Exhibit_A__Tech_Requirements.pdf

Exhibit A SPRBL1-17-R-0037 Page 1 of 20 Issue: 06 June 2017

TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS

5985-01-588-5574, AS-4697/VRC ANTENNA

Exhibit A SPRBL1-17-R-0037 Page 2 of 20

TABLE OF CONTENTS

APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

CHEMICAL AGENT RESISTANT COATING (CARC)

Paint Colors

Special Instructions

PACKAGING

Requirements for Production Evaluation

Requirements for Production Evaluation – Appendix A

Requirements for Contractor Performed First Article Testing – Appendix B

CDRL List

Individual CDRLs

Exhibit A SPRBL1-17-R-0037 Page 3 of 20

APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

Military and Federal Standards FED-STD-595C Colors used in Government Procurement MIL-DTL-53072C Chemical Agent Resistant Coating (CARC) System Application

Procedures and Quality Control Inspection MIL-DTL-64159 Coating, Water Dispersible Aliphatic Polyurethane, Chemical Agent

Resistant MIL-M-53039A Coating, Aliphatic Polyurethane, Single Component, Chemical

Agent Resistant w/Amd 2 MIL-PRF-22750F Coating, Epoxy, High-Solids MIL-PRF-24635 Coating Systems, Weather-Resistant, Exterior Use MIL-STD-129R Military Marking for Shipment and Storage MIL-STD-130N Identification Marking of U.S. Military Property MIL-STD-3046 Department of Defense Interim Standard Practice Configuration

Management MIL-HDBK-61A Configuration Management Guidance (Dated 7 Feb 2001)

Other Documents CECOM-A A3325550 Specification 30-88 and 225-450MHz VHF-UHF Vehicular Antenna, dated, 01 March 2010

Commercial Documents ISPM 15 Regulation of Wood Packaging Material in International Trade ASTM D 3951-15 Standard Practice for Commerical Packaging SAE EIA-649-1 Configuration Management Requirements for Denfense Contracts

Security Documents N/A

Exhibit A SPRBL1-17-R-0037 Page 4 of 20

CHEMICAL AGENT RESISTANT COATING (CARC)

Paint Colors

X = Applicable Location Color

Color No.

FED-STD 595

X Exterior – Lusterless Green Green 383 34094

Exterior – Camouflage – Desert Colors Green 383 34094 Tan 686A 33446 Green 24533 Brown 383 30051 White 27875

Interior Shelter Surfaces Green 24533

(White or Green) White 27875 Exterior – Sand Camo Sand 33303

Special Instructions

X = Applicable Location or Part Instruction Antenna Elements, including protective covers, i.e. fiberglass shields.

Part that conforms to a Government requirement.

Finish as required by the individual part requirement.

Parts subject to temperatures in excess of 400 degrees F (205 degrees C).

Paint with heat resistant paint.

Parts which can be flexed. Do not paint with CARC.

X CARC Marking

Stencil “CARC” in CARC paint in close proximity to the nameplate using a contrasting color, or use plates or embossed lettering.

Marking shall be durable enough to withstand all environmental conditions during field use.

PACKAGING

a. Preservation, packing and marking for shipment shall be in accordance with Section ‘D’ of the contract.

Marking shall be in accordance with MIL-STD-129R. Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) requirements shall be in accordance with the Section “F” clause, DFARS 252.211-7006, of the contract. MIL-STD-129R is applicable.

b. Packaging/packing shall be in accordance with ASTM D3951-15, Standard Practice for Commercial Packaging, Level of Protection (LOP): Commercial, Level of Pack (LPK): Commercial, Quantity Unit Pack

Exhibit A SPRBL1-17-R-0037 Page 5 of 20

(QUP): 001. Some supplies may need Military packaging depending on the destination and intended use.

Packaging requirements for those items will be provided with the delivery order.

c. Wood Packaging Material (WPM) shall meet the requirements below.

1. Wood packaging material (WPM) includes but is not limited to pallets, skids, load boards, pallet collars, wooden boxes, reels, dunnage, crates, frame and cleats. This requirement excludes materials that have undergone a manufacturing process, such as corrugated fiberboard, plywood, particleboard, veneer, and oriented strand board (OSB).

2. All WPM shall meet the requirements of International Standards for Phytosanitary Measures (ISPM) Number 15, “Regulation of Wood Packaging Material in International Trade”. DoD shipments inside and outside of the United States shall meet the requirements of ISPM 15 whenever WPM is used to ship DoD cargo.

3 All WPM shall comply with the official quality control program for heat treatment (HT) or kiln dried heat treatment (KD HT) (IAW) American Lumber Standard Committee (ALSC), Incorporated, Wood Packaging Material Program and WPM Enforcement Regulations (see http://www.alsc.org/).

4 All WPM shall include certification/quality markings IAW the ALSC standard. Markings shall be placed in an unobstructed area that will be readily visible to inspectors. Pallet markings shall be applied to the stringer or block on diagonally opposite sides of the pallet and be contrasting and clearly visible. All containers shall be marked on a side other than the top or bottom, contrasting and clearly visible. All dunnage used in configuring and/or securing the load shall also comply with ISPM 15 and be marked with an ASLC approved DUNNAGE stamp.

5 Failure to comply with these requirements may result in refusal, destruction, or treatment of materials at the point of entry. The Government reserves the right to recoup from the contractor any remediation costs incurred by the Government.

Item Marking

a. Part Number Marking. Each item delivered under contract, along with each assembly, sub assembly, and module, shall be legibly marked with the appropriate part number and manufacturer’s identification. Hardware such as screws, nuts, bolts, etc., need not be marked. The marking shall become permanently part of the item after it is applied, and can be applied using deformation, tag, rubber stamp with permanent characteristics, etc.

The marking shall not interfere with proper operation of the item, and shall have no deleterious effect on the item. Any item deemed unsuitable for marking as outlined herein shall be identified to the Contracting Officer for resolution as to marking requirement. This requirement may be entirely met by existing marking requirements contained within the drawings or specifications cited in this contract.

b. NSN Marking. In addition to the marking required by para 3.3.1 above, each item on contract listed in Section B of the contract, shall be identified with its Government assigned NSN. The intent of this requirement is to ensure that using personnel can identify the circuit card or assembly when it is removed from its assembly, and when it is received from stock as a spare part. The marking can be on a paper label, placed in a location that will not harm the item. If guidance is necessary to implement this requirement, contact the Contracting Officer for guidance.

http://www.alsc.org/

Exhibit A SPRBL1-17-R-0037 Page 6 of 20

CONFIGURATION CONTROL.

a. Configuration Baseline. The applicable Configuration Baseline (CB) for the listed Configuration Item (CI)/Computer Software Configuration Item (CSCI) is as follows:

NSN CB DESCRIPTION (CI/CSCI)

5985-01-588-5574 A3325550 ANTENNA, AS-4697/VRC

b. Configuration Responsibility. Each CI/CSCI, as developed/built and delivered, shall conform to the cited CB and (if applicable) all subsequent CB’s that will be made contractually binding by the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO). Configuration changes not directly effecting the configuration baseline do not require Government approval prior to incorporation, but must be documented by the contractor and shall be made available to the Government upon request. The contractor may use MIL-HDBK-61A and SAE EIA-649-1, Configuration Management Requirements for Defense Contracts, which was adapted on 04 March 2015 for use by the Department of Defense (DoD), as guidance for establishing a Configuration Management Program.

c. Departures from CB. No changes or departures from the CB are acceptable except for changes or departures which are submitted in accordance with DD Form 1423 for DI-MISC-80711A and are approved by the Government Configuration Manager (C Mgr.) or Configuration Management Officer (CMO) and which are made applicable to the contract by the PCO. Configuration Control shall be effected by the Configuration Control Documents (CCDs) as follows:

1. Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) includes both the engineering change and the supporting documentation by which the change is described and suggested. An ECP describes changes to the CI/CSCI and associated Government documents and data that are affected by the proposed engineering change. An ECP shall be prepared on the latest revision of DD Form 1692, to include DD Form 1692/1 through 1692/6, addressing all areas impacted by the requested change. A separate ECP/VECP shall be prepared for each distinct engineering change.

2. Notice of Revision (NOR) shows the detailed changes that must be made to technical documentation, except specifications, (one NOR per document) following approval of an ECP. The NOR is submitted as part of the ECP. The NOR shall be prepared on the latest revision of DD Form 1695.

3. A Specification Change Notice (SCN) is used to delineate the exact change(s) in a specification that will be distributed to users when the ECP is approved. The SCN is submitted as part of the ECP. The SCN shall be prepared on the latest revision of DD Form 1696. The SCN is not used for a military or federal document, only a Request for Variance can be used for those documents.

4. Value Engineering Change Proposal (VECP) is the same as an ECP except there are proposed cost savings for the program. The contractor shall follow the guidance in Section I of this contract for VECPs.

5. Request for Variance (RFV) is a temporary departure from requirements and do not constitute a permanent change to the Functional Configuration Document, Allocated Configuration Document, or Product

Exhibit A SPRBL1-17-R-0037 Page 7 of 20 configuration Document. Prior to or after manufacture of an item, the supplying activity may request a variance.

The supplying activity shall not build items, or present items for acceptance, that incorporate a known departure from requirements, unless a request for a variance has been approved. Where it is determined that a change should be permanent, an ECP must be processed in accordance with this document. A RFV shall be submitted using the latest revision of DD Form 1694.

6. Contractor shall provide all supporting program or cost data with the CCD. The contractor shall uniquely and sequentially identify (including the use of the contract number) each ECP, VECP, NOR, SCN or RFV. The identification number should use less than 16 characters.

d. Identification of Authorized Personnel. The contractor shall identify to the PCO, Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO), and the technical office identified on the DD Form 1423 for DI-MISC-80711A, the name(s) of the official(s) of its organization who are authorized to submit CCDs 30 Days after Contract (DAC).

Requirements for Production Evaluation.

a. General. The equipment on contract, including all materials, parts, subassemblies and assemblies, shall be produced in strict conformance with the Government-Furnished technical data, including all changes cited in the solicitation/contract, and as supplemented or modified by approved Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs). This technical data may require compatibility corrections, referred to throughout this SOW as 'Production Evaluation (PE) Compatibility' corrections, to improve production efficiency.

b. Contractor's Obligation and Responsibility. The contractor shall perform the following tasks.

c. Perform a PE review. The contractor shall continually review the technical data to identify and propose corrections for all PE compatibility discrepancies. This review will commence during the production and quality planning phase and continue through the preproduction, production, inspection and testing phases of this contract. The contractor will evaluate the Government-Furnished Technical Data Package (including drawings, specifications, gage drawings, test fixture drawings, master pattern drawings or data, engineering change proposals with notices of revisions (NOR) and specification change notices (SCN), models (if any) and any other data defined as technical data by the government) to determine such PE corrections, and submit PE Compatibility ECPs to the Government to reflect these corrections, as described below. PE Compatibility corrections are discussed in Appendix A entitled “Sample PE Compatibility Discrepancies, Errors, Omissions and Deficiencies.”

d. Submit PE Compatibility Engineering Change Proposals to the Government. Recommendations for compatibility changes shall be prepared and submitted as Engineering Change Proposals (ECP) with appropriate NORs and SCNs in accordance with the Configuration Management Section. PE ECPs will:

e. Be submitted as soon as the need for a change is recognized.

f. Clearly and explicitly state the proposed change and the need for the change.

g. Include all technical documentation and supporting data required to justify the change.

Exhibit A SPRBL1-17-R-0037 Page 8 of 20

h. Special Instructions for PE ECPs. The first page of the ECP form shall have the following:

i. This statement:

“This ECP is submitted as a PE compatibility change as defined in the contract”.

j. Have 'PE Compatibility' stamped in 3/8-inch block letters at the top and bottom of the page.

k. The effect on Delivery Schedule and Estimated Costs shall be indicated as “none”.

l. If the incorporation of a PE Compatibility ECP does not correct the deficiency, or creates another deficiency, the contractor shall submit any further ECPs and incorporate such approved changes into all items not yet accepted by the Government, at no cost to the Government.

m. Implement PE ECPs. The contractor shall apply all approved PE ECPs to the manufacture of the hardware on contract without increase in contract price or delay in delivery.

n. Revise Technical Data (as required). The contractor will generate all required additional data and revise affected Technical Data to incorporate PE corrections in accordance with the appropriate engineering drawings clauses without increase in contract price or delay in delivery.

o. Submit TDP Review Report. The contractor shall prepare and submit a TDP Review Report (including subcontracted PE effort - see paragraph 3.4.4 below) in accordance with DI-MISC-80750 as implemented by the DD Form 1423 for DI-MISC-80750.

p. Submit TDP Certification. The contractor shall prepare and submit a letter of PE certification in accordance with DI-MISC-80750 as implemented by the DD Form 1423 for DI-MISC-80750. This letter shall be prepared in accordance with the specific content and format requirements described below.

1. The certification shall be provided on company letterhead, and shall be dated and signed by an authorized official of the company.

2. This letter will state the following:

3. (Company Name) has conducted the Production Evaluation effort required to date by Provision

Number (Number) of Contract Number (Number) for the (End Item). Although we recognize that PE is a continuing effort and that occasional PE Compatibility ECP's may arise during the full scale production phase of this contract, we have sufficiently identified and corrected any discrepancy, error, omission or deficiency in design or technical data which would otherwise have precluded practical manufacture, assembly or attainment of required performance as set forth in specification (Number of End Item Specification). Accordingly, we hereby certify that the technical data package, as changed or supplemented by the ECP's approved to date, is suitable for our use in fulfilling our obligation of delivering conforming items at the price and delivery schedule established in this contract’.

Exhibit A SPRBL1-17-R-0037 Page 9 of 20

4. If the contractor does not submit this letter of certification at the specified time, the contractor shall be deemed to have failed to make delivery within the meaning of the 'Default' clause of this contract, and this contract shall be subject to termination for default. However, failure of the Government in such an event to terminate this contract for default shall not relieve the contractor of its responsibility to continue the Production Evaluation effort and to meet the delivery schedule for all items, as well as meeting all other contract requirements.

5. Submission of the Certification shall not relieve the contractor from compliance with the PE requirement, which remains in effect for the duration of the contract.

q. PE Compatibility Discrepancies, Errors, Omissions and Deficiencies. The types of discrepancies, errors, omissions and deficiencies which require PE compatibility corrections are listed in Appendix A entitled “Sample PE Compatibility Discrepancies, Errors, Omissions and Deficiencies.” Examples are provided for illustrative purposes, and are not inclusive.

NOTE: In the event of incompatibility between a 'common' or 'standard' part and a mating part, preference shall be given to correcting the incompatibility by changing the mating part.

r. Other Discrepancies. The following discrepancies may be uncovered during the PE review. While the contractor is responsible for submitting ECPs to propose corrections to the discrepancies, such ECPs will not be submitted as PE ECPs, but as described below.

s. Overspecified and nonessential requirements. When overspecified or nonessential requirements are identified, the contractor shall submit an ECP proposing the elimination or modification of the nonessential or overspecified requirements in accordance with the 'Configuration Management' provision of this contract. If significant savings are anticipated, the contractor shall submit the change as a Value Engineering Change Proposal (VECP) in accordance with the 'Value Engineering' provision of this contract.

t. Design Deficiencies. While it is not the intent of the Government to transfer full design responsibility to the contractor, it is recognized that the PE effort may require some design effort on the part of the contractor. In the event that the contractor discovers a conflict between the specified performance requirements and the construction characteristics specified by the technical data, the contractor shall immediately submit an ECP in accordance with the 'Configuration Management' provision of this contract. Such ECPs shall be identified as 'Basic Design Deficiency' ECPs, and shall describe the alleged design deficiency, the basis for the contractor's conclusion that it is not a PE compatibility discrepancy and the proposed change that will correct the deficiency.

u. Subcontracting of PE. If any item described by the Government-furnished technical data should be subcontracted, one of the following tasks shall be performed by the contractor:

v. This Production Evaluation requirement shall be made a part of the subcontract. The prime contractor is responsible for assuring that the subcontractor complies with the Production Evaluation requirements.

Submission of ECPs to the Government shall be made only by the prime contractor.

Exhibit A SPRBL1-17-R-0037 Page 10 of 20

w. Production Evaluation responsibility will be retained by the prime contractor, and all approved PE ECPs will be provided to the subcontractor for incorporation on hardware. In this situation, the contractor will prepare and submit a letter to the Procuring Contracting Officer within seven (7) days of award of the subcontract. This letter will identify the item that has been subcontracted without the PE clause and state the contractor's intention of retaining Production Evaluation responsibility for the subcontracted item.

x. Alternate Changes. The Government reserves the right to direct an alternate change to a PE ECP.

Exhibit A SPRBL1-17-R-0037 Page 11 of 20

Requirements for Production Evaluation – Appendix A

Appendix A

Sample PE Compatibility Discrepancies, Errors, Omissions and Deficiencies

A.1. Compatibility among the drawings and between drawings and other technical data. For example:

- Are the correct specifications cited?

- If a specification has been superseded, is the appropriate replacement cited?

- When parts are specified, is the quantity and part number correct?

- Are code identifications correct?

A.2. Compatibility between the equipment drawings and related gage/test fixture drawings, test procedures, master pattern drawings and other drawings in the technical data package. For example:

- Are the desired characteristics adequately and correctly specified?

A.3. Compatibility between Data Lists, Parts Lists, assembly drawings and other technical data. For example:

- Does information on the Data List match or correctly supplement information on the Parts List?

- Do the Data Lists and Parts Lists cite all required drawings?

A.4. Compatibility between the physical or functional requirements of the specifications or drawings and the inspection provisions to verify compliance. For example:

- If the requirement specifies operation at a certain temperature, does the inspection requirement provide for its measurement at that temperature?

- Are specified parts and materials compatible with the performance or testing requirements specified for the end item or assemblies?

A.5. Correction of absence of an inspection that is necessary to ensure compliance with the performance requirements established by the equipment specification. For example:

- Do inspection requirements exist, either on the drawings or in the applicable specification(s), to ensure the proper function of the component described by the technical data?

A.6. Correction of an impossible or impractical manufacturing condition. For example:

- Are the specified dimensions or tolerances of material appropriate?

Exhibit A SPRBL1-17-R-0037 Page 12 of 20

- Can the item be manufactured using only the cited information?

In these cases, the contractor will provide any data required to provide complete manufacturing instructions.

A.7. Correction of an impossible or impractical assembly procedure. For example:

- If assembly is possible in only one sequence of actions, is that sequence specified?

- Can data be added or deleted to facilitate efficient assembly?

- Will mating parts assemble as specified?

A.8. Correction of a condition which precludes inspection (examination or testing). For example

- Should hole locations be inspected before or after fasteners are installed?

- Is the part to be inspected accessible without unreasonable disassembly?

A.9. Correction of obvious administrative and typographical errors in the drawings and in the performance requirements of the end item specification.

A.10. Corrections to permit procurement of physically and functionally suitable and interchangeable purchased parts and materials. For example:

- Is the correct vendor part number specified?

- Are the specified sources still viable?

Exhibit A SPRBL1-17-R-0037 Page 13 of 20

Requirements for Contractor Performed First Article Testing – Appendix B.

Appendix B

Requirements for Contractor Performed First Article Testing

a. General. The contractor shall perform First Article Testing (FAT) for NSNs in accordance with FAR 52.209-3, Alternate 1 First Article Approval – Contractor Testing. Refer to FAR 52.209-3, Alternate 1 for the number of units and the test report submission and review schedule.

b. Insure all equipment used to take performance readings for acceptance tests are kept within the performance parameters delineated by the manufacturer of that equipment, whether the equipment is manufactured by the contractor or by another source.

c. If the antenna has been successfully produced and accepted by the Government within the past three years of award of order, a waiver of First Article Testing may be granted.

d. Test Requirements. The antenna shall be subjected to the First article Test (FAT) inspection. The environment requirements set forth in paragraph 3.5 of drawing A3325550 shall be verified as part of FAT for compliance of the performance requirements set forth in paragraph 3.0 of drawing A3325550.

Test unit(s) used for FAT shell be selected by the Government's Quality Assurance Representative (QAR) from Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) from the first production lot.

e. Test Plan. The contractor shall prepare and submit a First Article Qualification Test Plan in accordance with DI-NDTI-81307A as implemented by the DD Form 1423 for DI-NDTI-81307A. In addition to the information required by DI-NDTI-81307A, this submission shall contain:

1. The delineation and allocation of tests to be performed on each of the First Article units and the order of such tests (this may be prescribed in applicable technical data).

2. Step-by-step test procedures for each test and the data sheets to be employed to document the results of testing.

3. Identification of required test facilities, equipment and personnel.

4. Test milestones schedules and the contractor's test readiness posture.

5. A table which cross references the paragraph number of the specification requirement (including a brief description of the requirement) and the associated paragraph number of the First Article Qualification Test Plan.

Exhibit A SPRBL1-17-R-0037 Page 14 of 20

f. Notice of FAT Performance. As required by FAR 52.209-3, written notices concerning the time and location of FAT shall be furnished to the PCO, the Administrative Contracting Officer and the Government Technical Activity listed in Block 6 of the DD Form 1423 for DI-NDTI-80809B.

g. Selection of First Article Samples. FAT samples shall be selected at random from the initial production lot.

h. Reporting of FAT Failures. Reporting of FAT failures shall be by the FAT Report, in lieu of any other reporting requirements specified in this contract. In addition, FAT failures shall be verbally reported to the Government's Quality Assurance Representative (QAR) and Government Technical Activity listed in Block 6 of the DD Form 1423 for DI-NDTI-80809B within twenty four hours of occurrence.

i. FAT Report. A FAT Report shall be prepared and submitted in accordance with DI-NDTI-80809B as implemented by the DD Form 1423 for DI-NDTI-80809B. The FAT Report shall be complete, accurate, and readable and shall include the following:

1. General Data.

2. Contractor's name and address.

3. Contract number.

4. Nomenclature, type number and (if assigned) stock number of item represented by the First

Article.

5. Name and address of plant where First Article was fabricated and assembled.

6. Place and date of performance of tests.

7. Identification (including date) of applicable equipment specifications and associated amendments.

8. Sample size or quantity submitted for test or inspection.

9. Test data shall include: Place and date of test, tester name and signature, Government verifier/witness (if applicable), and tested item serial number.

10. Test results shall cite detailed qualitative and quantitative data results such as test categories, test conditions, test methods employed, and types of inspection and test equipment used during the test or inspection.

j. Cross Reference. If required, submit a table which cross-references the paragraph numbers of the specification, the test procedures, and data sheet entry.

k. FAT Failures. FAT failures shall list all requirements not complied with during FAT. If none, this should be explicitly stated. For each requirement not met, a corrective action to remove the noncompliance will be proposed. This corrective action must include retest or other verification that the corrective action does remedy the problem/failure. The corrective action will address changes in design or manufacturing process which will preclude this deficiency in subsequent production units. Verified corrective action must be implemented prior to contractor entering into production.

l. FAT/Production Discrepancies. Any Government approved difference between the parts, materials and processes used to manufacture FAT samples and production units shall be documented in the FAT report.

Exhibit A SPRBL1-17-R-0037 Page 15 of 20

m. FAT Approval. FAT samples shall meet all contractual requirements or all variances shall be documented by Government approved waivers. First Article approval will be contingent upon the submission of a complete and acceptable FAT report to include verification of corrective action for reported FAT failures to include adequacy of identified changes to the design/manufacturing process.

n. Disposition of First Article Samples. Upon successful completion of FAT, the contractor shall dispose of the FAT samples as follows:

1. One (1) sample each of ANTENNA, AS-4697/VRC shall be retained at the contractor's facility for use as a reference by the QAR.

2. All remaining FAT samples shall not be delivered as production items on the contract, and shall be shipped to the nearest DLA Disposition Services.

o. Production Test Procedures. Production test procedures used to test production units shall be identical to those used to test First Article samples.

p. Once FAT is approved, proposed changes to the production test procedures will be submitted to the Government Technical Activity for evaluation. Such submissions will provide complete justification for the change. Changes to the approved test procedures shall not be implemented without written Government approval.

q. Any notice of approval of test procedures or changes thereto shall not relieve the contractor from complying with all contractual requirements.

r. Use of FAT Samples as a Manufacturing Standard. The FAT samples shall NOT serve as a manufacturing standard.

Exhibit A SPRBL1-17-R-0037 Page 16 of 20

CDRL List

CDRL

Data Line No. DID Identification Title A001 DI-MISC- 80771A Configuration Control B001 DI-MISC- 80750 Technical Data Package Review Report C001 DI-NDTI- 81307A First Article Qualification Test Plan D001 DI-NDTI- 80809B First Article Test Report

Individual CDRLs

Individual CDRLs start on the next page.

Exhibit A SPRBL1-17-R-0037 Page 17 of 20

CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST

(1 Data Item)

Original Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 110 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA. 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of these addresses. Send completed form to the Government Issuing Contracting Officer for Contract/PR No. listed in Block E.

A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO. B. EXHIBIT C. CATEGORY:

TDP X TM OTHER

D. SYSTEM/ITEM E. CONTRACT/PR NO. F. CONTRACTOR

ANTENNA TBD

1. DATA ITEM NO. 2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM 3. SUBTITLE 17. PRICE GROUP

A001 Scientific and Technical Reports Configuration Control

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.) 5. CONTRACT REFERENCE 6. REQUIRING OFFICE 18. ESTIMATED

TOTAL PRICE

DI-MISC-80711A Technical Document RDER-PRC-TR INSERT

7. DD 250 REQ 9.DIST STATEMENT

REQUIRED

10. FREQUENCY 12. DATE OF FIRST

SUBMISSION 14. DISTRIBUTION IN

DD ASREQ SEE ITEM 16 b. COPIES

SECT. B

8. APP CODE N/A 11. AS OF DATE 13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT

SUBMISSION

a. ADDRESSEE

Draft Final

SEE ITEM 16

Reg

Repro

16. REMARKS:

Data Item Description DI-MISC-80711A: Delete block 10 instructions entirely and follow instructions in SOW 3.2.

The contractor shall prepare and submit Configuration Control Documents in accordance with the SOW section for Configuration Control (Para 3.2) when a change to or departure from a contractual baseline document is deemed necessary.

The Government will have 30 days to review, accept, and/or comment on the draft submission. The contractor shall incorporate changes into the electronic deliverable within 30 days after receipt of Government comments. The Government will have 30 days to review, accept, and/or comment on the final submission.

All deliveries shall be in digital format. All digital files shall be provided both by electronic submission, e.g., e-mail, FTP, etc., as arranged with the requiring office, and also by CD ROM or DVD readable by computers running Microsoft Windows. Alternate delivery media may be allowed subject to Government review and approval.

If the CDRL data deliverable is to be priced and is not NSP, then an electronic DD Form 250 will be required via the Wide Area Workflow Web Site in order to received payment for the data deliverable. (See Section G of the Contract). Email notification required with any electronic submission.

RDER-PRC-TR

PCO

ACO

QAR

AMSEL-LCL-ECM

AMSEL-LCL-EIE*

*1 COPY VECP ONLY

15. TOTAL 0 6 0

G. PREPARED BY H. DATE I. APPROVED BY J. DATE

Man Bun Lau

RDER-PRC-TR

06/07/2017 Daniel Webster

RDER-PRC-TR

Chief, Tactical Radio Branch

06/07/2017

Based upon DD Form 1423-1, 1 Jun 90

Exhibit A SPRBL1-17-R-0037 Page 18 of 20

Form Approved

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 110 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA. 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of these addresses. Send completed form to the Government Issuing Contracting Officer for Contract/PR No. listed in Block E.

A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO. B. EXHIBIT C. CATEGORY:

TDP TM OTHER MISC

D. SYSTEM/ITEM E. CONTRACT/PR NO. F. CONTRACTOR

ANTENNA

1. DATA ITEM NO. 2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM 3. SUBTITLE 17. PRICE GROUP

B001 Technical Data Package Review Report Production Evaluation (PE)

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.) 5. CONTRACT REFERENCE 6. REQUIRING OFFICE 18. ESTIMATED

TOTAL PRICE

DI-MISC-80750 RDER-PRC-TR INSERT

7. DD 250 REQ 9.DIST STATEMENT

REQUIRED

10. FREQUENCY 12. DATE OF FIRST

SUBMISSION 14. DISTRIBUTION IN

DD QRTLY 90 DAC b. COPIES

SECT. B

8. APP CODE N/A 11. AS OF DATE 13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT

SUBMISSION

a. ADDRESSEE

Draft Final

16.1 DID Modify DI-MISC-80750 as follows:

a. All references to ECP is limited to PE compatibility ECP's.

b. Information required for 10.2.1 shall be as follows:

1. Contract number.

2. PE-ECP Number.

3. Nomenclature of affected configuration item.

4. Date of ECP submittal to Government.

5. Date of Government authorization/disapproval.

6. Baseline documents affected.

7. Date of revision to baseline document.

8. Total number of drawings/specifications/other technical data.

9. Total number of PE compatibility ECPs prepared during the reporting period.

10. Total number of drawings revised due to the PE effort during the reporting period. A list of revised drawings shall be attached.

11. The cumulative number of drawings/specifications/other technical data reviewed during the reporting period.

12. Percentage of total PE effort accomplished since contract award.

c. Information required for 10.2.2 shall be submitted as a letter of PE Certification to the PCO with a copy furnished to the addressee cited in Item 14. This letter shall be submitted concurrently with submission of the First Article Test (FAT) report and content of this letter shall be IAW Paragraph p of Section, “Requirements for Production Evaluation”

d. If any of the PE effort is subcontracted, the information per 16.b above for the subcontractor effort shall be separately listed and shall include the name of the subcontractor.

16.2 Submit by LT except for final report, which shall be submitted by

DD250.

RDER-PRC-TR

PCO

SPRBL1

15. TOTAL 0 2 0

G. PREPARED BY H. DATE I. APPROVED BY J. DATE

Man, B, Lau

RDER-PRC-TR

Electronic Engineer

06/07/2017 Daniel Webster

RDER-PRC-TR

Chief, Tactical Radio Branch

DD Form 1423-1, 1 Jun 90

Exhibit A SPRBL1-17-R-0037 Page 19 of 20

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 110 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA. 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of these addresses. Send completed form to the Government Issuing Contracting Officer for Contract/PR No. listed in Block E.

A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO. B. EXHIBIT C. CATEGORY:

TDP TM OTHER NDTI

D. SYSTEM/ITEM E. CONTRACT/PR NO. F. CONTRACTOR

ANTENNA

1. DATA ITEM NO. 2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM 3. SUBTITLE

C001 First Article Qualification Test Plan

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.) 5. CONTRACT REFERENCE 6. REQUIRING OFFICE

DI-NDTI-81307A RDER-PRC-TR

7. DD 250 REQ 9.DIST STATEMENT

REQUIRED

10. FREQUENCY 12. DATE OF FIRST

SUBMISSION 14. DISTRIBUTION

DD ONE/P 30 DAC (DAYS

AFTER

CONTRACT

AWARDED)

b. COPIES

8. APP CODE N/A 11. AS OF DATE 13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT

SUBMISSION

a. ADDRESSEE Draft

Final

A SEE ITEM 16

Submit draft via LT. Government requires 30 days for review/comments. Submit final within 15 days of receipt of Government comments, via DD-250.

All deliveries shall be in digital format. Data shall be submitted and exchanged electronically in a format, compatible with Microsoft Office 2007 software delivered by e-mail. Alternative delivery media may be discussed with the Contracting Officer prior to delivery. E-mail notification is required with any electronic submission. Alternate formats may be allowed subject to Government review and approval.

SPRBL1

Man, B, Lau

RDER-PRC-TR

Electronic Engineer

06/07/2017 Daniel Webster

RDER-PRC-TR

Chief, Tactical Radio Branch

DD Form 1423-1, 1 Jun 90

Exhibit A SPRBL1-17-R-0037 Page 20 of 20

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 110 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA. 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of these addresses. Send completed form to the Government Issuing Contracting Officer for Contract/PR No. listed in Block E.

A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO. B. EXHIBIT C. CATEGORY:

TDP TM OTHER NDTI

D. SYSTEM/ITEM E. CONTRACT/PR NO. F. CONTRACTOR

ANTENNA

1. DATA ITEM NO. 2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM 3. SUBTITLE

D001 Test/Inspection Report First Article Test Report

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.) 5. CONTRACT REFERENCE 6. REQUIRING OFFICE

DI-NDTI-80809B RDER-PRC-TR

7. DD 250 REQ 9.DIST STATEMENT

REQUIRED

10. FREQUENCY 12. DATE OF FIRST

SUBMISSION 14. DISTRIBUTION

DD OTIME 20 DAT (DAYS

AFTER

TESTING)

b. COPIES

8. APP CODE N/A 11. AS OF DATE 13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT

SUBMISSION

a. ADDRESSEE Draft

Final

Submit report of First Article Test results via DD 250. Submit revised report within 15 days after receipt of government comments.

Government requires 20 days to provide comments/approval.

All deliveries shall be in digital format. Data shall be submitted and exchanged electronically in a format, compatible with Microsoft Office 2007 software delivered by e-mail. Alternative delivery media may be discussed with the Contracting Officer prior to delivery. E-mail notification is required with any electronic submission. Alternate formats may be allowed subject to Government review and approval.

Man, B, Lau

RDER-PRC-TR

Electronic Engineer

06/07/2017 Daniel Webster

RDER-PRC-TR

Chief, Tactical Radio Branch