EDL_EDA.pdf
PDF 1 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Control Unit, Antisk Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- SPRHA1-19-Q-0630
About this file
Attachments
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| SPRHA119Q0630.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
For the best experience, open this PDF portfolio in
Acrobat X or Adobe Reader X, or later.
Get Adobe Reader Now!
http://www.adobe.com/go/reader
ENGINEERING DATA LIST
DATE:
31 DEC 2018
REVISION: 18 *HISTORY*
CAGE:
98747
PAGE:
NSN:
1630014171493
DATA TECH:
Williamson, Tiffany
END ITEM:
F-16 LANDING GEAR
ORGANIZATION/OFFICE SYMBOL:
429 SCMS GUMACB/
MANUFACTURER NAME:
OGDEN AIR LOGISTICS CENTER
REFERENCE NUMBER:
9246250-10
NOUN:
CONTROL UNIT,ANTISK
LINE/
SUB CAGE
ENG DRAWING NUM/ ACCOMP
DOC NUM REV
NR
SHEETS
FURN
CODE
DIST
CODE NOUN REMARKS
L 98747 9246250 E S F-16 BRAKE
CONTROLL/ANTISKID
ASSEMBLY
Williamson, Tiffany 31 DEC 2018
W/EO 10A0788
DRAWING 201416605 SECTION/PARAGRAPH APPLIES:
MATERIAL REVIEW BOARD (MRB) 5.3.1
PART MARKING AND IDENTIFICATION (IUID) 6.1.1
NAME: DATE:
L 98747 9246251 B S ENCLOSURE-CASTING
L 98747 9246252 B S COVER-CASTING
L 98747 9246253 E S CIRCUIT CARD ASSY,
PRIMARY BACKUP
L 98747 9246255 A S CIRCUIT CARD ASSY, MOTHER
L 98747 9246256 E S CIRCUIT CARD ASSY,
CONNECTOR
L 98747 9246257 E S CIRCUIT CARD ASSY, DRIVER
L 98747 9246262 C S PRIMARY/BACKUP BOARD
ASSEMBLY, GERBER
L 98747 9246263 S MOTHER BOARD ASSEMBLY
L 98747 AW9246263 S MOTHER BOARD ASSEMBLY
(ARTWORK) GERBER
L 98747 9246264 B S CONNECTOR BOARD
L 98747 AW9246264 B S CONNECTOR BOARD
ASSEMBLY (ARTWORK)
GERBER
L 98747 9246265 C S DRIVER BOARD ASSEMBLY
L 98747 AW9246265 B S DRIVER BOARD ASSEMBLY
(ARTWORK) GERBER
W/EO 09A2343-H
L 98747 9513025 B S PLATE, IDENTIFICATION
L 98747 9513054 A S FIRMWARE, MICROCIRCUIT,
DIGITAL-PA
L 98747 9513055 B S MICROCIRCUIT,
PROGRAMMED-EPLD
L 98747 9513061 B S SCHEMATIC, CIRCUIT CARD
ASSY, PRIMARY/BACKUP
C - CLASSIFIED DOCUMENT.
S - FURNISHED WITH SOLICITATION.
M - STABLE BASE DRAWING REQUIRED; FURNISHED WITH
CONTRACT AWARD.
X - DATA SUPPLIED (NOT IN JEDMICS).
R - FURNISHED BY PCO UPON REQUEST.
P - PARTIAL DOCUMENT FURNISHED.
V - VENDOR DRAWING; (NOT PROVIDED).
G - GOV'T DOCUMENT.
O - OTHERS, CONTRACTOR MUST ACQUIRE.
A- DATA NOT AVAILABLE.
FURNISHED METHOD CODE LEGEND:
Page 1 of 3EDL Version 18Generated by PRPS using Jasper Reports on 28 Mar 2019
LINE/
SUB CAGE
ENG DRAWING NUM/ ACCOMP
DOC NUM REV
NR
SHEETS
FURN
CODE
DIST
CODE NOUN REMARKS
L 98747 9513062 S SCHEMATIC, CIRCUIT CARD
ASSY, MOTHER
L 98747 9513063 C S SCHEMATIC, CIRCUIT BOARD
ASSY, CONNECTOR
L 98747 9513064 B S SCHEMATIC, CIRCUIT CARD
ASSY, DRIVER
L 98747 9513069 D S BRACKET, CABLE SUPPORT
L 98747 200825103 S DSP, CQFP-132 FORMED AND
TINNED LEADS
L 98747 200825104 S FLASH MEMORY SCREENED,
LOW TEMP
L 98747 200827953 A S LABEL, UNIQUE
IDENTIFICATION (UID),
LANDING GEAR
L 81755 FPS-3001 G S CONTRACTORS FINISH
SPECIFICATION FOR F-16
L 81755 FPS-3017 F S METAL REMOVAL
PROCEDURES AND
LIMITATIONS
L 81755 FPS-3018 B S FORMING OF ALUMINUM
ALLOYS
W/AM 4 AND 5
L 81755 M100 AT S RIVET INSTALLATION, SOLID
AND BLIND
L 98747 201416605 A S LANDING GEAR
REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENT
STANDARD ENGINEERING TEXT
NOTE TO ALL SUPPLY CHAIN PERSONNEL: THE ENGINEERING NOTES ARE PROVIDED ON AIR FORCE DRAWING 201416605, CAGE CODE 98747, AND ADVANCED ENGINEERING SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER(S) (AESO'S). THE HILL AFB FORM 462, ENGINEERING DATA REQUIREMENTS (ATTACHMENT A /ENGINEERING INSTRUCTIONS) ARE NO LONGER UTILIZED FOR LANDING GEAR AND WILL NOT BE PROVIDED. ALL PREVIOUS LANDING GEAR VERSIONS OF THE HILL AFB FORM 462 FOR THIS NATIONAL STOCK NUMBER (NSN) HAVE BEEN SUPERSEDED AND WILL NOT BE UTILIZED FOR
MANUFACTURE OF THIS COMPONENT/ASSEMBLY.
DRAWING 201416605 SECTION/PARAGRAPH APPLIES:
MATERIAL REVIEW BOARD (MRB) 5.3.1
PART MARKING AND IDENTIFICATION (IUID) 6.1.1
Page 2 of 3EDL Version 18Generated by PRPS using Jasper Reports on 28 Mar 2019
RELEASE OF THIS DATA TO A FOREIGN-OWNED, CONTROLLED OR INFLUENCED COMPANY IS DEPENDENT UPON THE APPROVAL OF THE FOREIGN DISCLOSURE OFFICE.
Page 3 of 3EDL Version 18Generated by PRPS using Jasper Reports on 28 Mar 2019
Existing Packaging Statement of Work January 2019
SPECIAL PACKAGING INSTRUCTIONS RETRIEVAL & EXCHANGE SYSTEM (SPIRES)
Contractors may request the use of SPIRES website to view item packaging requirements or search for
Special Packaging Instruction drawings via the following website: https://spires.wpafb.af.mil/
REUSABLE CONTAINERS
The contractor shall safeguard all received reusable shipping containers that meet the requirements of the
AFMC Form 158 and are suitable for return shipment of serviceable assets. The contractor shall dispose of and replace unserviceable containers with new containers that meet requirements of the AFMC Form 158. Contact the Administering Contracting Office (ACO) for disposition and replacement when Long Life Reusable
Containers (LLRC) are received in an unserviceable condition.
REPORTING DISCREPANCIES
The contractor shall use Web Supply Discrepancy Report (WebSDR) to submit/reply to a Supply Discrepancy
Report (SDR), when improperly packed assets are received/shipped in other than the contracted packaging requirements (coded data or Special Packaging Instructions (SPI) drawings) from Department of Defense
(DoD) components or contractor activities. The contractor shall request a WebSDR account via the following website: https://www.transactionservices.dla.mil/daashome/homepage.asp
(See Defense Logistics Management (DLMS) 4000.25-M, Volume 2, Supply Standard and Procedures, Chapter 17, Supply Discrepancy Reporting)
Exceptions when no damage has occurred are as follows:
- Items packaged before the current SPI date.
- An alternate pack may be used, provided the prime Air Force Sustainment Complex, Packaging Office at the Air Logistics Complex (ALC) approves and issues a waiver and deviation number, which would be annotated on the exterior container on the lower right hand portion of the identification side of the container.
- In accordance with Technical Order (TO) 00-85B-3, How to Package Air Force Spares, the contractor may substitute the next larger size fast pack, of the type I or type II to ship transportation priorities 1 and 2 shipments as long as there is no decrease in any of the container dimensions without the requirement of a waiver deviation. TO 00-85B-3, para 4.2 can be accessed via the website:
- https://www.tinker.af.mil/Portals/106/Documents/Technical%20Orders/AFD-082416-00-85B-3.pdf
ASSIST Documents for Specifications Listed in the GSA Index of Federal Specifications, Standards and Commercial Item Descriptions The contractor shall use the ASSIST website to access specification, standards, data item descriptions documents listed in this contract solicitation:
FAR 52-211-2 Availability of Specifications, Standards, and Data Item Descriptions listed in the Acquisition
Streamlining and Standardization Information System https://quicksearch.dla.mil/ https://spires.wpafb.af.mil/ https://www.transactionservices.dla.mil/daashome/homepage.asp https://www.tinker.af.mil/Portals/106/Documents/Technical%20Orders/AFD-082416-00-85B-3.pdf https://quicksearch.dla.mil/#/
Existing Packaging Statement Of Work (Cont)
AFSC
406 SCMS/GULAA
Attn: BRAD TALBOT
DSN: 777-8840
COMM: (801)777-8840
E-mail: BRADLEY.TALBOT.2@US.AF.MIL
APPLICABLE GOVERNMENT PACKAGING DOCUMENTS
NOTE: UTILIZE THE MOST RECENT REVISION
DLMS 4000.25, Defense Logistics Management Systems, Volume 2, Change 10, Supply Standards and
Procedures, Chapter 17, Supply Discrepancy Reporting
TO 00-85B-3 How to Package Air Force Spares
MANUFACTURING QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
NSN: 1630014171493
P/N: 9246250-10 Noun: Control Unit, Antiskid Application: F-16 Landing Gear
5 Oct 2017 Section C 1/3
SECTION C:
1. QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS THAT MUST BE SATISFIED TO BECOME A QUALIFIED SOURCE
a. Prequalification Notice/Sources Sought: The offeror shall notify the appropriate government Small Business Office or, if responding to a solicitation, the contracting officer in the appropriate government contracting office, of intent to qualify as a source for this Control Unit, Antiskid.
b. Facilities, Testing, and Inspection Capabilities: The offeror must certify to the government that they have, or have access to, the required facilities and equipment to manufacture, inspect, test, package, and store the item. The offeror shall make their facilities, equipment, tooling, and personnel available for evaluation and inspection by the government.
c. Data Verification: The offeror must verify that he has a complete data package. This verification must include a complete list of all procedures, drawings, and specifications, including change notices, in the offeror’s possession. The offeror may also be required to produce copies of all applicable procedures, drawings, or specifications.
d. Manufacture/Process Verification: The offeror must manufacture this item to conform to the government requirements as prescribed within the ESA-approved engineering/technical data package. The offeror must show compliance with Unique Identification (UID) requirements in accordance with DFARS 211.274 as prescribed within the ESA-approved engineering/technical data package. The offeror must provide, at their own expense, data showing the results of all quality, performance, and environmental evaluations conducted by the offeror to show compliance with the government requirements as prescribed by Antiskid IPT. The offeror shall also identify its sources for materials and its standards for internally used processes. The offeror must also provide evidence in the form of a management process in which they will manage Critical Safety Items (CSIs) and all of the critical characteristics and critical safety processes.
e. Test and Evaluation and/or Verification: The offeror, at their own expense, shall prepare and submit to Antiskid IPT for their prior approval, a qualification test plan/procedure detailing how they intend to verify compliance with all performance, environmental, mechanical, and quality assurance requirements identified by Drawing 9246250. After completion of the approved qualification testing, the offeror shall be required to submit a complete test report of the results to Antiskid IPT for their review and approval prior to the contract award. The government retains the right to exercise the option to inspect the testing processes, including on-site witnessing of any or all documented testing. To allow accomplishing this, the offeror shall notify the government at least 30 days in advance of the occurrence of any testing that will be used as a basis for qualification. The offeror’s facilities shall be made available for government inspection during these tests.
f. Qualification Article Verification: The offeror must provide, at their own expense, a pre-contract award qualification article for evaluation by the government. This article must comply with all of the requirements of Drawing 9246250. This article shall be subjected to a form, fit, and
P/N: 9246250-10
5 Oct 2017 Section C 2/3 function evaluation to demonstrate compatibility with the weapon system and to evaluate the manufacturing capability of the offeror. Offerors will be notified whether or not their qualification article passed or failed the required qualification testing within 180 days of submitting a product for qualification testing. Note that successful completion of the qualification testing does not guarantee any contract award. If the offeror is deemed qualified and awarded the contract, a post-contract award first article exhibit may be required to verify production capability.
g. Qualification Requirement Cost Estimate: Estimated likely costs for testing and evaluation, which will be incurred by the potential offering party to become qualified: $502,770.00.
h. Qualification Time Completion Estimate: It is the estimate of the engineering support activity that completion of this qualification effort should require 180 days. This is based on complexity of the Control Unit, Antiskid and other factors.
i. Qualification Time Limitation: An offeror may not be denied the opportunity to submit and have considered an offer for a contract if the offeror can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the contracting officer that the offeror (or its product) meets these standards for qualification or can meet them before the date specified for award of the contract. The award will not be delayed to provide the vendor with an opportunity to demonstrate its ability to meet the standards specified in this qualification requirement.
j. Evaluation of Proposals Not Previously Qualified: The offeror must be fully qualified in order to be eligible for a contract award. Therefore, the offeror must fulfill all of the requirements stated, in writing, in the qualification requirement before the date specified for award of the contract. Once all requirements are met, the offeror will be listed as an approved source for this item. Approval, however, does not guarantee subsequent contract award.
P/N: 9246250-10
5 Oct 2017 Section C 3/3
2. SOURCE QUALIFICATION WAIVER REQUIREMENTS
Sources who meet any of the following source Qualification Waiver Criteria (QWC) may apply for a waiver of all or part of the qualification requirements. If a waiver is granted and the offeror is awarded a contract, the offeror may still be required to provide a post-contract award first article exhibit to verify production capability:
a. QWC1: The potential source submits written certification that the articles have been supplied to the government or original equipment manufacturer (e.g., DD Form 250, Material Inspection and Receiving Report, Purchase Order invoice, etc).
b. QWC2: The potential source is qualified on the right-hand article and requests to be qualified on the left-hand article. If the right-and left-hand articles are mirror images of each other, then approval can generally be given.
c. QWC3: A source qualified to provide an assembly is usually qualified to provide subassemblies, major components, and items of that assembly.
d. QWC4: A source qualified to provide earlier dash numbers of a basic P/N may be qualified to provide other dash numbers of that same basic P/N, provided there is no increase in complexity, criticality, or other relevant requirements.
e. QWC5: A source qualified to provide a similar or like item can be qualified to provide the required item. However, for approval, the engineering authority must verify that there is no increase in complexity, criticality, or other requirements over that of the similar item. At a minimum, the source shall provide a complete set of drawings for the similar item and written proof, such as purchase orders, shipping documents, etc., to show that the similar item was provided to the original equipment manufacturer or DoD.
f. QWC6: A source previously qualified to provide an item, but which has been purchased, sold, merged, absorbed, reformed, split, etc., may qualify if it can be established that the qualification is currently with the requester and that the requester has the same or equivalent facilities, tooling, equipment, personnel, and utilizes the original forging, castings, etc., in the manufacturing process.
File details come from the government source that posted it.