SQS.pdf

PDF 103 KB Posted

Attached to
Aircraft Components and Accessories Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
SPRHA1-16-R-00996
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Lifecycle Management Center Hill Air Force Base

About this file

SQS

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Aircraft Components and Accessories, newest first.
File Type Posted
SPRHA116R00996______0001.RTF RTF text file
SPI.pdf PDF
SOW.pdf PDF
SPRHA116R00996.pdf PDF
EDL.pdf PDF
CDRL.pdf PDF
EDR.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS

NSN: 1650-01-297-3709

P/N: DAA3222A121-005

Noun: Cylinder Assembly Application: B-2 MLG

SECTION C:

1. QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS THAT MUST BE SATISFIED TO BECOME A QUALIFIED SOURCE

a. Prequalification Notice/Sources Sought: The offeror shall notify the appropriate government Small Business Office or, if responding to a solicitation, the contracting officer in the appropriate government contracting office, of intent to qualify as a source for this item. Source Approval Request (SAR) packages shall be generated in accordance with Attachment 6 of AFMCI 23-113 (Pre-Award Qualification Of New or Additional Parts Sources and the Use of the Source Approval Request), this Qualification Requirement, and any other specific guidance provided by the design control activity. Submittal packages shall be categorized (I-IV) appropriately as defined by AFMCI 23-113.

b. Facilities, Testing, and Inspection Capabilities: The offeror must certify to the government that he/she has a significant portion of the required facilities and equipment to manufacture the item. The offeror must also certify to the government that he/she has access to the facilities required to inspect, test, package, and store the item. The offeror shall make his/her facilities, equipment, tooling, and personnel available for evaluation and inspection by the government.

c. Data Verification: The offeror must verify that he has a complete data package. This verification must include a complete list of all procedures, drawings, and specifications, including change notices, in the offeror’s possession. The offeror may also be required to produce copies of all applicable procedures, drawings, or specifications.

d. Manufacture/Process Verification: The offeror must manufacture this item to conform to the government requirements as prescribed within the approved engineering/technical data package. The offeror must show compliance with Item Unique Identification (IUID) requirements in accordance with DFARS 211.274 as prescribed within the approved engineering/technical data package. The offeror must provide, at their own expense; data showing the results of all quality, performance, and environmental evaluations conducted by the offeror to show compliance with the government requirements as prescribed by the design control activity. The offeror shall also identify its sources for materials and its standards for internally used processes. If the item considered is a Critical Safety Item (CSI), upon request the offeror must provide evidence of a management plan for all critical characteristics and/or processes. All manufacturing, assembly, and inspection points for CSI’s must be controlled by detailed procedures outlining each step or parameter of the process along with any materials, tooling, equipment, environmental control, and operator certification required that leads to the specific production of an end item. Plans should clearly identify all critical characteristics and will include identification, in accordance with contractor procedures, as to its particular revision.

All process plans must clearly define sequence of operation, machine type, and accept/reject limits for the specific process or operation. Critical processes not easily verified by subsequent inspection must clearly define process-operating parameters with tolerances.

e. Test and Evaluation and/or Verification: A Specification or Source Control Drawing (SCD) intended function is to assist the design control activity to qualify a nonstandard product for use

Section C

P/N: DAA3222A121-005

Noun: Cylinder Assembly Application: B-2 MLG on a specific aircraft landing gear system. The offerer will complete the orderly development of their product to assure that it meets all of the specified requirements. The offerer will also produce a detail data set, which defines the product, and all the manufacturing techniques, processes, and procedures needed to assure that required repetitive quality can be expected.

Product development will be accomplished as specified by the SCD to include all referenced data. The SCD provides minimum design requirements to be met. All SCD data requirements must be met unless otherwise noted here in. The offeror, at his own expense, shall prepare and submit to the design control activity for their prior approval, a qualification test plan/procedure detailing how he intends to verify compliance with all performance, environmental, mechanical, and quality assurance requirements. The procuring activity may add to, subtract from or modify original testing requirements to meet current standards and operational conditions. Prior approval of the test plan is required. After completion of the approved qualification testing, the offeror shall be required to submit a complete test report of the results to the design control activity for their review and approval prior to the contract award. The government retains the right to exercise the option to inspect the testing processes, including on-site witnessing of any or all documented testing. To allow accomplishing this, the offeror shall notify the government at least 30 days in advance of the occurrence of any testing that will be used as a basis for qualification. The offeror’s facilities shall be made available for government inspection during these tests.

f. Qualification Article Verification: The offeror must provide, at their own expense, a pre-contract award qualification article for evaluation by the government. This article must comply with all drawing requirements. Forgings shall be procured from the qualified forging source using the original certified forging procedures, equipment and dies. Forging material and lot qualifications shall be accomplished as required by the forging drawing and specification. The offeror shall assure that this is or has been accomplished by the approved forging source(s) as listed within the current Technical Data Package (TDP) and will submit certified documentation of accomplishment of the above requirements to the government along with the pre-contract award qualification article. This article shall be subjected to a form, fit, and function evaluation to demonstrate compatibility with the weapon system and to evaluate the manufacturing capability of the offeror. Such testing may result in the destruction of the article. Note that successful completion of the qualification testing does not guarantee any contract award. If the offeror is deemed qualified and awarded the contract, a post-contract award first article exhibit may be required to verify production capability.

g. Qualification Requirement Cost Estimate: Estimated likely costs for government testing and evaluation, which will be incurred by the potential offering party to become qualified: $5000.

h. Qualification Time Completion Estimate: Offerors will be notified whether or not their qualification article passes or failed the required qualification testing within 120 days. This is based on complexity of the item and other factors. This is not a deadline, but a notification to a potential offeror of the time estimation that will be required. Events that occur during the qualification process may cause this time requirement to increase or perhaps decrease, depending on individual circumstances.

P/N: DAA3222A121-005

i. Qualification Time Limitation: An offeror may not be denied the opportunity to submit and have considered an offer for a contract if the offeror can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the contracting officer that the offeror (or its product) meets these standards for qualification or can meet them before the date specified for award of the contract. The award will not be delayed to provide the vendor with an opportunity to demonstrate its ability to meet the standards specified in this qualification requirement.

j. Evaluation of Proposals Not Previously Qualified: The offeror must be fully qualified in order to be eligible for a contract award. Therefore, the offeror must fulfill all of the requirements stated, in writing, in the qualification requirement before the date specified for award of the contract. Once all requirements are met, the offeror will be listed as an approved source for this item. Approval, however, does not guarantee subsequent contract award.

2. SOURCE QUALIFICATION WAIVER REQUIREMENTS

Sources who meet any of the following Qualification Waiver Criteria (QWC) may apply for a waiver of all or part of the qualification requirements. If a waiver is granted and the offeror is awarded a contract, the offeror may still be required to provide a post-contract award first article exhibit to verify production capability:

a. QWC1: The potential source submits written certification that the articles have been supplied to the government or original equipment manufacturer (e.g., DD Form 250, Material Inspection and Receiving Report, Purchase Order invoice, etc).

b. QWC2: The potential source is qualified on the right-hand article and requests to be qualified on the left-hand article. If the right-and left-hand articles are mirror images of each other, then approval can generally be given.

c. QWC3: A source qualified to provide an assembly is usually qualified to provide subassemblies, major components, and items of that assembly.

d. QWC4: A source qualified to provide earlier dash numbers of a basic P/N may be qualified to provide other dash numbers of that same basic P/N, provided there is no increase in complexity, criticality, or other relevant requirements.

e. QWC5: A source qualified to provide a similar or like item can be qualified to provide the required item. The source under consideration for qualification must have a significant portion of the manufacturing capability to produce the required item. However, for approval, the engineering authority must verify that there is no increase in complexity, criticality, or other requirements over that of the similar item. At a minimum, the source shall provide a complete set of drawings for the similar item and written proof, such as purchase orders, shipping documents, etc., to show that the similar item was provided to the original equipment manufacturer or DoD.

P/N: DAA3222A121-005

f. QWC6: A source previously qualified to provide an item, but which has been purchased, sold, merged, absorbed, reformed, split, etc., may qualify if it can be established that the qualification is currently with the requester and that the requester has the same or equivalent facilities, tooling, equipment, personnel, and utilizes the original forging, castings, etc., in the manufacturing process.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .