JA_SPE4A617R0556_Redacted.pdf
PDF 84 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Press, Oil Filter Unit Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- SPE4A617R0556
- Issued by
- Defense Logistics Agency Aviation
About this file
Justification for Other Than Full & Open Competition
View the file
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY
AVIATION
8000 JEFFERSON DAVIS HIGHWAY
RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23297-5002
JUSTIFICATION FOR OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
SOLE SOURCE SERVICE DISABLED VETERAN OWNED SMALL BUSINESS
(SDVOSB)
(1) Identification of the agency and the contracting activity
This justification and approval (J&A) is submitted to request authority for the use of other than full and open competition to support requirements generated by the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA). The contracting authority for this requirement is DLA Aviation, , Richmond, VA.
(2) Nature and/or description of the action being approved.
This J&A seeks approval to issue Solicitation SPE4A -17-R- as a sole source SDVOSB set-aside directed to .
(3) A description of the supplies or services required to meet the agency’s needs (including the estimated value)
The solicitation proposes to award an quantity contract for . The item(s) are source controlled and is the only source identified through market research that is capable of manufacturing the NSN. The contract will cover
. The total estimated value is .
(4) An identification of the statutory authority permitting other than full and open competition.
A sole source SDVOSB set-aside is justified under 10 USC 2304(c)(5), FAR 6.302-5, authorized or required by statute.
(5) A demonstration that the proposed contractor’s unique qualifications or the nature of the acquisition requires use of the authority cited.
FAR 19.1406(a)(1)-(5) specify when a sole source SDVOSB set-aside is appropriate. This acquisition meets those circumstances, as follows:
(1) The contracting officer does not have a reasonable expectation that offers will be received from two or more service-disabled veteran-owned small business ;
Market research identified as the only SDVOSB manufacturer capable of manufacturing this NSN.
(2) The anticipated award price of the contract, including options, will not exceed—
(i) $6.5 million for a requirement within the NAICS codes for manufacturing; or
(ii) $4 million for a requirement within any other NAICS code;
The applicable NAICS code is , , so the $6.5 million limitation applies. As stated above, the estimated value is
(3) The requirement is not currently being performed by an 8(a) participant under the provisions of Subpart 19.8 or has been accepted as a requirement by SBA under Subpart 19.8;
No performance by an 8(a) participant was identified during market research.
(4) The service-disabled veteran-owned small business concern has been determined to be a responsible contractor with respect to performance;
has a history of successful performance on previous contracts for these items.
(5) Award can be made at a fair and reasonable price.
Review of DLA Aviation’s procurement history indicates that has received awards for NSN, at prices determined fair and reasonable. ased on this, the Contracting Officer has a reasonable expectation that can supply the item at fair and reasonable price.
(6) A description of efforts made to ensure that offers are solicited from as many potential sources as is practicable, including whether a notice was or will be publicized as required by Subpart 5.2 and, if not, which exception under 5.202 applies.
Potential sources were identified thro . In addition, the solicitation will be synopsized on FedBizOpps, which meets the requirement at FAR 5.201. Any potential source requesting a copy of the solicitation will be provided one and any offers, which qualify under the terms of the SDVOSB set-aside, will be considered.
(7) A determination by the contracting officer that the anticipated cost to the Government will be fair and reasonable.
The Contracting Officer has determined that the cost to the Government will be fair and reasonable. As stated above, has previously supplied at prices determined fair and reasonable.
(8) A description of the market research conducted and the results or a statement of the reason market research was not conducted.
to identify potential suppliers that have supplied or are capable of supplying the items for the acquisition. Using both historical data and information gathered from the vendors, there is no reasonable expectation that competition exists between two or more SDVOSB s. vendor responded to the
(9) Any other facts supporting the use of other than full and open competition.
No long-term adverse impact to competition is anticipated and set-aside will be dissolved if award is not made at a fair market price.
(10) A listing of the sources, if any, that expressed, in writing, an interest in the acquisition.
Potential Supplier Business Type S S
(11) A statement of the actions, if any, the agency may take to remove or overcome any barriers to competition before any subsequent acquisition for the supplies or services required.
As this acquisition is authorized by the Veterans Benefits Act of 2003 and supports the DoD's goals to leverage SDVOSBs for prime contract business opportunities, no action will be taken to overcome this barrier. No long-term adverse impact to competition is anticipated and the set-aside will be dissolved if award cannot be made at a fair market price.
(12) Contracting officer certification that the justification is accurate and complete to the best of the contracting officer’s knowledge and belief.
The Contracting Officer’s signature on the coordination and approval documents provides evidence that he/she has determined this document to be both accurate and complete to the best of his/her knowledge and belief.
Coordination and Approval, J&A for other than full and open competition, Solicitation
SPE4A -17-R-
I hereby certify that the information contained in this justification is complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
Date
NAME
Contracting Officer
This justification has been reviewed and is approved.
Date NAME
Competition Advocate DLA Aviation
File details come from the government source that posted it.