RFI Contractor Capability Statement for F100 IETMS Re-Acq 2023.pdf

Contractor Capability Statement

F100 Interactive Electronic Technical Manual SYSTEM (IETMS) Sustainment Support

Part I. Business Information

Please provide the following business information for your company/institution and for any teaming or joint venture partners:

• Company/Institute Name:

• Address:

• Point of Contact:

• CAGE Code:

• Phone Number:

• E-mail Address:

• Web Page URL:

• Size of business pursuant to North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code:

541990 – All Other Professional, Scientific and Technical Services

Size Standard: $15M Based on the above NAICS Code, state whether your company is:

• Small Business (Yes / No)

• Woman Owned Small Business (Yes / No)

• Small Disadvantaged Business (Yes / No)

• 8(a) Certified (Yes / No)

• HUBZone Certified (Yes / No)

• Veteran Owned Small Business (Yes / No)

• Service Disabled Veteran Small Business (Yes / No)

• Central Contractor Registration (CCR). (Yes / No)

• A statement as to whether your company is domestically or foreign owned (if foreign, please indicate the country of ownership).

This RFI will be posted for 14 days. All responses must be received no later than close of business on 14 July 2023.

Submit information to:

Shane Washburn (Procurement Contracting Officer - PCO) AFLCMC/LPK (Propulsion Sustainment Contracting) 3001 Staff Drive Tinker AFB, OK 73145 shane.washburn.5@us.af.mil

Questions relative to this market survey should be addressed to the requiring activity point of contact:

mailto:shane.washburn.5@us.af.mil

Albert Deleon (Contracting Officer Representative – COR)

AFLCMC/ LPSZB (F100 TOMA)

(405) 655-7108 albert.deleon@us.af.mil

Part II. Capability Survey Matrix

Please complete the attached capabilities matrix using the following guidelines:

Technical data rating (repair data only – need not address component-level drawings)

Own – has acquired long-term rights to repair data DoD Contract – has data rights through existing DoD contract Limited - has acquired rights on a renewable basis No rights - do not have rights

Repair categories rating (please rate all applicable categories and identify if ratings are different for:

DoD and Commercial – for example Commercial Current and DoD Past DoD Current – perform current DoD workload

Commercial Current - perform current Commercial workload DoD Past - performed DoD work in the past Commercial Past - performed commercial work in the past DoD Certified- certified by DoD for work, but no current contracts Commercial Certified- certified by OEM for Commercial work, but no current contract

Engine Test

DoD Have – have existing capability certified by DoD entity Commercial Have – have existing capability certified by Commercial or FAA DoD via Sub – have capability via existing subcontract to third party certified by DoD Commercial via Sub – have capability via existing subcontract to third party certified by Commercial or FAA None – no current or past DoD or Commercial work

Material Supply

OEM – original equipment manufacturer or DoD-certified prime provider of new parts Commercial Certified – FAA-approved source of new or repaired parts DoD Have – support existing DoD contracts with established OEM or prime provider subcontracts Commercial Have - support existing commercial contracts with established OEM or prime mailto:albert.deleon@us.af.mil provider subcontracts

Promotional data may be provided, but Offerors will not be penalized for not doing so. The Air Force Material Command Life Cycle Management Center reserves the right to review Government contract databases and commercially-available resources to confirm responses.

Company: CAGE Code:

Mailing Address: Small Business Status:

Point of Contact for questions or clarifications:

Sample Matrix

Capabilities for Dave’s Jet Engine Repair 20 May 2016

Example: Dave’s company has been repairing and testing commercial JT-3D engines (DoD designation TF-33) for a number of years and has an existing parts supply contract from his OEM. He also has been repairing low-pressure turbine blades for the F101 and F110 engines, but not full engines, under contract to DoD. He has not been involved in any PW2000 or F117 repair. His matrix would look like this:

Engine Program

Technical Data

Access

Minor/Module Repairs

On-condition Maintenance

Overhaul Engine Test

Material Supply

F100

Engine Program

Technical Data

Access

Minor/Module Repairs

On-condition Maintenance

Overhaul Engine Test Material Supply

F101 DoD Contract

DoD Current None None None None

F110 DoD Contract

DoD Current None None None None

F117/

PW2037

No Rights None None None None None

TF-33/JT-

3D

Own Commercial Current

Commercial Current

Commercial Current

Commercial Have

Commercial Have

Part III. Capability Survey Questions

A. General Capability Questions:

1. Describe your company’s experience in the maintenance and sustainment of technical data and intermediate technical manuals, specifically Type II IETMS, for the above listed engine.

2. Describe your company's capabilities and experience in generating technical data, engineering drawings and manuals. Identify what software programs are utilized to generate these data products and what formats are available for delivered items.

3. What is your company’s current maximum capacity per month for this particular type of requirement? Provide information on any facility reserves you may possess to increase capacity in the event of an immediate need do to critical operational mission requirements.

B. Tech Data Questions:

1. Describe your capabilities and experience in repairing existing systems/equipment (hardware and software) to solve maintenance and support problems in the depot environment.

2. Describe your capabilities and experience in developing/modifying accurate and complete digital technical data for use by the end-user to maintain, and overhaul engines to continue Operational Safety, Suitability, and Effectiveness (OSS&E) for each engine’s technical manual system (TMS). Include associated upgrade of technical orders and preparation of new technical orders.

a. State the types of diagnostic and troubleshooting tools utilized for efforts such as this.

C. Performance Management Questions:

1. Describe your capabilities and experience in developing contract management plans describing the technical approach, organizational resources and management controls to be employed to meet the cost, performance, and schedule requirements throughout contract execution.

D. Informed Decision Making Questions

1. The government is interested in collecting as much useful information as possible while reducing cost and reporting. What options exist for providing the information to the Government needed to make informed OSS&E decisions with the fewest number of CDRL items? For example, the government desires information on parts’ usage, replacements, rates, factors, etc. but may not need it in a custom format.

2. The government doesn’t require ownership of intellectual property, data, drawings, etc.

but would desire to have more information for better decision making. What additional information would assist the government to that end and how could that be achieved?