ratings sheet - attachment A.docx
DOCX document 13 KB Posted
- Attached to
- SECURE DATA EXCHANGE AND CLEARINGHOUSE SERVICES - OCAO Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 246-21-Q-0010
About this file
This solicitation is seeking quotes for Secure Data Exchange and Clearinghouse Services for the Oklahoma Area Indian Health Services. The required services include a secure data exchange and clearinghouse to cover all facilities described in the Statement of Work. Quotes are due by April 9, 2021 and shall include pricing for a one year base period and four one-year options. Offerors must provide past performance references for similar services and their DUNS number. The solicitation will result in a single-award firm fixed price Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity contract. The Indian Health Service will evaluate quotes based on understanding of requirements, technical approach, past performance, and price.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 246-21-Q-0010 Questions 04062021.docx | DOCX document | |
| SOW - OCAO Software Application and Clearinghouse Services.docx | DOCX document | |
| Pt 12 solicitation clauses March 2021.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT A – RATINGS SHEET
Ratings Methods Ratings Descriptors
Excellent Proposal demonstrates superior understanding of requirements and approach that exceeds performance or capability standards and contains at least one exceptional enhancing feature that benefits the Government. Any weakness is minor. Risk of unsuccessful performance is very low.
Good Proposal demonstrates an exhaustive understanding of the requirements and a thorough approach that meets performance or capability standards. There may be strengths and weaknesses, though they offset one another. Has one or more enhancing features that will benefit the Government. Weakness do not significantly detract from the Quoter’s response. Any weaknesses appear to be correctable and will have little or no impact on contract performance. Risk is low.
Satisfactory Proposal demonstrates acceptable understanding of requirements and approach that meets performance or capability standards. Acceptable solutions are identified. No major enhancing features will benefit the Government are identified. There is some risk.
Unsatisfactory Proposal fails to meet performance or capability standards and requirements of the Solicitation. Proposal is not awardable. Requirements can only be met with major changes to the proposal. Risk of unsuccessful performance is high.
Past Performance Ratings
| Rating Method |
| Rating Descriptors |
| Excellent |
| The contractor has performed successfully and greatly exceeded expectations under the contract. |
| Good |
| The contractor has performed successfully under the contract. |
| Neutral |
| No record of performance or performance is inconclusive. |
| Marginal |
| The contractor has some unsuccessful performance under the contract. |
| Poor |
| The contractor has performed unsuccessfully under the contract. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .