Exhibit_A_CDRLs_&_DIDs.pdf
PDF 426 KB Posted
- Attached to
- IA Support Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N6426717T0310
About this file
Exhibit A CDRLs & DIDs
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Q&A_Rev1.docx | DOCX document | |
| Q&A.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFQ_N6426717T0310.pdf | ||
| Attachment_1_Applicable_Directives.pdf | ||
| Attachment_2_WD_No._2015-5629_Rev5.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DD FORM 1423-1, FEB 2001
CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST
(1 Data Item)
PREVIOUS EDITION MAY BE USED.
Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188
The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 110 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to the Department of Defense, Executive Services and Communications Directorate (0704-0188). Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. Please do not return your form to the above organization. Send completed form to the Government Issuing Contracting Officer for the Contract/PR No. listed in Block E.
A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO. B. EXHIBIT C. CATEGORY:
TDP ________ TM _______ OTHER
D. SYSTEM/ITEM E. CONTRACT/PR NO. F. CONTRACTOR
1. DATA ITEM NO. 2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM 3. SUBTITLE
4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.) 5. CONTRACT REFERENCE 6. REQUIRING OFFICE
7. DD 250 REQ
8. APP CODE
9. DIST STATEMENT
REQUIRED
10. FREQUENCY
11. AS OF DATE
12. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION
13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT
SUBMISSION
14. DISTRIBUTION
a. ADDRESSEE
b. COPIES
Draft Final
Reg Repro
15. TOTAL
16. REMARKS
17. PRICE GROUP
18. ESTIMATED
TOTAL PRICE
G. PREPARED BY H. DATE I. APPROVED BY J. DATE
Page of Pages
A
MGMT
DATA MANAGEMENT SERVICES TBD
A001 CONTRACTOR'S PROGRESS STATUS AND
MANAGEMENT REPORT
MONTHLY STATUS REPORT
DI-MGMT-80227 SOW PARA 6.0 NSWC CORONA (AR30)
LT
N/A C
MTHLY
N/A
30DAC/See Blk 16
SEE BLK 16
J. Trunko (AR30) 1
0 1 0
BLK 4 – CONTRACTOR FORMAT IS ACCEPTABLE.
BLK 9 - USE THE FOLLOWING: "DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT C.
DISTRIBUTION AUTHORIZED TO U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCIES AND
THEIR CONTRACTORS ONLY. (REASON: ADMINISTRATIVE USE).
OTHER REQUESTS FOR THIS DOCUMENT SHALL BE REFERRED TO
NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER, CORONA DIVISION, CORONA
CA."
BLK 12 - THE REPORTING PERIOD SHALL BE FROM THE FIRST TO LAST
BUSINESS DAY OF EACH MONTH, BEGINNING WITHIN 30 CALENDAR
DAYS AFTER EFFECTIVE DATE OF ORDER.
BLK 13 - SUBSEQUENT REPORTS SUBMITTED MONTHLY THEREAFTER,
NOT LATER THAN THE 10TH DAY OF THE REPORTING MONTH.
BLK 14 - ELECTRONIC COPY SHALL BE BY E-MAIL IN MICROSOFT
OFFICE COMPATIBLE OR PDF FORMAT IN ACCORDANCE WITH CDRL
DISTRIBUTION BLOCK 14.
ADDRESSEE(S) EMAIL ADDRESS: joseph.trunko@navy.mil
19 July 2017
BERGLAND.KA
RI.L.1263458067
Digitally signed by
BERGLAND.KARI.L.1263458067
Date: 2017.08.15 13:10:02 -07'00' 15 August 2017
1 1
TRUNKO.JOSEPH.M
ICHAEL.1228939990
Digitally signed by
TRUNKO.JOSEPH.MICHAEL.1228
939990 Date: 2017.07.19 10:02:27 -07'00'
(1 Data Item)
PREVIOUS EDITION MAY BE USED.
Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188
The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 110 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to the Department of Defense, Executive Services and Communications Directorate (0704-0188). Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. Please do not return your form to the above organization. Send completed form to the Government Issuing Contracting Officer for the Contract/PR No. listed in Block E.
A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO. B. EXHIBIT C. CATEGORY:
TDP ________ TM _______ OTHER
D. SYSTEM/ITEM E. CONTRACT/PR NO. F. CONTRACTOR
1. DATA ITEM NO. 2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM 3. SUBTITLE
4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.) 5. CONTRACT REFERENCE 6. REQUIRING OFFICE
7. DD 250 REQ
8. APP CODE
9. DIST STATEMENT
REQUIRED
10. FREQUENCY
11. AS OF DATE
12. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION
13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT
SUBMISSION
14. DISTRIBUTION
a. ADDRESSEE
b. COPIES
Draft Final
Reg Repro
15. TOTAL
16. REMARKS
17. PRICE GROUP
18. ESTIMATED
TOTAL PRICE
G. PREPARED BY H. DATE I. APPROVED BY J. DATE
Page of Pages
A
MGMT
DATA MANAGEMENT SERVICES TBD
A002 DOD INFORMATION ASSURANCE
CERTIFICATION AND ACCREDITATION PROCESS
RMF DOCUMENTATION
DI-MGMT-82000 SOW PARA 5.1 AND 6.0 NSWC CORONA (AR30)
LT
N/A C
ASREQ (See Blk 16)
N/A
ASREQ (See Blk 16)
ASREQ (See Blk 16) J. Trunko (AR30) 1
0 1 0
BLK 4/5 - (DI-MGMT-82000) PARAGRAPH 2.1.6, 2.1.8 AND 2.1.9 DO NOT
APPLY AND SHOULD BE TAILORED OUT FROM THE DELIVERABLE.
SOW PARAGRAPH 5.1 IS MANDATORY TO THIS REQUIREMENT.
BLK 9 - USE THE FOLLOWING: "DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT C.
DISTRIBUTION AUTHORIZED TO U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCIES AND
THEIR CONTRACTORS ONLY. (REASON: ADMINISTRATIVE USE).
OTHER REQUESTS FOR THIS DOCUMENT SHALL BE REFERRED TO
NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER, CORONA DIVISION, CORONA
CA."
BLK 10, 12, 13 – DOCUMENTATION DUE IN ACCORDANCE WITH C&A
PLAN FOR INITIAL ACCREDITATION AND FIVE (5) DAYS AFTER EACH
REVIEW OR REQUIRED CHANGE.
BLK 14 - ELECTRONIC COPY SHALL IN ODAA REQUIRED COMPATIBLE
FILE FORMAT SUBMITTED PER ODAA DIRECTIVES (eMASS) AND BY
E-MAIL IN MICROSOFT OFFICE / PDF FORMAT IN ACCORDANCE WITH
CDRL DISTRIBUTION BLOCK 14.
ADDRESSEE(S) EMAIL ADDRESS: joseph.trunko@navy.mil
19 July 2017
BERGLAND.KA
RI.L.1263458067
Digitally signed by
BERGLAND.KARI.L.1263458067
Date: 2017.08.15 14:30:56 -07'00' 15 August 2017
1 1
TRUNKO.JOSEPH.M
ICHAEL.1228939990
Digitally signed by
TRUNKO.JOSEPH.MICHAEL.1228
Date: 2017.07.19 10:02:27 -07'00'
(1 Data Item)
PREVIOUS EDITION MAY BE USED.
Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188
The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 110 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to the Department of Defense, Executive Services and Communications Directorate (0704-0188). Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. Please do not return your form to the above organization. Send completed form to the Government Issuing Contracting Officer for the Contract/PR No. listed in Block E.
A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO. B. EXHIBIT C. CATEGORY:
TDP ________ TM _______ OTHER
D. SYSTEM/ITEM E. CONTRACT/PR NO. F. CONTRACTOR
1. DATA ITEM NO. 2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM 3. SUBTITLE
4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.) 5. CONTRACT REFERENCE 6. REQUIRING OFFICE
7. DD 250 REQ
8. APP CODE
9. DIST STATEMENT
REQUIRED
10. FREQUENCY
11. AS OF DATE
12. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION
13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT
SUBMISSION
14. DISTRIBUTION
a. ADDRESSEE
b. COPIES
Draft Final
Reg Repro
15. TOTAL
16. REMARKS
17. PRICE GROUP
18. ESTIMATED
TOTAL PRICE
G. PREPARED BY H. DATE I. APPROVED BY J. DATE
Page of Pages
A
MGMT
DATA MANAGEMENT SERVICES TBD
A003 DOD INFORMATION ASSURANCE
CERTIFICATION AND ACCREDITATION PROCESS
SCAN RESULTS
DI-MGMT-82000 SOW PARA 5.1 AND 6.0 NSWC CORONA (AR30)
LT
N/A C
ASREQ (See Blk 16)
N/A
ASREQ (See Blk 16)
ASREQ (See Blk 16) J. Trunko (AR30) 1
0 1 0
BLK 4 - (DI-MGMT-82000) ONLY PARAGRAPHS 1, 2, 2.1, 2.1.12, AND 2.1.13
ARE APPLICABLE. OTHER PARAGRAPHS OF THIS DID ARE NOT
REQUIRED AND SHOULD BE TAILORED OUT. SOW PARAGRAPH 5.1 IS
MANDATORY TO THIS REQUIREMENT.
BLK 9 - USE THE FOLLOWING: "DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT C.
DISTRIBUTION AUTHORIZED TO U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCIES AND
THEIR CONTRACTORS ONLY. (REASON: ADMINISTRATIVE USE).
OTHER REQUESTS FOR THIS DOCUMENT SHALL BE REFERRED TO
NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER, CORONA DIVISION, CORONA
CA."
BLK 10, 12, 13 – SCAN RESULTS ARE DUE WITHIN 7 DAYS OF EACH
SYSTEM’S VALIDATION.
BLK 14 - ELECTRONIC COPY SHALL IN ODAA REQUIRED COMPATIBLE
FILE FORMAT SUBMITTED PER ODAA DIRECTIVES (eMASS) AND BY
E-MAIL IN MICROSOFT OFFICE / PDF FORMAT IN ACCORDANCE WITH
CDRL DISTRIBUTION BLOCK 14.
ADDRESSEE(S) EMAIL ADDRESS: joseph.trunko@navy.mil
19 July 2017
BERGLAND.KA
RI.L.1263458067
Digitally signed by
BERGLAND.KARI.L.1263458067
Date: 2017.08.15 14:25:29 -07'00' 15 August 2017
1 1
TRUNKO.JOSEPH.M
ICHAEL.1228939990
Digitally signed by
TRUNKO.JOSEPH.MICHAEL.1228
Date: 2017.07.19 10:04:15 -07'00'
(1 Data Item)
PREVIOUS EDITION MAY BE USED.
Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188
The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 110 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to the Department of Defense, Executive Services and Communications Directorate (0704-0188). Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. Please do not return your form to the above organization. Send completed form to the Government Issuing Contracting Officer for the Contract/PR No. listed in Block E.
A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO. B. EXHIBIT C. CATEGORY:
TDP ________ TM _______ OTHER
D. SYSTEM/ITEM E. CONTRACT/PR NO. F. CONTRACTOR
1. DATA ITEM NO. 2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM 3. SUBTITLE
4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.) 5. CONTRACT REFERENCE 6. REQUIRING OFFICE
7. DD 250 REQ
8. APP CODE
9. DIST STATEMENT
REQUIRED
10. FREQUENCY
11. AS OF DATE
12. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION
13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT
SUBMISSION
14. DISTRIBUTION
a. ADDRESSEE
b. COPIES
Draft Final
Reg Repro
15. TOTAL
16. REMARKS
17. PRICE GROUP
18. ESTIMATED
TOTAL PRICE
G. PREPARED BY H. DATE I. APPROVED BY J. DATE
Page of Pages
A
MGMT
DATA MANAGEMENT SERVICES TBD
A004 DOD INFORMATION ASSURANCE
CERTIFICATION AND ACCREDITATION PROCESS
ANNUAL SECURITY REVIEW AND
ANNUAL TESTING OF SECURITY
DI-MGMT-82000 SOW PARA 5.2 AND 6.0 NSWC CORONA (AR30)
LT
N/A C
ASREQ (See Blk 16)
N/A
ASREQ (See Blk 16)
ASREQ (See Blk 16) J. Trunko (AR30) 1
0 1 0
BLK 4/5 - (DI-MGMT-82000) PARAGRAPH 2.1.6, 2.1.8 AND 2.1.9 DO NOT
APPLY AND SHOULD BE TAILORED OUT FROM THE DELIVERABLE.
SOW PARAGRAPH 5.2 IS MADATORY TO THIS REQUIREMENT.
BLK 9 - USE THE FOLLOWING: "DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT C.
DISTRIBUTION AUTHORIZED TO U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCIES AND
THEIR CONTRACTORS ONLY. (REASON: ADMINISTRATIVE USE).
OTHER REQUESTS FOR THIS DOCUMENT SHALL BE REFERRED TO
NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER, CORONA DIVISION,
CORONA CA."
BLK 10, 12, 13 – ANNUAL REVIEW IS DUE IN ACCORDANCE WITH C&A
PLAN. DOCUMENTATION FOR ANNUAL REVIEW DUE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH ODAA DIRECTIVES (eMASS) AND FIVE (5) DAYS
AFTER EACH SUBSEQUENT REVIEW OR REQUIRED CHANGE.
BLK 14 - ELECTRONIC COPY SHALL IN ODAA REQUIRED COMPATIBLE
FILE FORMAT SUBMITTED PER ODAA DIRECTIVES (eMASS) AND BY
E-MAIL IN MICROSOFT OFFICE / PDF FORMAT IN ACCORDANCE WITH
CDRL DISTRIBUTION BLOCK 14.
ADDRESSEE(S) EMAIL ADDRESS: joseph.trunko@navy.mil
19 July 2017
BERGLAND.KA
RI.L.1263458067
Digitally signed by
BERGLAND.KARI.L.1263458067
Date: 2017.08.15 14:35:48 -07'00' 15 August 2017
1 1
TRUNKO.JOSEPH.M
ICHAEL.1228939990
Digitally signed by
TRUNKO.JOSEPH.MICHAEL.1228
Date: 2017.07.19 10:08:56 -07'00'
(1 Data Item)
PREVIOUS EDITION MAY BE USED.
Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188
The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 110 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to the Department of Defense, Executive Services and Communications Directorate (0704-0188). Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. Please do not return your form to the above organization. Send completed form to the Government Issuing Contracting Officer for the Contract/PR No. listed in Block E.
A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO. B. EXHIBIT C. CATEGORY:
TDP ________ TM _______ OTHER
D. SYSTEM/ITEM E. CONTRACT/PR NO. F. CONTRACTOR
1. DATA ITEM NO. 2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM 3. SUBTITLE
4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.) 5. CONTRACT REFERENCE 6. REQUIRING OFFICE
7. DD 250 REQ
8. APP CODE
9. DIST STATEMENT
REQUIRED
10. FREQUENCY
11. AS OF DATE
12. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION
13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT
SUBMISSION
14. DISTRIBUTION
a. ADDRESSEE
b. COPIES
Draft Final
Reg Repro
15. TOTAL
16. REMARKS
17. PRICE GROUP
18. ESTIMATED
TOTAL PRICE
G. PREPARED BY H. DATE I. APPROVED BY J. DATE
Page of Pages
A
MGMT
DATA MANAGEMENT SERVICES TBD
A005 CONTRACTOR'S PERSONNEL ROSTER
DI-MGMT-81834A SOW PARA 8.1, 8.2, 8.3 NSWC CORONA (AR30)
LT
N/A C
ASGEN (See Blk 16)
N/A
20DAC (See Blk 16)
ASGEN (See Blk 16) J. Trunko (AR30) 1
0 1 0
BLK 4/5 - DI-MGMT-81834A CONTRACTOR FORMAT IS ACCEPTABLE.
SOW PARAGRAPH(S) 8.1, 8.2 AND 8.3 ARE MANDATORY TO THIS
REQUIREMENT.
BLK 9 - USE THE FOLLOWING: "DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT C.
DISTRIBUTION AUTHORIZED TO U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCIES AND
THEIR CONTRACTORS ONLY. (REASON: ADMINISTRATIVE USE).
OTHER REQUESTS FOR THIS DOCUMENT SHALL BE REFERRED TO
NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER, CORONA DIVISION, CORONA
CA."
BLK 10, 13 - REPORTS SUBMITTED MONTHLY NO LATER THAN THE
10TH DAY OF THE MONTHLY REPORTING PERIOD. AND AS
GENERATED WHEN PERSONNEL CHANGES OCCUR, SUBMITTED NO
LATER THAN THE 10TH DAY AFTER CHANGE IN PERSONNEL HAS
OCCURRED.
BLK 12 - THE REPORTING PERIOD WILL BE FROM THE FIRST TO LAST
BUSINESS DAY OF EACH MONTH. FIRST SUBMISSION BEGINNING
WITHIN 20 BUSINESS DAYS AFTER EFFECTIVE DATE OF ORDER.
BLK 14 - ELECTRONIC COPY SHALL BE BY E-MAIL IN MICROSOFT
OFFICE / PDF FORMAT IN ACCORDANCE WITH CDRL DISTRIBUTION
BLOCK 14. ADDRESSEE(S) EMAIL ADDRESS: joseph.trunko@navy.mil
19 July 2017
BERGLAND.KA
RI.L.1263458067
Digitally signed by
BERGLAND.KARI.L.1263458067
Date: 2017.08.15 15:13:41 -07'00' 15 August 2017
1 1
TRUNKO.JOSEPH.M
ICHAEL.1228939990
Digitally signed by
TRUNKO.JOSEPH.MICHAEL.1228
Date: 2017.07.19 10:11:11 -07'00'
DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION
Title: DOD Information Assurance Certification and Accreditation Process (DIACAP) and
Risk Management Framework (RMF) Deliverable Data
Number: DI-MGMT-82000 Approval Date: 20151014
AMSC Number: 9594 Limitation:
DTIC Applicable: GIDEP Applicable:
Office of Primary Responsibility: AS Project Number: MGMT-2015-021
Applicable Forms:
Use/relationship: The DIACAP and RMF Deliverable Data will be used to satisfy the requirements of the DIACAP and/or RMF process.
This Data Item Description (DID) contains the format, content, and intended use information for the data product resulting from the work task described by the contract.
Requirements:
1. Format. The DIACAP and/or RMF artifacts shall be delivered in a format approved by the
Government’s Designated Accrediting Authority (DAA), Authorizing Official (AO), or Information
Systems Security Manager (ISSM).
2. Content. The content of the DIACAP and/or RMF artifacts shall contain the necessary artifacts required by the DAA, AO, or ISSM to successfully achieve Platform IT Risk Approval (PRA), Interim Authority to Test (IATT), Interim Authority to Operate (IATO), or Authority to Operate
(ATO).
2.1 Introduction. This section shall contain a narrative of the DIACAP/RMF package content.
2.1.1 IATT Request. The IATT Request shall use the approved DAA, AO, or ISSM format. The
IATT Request shall identify the ‘who’, ‘what’, ‘why’, ‘where’, ‘when’, and ‘how’ of the requested
Test event. IATT Request shall be delivered not less than 30 days prior to the start of the Test
Event.
2.1.2 Certification and Accreditation (C&A) or Security Plan. The C&A or Security Plan shall use the approved DAA, AO, or ISSM format. The C&A Plan shall contain at a minimum, System
Information, Mission Description, Concept of Operations (CONOPS), Environment, Operating and
Computing Environment, Physical Security Measures, Facilities Descriptions, Threat Analysis, System Architecture Description, Components, Configurations, Accreditation Boundaries, Connection Process Guide (CPG) Compliant Network Diagrams, External Interfaces and Data Flow, Internal Data Flow, Contingency Plan, Incident Response Plan, User Descriptions and Clearances, Security Roles, Hardware Lists, Software Lists, Ports, Protocols, and Services (PPS), Configuration
Management Plan, Information Assurance Vulnerability Management (IAVM) Plan, and C&A Tasks and Milestones. The C&A Plan shall be approved and signed by the ISSM, User Rep, Program
Manager (PM), and DAA or AO.
Source: https://assist.dla.mil -- Downloaded: 2016-06-17T23:06Z Check the source to verify that this is the current version before use.
DI-MGMT-82000
2.1.3 C&A Project Plan. The C&A Project Plan shall use the approved DAA, AO, or ISSM format.
The C&A Project Plan shall be approved and signed by the ISSM, Echelon II Representative, and
PM. The C&A Project Plan shall define the various C&A Tasks and Milestones needed to achieve
PRA, IATT, IATO, or ATO.
2.1.4 Collaboration Brief. The Collaboration Brief shall use the approved DAA, AO, or ISSM format. The Collaboration Brief is submitted with the DIACAP/RMF package and is used to describe the System and System Risk during the Collaboration meeting.
2.1.5 DIACAP Implementation Plan (DIP). The DIP shall use the approved DAA, AO, or ISSM format. The DIP shall be used during the DIP Concurrence meeting with the Echelon II, Navy CA, and ODAA. The DIP shall define which IA Controls (IACs) will be ‘Implemented’, ‘Inherited’, ‘Non-Compliant’, or ‘Not Applicable’. The DIP shall be approved by the DAA, AO, and ISSM prior to execution of the IA Test Plan.
2.1.6 PIT Implementation Plan (PIP). The PIP shall use the approved DAA, AO, or ISSM format.
The PIP shall be used during the PIT Concurrence meeting with the Echelon II, Navy CA, and
ODAA. The PIP shall define which IACs will be ‘Implemented’, ‘Inherited’, ‘Non-Compliant’, or
‘Not Applicable’. The PIP shall be approved by the DAA, AO, and ISSM prior to execution of the
IA Test Plan.
2.1.7 IA Test Plan. The IA Test Plan shall use the approved DAA, AO, or ISSM format. The IA
Test Plan shall define all required Vulnerability Scans, Security Technical Implementation Guides
(STIGs), Security Readiness Guides (SRGs), Secure Content Automation Protocol (SCAP) benchmarks, and IA Controls or Security Overlays to be applied to the System. The IA Test Plan shall be approved by the DAA, AO, and ISSM during the DIP or PIP Concurrence Meeting.
2.1.8 PIT Designation Request. The PIT Designation Request shall use the approved DAA, AO, or
ISSM format. The PIT Designation Request is the formal request to the DAA or AO that the System shall be designated as Platform IT (versus an Information System (IS)). The PIT Designation
Request shall be approved and a PIT Designation Letter shall be signed by the DAA or AO prior to the execution of the IA Test Plan.
2.1.9 PIT Determination Brief. The PIT Determination Brief shall use the approved DAA, AO, or
ISSM format. The PIT Determination Brief shall be used in conjunction with the PIT Designation
Request to formally request the System be designated Platform IT (versus and Information System).
2.1.10 Plan of Action and Milestones (POA&M). The POA&M shall use the approved DAA, AO, or ISSM format. The POA&M shall be considered a ‘living’ document and shall regularly be updated throughout the entire lifecycle of the System through Decommission. The POA&M shall contain all Not Applicable IA Controls, All Non-Compliant IA Controls, and all Non-Compliant
Vulnerability Findings as identified in the Vulnerability Scans, STIGs, SRGs, and SCAP
Benchmarks. At a minimum, the POA&M shall be updated monthly.
2.1.11 Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA). The PIA shall use the approved DAA, AO, or ISSM format. The PIA shall be approved and signed by the ISSM, PM, and the Command PIA Officer.
2.1.12 Vulnerability Scans. In accordance with the approved IA Test Plan, the System shall be scanned using the approved vulnerability scanning tools as identified by the DAA, AO, or ISSM.
DI-MGMT-82000
The vulnerability scanner shall be updated with the latest signatures and scanning engines prior to the execution of each vulnerability scan. At a minimum, vulnerability scans shall be conducted monthly against the System. Non-compliant findings shall be documented in the System POA&M on a minimum monthly basis. At a minimum, vulnerability scans shall be submitted electronically to the
ISSM or uploaded into the DIACAP/RMF package. Vulnerability scans shall be handled in accordance with the System’s classification level. Vulnerability reports shall be in a format approved by the DAA, AO, or ISSM.
2.1.13 STIGs, SRGs, SCAP Benchmarks. In accordance with the approved IA Test Plan, the
System shall be hardened using the required and approved STIGs, SRGs, and SCAP Benchmarks.
Non-compliant STIG, SRG, and SCAP Benchmark findings shall be documented in the System
POA&M on a minimum monthly basis. Updates to the STIGs, SRGs, and SCAP Benchmarks are released on a monthly, quarterly, and yearly basis. Updates to the STIGs, SRGs, and SCAP
Benchmarks shall be implemented into the System as they are released. Non-compliant STIG, SRG, and SCAP Benchmark findings shall be documented in the System POA&M on a minimum monthly basis. STIG, SRG, and SCAP Benchmark artifacts shall be provided in a format approved by the
DAA, AO, or ISSM. STIG, SRG, and SCAP Benchmark artifacts shall be handled in accordance with the System’s classification level. At a minimum, STIG, SRG, and SCAP Benchmarks shall be submitted electronically to the ISSM or uploaded into the DIACAP/RMF Package on a minimum monthly basis.
2.1.14 Scorecard. The Scorecard shall use the approved DAA, AO, or ISSM format. The
Scorecard shall be maintained and updated on a minimum monthly basis.
2.1.15 Contingency Plan. The Contingency Plan shall use the approved DAA, AO, or ISSM format.
The Contingency Plan shall be submitted in conjunction with the System’s C&A Plan. The
Contingency Plan shall be approved and signed by the PM, ISSM, and DAA or AO.
2.1.16 IAVM Plan. The IAVM Plan shall use the approved DAA, AO, or ISSM format. The IAVM
Plan shall be submitted in conjunction with the System’s C&A Plan. The IAVM Plan shall be approved and signed by the PM, ISSM, and DAA or AO.
2.1.17 Cyber Security Waivers. Cyber Security Waivers shall use the approved DAA, AO, or ISSM format. All Cyber Security Waivers shall be approved and signed by the ISSM, PM, and First Flag or Equivalent prior to submission to the DAA or AO.
END OF: DI-MGMT-82000
DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION
Title: CONTRACTOR'S PERSONNEL ROSTER
Number: DI-MGMT-81834A Approval Date: 20130118 AMSC Number: N9316 Limitation: N/A DTIC Applicable: No GIDEP Applicable: N/A Office of Primary Responsibility: SH/MS10 Applicable Forms: N/A
Use/relationship:
This roster shall be used to list all contractor personnel assigned to the contract.
This Data Item Description (DID) contains the content and preparation instructions for data product resulting from the work task specified in the contract.
Requirements:
1. Format. The Roster shall be in contractor’s format.
2. Content. The Roster shall contain an alphabetical listing of the names of all contractor personnel assigned to the contract.
2.1 The roster shall identify the following for each employee:
a. Change Status: Add/Change/Remove
b. Start Date
c. End Date
d. First Name
e. Middle Name
f. Last Name
g. Position Title
h. Email Address
i. Work Phone Number
j. Physical Work Location – Base Name
k. Physical Work Location - City
l. Physical Work Location - State
m. Physical Work Location – Building Number
n. Physical Work Location – Room Number
o. Contract Number
p. Contract Name
q. Contracting Supervisor
r. Government Support POC
s. Supporting Code
2.2 The roster shall identify work schedules for full time and part time employees and shall include current CAC and clearance information for each.
3. End of DI-MGMT-81834A.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .