SATPC0039788 Tab 06 BNJ..pdf

Page 1 V2.0 3-15-2017

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

NASA SHARED SERVICES CENTER

RECOMMENDATION AND DETERMINATION TO SOLICIT FROM ONE SOURCE

OR BRAND NAME

PICK ONE

Sole Source:

☐I recommend that NASA, NASA Shared Services Center negotiate with Vendor Name only for Enter Supply or Service to be procured. The total estimated cost of this effort is Enter Dollar amount and the estimated period of performance or lead-time for delivery is Date.

OR

Brand Name Justification:

☒I recommend that NASA, NASA Shared Services Center negotiate only with vendors who can provide the subject band name from Corning, Inc. for Corning Mid-Power Unit Power Amplifier Module supporting PCS 1900 MH, Mid-Power Remote Unit Amplifier Module supporting Extended AWS, Mid- Power Unit Power Amplifier Module supporting LTE 700 MHz, Labor, and Travel & Expenses. The total estimated cost of this effort is and the estimated period of performance or lead-time for delivery is 15 weeks ARO.

This recommendation is for the acquisition of supplies or services determined to be reasonably available from only one source/only one manufacture. Competition is impractical for the following reasons (please answer the questions below):

1. What are the reasons for soliciting only the suggested source/suggested brand name? Please provide the unique characteristics of the items or services along with the supporting rationale and the market research performed to substantiate your reason for the suggested source/brand name.

The item in question is a set of replacement amplifiers intended for the building, specifically pertaining to the Corning Modular Radio Unit (MRU-E-7817E 19-AC) remote units installed in the Intermediate Distribution Frame (IDF) closets. These amplifiers play a critical role in ensuring consistent signal transmission for the three major carriers: Verizon, T-Mobile, and AT&T. They are fully compatible with the existing Corning MRU-E-7817E 19-AC remote units in the facility, facilitating seamless integration into the current configuration. These amplifiers are not new to the environment; rather, they serve as direct replacements for malfunctioning units that have been previously utilized. Their installation is essential to cover all necessary frequency ranges for optimal signal transmission, which is vital for maintaining communication efficiency throughout the building. The absence of these replacements could result in suboptimal system performance, potentially leading to degraded service and communication challenges. It is imperative to address this maintenance requirement to ensure reliable signal coverage and secure, efficient communications within the premises.

2. What is the impact to the government if another vendor/brand is used? Include any dollar, schedule, or compatibility impacts if possible.

Utilizing a different brand for the amplifiers may have significant implications, including: compatibility challenges: the amplifiers in question are system components specifically designated for the Corning MRU-E-7817E 19-AC by NASA. Potential schedule delays: the introduction of an alternate brand may not be suitable for this purchase. Increased expenses: costs may escalate if new equipment necessitates additional components or services to ensure compatibility. This situation may also lead to potential downtime costs should the system encounter prolonged inefficiencies. By maintaining the current brand, we can ensure compatibility, uphold continuity, and minimize any disruption to the communication system.