SPM4A816Q0131.pdf
PDF 7 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Plasma Cutter for FSC 3449 Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- SPM4A816Q0131
- Issued by
- Defense Logistics Agency Aviation
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| SPM4A816Q0131_Amendment_2.pdf | ||
| SPM4A816Q0131_Amendment_1.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 1 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 2 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 3 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 4 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 5 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 6 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 7 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 8 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 9 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 10 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 11 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 12 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 13 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 14 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 15 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 16 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 17 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 18 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 19 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 20 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 21 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 22 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 23 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 24 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 25 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 26 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 27 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 28 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 29 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 30 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 31 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 32 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 33 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 34 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 35 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 36 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 37 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 38 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 39 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 40 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 41 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 42 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 43 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 44 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 45 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 46 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 47 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 48 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 49 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 50 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 51 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 52 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 53 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 54 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 55 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 56 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 57 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 58 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 59 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 60 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 61 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 62 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 63 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 64 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 65 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 66 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 67 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 68 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 69 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 70 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 71 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 72 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 73 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 74 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 75 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 76 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 77 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 78 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 79 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 80 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 81 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 82 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 83 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 84 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 85 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 86 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 87 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 88 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 89 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 90 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 91 of 92
SPM4A816Q0131 Page 92 of 92
SPM4A8-16-Q-0131 /DLA-VICA/Odemaris Garcia
* RETURN DIRECTLY TO THE GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT OFFICE AT FAX NO. 804-279-5948
OR VIA EMAIL AT AVNIPERWEB@DLA.MIL. *
PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Defense Logistics Agency - Aviation is collecting past performance information on the company listed below as part of its best value determination on an active procurement. Please complete the evaluation and return directly to the Government. The information is considered sensitive and will not be released to the Offeror.
Company (Offeror) Name:_______________________________________________
Address:_____________________________________________________________
RATING SCALE: Please use the following ratings to answer the questions, by placing an “X” in the appropriate box.
If you are unable to rate an item because it was not a requirement, never an issue, or you have no knowledge of the item in question, then you should mark “NA.”
EVALUATION CRITERIA:
Exceptional - The company’s performance was consistently superior. Performance was entirely favorable and you wouldn’t hesitate to do business with them again.
Very Good - The company’s performance was better than average, and you would willingly do business with them again. The contractual performance was mostly favorable and corrective actions, if any, that were taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory - The company’s performance was adequate for the project and you would consider doing business with them again. There were minor performance problems which were corrected.
Marginal – The company’s performance was below average and you would be hesitant to do business with them again. There were some significant performance issues and the vendor had some difficulty taking corrective action.
Unsatisfactory – The company’s performance was entirely unsatisfactory and you would not do business with them again under any circumstances. There were serious performance issues with the contractor and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.
Neutral—No record exists.
FOR AREAS INDICATING EITHER EXCEPTIONAL OR UNSATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE, PLEASE PROVIDE AN
EXPLANATION IN THE COMMENTS SECTION OF THE SURVEY.
QUALITY OF PRODUCT Neutral Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Very Good
Exceptional
Provided a service that conformed to contract requirements, specs, and standards of good workmanship.
Submitted accurate reports.
Utilized personnel appropriate to the effort performed.
COST CONTROL Neutral Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Very Good
Exceptional
Performed the effort within the estimated cost/price.
Submitted accurate invoices on a timely basis.
Demonstrated cost efficiencies in performing the required effort.
Actual costs/rates realized closely reflected the negotiated costs/rates.
SCHEDULE Neutral Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Very Good
Exceptional
Tasks were performed in a timely manner and within the period of performance of the contract.
SPM4A8-16-Q-0131 /DLA-VICA/Odemaris Garcia
* RETURN DIRECTLY TO THE GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT OFFICE AT FAX NO. 804-279-5948
OR VIA EMAIL AT AVNIPERWEB@DLA.MIL. *
Contractor was responsive to technical and/or contractual direction.
BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS Neutral Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Very Good
Exceptional
Demonstrated effective management over the effort performed.
Maintained an open line of communication so that the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) or technical POC were apprised of technical, cost, and scheduling issues.
Presented information and correspondence in a clear, concise, and businesslike manner.
Promptly notified the COR, technical POC, and/or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent issues.
Cooperated in providing flexible, proactive, and effective recommended solutions to critical program issues.
Demonstrated effective management of its subcontractors
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION Neutral Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Very Good
Exceptional
Products/services adequately met the needs of the contract.
Contractor was able to perform with minimal or no direction from the COR or technical
POC.
I am satisfied with the performance of the contractor.
Expectation that we would award another contract to this firm.
Was the contract terminated for default? [ ] Yes [ ] No. If you answered yes, provide an explanation:
COMMENTS: (Required for all EXCEPTIONAL and UNSATISFACTORY ratings)
TYPE OF EQUIPMENT/SERVICE PROVIDED: _______________________________________________________
MANUFACTURER/ MODEL NUMBER OF THE EQUIPMENT:
THIS EVALUATION WAS COMPLETED BY:
BUSINESS NAME:______________________________ POINT OF CONTACT:__________________________
ADDRESS: _________________________________________________________________________________
PHONE: _________________________________ EMAIL: __________________________________________
SIGNATURE: _____________________________________________ DATE: __________________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .