Exhibit_A_Technical_Requirements.docx

TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS

5995-01-351-4485 Cable Assembly, Printed, Felxible-Control

TABLE OF CONTENTS

APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

Military and Federal Standards

Military and Federal Specifications

Other Documents

Commercial Documents

Security Documents

CONFIGURATION BASELINE

The applicable Configuration Baselines (CB), for the listed Configuration Item (CI) and/or Computer Software Configuration Item (CSCI), are as listed in the table below.

Configuration Responsibility. Each CI/CSCI, as developed/built and delivered, shall conform to the cited CB and (if applicable) all subsequent CB’s that will be made contractually binding by the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO). Configuration changes not directly effecting the configuration baseline do not require Government approval prior to incorporation, but must be documented by the contractor and shall be made available to the Government upon request. The contractor may use MIL-HDBK-61A and SAE EIA-649-1, Configuration Management Requirements for Defense Contracts, which was adapted on 04 March 2015 for use by the Department of Defense (DoD), as guidance for establishing a Configuration Management Program.

Departures from CB. No changes or departures from the CB are acceptable except for changes or departures which are submitted in accordance with DI-MISC-80711A and are approved by the Government Configuration Manager or Configuration Management Officer (CMO) and which are made applicable to the contract by the PCO. Configuration Control shall be affected by the Configuration Control Documents (CCDs) as follows:

a. Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) includes both the engineering change and the supporting documentation by which the change is described and suggested. An ECP describes changes to the CI/CSCI and associated Government documents and data that are affected by the proposed engineering change. An ECP shall be submitted using the latest revision of DD Form 1692.

b. A Notice of Revision (NOR) shows the detailed changes that must be made to technical documentation, except specifications, (one NOR per document) following approval of an ECP. The NOR is submitted as part of the ECP. A NOR shall be submitted using the latest revision of DD Form 1695.

c. A Specification Change Notice (SCN) is used to delineate the exact change(s) in a specification that will be distributed to users when the ECP is approved. The SCN is submitted as part of the ECP. The SCN is not used for a military or federal document. A SCN shall be submitted using the latest revision of DD Form 1696.

d. Value Engineering Change Proposal (VECP) is the same as an ECP except there are proposed cost savings for the program. The contractor shall follow the guidance in Section I of this contract for VECPs.

e. Request for Variance (RFV) is a temporary departure from requirements and do not constitute a permanent change to the Functional Configuration Document, Allocated Configuration Document, or Product Configuration Document. Prior to or after manufacture of an item, the supplying activity may request a variance. The supplying activity shall not build items, or present items for acceptance, that incorporate a known departure from requirements, unless a request for a variance has been approved. Where it is determined that a change should be permanent, an ECP must be processed in accordance with this document. A RFV shall be submitted using the latest revision of DD Form 1694.

f. Contractor shall provide all supporting program or cost data with the CCD. The contractor shall uniquely and sequentially identify (including the use of the contract number) each ECP, VECP, NOR, SCN or RFW. The identification number should use less than 16 characters.

Identification of Authorized Personnel. The contractor shall identify to the PCO, Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO), and the technical office identified on the DD Form 1423 for DI-MISC-80711A, the name(s) of the official(s) of its organization who are authorized to submit CCDs 30 Days after Contract (DAC).

Requirements for Production Evaluation.

a. General. The equipment on contract, including all materials, parts, subassemblies and assemblies, shall be produced in strict conformance with the Government-Furnished technical data, including all changes cited in the solicitation/contract, and as supplemented or modified by approved Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs). This technical data may require compatibility corrections, referred to throughout this Technical Requirements as 'Production Evaluation (PE) Compatibility' corrections, to improve production efficiency.

b. Contractor's Obligation and Responsibility. The contractor shall perform the following tasks.

c. Perform a PE review. The contractor shall continually review the technical data to identify and propose corrections for all PE compatibility discrepancies. This review will commence during the production and quality planning phase and continue through the preproduction, production, inspection and testing phases of this contract. The contractor will evaluate the Government-Furnished Technical Data Package (including drawings, specifications, gage drawings, test fixture drawings, master pattern drawings or data, engineering change proposals with notices of revisions (NOR) and specification change notices (SCN), models (if any) and any other data defined as technical data by the government) to determine such PE corrections, and submit PE Compatibility ECPs to the Government to reflect these corrections, as described below. PE Compatibility corrections are discussed in Appendix A entitled “Sample PE Compatibility Discrepancies, Errors, Omissions and Deficiencies.”

d. Submit PE Compatibility Engineering Change Proposals to the Government. Recommendations for compatibility changes shall be prepared and submitted as Engineering Change Proposals (ECP) with appropriate NORs and SCNs in accordance with the Configuration Management Section. PE ECPs will:

e. Be submitted as soon as the need for a change is recognized.

f. Clearly and explicitly state the proposed change and the need for the change.

g. Include all technical documentation and supporting data required to justify the change.

h. Special Instructions for PE ECPs. The first page of the ECP form shall have the following:

i. This statement:

“This ECP is submitted as a PE compatibility change as defined in the contract”.

j. Have 'PE Compatibility' stamped in 3/8-inch block letters at the top and bottom of the page.

k. The effect on Delivery Schedule and Estimated Costs shall be indicated as “none”.

l. If the incorporation of a PE Compatibility ECP does not correct the deficiency, or creates another deficiency, the contractor shall submit any further ECPs and incorporate such approved changes into all items not yet accepted by the Government, at no cost to the Government.

m. Implement PE ECPs. The contractor shall apply all approved PE ECPs to the manufacture of the hardware on contract without increase in contract price or delay in delivery.

n. Revise Technical Data (as required). The contractor will generate all required additional data and revise affected Technical Data to incorporate PE corrections in accordance with the “Requirements for Drawing (Revisions)” section below without increase in contract price or delay in delivery.

o. Submit TDP Review Report. The contractor shall prepare and submit a TDP Review Report (including subcontracted PE effort - see paragraph u and v below) in accordance with DI-MISC-80750 as implemented by the DD Form 1423 for DI-MISC-80750.

p. Submit TDP Certification. The contractor shall prepare and submit a letter of PE certification in accordance with DI-MISC-80750 as implemented by the DD Form 1423 for DI-MISC-80750. This letter shall be prepared in accordance with the specific content and format requirements described below.

a. The certification shall be provided on company letterhead, and shall be dated and signed by an authorized official of the company.

b. This letter will state the following:

c. (Company Name) has conducted the Production Evaluation effort required to date by Provision Number (Number) of Contract Number (Number) for the (End Item). Although we recognize that PE is a continuing effort and that occasional PE Compatibility ECP's may arise during the full scale production phase of this contract, we have sufficiently identified and corrected any discrepancy, error, omission or deficiency in design or technical data which would otherwise have precluded practical manufacture, assembly or attainment of required performance as set forth in specification (Number of End Item Specification). Accordingly, we hereby certify that the technical data package, as changed or supplemented by the ECP's approved to date, is suitable for our use in fulfilling our obligation of delivering conforming items at the price and delivery schedule established in this contract’.

d. If the contractor does not submit this letter of certification at the specified time, the contractor shall be deemed to have failed to make delivery within the meaning of the 'Default' clause of this contract, and this contract shall be subject to termination for default. However, failure of the Government in such an event to terminate this contract for default shall not relieve the contractor of its responsibility to continue the Production Evaluation effort and to meet the delivery schedule for all items, as well as meeting all other contract requirements.

e. Submission of the Certification shall not relieve the contractor from compliance with the PE requirement, which remains in effect for the duration of the contract.

q. PE Compatibility Discrepancies, Errors, Omissions and Deficiencies. The types of discrepancies, errors, omissions and deficiencies which require PE compatibility corrections are listed in Appendix entitled “Sample PE Compatibility Discrepancies, Errors, Omissions and Deficiencies.” Examples are provided for illustrative purposes, and are not inclusive.

NOTE: In the event of incompatibility between a 'common' or 'standard' part and a mating part, preference shall be given to correcting the incompatibility by changing the mating part.

r. Other Discrepancies. The following discrepancies may be uncovered during the PE review. While the contractor is responsible for submitting ECPs to propose corrections to the discrepancies, such ECPs will not be submitted as PE ECPs, but as described below.

s. Overspecified and nonessential requirements. When overspecified or nonessential requirements are identified, the contractor shall submit an ECP proposing the elimination or modification of the nonessential or overspecified requirements in accordance with the 'Configuration Management' provision of this contract. If significant savings are anticipated, the contractor shall submit the change as a Value Engineering Change Proposal (VECP) in accordance with the 'Value Engineering' provision of this contract.

t. Design Deficiencies. While it is not the intent of the Government to transfer full design responsibility to the contractor, it is recognized that the PE effort may require some design effort on the part of the contractor. In the event that the contractor discovers a conflict between the specified performance requirements and the construction characteristics specified by the technical data, the contractor shall immediately submit an ECP in accordance with the 'Configuration Management' provision of this contract. Such ECPs shall be identified as 'Basic Design Deficiency' ECPs, and shall describe the alleged design deficiency, the basis for the contractor's conclusion that it is not a PE compatibility discrepancy and the proposed change that will correct the deficiency.

u. Subcontracting of PE. If any item described by the Government-furnished technical data should be subcontracted, one of the following tasks shall be performed by the contractor:

v. This Production Evaluation requirement shall be made a part of the subcontract. The prime contractor is responsible for assuring that the subcontractor complies with the Production Evaluation requirements. Submission of ECPs to the Government shall be made only by the prime contractor.

w. Production Evaluation responsibility will be retained by the prime contractor, and all approved PE ECPs will be provided to the subcontractor for incorporation on hardware. In this situation, the contractor will prepare and submit a letter to the Procuring Contracting Officer within seven (7) days of award of the subcontract. This letter will identify the item that has been subcontracted without the PE clause and state the contractor's intention of retaining Production Evaluation responsibility for the subcontracted item.

x. Alternate Changes. The Government reserves the right to direct an alternate change to a PE ECP.

Appendix A

Sample PE Compatibility Discrepancies, Errors, Omissions and Deficiencies

A.1. Compatibility among the drawings and between drawings and other technical data. For example:

- Are the correct specifications cited?

- If a specification has been superseded, is the appropriate replacement cited?

- When parts are specified, is the quantity and part number correct?

- Are code identifications correct?

A.2. Compatibility between the equipment drawings and related gage/test fixture drawings, test procedures, master pattern drawings and other drawings in the technical data package. For example:

- Are the desired characteristics adequately and correctly specified?

A.3. Compatibility between Data Lists, Parts Lists, assembly drawings and other technical data. For example:

- Does information on the Data List match or correctly supplement information on the Parts List?

- Do the Data Lists and Parts Lists cite all required drawings?

A.4. Compatibility between the physical or functional requirements of the specifications or drawings and the inspection provisions to verify compliance. For example:

- If the requirement specifies operation at a certain temperature, does the inspection requirement provide for its measurement at that temperature?

- Are specified parts and materials compatible with the performance or testing requirements specified for the end item or assemblies?

A.5. Correction of absence of an inspection that is necessary to ensure compliance with the performance requirements established by the equipment specification. For example:

- Do inspection requirements exist, either on the drawings or in the applicable specification(s), to ensure the proper function of the component described by the technical data?

A.6. Correction of an impossible or impractical manufacturing condition. For example:

- Are the specified dimensions or tolerances of material appropriate?

- Can the item be manufactured using only the cited information?

In these cases, the contractor will provide any data required to provide complete manufacturing instructions.

A.7. Correction of an impossible or impractical assembly procedure. For example:

- If assembly is possible in only one sequence of actions, is that sequence specified?

- Can data be added or deleted to facilitate efficient assembly?

- Will mating parts assemble as specified?

A.8. Correction of a condition which precludes inspection (examination or testing). For example

- Should hole locations be inspected before or after fasteners are installed?

- Is the part to be inspected accessible without unreasonable disassembly?

A.9. Correction of obvious administrative and typographical errors in the drawings and in the performance requirements of the end item specification.

A.10. Corrections to permit procurement of physically and functionally suitable and interchangeable purchased parts and materials. For example:

- Is the correct vendor part number specified?

- Are the specified sources still viable?

SPRBL1-19-Q-0076 Exhibit A Technical Requirements

Exhibit A SPRBL1-19-Q-0076 Page 2 of 22 Issue: 28 February 2019

PACKAGING

Wood Packing Material

Wood packaging material (WPM) shall meet the requirements below. Wood packaging material (WPM) includes but is not limited to pallets, skids, load boards, pallet collars, wooden boxes, reels, dunnage, crates, frame and cleats. This requirement excludes materials that have undergone a manufacturing process, such as corrugated fiberboard, plywood, particleboard, veneer, and oriented strand board (OSB).

a. All WPM shall meet the requirements of International Standards for Phytosanitary Measures (ISPM) Number 15, “Regulation of Wood Packaging Material in International Trade”. DoD shipments inside and outside of the United States shall meet the requirements of ISPM 15 whenever WPM is used to ship DoD cargo.

b. All WPM shall comply with the official quality control program for heat treatment (HT) or kiln dried heat treatment (KD HT) (IAW) American Lumber Standard Committee (ALSC), Incorporated, Wood Packaging Material Program and WPM Enforcement Regulations (see http://www.alsc.org/).

c. All WPM shall include certification/quality markings IAW the ALSC standard. Markings shall be placed in an unobstructed area that will be readily visible to inspectors. Pallet markings shall be applied to the stringer or block on diagonally opposite sides of the pallet and be contrasting and clearly visible. All containers shall be marked on a side other than the top or bottom, contrasting and clearly visible. All dunnage used in configuring and/or securing the load shall also comply with ISPM 15 and be marked with an ASLC approved DUNNAGE stamp.

d. Failure to comply with these requirements may result in refusal, destruction, or treatment of materials at the point of entry. The Government reserves the right to recoup from the contractor any remediation costs incurred by the Government.

Military Packaging DS7029 and/or DS7033 Preservation, Packing and Marking Instructions

DS7029 - DS7033 LEGEND

The below codes are for special markings:

DS7029 - DS7033

Special Markings

SPECIALIZED TESTING

Contractor Performed First Article Testing.

a. General. The contractor shall perform First Article Testing (FAT) in accordance with FAR 52.209-3 (see Section I of this contract) and this SOW. As part of FAT, the contractor shall:

a. Select the test unit(s) used for FAT from the first production lot. Test unit(s) shall be selected by the Government representative.

b. Develop the test procedures and plans necessary to demonstrate that these units conform to the requirements established by the applicable specification(s) and other technical data provided in this contract.(Para 3.5.4)

c. Notify the Government and test the First Article units.

d. Provide a First Article Test Report to the Government which documents the FAT results.

e. Insure all equipment used to take performance readings for acceptance tests are kept within the performance parameters delineated by the manufacturer of that equipment. All equipment manufactured by the contractor shall be listed and the parameters established and maintained for this equipment also.

b. Test Requirements. The following test requirements shall be verified as part of FAT. FAT inspection shall be performed on 2 units. Test unit(s) used for FAT shall be selected from first production lot, which shall contain a minimum of 10 units by the Government representative. Continuty test will be conducted DURING and AFTER test for compliance per IPC-6013. Test voltage shall be 100 volts DC.

a. Temperature. The Units Under Test shall be subjected to the test of MIL-STD-810G, Method 502.5, Procedure I and Procedure II. The Units Under Test shall meet the tempeture requirements specified in Paragraph 4.5.4.3.1.1 of Specification A3106088. Test units shall be selected from first production lot, which shall contain a minimum of 20 units by the Government representative.

b. Random Vibration. The The Units Under Test shall be subjected to the test of MIL-STD-810G, Method 514.6, Procedure I.

c. Production of First Article Units. All FAT samples shall be assembled at the same location at which production units will be assembled, using the same parts, materials, and manufacturing processes to be employed for subsequent production.

d. Test Plan. The contractor shall prepare and submit a First Article Qualification Test Plan in accordance with DI-NDTI-81307A as implemented by the DD Form 1423 for DI-NDTI-81307. In addition to the information required by DI-NDTI-81307, this submission shall contain:

a. The delineation and allocation of tests to be performed on each of the First Article units and the order of such tests (this may be prescribed in applicable technical data).

b. Step-by-step test procedures for each test and the data sheets to be employed to document the results of testing.

c. Identification of required test facilities, equipment and personnel.

d. Test milestones schedules and the contractor's test readiness posture.

e. A table which cross references the paragraph number of the specification requirement (including a brief description of the requirement) and the associated paragraph number of the First Article Qualification Test Plan.

e. Notice of FAT Performance. As required by FAR 52.209-3, written notices concerning the time and location of FAT shall be furnished to the PCO, the Administrative Contracting Officer and the Government Technical Activity listed in Block 6 of the DD Form 1423 for DI-NDTI-80809B.

a. Selection of First Article Samples. When Initial Production FAT applies to this contract (i.e., when FAR 52.209-3 ALT I and ALT II are specified in Section I), FAT samples shall be selected at random from the initial production lot.

b. Reporting of FAT Failures. Reporting of FAT failures shall be by the FAT Report, in lieu of any other reporting requirements specified in this contract. In addition, FAT failures shall be verbally reported to the Government's Quality Assurance Representative (QAR) and Government Technical Activity listed in Block 6 of the DD Form 1423 for DI-NDTI-80809B within twenty four hours of occurrence.

f. FAT Report. A FAT Report shall be prepared and submitted in accordance with FAR 52.209-3 and DI-NDTI-80809B as implemented by the DD Form 1423 for DI-NDTI-80809B. The FAT Report shall be complete, accurate, and readable and shall provide sufficient data to determine that the hardware item meets all the requirements delineated in the contract. The report will include the following:

a. General Data.

a. Contractor's name and address.

b. Contract number.

c. Nomenclature, type number and (if assigned) stock number of item represented by the First Article.

d. Name and address of plant where First Article was fabricated and assembled.

e. Place and date of performance of tests.

f. Identification (including date) of applicable equipment specifications and associated amendments.

g. Sample size or quantity submitted for test or inspection.

b. Cross Reference. A table which cross-references the paragraph numbers of the specification, the test procedures, and data sheet entry.

c. Test Results. Complete test results showing actual or quantitative observations and all required calculations. ‘GO/NOGO’ data is allowable (under certain circumstances) only with prior Government approval. Allowable tolerances for each parameter shall be presented. Test data should also include the date that the test was performed, name and signature of tester, name and signature of the Government verifier/witness (if applicable) and serial number of the equipment. Test results shall cite detailed qualitative and quantitative data results such as test categories, test conditions, test methods employed, and types of inspection and test equipment used during the test or inspection.

d. FAT Failures. FAT failures shall list all requirements not complied with during FAT. If none, this should be explicitly stated. For each requirement not met, a corrective action to remove the noncompliance will be proposed. This corrective action must include retest or other verification that the corrective action does remedy the problem/failure. The corrective action will address changes in design or manufacturing process which will preclude this deficiency in subsequent production units. Verified corrective action must be implemented prior to contractor entering into production.

e. FAT/Production Discrepancies. Any Government approved, difference between the parts, materials and processes used to manufacture FAT samples and production units shall be documented in the FAT report.

g. FAT Approval. FAT samples shall meet all contractual requirements or all variances shall be documented by Government approved waivers. First Article approval will be contingent upon the submission of a complete and acceptable FAT report to include verification of corrective action for reported FAT failures to include adequacy of identified changes to the design/manufacturing process.

h. FAT Samples and First Production Lot Inspection. If FAR 52.209-3 ALT II is specified in Section I, First Article units shall be utilized to satisfy initial production lot inspection requirements. If the quantity of First Article samples is less than that needed to satisfy first production lot sampling requirements, additional samples shall be selected at random from the production lot and inspected to meet first production lot acceptance requirements.

a. When Initial Production FAT (FAR 52.209-3 ALT I or ALT II) applies and additional units are tested to satisfy production acceptance requirements, failures for these additional units shall be reported as specified in this contract.

i. Disposition of First Article Samples. Upon successful completion of FAT, the contractor shall dispose of the FAT samples as follows:

a. One samples shall be retained at the contractor's facility for use as a reference by the QAR, and shall be shipped to the nearest DLA Disposition Services upon completion of contract performance.

b. All remaining FAT samples shall not be delivered as production items on the contract, and shall be shipped to the nearest DLA Disposition Services.

j. Production Test Procedures. Production test procedures used to test production units shall be identical to those used to test First Article samples.

a. Once FAT is approved, proposed changes to the production test procedures will be submitted to the COR and DCMA Software Specialist (when production test procedures are in the form of test software) for evaluation. Such submissions will provide complete justification for the change. Changes to the approved test procedures shall not be implemented without written Government approval.

b. Any notice of approval of test procedures or changes thereto shall not relieve the contractor from complying with all contractual requirements.

k. Use of FAT Samples as a Manufacturing Standard. The FAT samples shall NOT serve as a manufacturing standard.

Final Inspection and Quality Assurance System. The contractor shall implement and maintain a Final Inspection and Quality Assurance System to ensure product integrity that meets or exceeds the requirements established below. These requirements are commonly accepted practices employed by industry both in national and international environments.

a. Quality Approach. The contractor shall establish/maintain an approach to ensure product integrity and to satisfy contract or order requirements.

b. Initial Quality Planning. The contractor, during the earliest practical phase of the contract, shall conduct a complete review of the contract requirements to identify all test and inspection resources necessary for assuring product integrity.

c. Document Control. The contractor shall ensure that the latest revisions of drawings, specifications, work instructions, inspection/test instructions, and other documents required to satisfy the contract are utilized in production, inspection, and test.

d. Records. The contractor shall maintain records of all inspections and tests to demonstrate that the quality approach satisfies contract requirements.

e. Control of Purchases. The contractor shall ensure that all supplies and services that they purchase from suppliers conform to contract requirements. The contractor shall require that their subcontractors control the quality of their services and supplies.

f. Government Furnished Property (GFE). Not applicable

g. Materials Control. The contractor shall maintain controls over all materials and products throughout the manufacturing process. These controls shall enable the identification of materials that have passed inspection from those which have not. The contractor shall maintain records identifying the status and final destination of all materials/products.

h. Nonconforming Material. The contractor shall establish and maintain an approach for controlling material that does not satisfy contract requirements, including procedures for its identification, segregation, and disposition (rework/repair, scrap, etc.).

i. Corrective Action. The contractor shall promptly act to correct nonconforming materials and processes to preclude the recurrence of the problem and to satisfy contract requirements.

j. Manufacturing Operations/Process Controls. The contractor’s quality approach shall be responsible for assuring/monitoring that all manufacturing operations/processes are accomplished under controlled conditions. Controlled conditions include documented work instructions (including workmanship), production equipment, special work environments, inspections/test operations, work specifications, and approval/rejection criteria.

k. Inspection and Testing. The contractor shall perform final inspections and tests to ensure the production units are in compliance with the tecnical requirements set forth in the applicable technical documents. All production units prior to delivery to the Government shall undergo a 100% visual and mechanical inspection to verify compliance with the respective top assembly of the equipment and its corresponding parts list. All production units prior to delivery to the Government shall undergo continutity test. Continuty test shall be performed per IPC-6013. Test voltage shall be 100 volts DC. The Government has the right to perform an inspection at any time during normal business hours with a contractor quality representative present. Equipment and facilities required for inspection and testing shall be the contractor’s responsibility. The contractor shall obtain written approval from the Government for utilization of testing facilities other than the primary production testing facility prior to the commencement of any acceptance tests, and shall notify the Government, in writing, of the scheduled test(s), in accordance with FAR 52.246-2, to allow Government representatives to witness and verify inspection and test.

l. Measuring, Testing, and Inspection Equipment. The contractor shall provide and maintain gages (including production tooling used for inspection purposes) and other measuring and testing equipment to assure that finished products conform to contract requirements. These devices shall be calibrated against certified measurement standards that are traceable back to national/international standards.

m. Inspection and Test Status. The contractor shall maintain a system for the identification of the final inspection and test status of all products.

n. Quality Review. The contractor shall assure effectiveness of quality (e.g. internal quality audits, Statistical Process Control, and related measures).

o. Training Requirements. The contractor shall identify/provide for the training needs of their personnel performing quality functions.

p. Statistical Quality Control and Analysis. The contractor’s quality approach shall establish/utilize statistical methods whenever appropriate to satisfy the contract or order requirements.

q. Continuous Process Improvement. The contractor shall monitor the effectiveness of their quality system and continually improve quality processes.

r. Handling, Storage, Preservation, Packaging, and Shipping. The contractor shall establish/maintain procedures for handling, storage, preservation, packaging, and shipping to protect the quality of products and prevent damage, loss, deterioration, degradation or substitution of products.

CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENT LIST (CDRL) DD 1423-1

CDRL List

CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST

(1 Data Item) Original Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 110 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA. 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of these addresses. Send completed form to the Government Issuing Contracting Officer for Contract/PR No. listed in Block E.

TDP X TM OTHER

Radio Set Control C-11466A/ARC-201A(V)

TBD

17. PRICE GROUP

18. ESTIMATED TOTAL PRICE

INSERT

IN

DD

b. COPIES

SECT. B

SUBMISSION

a. ADDRESSEE

Draft Final

See Item 16

Reg

Repro

16. REMARKS:

Data Item Description DI-MISC-80711A: Delete block 10 instructions entirely and follow instructions in this Technical Requirements Document.

The contractor shall prepare and submit Configuration Control Documents in accordance with the Technical Requirements Document section for Configuration Control when a change to or departure from a contractual baseline document is deemed necessary.

The Government will have 30 days to review, accept, and/or comment on the draft submission. The contractor shall incorporate changes into the electronic deliverable within 30 days after receipt of Government comments. The Government will have 30 days to review, accept, and/or comment on the final submission.

All deliveries shall be in digital format, compatible with Microsoft Office 2007 software and adobe Acrobat version 7.0 and delivered via ARL SAFE (https://safe.arl.army.mil) with a notification email to the Government personnel listed in the distribution list. Alternative delivery media may be discussed with the Contracting Officer prior to delivery. The Government personnel listed in the distribution list will receive a copy of the submittals. Name and electronic address of the Government personnel are specified below:

PCO: Paulette.Poole@dla.mil

ACO: TBA

QAR: TBA

RDER-PRC-TR: Stanley Chan, stanley.u.chan.civ@mail.mil AMSEL-LCL-ECM: Eric Jones, eric.jones5.civ@mail.mil AMSEL-LCL-EIE: Joyce Jamison, joyce.a.jamison.civ@mail.mil

If the CDRL Data Deliverable is priced and is not NSP (Not Separately Priced), then an electronic DD Form 250 will be required via the Wide Area Workflow website in order for the contractor to receive payment for the data deliverable (see section G of the Contract). E-mail notification is required with any electronic submission.

RDER-PRC-TR

PCO

ACO

QAR

AMSEL-LCL-ECM

AMSEL-LCL-EIE*

*1 COPY VECP ONLY

Stanley U. Chan

RDER-PRC-TR

Electronics Engineer

RDER-PRC-TR

Chief, Tactical Radio Branch 02/13/2019

Based upon DD Form 1423-1, 1 Jun 90

CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST

(1 Data Item) Original Form Approved

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 110 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA. 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of these addresses. Send completed form to the Government Issuing Contracting Officer for Contract/PR No. listed in Block E.

TDP TM OTHER MISC

Radio Set Control C-11466A/ARC-201A(V)

TBD

17. PRICE GROUP

18. ESTIMATED TOTAL PRICE

INSERT

IN

DD

b. COPIES

SECT. B

SUBMISSION

a. ADDRESSEE

Final

See Item 16

16. REMARKS:

DID Modify DI-MISC-80750 as follows:

a. All references to ECP is limited to PE compatibility ECP's.

b. Information required for 10.2.1 shall be as follows:

1. Contract number.

2. PE-ECP Number.

3. Nomenclature of affected configuration item.

4. Date of ECP submittal to Government.

5. Date of Government authorization/disapproval.

6. Baseline documents affected.

7. Date of revision to baseline document.

8. Total number of drawings/specifications/other technical data reviewed during the reporting period. A list of all technical data reviewed shall be attached.

9. Total number of PE compatibility ECPs prepared during the reporting period.

10. Total number of drawings revised due to the PE effort during the reporting period. A list of revised drawings shall be attached.

11. The cumulative number of drawings/specifications/other technical data reviewed during the reporting period.

12. Percentage of total PE effort accomplished since contract award.

c. Information required for 10.2.2 shall be submitted as a letter of PE Certification to the PCO with a copy furnished to the addressee cited in Block 14. This letter shall be submitted concurrently with submission of the First Article Test (FAT) report or at first production lot submittal if FAT is not required and content of this letter shall be IAW the Requirements for Production Evaluation paragraph of this Technical Requirements

d. If any of the PE effort is subcontracted, the information per b. above for the subcontractor effort shall be separately listed and shall include the name of the subcontractor.

Block 13: Date of Subsequent Submission is as required.

All deliveries shall be in digital format, compatible with Microsoft Office 2007 software and adobe Acrobat version 7.0 and delivered via ARL SAFE (https://safe.arl.army.mil) with a notification email to the Government personnel listed in the distribution list. Alternative delivery media may be discussed with the Contracting Officer prior to delivery. The Government personnel listed in the distribution list will receive a copy of the submittals. Name and electronic address of the Government personnel are specified below:

RDER-PRC-TR: Stanley Chan, stanley.u.chan.civ@mail.mil

If the CDRL Data Deliverable is priced and is not NSP (Not Separately Priced), then an electronic DD Form 250 will be required via the Wide Area Workflow website in order for the contractor to receive payment for the data deliverable (see section G of the Contract). E-mail notification is required with any electronic submission.

Stanley U. Chan

RDER-PRC-TR

Electronics Engineer

RDER-PRC-TR

02/13/2019

CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST

(1 Data Item) Original Form Approved

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 110 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA. 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of these addresses. Send completed form to the Government Issuing Contracting Officer for Contract/PR No. listed in Block E.

TDP TM OTHER NDTI

Radio Set Control C-11466A/ARC-201A(V)

TBD

17. PRICE GROUP

18. ESTIMATED TOTAL PRICE

INSERT

IN

DD

b. COPIES

SECT. B

SUBMISSION

a. ADDRESSEE

Draft Final

A

SEE ITEM 16

16. REMARKS:

Submit draft via LT.

Government requires 45 days for review/comments. Submit final within 30 days of receipt of Government comments, with DD-250 via WAWF.

All deliveries shall be in digital format, compatible with Microsoft Office 2007 software and adobe Acrobat version 7.0 and delivered via ARL SAFE (https://safe.arl.army.mil) with a notification email to the Government personnel listed in the distribution list. Alternative delivery media may be discussed with the Contracting Officer prior to delivery. The Government personnel listed in the distribution list will receive a copy of the submittals. Name and electronic address of the Government personnel are specified below:

RDER-PRC-TR: Stanley Chan, stanley.u.chan.civ@mail.mil

QAR: TBA

If the CDRL Data Deliverable is priced and is not NSP (Not Separately Priced), then an electronic DD Form 250 will be required via the Wide Area Workflow website in order for the contractor to receive payment for the data deliverable.

RDER-PRC-TR

QAR

Stanley U. Chan

RDER-PRC-TR

Electronics Engineer

RDER-PRC-TR

02/13/2019

CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST

(1 Data Item) Form Approved

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 110 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA. 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of these addresses. Send completed form to the Government Issuing Contracting Officer for Contract/PR No. listed in Block E.

TDP TM OTHER NDTI

Radio Set Control C-11466A/ARC-201A(V)

TBD

17. PRICE GROUP

18. ESTIMATED TOTAL PRICE

INSERT

IN

DD

b. COPIES

SECT. B

SUBMISSION

a. ADDRESSEE

Final

16. REMARKS:

Submit report of First Article Test results via DD 250.

Government requires 30 days to provide comments/approval.

Submit revised report within 15 days after receipt of government comments. Government requires 30 days to provide comments/approval.

All deliveries shall be in digital format, compatible with Microsoft Office 2007 software and adobe Acrobat version 7.0 and delivered via ARL SAFE (https://safe.arl.army.mil) with a notification email to the Government personnel listed in the distribution list. Alternative delivery media may be discussed with the Contracting Officer prior to delivery. The Government personnel listed in the distribution list will receive a copy of the submittals. Name and electronic address of the Government personnel are specified below:

RDER-PRC-TR: Stanley Chan, stanley.u.chan.civ@mail.mil

QAR: TBA

PCO: TBA

If the CDRL Data Deliverable is priced and is not NSP (Not Separately Priced), then an electronic DD Form 250 will be required via the Wide Area Workflow website in order for the contractor to receive payment for the data deliverable.

RDER-PRC-TR

QAR

PCO

Stanley U. Chan

RDER-PRC-TR

Electronics Engineer

RDER-PRC-TR

02/13/2019 image1.wmf image2.wmf