past_performance_questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 18 KB Posted

Attached to
DEL RIO SECTOR AUTO CONCESSION STORE Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
70B03C20Q00000257
Issued by
Department of Homeland Security Customs and Border Protection

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to DEL RIO SECTOR AUTO CONCESSION STORE, newest first.
File Type Posted
1.1.4 PRICE SCHEDULE.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
1.1.5 NEW Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan for 1152020.docx DOCX document
1.1.4 PARTS LIST.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
1.1.4 PWS DR AM 22 APR 2020 v4B.pdf PDF
2.2.1 ATTACHMENT E EVALUATION CRITERIA.rtf RTF text file
2.2.1 70B03C20Q00000257.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Please complete the following questionnaire and return by electronic mail to:

Rosie.zaragoza@cbp.dhs.gov

This survey pertains to:

70B03C20Q00000257

Department/Component:

Contract Number:_________________ Date of Survey: _______________

Name of Person Completing Survey:

Signature of Person Completing Survey:

Your Company/Agency:

Your role in this Contract (check one):Contracting Officer
Other

Contract Value (including options): __________________________

Performance Period: ____________________________ (Including Options)

Type of Contract: _ __________________

Approximate percentage of work being performed (or completed) by subcontractor(s):

PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION SURVEY

Information on subcontractor(s) (where the subcontractor completed more than 49% of work):

__________________________________________________
SubcontractorProgram ManagerPhone
_____________________________________________________
SubcontractorProgram ManagerPhone
_____________________________________________________
SubcontractorProgram ManagerPhone

General description of products/services required under the contract:

RATINGS

Please answer each of the following questions with a rating that is based on objective measurable performance indicators to the maximum extent possible. Commentary to support rating shall be noted on Page 4.

Assign each area a rating of 0 (Unsatisfactory), 1 (Poor), 2 (Fair), 3 (Good), 4 (Excellent), or 5 (Outstanding). Use the attached Rating Guidelines as guidance in making these evaluations. Circle the appropriate rating. If you do not have enough personal knowledge or feedback from internal customers who directly received products and services from the contractor to make a determination on any of the performance criteria below, please circle “N/A” (not applicable/no opinion).

QUALITY OF SERVICE

1. Compliance with contract requirements:

0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

2. Accuracy of reports:

0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

3. Effectiveness of personnel:

0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

4. Technical Excellence:

0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

COST CONTROL (Not applicable to Fixed Price Type Contracts)

1. Record of forecasting and controlling target costs:

0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

2. Current, accurate and complete billings:

0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

3. Relationship of negotiated costs to actual:

0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

4. Cost efficiencies:

0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE

1. Met interim milestones:

0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

2. Reliability:

0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

3. Responsive to technical direction:

0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

4. Completed on time including wrap-up and contract administration:

0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

5. Met delivery schedules:

0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

6. Liquidate damages assessed: Yes No N/A

BUSINESS RELATIONS

1. Effective management, including management of subcontracts:

0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

2. Reasonable/cooperative behavior:

0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

3. Responsive to contract requirements:

0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

4. Notification of problems:

0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

5. Flexibility:

0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

6. Pro-active vs. reactive:

0 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

SMALL BUSINESS BUSINESS GOALS

1. The contractor met the goals set forth in its Subcontracting Plan. (See FAR 19.7 and 15.305(a)2(v):

Yes No N/A Comments (optional):

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

1. The contractor is committed to customer satisfaction:

Yes No

2. Would you recommend selection of this firm again?

Yes No

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

RATING GUIDELINES

QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE
COST CONTROL
TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE
BUSINESS RELATIONS
0-Unsatisfactory
Contractor is not in compliance and is jeopardizing achievement of contract objectives
Contractor is unable to manage costs effectively
Contractor delays are jeopardizing performance of contract objectives
Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is not effective
1-Poor
Major problems have been encountered
Contractor is having major difficulty managing costs effectively
Contractor is having major difficulty meeting milestones and delivery schedule
Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is marginally effective
2-Fair
Some problems have been encountered
Contractor is having some problems managing costs effectively
Contractor is having some problems meeting milestones and delivery schedule
Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is somewhat effective
3-Good
Minor inefficiencies/errors have been identified
Contractor is usually effective in managing costs
Contractor is usually effective in meeting milestones and delivery schedule
Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is usually effective
4-Excellent
Contractor is in compliance with Contract requirements and/or delivers quality products/services
Contractor is effective in managing costs and submits current, accurate, and complete

Billings

Contractor is effective in meeting milestones and delivery schedule
Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is effective

5-Outstanding: The contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level in any of the above four categories that justifies adding a point to the score. It is expected that this rating will be used in those rare circumstances when contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance levels described as "Excellent."

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .