Past_Performance_Questionnaire_.doc
DOC document 55 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Valley Forge Gym Upgrade Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 140P4221Q0071
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire template and details of a federal contract opportunity for repair and upgrade work at the Valley Forge National Historical Park. The past performance questionnaire is to be completed by references for contractors bidding on the opportunity and requests ratings on quality, schedule, change orders, documentation, issue response, and an overall performance rating. Strengths and weaknesses are also to be described. The related federal contract opportunity is solicitation number 140P4221Q0071 to replace the roof and complete other critical repairs at the Mordecai Moore/Ranger Station Garage within the park. The work includes roofing, exterior stairs, garage doors, HVAC, painting, windows, insulation, lighting, and electric panel upgrades. A firm fixed price contract will be awarded using FAR Part 13 procedures to the offeror representing the best value to the government. Responses are due by the date specified in sections L and M. The contracting agency is the Department of the Interior National Park Service Northeast Region.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Experience_Questionnaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| BID_BOND_SF24-16d.pdf | ||
| treatment-guidelines-2017.pdf | ||
| Wage_Determination_WD___PA20210099.docx | DOCX document | |
| Gym_SOW_R1.docx | DOCX document | |
| PERFORMANCE_BOND_SF25-16d1.pdf | ||
| PAYMENT_BOND_SF25A-16d_(2).pdf | ||
| Sol_140P4221Q0071.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Past Performance Questionnaire Solicitation Title & No.:
Name of Contractor:
Reference Contract / Project
a. Name of project:
b. Location of project:
c. Approximate completion date:
d. Approximate contract dollar amount:
e. Brief description of project and services provided:
Reference Questions
| Rating |
| Definition |
| Excellent |
| The reference was extremely satisfied with the contractor’s performance. |
| Good |
| The reference was very satisfied with the contractor’s performance. |
| Satisfactory |
| The reference believes the contractor’s performance was neither good nor bad but was satisfactory. |
| Poor |
| The reference was very dissatisfied with the contractor’s performance. |
| Failed |
| The reference was extremely dissatisfied with the contractor’s performance. |
Please rate the contractor’s performance on the above listed project:
a. Quality of the contractor’s work:
b. Contractor’s ability to meet the contractual schedule:
c. Did contractor have any/many change orders
d. Contractor’s ability to manage the project documentation (the paperwork):
e. Contractor’s ability to quickly and adequately address issues that may have arisen after delivery or contract closeout:
f. Overall rating of the Contractor’s performance:
Contractor’s Strengths and Weaknesses a.
Please describe the Contractor’s performance strengths:
b.
Please describe the Contractor’s performance weaknesses:
Additional reference comments:
Reference’s Printed Name:
Title:
Reference’s Signature:
Date:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .