drawing 3050770. The offeror may also be required to produce copies of all applicable procedures, drawings, or specifications.

offeror must show compliance with Unique Identification (UID) requirements in accordance with DFARS 211.274 as prescribed within the ESA-approved engineering/technical data package. The offeror must provide, at their own expense, data showing the results of all quality, performance, and environmental evaluations conducted by the offeror to show compliance with the government requirements as prescribed by 415 SCMS/GUMAD. The offeror shall also identify its sources for materials and its standards for internally used processes.

submit to 415 SCMS/GUMAD for their prior approval, a qualification test plan/procedure of the Radar Data Processor and other factors.

P/N: 3050770-101

7 Mar 2019 Section C 2/3 contracting officer that the offeror (or its product) meets these standards for qualification or can meet them before the date specified for award of the contract. The award will not be delayed

P/N: 3050770-101

7 Mar 2019 Section C 3/3 waiver of all or part of the qualification requirements. If a waiver is granted and the offeror is awarded a contract, the offeror may still be required to provide a post-contract award first article exhibit to verify minimum, the source shall provide a complete set of drawings for the similar item and written

NA:

Total cost is:

NA_2:

000:

a Chemical:

b Metallurgical:

1 Destructive:

2 NonDestructive:

c Dimensional:

d Electronic:

e Mechanical:

f NonDestructive Inspection:

NA_3:

NA_4:

NA_5:

b FlightData Reduction Analysis Costs:

Section F Travel by Contractor to Test Site if required:

a Lodging:

b Per Diem:

c Rental Cars:

d Incidentals Verified:

NA_6:

2019-03-19T14:35:40-0600

NGUYEN.THI.D.1515727392

2019-03-22T08:15:34-0600

KENT.BRYSON.C.1385517986

2019-03-27T16:38:41-0600

SCHMIDT.MELINDA.M.1144943801

Application: AN/MST-T1(V)

a. Criticality: Repair/overhaul of this REU Control Processor Assembly requires engineering source approval by the engineering support activity 415 SCMS/GUMBB in order to maintain the quality of the part. Failure to procure this REU Control Processor Assembly from a fully qualified repair of the AN/MST-T1(V).

to verify the structural and/or functional integrity and/or fit, form, and interface of the REU Control Processor Assembly being procured.

assure the government that the offeror is capable of repairing the REU Control Processor Assembly in compliance with the applicable technical specification/data within the schedule and of the REU Control Processor Assembly and other factors.

REU Control Processor Assembly 5840-01-491-3732 3050775-101 REU Control Processor Assembly 5840-01-498-3432 3050775-102 offeror to become qualified. This is a requirement of FAR 9.202(a)(1)(ii) and 10USC2319(b)(3)

(1) Destructive N/A

(2) Non-Destructive N/A

c. Dimensional N/A

d. Electronic N/A

e. Mechanical N/A

f. Non-Destructive Inspection N/A the location and duration of the testing. For example, landing gear laboratory testing is normally accomplished on a dynamometer and costs vary from $25,000 to $500,000 depending on the

a. Lodging N/A

b. Per Diem N/A

c. Rental Cars N/A

d. Incidentals (Verified) N/A contracting office, of intent to qualify as a source for this REU Control Processor Assembly.

verified using in the AN/MST-T1(V) system or equivalent.The offeror shall make their facilities, equipment, tooling, and personnel available for evaluation and inspection by the government per. The following software is required in order to repair this RCP, Harris Media Number 644C- 0001 and 6465-0053 per drawings 3051492.

The offeror may also be required to produce copies of all applicable procedures, drawings, or specifications.

offeror must show compliance with Unique Identification (UID) requirements in accordance with DFARS 211.274 as prescribed within the ESA-approved engineering/technical data package. The offeror must provide, at their own expense, data showing the results of all quality, performance, and environmental evaluations conducted by the offeror to show compliance with the detailing how they intend to verify compliance with all performance, environmental, REU Control Processor Assembly 5840-01-491-3732 3050775-101 3050775 Cage: 66948 REU Control Processor Assembly 5840-01-498-3432 3050775-102 3050775 Cage: 66948 of the REU Control Processor Assembly and other factors.

contracting officer that the offeror (or its product) meets these standards for qualification or can meet them before the date specified for award of the contract. The award will not be delayed waiver of all or part of the qualification requirements. If a waiver is granted and the offeror is awarded a contract, the offeror may still be required to provide a post-contract award first article exhibit to verify minimum, the source shall provide a complete set of drawings for the similar item and written

Item Description:

NSN:

Estimate the likely cost for testing and evaluation which will be incurred by the potential offeror to become qualified This is a requirement of FAR 9202a1ii and 10USC2319b3 The following categories may not apply in all cases The product engineer should identify the costs applicable to the project and indicate NA on all sections that do not apply:

Total cost is:

NA:

000:

a Chemical:

b Metallurgical:

1 Destructive:

2 NonDestructive:

c Dimensional:

d Electronic:

e Mechanical:

f NonDestructive Inspection:

NA_2:

NA_3:

NA_4:

b FlightData Reduction Analysis Costs:

Section F Travel by Contractor to Test Site if required:

a Lodging:

b Per Diem:

c Rental Cars:

d Incidentals Verified:

NA_5:

Item Description_2:

NSN_2:

Part Number:

Reference Docs:

2019-03-07T05:43:34-0700

NGUYEN.THI.D.1515727392

2019-03-07T06:59:21-0700

KENT.BRYSON.C.1385517986

2019-03-25T11:40:25-0600

GARDUNO.KEVIN.J.1249732865

a. Criticality: Repair/overhaul of this Transmitter Control Unit requires engineering source approval by the engineering support activity 415 SCMS/GUMBB in order to maintain the quality of the part. Failure to procure this Transmitter Control Unit from a fully qualified repair source can result in structural or functional deficiencies that will degrade the mission capability of the M3P

AN/MST-T1(V).

to verify the structural and/or functional integrity and/or fit, form, and interface of the Transmitter Control Unit being procured.

assure the government that the offeror is capable of repairing the Transmitter Control Unit in compliance with the applicable technical specification/data within the schedule and economic of the Transmitter Control Unit and other factors.

Transmitter Control Unit 5840-01-498-2679 3050772-101 Transmitter Control Unit 5998-01-491-4133 3050774-101

41X SCMS/XXXXX Lead Engineer

41X SCMS/XXXXX Engineer offeror to become qualified. This is a requirement of FAR 9.202(a)(1)(ii) and 10USC2319(b)(3)

(1) Destructive N/A

(2) Non-Destructive N/A

c. Dimensional N/A

d. Electronic N/A

e. Mechanical N/A

f. Non-Destructive Inspection N/A the location and duration of the testing. For example, landing gear laboratory testing is normally accomplished on a dynamometer and costs vary from $25,000 to $500,000 depending on the

b. Flight/Data Reduction & Analysis Costs. N