SATPC0036011 Tab 10 BNJ_Redacted.pdf
PDF 286 KB Posted
- Attached to
- BIZON X7000 G2 GPU Server Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 80NSSC24878359Q
About this file
This document is a Brand Name Justification (BNJ) for a federal contract opportunity to purchase a BIZON X7000 G2 GPU Server. The NASA Shared Services Center is seeking to expand their lab with equipment that is compatible with their current hardware, in order to conduct research and development of advanced fault management techniques. The BNJ indicates that negotiating with only vendors who can provide the BIZON X7000 G2 GPU Server is recommended due to the need for compatibility with existing systems and the limited resources available for implementing a new lab architecture. The total estimated cost is provided, along with a one-month estimated period of performance for delivery. The related federal contract opportunity has a solicitation number of 80NSSC24878359Q.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| SATPC0036011 Tab 04 4 SOW_revised.pdf | ||
| SATPC0036011 Tab 10 RFQ Open Market.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Page 1 V2.0 3-15-2017
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
NASA SHARED SERVICES CENTER
RECOMMENDATION AND DETERMINATION TO SOLICIT FROM ONE SOURCE
OR BRAND NAME
PICK ONE
OR
Brand Name Justification:
I recommend that NASA, NASA Shared Services Center negotiate with only with vendors who can provide the subject band name from Bizon for X7000 G2 GPU Server. The total estimated cost of this effort is and the estimated period of performance or lead-time for delivery is one month from purchase date.
This recommendation is for the acquisition of supplies or services determined to be reasonably available from only one source/only one manufacture. Competition is impractical for the following reasons (please answer the questions below):
1. What are the reasons for soliciting only the suggested source/suggested brand name? Please provide the unique characteristics of the items or services along with the supporting rationale and the market research performed to substantiate your reason for the suggested source/brand name.
We are expanding our lab with equipment that is compatible with the current hardware for research and development of advanced fault management techniques using simulated and actual hardware data. The
2. What is the impact to the government if another vendor/brand is used? Include any dollar, schedule, or compatibility impacts if possible.
Going with another branch/model than has been chosen here will impact schedule and resources. We are already limited on the number of resources on our project. If another brand is purchased, we will have to implement a new lab architecture . We would also have to maintain multiple systems, rather that maintaining the one we currently have in place. With the limited resources available, if we purchased a different brand, these items would likely have to sit on the shelf until more resources become available to us to utilize this equipment.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .