SPMYM316Q3016_Redacted.pdf

SPMYM3-16-Q-3016

Justification for Other Than Full & Open Competition (November 2011)

JUSTIFICATION FOR OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

1. Contracting Agency and Activity: DLA Land and Maritime-KME

2. The action being approved is the acquisition of supplies/services on other than a full and open competition basis.

3. The supplies/services required to meet the using activity’s needs are described as follows:

See Attachment 1 to this J&A.

All items part of a repair kit for a Rotational Deployment Mechanism (RDM). The RDM is the "Remote Deployment Mechanism" for the SPU. It deploys, stows and trains (turns) the SPU motor (Secondary Propulsion Unit). The motor is part of this repair and these parts and pieces are considered components for that major component. Therefore, the FSC code for this requirement is 6150.

The total Government Estimate for this acquisition is This acquisition:

[X] will not include an option.

4. The acquisition is restricted to the only source(s) of supply known to have the capability of furnishing the required supplies/services. Source(s) are: (Include CAGE code)

Curtis Wright EMD: Cage Code 04808

5. The statutory authority permitting other than full and open competition is:

[X ] 10 U.S.C. 2304(c)(1) - Available from only one source: Curtis Wright per NAVSEA instruction

6. The use of the authority cited in other than 10. U.S.C. 2304(c)(2) above is based on:

[X] AMSC P. The rights to use the data needed to purchase this part from additional source(s) are not owned by the Government and cannot be purchased, developed, or otherwise obtained. The information required to manufacture these parts is proprietary to Curtis Wright. The Government does not own these rights, therefore the Government cannot offer this as a full and open requirement.

7. Efforts to ensure that offers are solicited from as many sources as practicable are:

The acquisition will be synopsized and any firm requesting a solicitation copy will be provided one.

8. A market survey:

Sources sought notice SPMYM3-16-Q-3S16 was posted to Fedbizopps on 1/26/2016 and remained open until 2/2/2016. There were no responses to the notice.

9. Additional facts supporting other than full and open competition are:

[X] Based upon the technical certification on file, technical data is not available and cannot be developed to permit full and open competition. The data presently available reflects the minimum needs of the Government.

There is only one manufacturer with no dealers of this product, therefore only the manufacturer is expected to respond to the solicitation.

(November 2011)

This sole source is being issued in accordance with NAVSEA instruction, due to this being replacement material for OEM equipment. This can be found under AWP Line Item 28.2280.2100, SWLIN 238All. This requirement is specifically dictated by NAVSEA to utilize Curtis Wright as they are the OEM.

10. A listing of sources, if any, indicating an interest in the acquisition are: Curtis Wright, Cage Code 04808

11. The actions, being taken to overcome barriers to competition before any subsequent acquisitions are made are:

(If none, so state and explain why not.)

During the solicitation, if we receive a proposal from a dealer we will require the dealer to provide traceability documentation proving that the material was manufactured by Curtis Wright in accordance with its assigned part-number.

12. I hereby determine that the anticipated cost to the Government will be fair and reasonable. Although pricing is unknown at this point, the items in the repair kit have been broken down by component and at first glance, the components will be relatively simple to compare to other items in the market place (screws, o-rings, etc).

For any items that are more difficult, the vendor will be contacted for more information, cost breakdowns, or previous invoices.

13. Additional facts, if any, supporting this determination: None

APPROVAL

APPROVAL LEVELS OF THE JUSTIFICATION – FAR 6.304

[X] not exceeding $650,000 Contracting Officer

[ ] over $650,000 to $12,500,000 Competition Advocate

[ ] over $12,500,000 to $85,500,000 Head of Contracting Activity (HCA)

TECHNICAL/REQUIREMENTS PERSONNEL I certify that the facts and representations under my cognizance which are included in this justification are complete and accurate.

Technical Cognizance:

(Requirements originator)

Name and Title Signature Phone Date

LEGAL REVIEW

The foregoing J&A has been reviewed for legal sufficiency and redaction prior to posting on FedBizOpps.gov..

Name and Title Signature Phone Date 2/29/2016

Date: 2016.02.25 13:26:58 -05'00'

(November 2011)

CONTRACTING OFFICER

I hereby certify that the information contained in this justification is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. If not exceeding $650,000, this signature serves as the approval.

Name and Title Signature Phone Date

COMPETITION ADVOCATE

I have reviewed and approve this Justification $650,000 to $12,500,000, or if above $12,500,000, hereby recommends that this Justification be approved:

Name and Title Signature Phone Date

HEAD OF THE CONTRACTING ACTIVITY

I have reviewed and approve this Justification $85,500,000 or below.

Name and Title Signature Phone Date

MCCLUSKEY.RACHEL

.JESSICA.1012573452

Digitally signed by

MCCLUSKEY.RACHEL.JESSICA.1012573452

DN: c=US, o=U.S. Government, ou=DoD, ou=PKI, ou=DLA, cn=MCCLUSKEY.RACHEL.JESSICA.1012573452

Date: 2016.02.29 14:02:19 -05'00'