SectionM.pdf

PDF 219 KB Posted

Attached to
F-16 AIS Test Stand Installation Kits - Solicitation Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA8212-22-R-0012
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Air Force Sustainment Center

About this file

This solicitation seeks proposals for F-16 AIS Test Stand Installation Kits to support U.S. Government acquisitions. Offerors must meet all requirements including acceptable pricing, past performance, and delivery schedules to be considered for award. The Air Force Sustainment Center will evaluate proposals solely on total evaluated price, calculated from unit pricing in the response. Proposers must also comply with all terms and conditions, and be pre-approved sources listed on the Government's Screening Analysis Worksheet Form 761. The apparent successful offeror meeting requirements and presenting the lowest price will be selected for this sole-source contract to provide support for F-16 aircraft.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to F-16 AIS Test Stand Installation Kits - Solicitation, newest first.
File Type Posted
3280_QAInspection.pdf PDF
8839_QAInspection.pdf PDF
8833_QAInspection.pdf PDF
8839_ItemDescription.pdf PDF
2061_IUID.pdf PDF
8831_ItemDescription.pdf PDF
2061_EngineeringDataList.pdf PDF
8829_ItemDescription.pdf PDF
8838_QAInspection.pdf PDF
2066_IUID.pdf PDF
3280_ItemDescription.pdf PDF
2065_ItemDescription.pdf PDF
8838_IUID.pdf PDF
8838_ItemDescription.pdf PDF
FA821222R0012.pdf PDF
SectionL.pdf PDF
JandA.pdf PDF
SOW.pdf PDF
2061_QAInspection.pdf PDF
8831_QAInspection.pdf PDF
TransportationData.pdf PDF
2066_ItemDescription.pdf PDF
3280_IUID.pdf PDF
8309_ItemDescription.pdf PDF
2061_ItemDescription.pdf PDF
2065_IUID.pdf PDF
8839_IUID.pdf PDF
8833_ItemDescription.pdf PDF
2061-EDR.rtf RTF text file
2065_QAInspection.pdf PDF
2066_QAInspection.pdf PDF
8829_QAInspection.pdf PDF
8309_QAInspection.pdf PDF
CDRL_CPP.pdf PDF
Show all 34

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

SECTION M

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

A. INTRODUCTION:

1. This acquisition will utilize Lowest Priced procedures restricted to technically qualified “Approved Source” offeror(s) This acquisition shall use price as the only evaluated factor.

2. The Government intends to award the requirement(s) represented in this solicitation to one awardee. However, the Government reserves the right to award no contract at all.

B. EVALUATION FACTORS AND PROCEDURES:

1. The Government shall evaluate proposals based on the evaluation factor below:

Factor 1- Price

The Offeror’s price will be evaluated based upon the Total Evaluated Price (TEP). The

Offeror’s Price Proposal will be evaluated for the criteria of Price Reasonableness and

Balance.

Price Reasonableness: The proposed prices will be evaluated for Price

Reasonableness. For a price to be reasonable, it will represent a price to the

Government that a prudent person would pay when consideration is given to prices in the market. Normally, price reasonableness is established through adequate price competition, but may also be determined through cost and price analysis techniques as described in FAR 15.404. For additional information see

FAR 31.201-3.

Balance: The Government may also determine a proposal unacceptable should the proposed prices be unbalanced. Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total evaluated price, the price of one or more items/Contract Line

Item Numbers (CLINs) is significantly overstated or understated as indicated by the application of price analysis techniques as those defined by FAR 15.404-1.

Total Evaluated Price (TEP): A TEP will be calculated and be used for evaluation of offers to determine the lowest priced proposal. The TEP will utilize the offerors unit pricing proposed in Section B

2. Solicitation Requirements, Terms and Conditions: In addition to meeting the identified factor above, Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, acceptable small business subcontracting plan if the offeror is other than a small business (FAR 52.219-9 & 19.702(a)(1)), representations and certifications, security requirements of the DD254, and required delivery schedules.

Furthermore, all Offeror’s shall be listed as an approved source in the Government’s

Screening Analysis Worksheet Form 761 prior to contract award. A Manufacturing

Qualification Requirements package is attached to this solicitation for those contractors who are not already qualified; however, per FAR 9.202(e), the Government reserves the right not to delay contract award in order to provide a potential offeror with an opportunity to demonstrate its ability to meet the standards.

3. The process for the evaluation of proposals is as follows:

a. Offerors Total Evaluated Price will be calculated.

b. Proposals will be evaluated to ensure all solicitation requirements identified above have been met. If an offeror fails to meet the solicitation requirements identified above, they may be ineligible to receive the award.

c. Past performance record and history will be assessed via Government databases as one of the multiple standards required for a successful offeror to be determined responsible as described in FAR 9.104. Contractors shall meet the required delivery dates, as well as the terms and conditions in this solicitation, to be determined responsible.

d. The offeror meeting the contract requirements who is determined to be responsible, with the lowest Total Evaluated Price will be selected for award.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .