QASP.pdf

PDF 145 KB Posted

Attached to
Coyote RD Janitorial Services Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
12837120Q0124
Issued by
Department of Agriculture Forest Service R3-Southwestern Region

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Coyote RD Janitorial Services, newest first.
File Type Posted
Amendment 0001.pdf PDF
12837120Q0124.pdf PDF
Floor Plan for Warehouse.pdf PDF
Wage Determination No. 2015_5452, Revision No. 11.pdf PDF
Floor Plan for Office.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN

FOR JANITORIAL WORK

1. Purpose: this quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) describes methods that will be used to monitor the Contractor’s performance. The QASP is not part of the contract. It is provided solely for informational purposes and is subject to change by the Government during the life of the contract. The Government reserves the right to perform assessments more or less often than outlined in this QASP.

2. Introduction: The QASP establishes methods to asses or evaluate performance of the Contractor under the contract. It is designed to provide an effective method of monitoring Contractor performance for each objective on the Performance Requirements Summary (PRS) in the contract. The Government is concerned with the quality of the services provided, and not with the method that the Contractor uses to provide the services.

3. Responsibility for Quality Control: the Contractor is responsible for quality control and management actions to meet the performance requirements and terms of the contract. The Government performs quality assurance to assess the quality of services rendered, if the services meet the contract requirements, and if the contract standards are achieved.

4. Surveillance Methods: The Government will evaluate the Contractor’s performance under this contract. Examples of Government surveillance may include

a. Government inspections.

b. Customer complaints with verification by the CO.

c. Review of Contractor’s Quality Control documentation.

5. Deduction Methods: The Government will record performance noting any substandard performance. For substandard performance, the Government’s preferred course of action will be discussions with the Contractor to make the Contractor aware of the problem, and to effectively prevent any recurrence of substandard performance.

The Government may also take the following actions:

a. Presentation of a Contract Discrepancy Report requiring a written explanation for substandard performance.

b. Payment deductions in accordance with the PRS.

c. Payment deduction s in accordance with the applicable FAR clauses.

d. Require correction or re-performance of the service.

Performance Requirements Summary

Performance Based deduction Formula

Performance Objective

Weight Maximum Allowable Defect Rate

Surveillance Method

Overall Cleaning 80% 4 Defects Per Month Random Sampling Inspection or Verified Customer Complaint

Perform Work Within Schedule

Requirements

5% 4 Defects Per Month Random Sampling Inspection or Verified Customer Complaint

Maintain Security of Building and

Compound Access

15% 4 Defects Per Month Random Sampling Inspection or Verified Customer Complaint

Deduction Threshold: If the number of defects or instances of unacceptable performance, observed during a month long period is EQUAL OR LESS THAN the maximum allowable defect rate (MADR), then there will be NO DEDUCTION in payment to the Contractor for the task. However, if the number of defects observed during a month long period is GREATER than the MADR then there will be a DEDUCTION in payments to the contractor for that task.

Example of Deduction Amount to Contractor Payments: the MADR for janitorial work is four (4) defects per month based on the performance objective. A verified customer complaint regarding any maintenance work that falls below the standards set forth in the PWS will be considered a defect as will any inspection work that falls below the same standards. If one or more complaints is received regarding the same item, this will only be considered one complaint.

Upon notice of the defect(s), the Contractor will be given 24 hours to correct prior to a deduction being taken.

Assume that there is four verified customer complaints regarding untimely trash collection during the month:

Five defects exceeds the MADR of four, a deduction in the payment to the Contractor will be made;

The deduction amount will be as follows:

(i) Assume the maximum possible contract payment for all items is $1000.00 per month.

(ii) Timely trash collection is weighed at 80% of the monthly total payment, which equals

$800.00.

(iii) A deduction of 1/30 of $800.00 will be taken for everyday that the defect remains uncorrected, starting from the date that the defect was first reported to the contractor.

(iv) Therefore, if the defect was reported to the Contractor on July 1 and it was not corrected until July 6 this would equal five defective days. Thus the deduction would be 5 X 1/30 X $800.00 = $132.00

(v) The Contractor will receive a monthly payment of $868.00 which is the maximum possible monthly payment of $1,000.00 minus the deduction amount of $132.00.

Surveillance Guide and Evaluation Procedure: The CO will use an inspection checklist (Contract Daily Diaries), provided by the COR to evaluate Contractor performance. At the end of each month the CO will summarize the findings, calculate the deduction amount, and notify the Contractor of any deductions that need to be made to the invoice. Notice to the Contractor will not be made if there is no deduction.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .