QASP.docx

Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) Project Title: Health Care for Homeless Veterans (HCHV) Contracted Emergency Residential Services

Contract Number: Formerly 36C26118D0047 Contract Description: Contractor will provide temporary, emergency housing (90 days) and basic case management services to homeless Veterans who may be dealing with any number of psychosocial stressors, including, but not limited to: substance use disorders, serious mental illnesses, lack of financial resources, familial discord, etc.

Contractor’s Name:

INTRODUCTION

1. PURPOSE

This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) provides a systematic method to evaluate performance for the stated contract. This QASP explains the following:

· What will be monitored.

· Method and frequency of surveillance.

· Who will conduct surveillance

· How surveillance efforts and data will be documented.

This QASP does not detail how the contractor accomplishes the work. Rather, the QASP is created with the expectation that the contractor is responsible for management and quality control actions to meet the terms of the contract. It is the Government’s responsibility to be objective, fair, and consistent in evaluating performance.

This QASP is based on the premise, the Government desires to maintain a quality standard in providing residential and supportive services to its patients. The resulting contract is considered the best means of achieving that objective. This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) has been developed to evaluate contracted programs’ activities while implementing the Performance Work Statement (PWS) incorporated into the contract. It is designed to provide an effective surveillance method of monitoring Contractor performance.

This QASP is a “living document” and the Government may review and revise it on a regular basis. However, the Government shall coordinate changes with the contractor. Copies of the original QASP and revisions shall be provided to the contractor and Government officials implementing surveillance activities.

2. GOVERNMENT ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

The following personnel shall oversee and coordinate surveillance activities.

a. Contracting Officer (CO) – The CO shall ensure performance of all necessary actions for effective contracting, ensure compliance with the contract terms, and shall safeguard the interests of the United States in the contractual relationship. The CO shall also assure that the contractor receives impartial, fair, and equitable treatment under this contract. The CO is ultimately responsible for the final determination of the adequacy of the contractor’s performance.

Assigned CO: Joleo Dianala Organization or Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Acquisition and Material Management

b. Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) – The COR is responsible for technical administration of the contract and shall assure proper Government surveillance of the contractor’s performance. The COR shall keep a quality assurance file. The COR is not empowered to make any contractual commitments or to authorize any contractual changes on the Government’s behalf.

Assigned COR: Iisha Toombs, LCSW

The following employees of the contractor serve as the contractor’s program manager for this contract.

Performance standards define desired services. They are comprised of performance indicators (some characteristic of a deliverable that can be measured) and performance measures (a mark, measure or benchmark that government personnel use as a point of comparison when evaluating contractor performance). The Government performs surveillance to determine if the contractor exceeds, meets or does not meet these standards.

The PWS (or SOW) identifies the requisite performance indicators. The Government shall use the corresponding standards below to determine contractor performance in relation to those indicators and shall compare contractor performance to the Acceptable Quality Level (AQL), also identified below, to determine overall contractor performance score.

In CPARS review. And increase in program size if funds are available.

Negative Past Performance In CPARS review. And possible reduction in program size.

Preferred: 100%

in CPARS review.

Negative Past Performance in CPARS review.

Preferred: 100%

in CPARS review.

Negative Past Performance in CPARS review.

Accepted: At least 50% of all Veteran discharges will be to an independent, permanent housing arrangement.

Preferred: 55% or higher.

in CPARS review.

Negative Past Performance in CPARS review.

Preferred: 20% or less.

in CPARS review.

Negative Past Performance in CPARS review.

5. METHODS OF QA SURVEILLANCE

Various methods exist to monitor performance. The COR shall use the surveillance methods listed below in the administration of this QASP.

a. DIRECT OBSERVATION. (Can be performed periodically or through 100% surveillance.)

· Occupancy

· Independent Housing

· Negative Exits

b. PERIODIC INSPECTION. (Inspections for HCHV CERS Programs will occur quarterly or more)

· Care Planning

· Case Management

6. RATINGS

Metrics and methods are designed to determine if performance exceeds, meets, or does not meet a given standard and acceptable quality level. A rating scale shall be used to determine a positive, neutral, or negative outcome. The following ratings shall be used:

Occupancy: receives 20% if meets preferred measure, 18% if meets accepted measure, and 0% to 17% if measured failed for the year.

Care Planning: receives 20% if meets preferred measure, 18% if meets accepted measure, and 0% to 17% if measured failed for the year.

Case Management: receives 20% if meets preferred measure, 18% if meets accepted measure, and 0% to 17% if measured failed for the year.

Independent Housing: receives 20% if meets preferred measure, 18% if meets accepted measure, and 0% to 17% if measured failed for the year.

Negative Exits: receives 20% if meets preferred measure, 18% if meets accepted measure, and 0% to 17% if measured failed for the year.

91-100% Positive Performance 80-90% Neutral Performance < 80% Negative Performance

7. DOCUMENTING PERFORMANCE

The Government shall document acceptable performance quarterly and annually. Any report may become a part of the supporting documentation for any contractual action.

a. POSITIVE PERFORMANCE (91-100% Rating), NEUTRAL PERFORMANCE (81-90% Rating) Positive and Neutral Performance will be recorded in CPARS review.

c. UNACCEPTABLE PERFORMANCE (80% Rating or below) When unacceptable performance occurs, the COR shall inform the contractor. This will normally be in writing unless circumstances necessitate verbal communication. In any case the COR shall document the discussion and place it in the COR file.

When the COR determines formal written communication is required, the COTR shall prepare a Contract Discrepancy Report (CDR), and present it to the contractor's program manager.

The contractor shall acknowledge receipt of the CDR in writing. The CDR will specify if the contractor is required to prepare a corrective action plan to document how the contractor shall correct the unacceptable performance and avoid a recurrence. The CDR will also state how long after receipt the contractor has to present this corrective action plan to the COTR. The Government shall review the contractor's corrective action plan to determine acceptability.

Any CDRs may become a part of the supporting documentation for any contractual action deemed necessary by the CO.

During contract performance, the COR will periodically analyze whether the negotiated frequency of surveillance is appropriate for the work being performed.

b. Frequency of Performance Assessment Meetings.

The COR shall meet with the contractor quarterly to assess performance.

Signature – Contractor Program Manager

Signature – Contracting Officer’s Representative