Nexsan_16-T-0284_Posting.pdf

MOBILE WORKSTATIONS – PA021

MATERIAL/EQUIPMENT/SUPPLY

N64267-16-T-0284

This is a Request for Quotation (RFQ) for a commercial item(s) prepared in accordance with the information in FAR Part 13.

SALES TAX EXEMPTION: The Contractor is hereby advised that the United States Government and

Agencies thereof are exempt from State and Local Government tax by virtue of Article 6 of the United States

Constitution. No exemption certificate is required.

1. INTRODUCTION

The Naval Surface Warfare Center, Corona Division (NSWC CO), Performance Assessment Department, Code

PA021 requires the purchase of NEXSAN E18V and E48V controllers to replace unwarranted hardware on the

Corona Classified Research Development Test & Evaluation (RDT&E) Network (CCRN).

2. BACKGROUND

NSWC CO has a requirement to purchase NEXSAN E18V and E48V hardware to replace and provide shared storage to CCRN customers. In order to meet this requirement, PA021requires the NEXSAN hardware listed in the specifications.

3. SCOPE

Qty Brand Part# Part Description

1 NEXSAN E48VT2J192N/4 E48VT 48X4TB 7.2K DUAL CONTROLLER 8GB

1 NEXSAN E18VH2J36N/2 E18V 18x2TB 7.2K DUAL CONTROLLER 8GB

Salient Characteristics:

E18V: configured with 8Gb FC Storage Array with Dual Controller, 36TB (18x 2TB Disks /7200 RPM), 18 Bay, 2U, 4GB Cache per Controller - (4) 8Gb FC and (4) 1GbE iSCSI connections, 3 yr. warranty

E48V: configured with 8Gb FC Storage Array with Dual Controller, 192TB (48x 4TB Disks / 7,200 RPM), 48 Bay, 4U, 16GB Cache per Controller - (4) 8Gb FC and (4) 1GbE iSCSI connections, 3 yr. warranty

4. APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

N/A

5. REQUIREMENTS

PA021 requires the purchase of NEXSAN E18V and E48V Controllers to replace unwarranted hardware on the

Corona Classified RDT&E Network (CCRN).

6. GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PROPERTY

N/A

7. DELIVERABLES

N/A

8. ACRONYM LIST

N/A

THIS PAGE CONTAINS NECESSARY INFORMATION FOR THE PROCUREMENT ACTION THAT IS

PLACED IN OTHER SECTIONS OF THE CONTRACT

A. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE / REQUIRED DELIVERY DATES

08/26/2016

B. PLACE OF PERFORMANCE

N/A

C. SHIPPING ADDRESS

Naval Surface Warfare Center Corona Division N64267

1999 Fourth St.

Norco, CA 92860

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.204-19 Incorporation by Reference of Representations and Certifications DEC 2014

52.209-10

52.211-6

52.212-1

52.212-4

Prohibition on Contracting with Inverted Domestic Corporations

Brand Name or Equal

Instructions To Offerors – Commercial Items

Contract Terms and Conditions--Commercial Items

NOV 2015

AUG 1999

OCT 2015

DEC 2014

52.219-6

52.222-50

52.223-18

52.225-1

52.232-39

Notice of Total Small Business Set-Aside

Combating Trafficking in Persons

Encouraging Contractor Policies to Ban Text Messaging While Driving

Buy American-Supplies

Unenforceability of Unauthorized Obligations

NOV 2011

MAR 2015

AUG 2011

MAY 2014

JUN 2013

52.232-40 Providing Accelerated Payments to Small Business Subcontractors DEC 2013

52.233-3

52.233-4

52.243-1

Protest After Award

Applicable Law for Breach of Contract Claim

Changes--Fixed Price

AUG 1996

OCT 2004

AUG 1987

252.203-7000 Requirements Relating to Compensation of Former DoD Officials SEP 2011

252.203-7002 Requirement to Inform Employees of Whistleblower Rights SEP 2013

252.203-7005 Representation Relating to Compensation of Former DoD Officials NOV 2011

252.204-7003 Control Of Government Personnel Work Product APR 1992

252.204-7006

252.204-7008

252.204-7012

Billing Instructions

Compliance with Safeguarding Covered Defense Information Controls Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and Cyber Incident Reporting

OCT 2005

DEC 2015

DEC 2015

252.204-7015 Disclosure of Information to Litigation Support Contractors FEB 2014

252.225-7048 Export-Controlled Items JUN 2013

252.232-7003 Electronic Submission of Payment Requests and Receiving Reports JUN 2012

252.232-7010 Levies on Contract Payments DEC 2006

252.243-7001

252.247-7023

Pricing Of Contract Modifications

Transportation of Supplies by Sea

DEC 1991

APR 2014

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

252.232-7006 WIDE AREA WORKFLOW PAYMENT INSTRUCTIONS (MAY 2013)

(a) Definitions. As used in this clause--

Department of Defense Activity Address Code (DoDAAC) is a six position code that uniquely identifies a unit, activity, or organization.

Document type means the type of payment request or receiving report available for creation in Wide Area

WorkFlow (WAWF).

Local processing office (LPO) is the office responsible for payment certification when payment certification is done external to the entitlement system.

(b) Electronic invoicing. The WAWF system is the method to electronically process vendor payment requests and receiving reports, as authorized by DFARS 252.232-7003, Electronic Submission of Payment Requests and

Receiving Reports.

(c) WAWF access. To access WAWF, the Contractor shall--

(1) Have a designated electronic business point of contact in the Central Contractor Registration at https://www.acquisition.gov; and

(2) Be registered to use WAWF at https://wawf.eb.mil/ following the step-by-step procedures for self-registration available at this Web site.

(d) WAWF training. The Contractor should follow the training instructions of the WAWF Web-Based Training

Course and use the Practice Training Site before submitting payment requests through WAWF. Both can be accessed by selecting the “Web Based Training” link on the WAWF home page at https://wawf.eb.mil/.

(e) WAWF methods of document submission. Document submissions may be via Web entry, Electronic Data

Interchange, or File Transfer Protocol.

(f) WAWF payment instructions. The Contractor must use the following information when submitting payment requests and receiving reports in WAWF for this contract/order:

(1) Document type. The Contractor shall use the following document type(s).

X - Invoicing and Receiving Report Combo (FFP Supply)

(2) Inspection/acceptance location. The Contractor shall select the following inspection/acceptance location(s) in

WAWF, as specified by the contracting officer.

DESTINATION / DESTINATION

(3) Document routing. The Contractor shall use the information in the Routing Data Table below only to fill in applicable fields in WAWF when creating payment requests and receiving reports in the system.

Routing Data Table*

Field Name in WAWF Data to be entered in WAWF

Contract Number N/A

Task Order/Delivery Order Number N6424716XXXX

Cage Code TBD

Pay Official DoDAAC N62827

Issue By DoDAAC N64267

Admin DoDAAC N64267

Inspect By DoDAAC N/A

Ship To Code N64267

Ship From Code N/A

Mark For Code N/A

Service Approver (DoDAAC) N/A

Service Acceptor (DoDAAC) N/A

Accept at Other DoDAAC N/A

LPO DoDAAC N/A

DCAA Auditor DoDAAC N/A

Other DoDAAC(s) N/A

(4) Payment request and supporting documentation. The Contractor shall ensure a payment request includes appropriate contract line item and subline item descriptions of the work performed or supplies delivered, unit price/cost per unit, fee (if applicable), and all relevant back-up documentation, as defined in DFARS Appendix F, (e.g. timesheets) in support of each payment request.

(5) WAWF email notifications. The Contractor shall enter the email address identified below in the “Send

Additional Email Notifications” field of WAWF once a document is submitted in the system.

CRNA_WAWF_COMPTROL@navy.mil, pedro.rivas@navy.mil, CRNA_FISC_MAILBOX@navy.mil, TBD@navy.mil.

mailto:CRNA_WAWF_COMPTROL@navy.mil mailto:pedro.rivas@navy.mil mailto:CRNA_FISC_MAILBOX@navy.mil mailto:TBD@navy.mil

(g) WAWF point of contact. (1) The Contractor may obtain clarification regarding invoicing in WAWF from the following contracting activity's WAWF point of contact.

Scott Wobken (951) 393-5131 or scott.wobken@navy.mil

For pay issues contact Dolores Gonzalez at (951) 393-4459 or dolores.gonzalez@navy.mil

(2) For technical WAWF help, contact the WAWF helpdesk at 866-618-5988.

(End of clause)

252.246-7007 CONTRACTOR COUNTERFEIT ELECTRONIC PART DETECTION AND AVOIDANCE

SYSTEM (MAY 2014)

The following paragraphs (a) through (e) of this clause do not apply unless the Contractor is subject to the Cost

Accounting Standards under 41 U.S.C. chapter 15, as implemented in regulations found at 48 CFR 9903.201-1.

(a) Definitions. As used in this clause--

Counterfeit electronic part means an unlawful or unauthorized reproduction, substitution, or alteration that has been knowingly mismarked, misidentified, or otherwise misrepresented to be an authentic, unmodified electronic part from the original manufacturer, or a source with the express written authority of the original manufacturer or current design activity, including an authorized aftermarket manufacturer. Unlawful or unauthorized substitution includes used electronic parts represented as new, or the false identification of grade, serial number, lot number, date code, or performance characteristics.

Electronic part means an integrated circuit, a discrete electronic component (including, but not limited to, a transistor, capacitor, resistor, or diode), or a circuit assembly (section 818(f)(2) of Pub. L. 112-81). The term

``electronic part'' includes any embedded software or firmware.

Obsolete electronic part means an electronic part that is no longer in production by the original manufacturer or an aftermarket manufacturer that has been provided express written authorization from the current design activity or original manufacturer. Suspect counterfeit electronic part means an electronic part for which credible evidence

(including, but not limited to, visual inspection or testing) provides reasonable doubt that the electronic part is authentic.

(b) Acceptable counterfeit electronic part detection and avoidance system. The Contractor shall establish and maintain an acceptable counterfeit electronic part detection and avoidance system. Failure to maintain an acceptable counterfeit electronic part detection and avoidance system, as defined in this clause, may result in disapproval of the purchasing system by the Contracting Officer and/or withholding of payments.

(c) System criteria. A counterfeit electronic part detection and avoidance system shall include risk-based policies and procedures that address, at a minimum, the following areas:

(1) The training of personnel.

(2) The inspection and testing of electronic parts, including criteria for acceptance and rejection. Tests and inspections shall be performed in accordance with accepted Government- and industry-recognized techniques.

Selection of tests and inspections shall be based on minimizing risk to the Government. Determination of risk shall be based on the assessed probability of receiving a counterfeit electronic part; the probability that the inspection or test selected will detect a counterfeit electronic part; and the potential negative consequences of a mailto:scott.wobken@navy.mil mailto:dolores.gonzalez@navy.mil counterfeit electronic part being installed (e.g., human safety, mission success) where such consequences are made known to the Contractor.

(3) Processes to abolish counterfeit parts proliferation.

(4) Processes for maintaining electronic part traceability (e.g., item unique identification) that enable tracking of the supply chain back to the original manufacturer, whether the electronic parts are supplied as discrete electronic parts or are contained in assemblies. This traceability process shall include certification and traceability documentation developed by manufacturers in accordance with Government and industry standards; clear identification of the name and location of supply chain intermediaries from the manufacturer to the direct source of the product for the seller;

and where available, the manufacturer's batch identification for the electronic part(s), such as date codes, lot codes, or serial numbers. If IUID marking is selected as a traceability mechanism, its usage shall comply with the item marking requirements of 252.211-7003, Item Unique Identification and Valuation.

(5) Use of suppliers that are the original manufacturer, or sources with the express written authority of the original manufacturer or current design activity, including an authorized aftermarket manufacturer or suppliers that obtain parts exclusively from one or more of these sources. When parts are not available from any of these sources, use of suppliers that meet applicable counterfeit detection and avoidance system criteria.

(6) Reporting and quarantining of counterfeit electronic parts and suspect counterfeit electronic parts. Reporting is required to the Contracting Officer and to the Government-Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP) when the

Contractor becomes aware of, or has reason to suspect that, any electronic part or end item, component, part, or assembly containing electronic parts purchased by the DoD, or purchased by a Contractor for delivery to, or on behalf of, the DoD, contains counterfeit electronic parts or suspect counterfeit electronic parts. Counterfeit electronic parts and suspect counterfeit electronic parts shall not be returned to the seller or otherwise returned to the supply chain until such time that the parts are determined to be authentic.

(7) Methodologies to identify suspect counterfeit parts and to rapidly determine if a suspect counterfeit part is, in fact, counterfeit.

(8) Design, operation, and maintenance of systems to detect and avoid counterfeit electronic parts and suspect counterfeit electronic parts. The Contractor may elect to use current Government- or industry-recognized standards to meet this requirement.

(9) Flowdown of counterfeit detection and avoidance requirements, including applicable system criteria provided herein, to subcontractors at all levels in the supply chain that are responsible for buying or selling electronic parts or assemblies containing electronic parts, or for performing authentication testing.

(10) Process for keeping continually informed of current counterfeiting information and trends, including detection and avoidance techniques contained in appropriate industry standards, and using such information and techniques for continuously upgrading internal processes.

(11) Process for screening GIDEP reports and other credible sources of counterfeiting information to avoid the purchase or use of counterfeit electronic parts.

(12) Control of obsolete electronic parts in order to maximize the availability and use of authentic, originally designed, and qualified electronic parts throughout the product's life cycle.

(d) Government review and evaluation of the Contractor's policies and procedures will be accomplished as part of the evaluation of the Contractor's purchasing system in accordance with 252.244-7001, Contractor Purchasing

System Administration--Basic, or Contractor Purchasing System Administration--Alternate I.

(e) The Contractor shall include the substance of this clause, including paragraphs (a) through (e), in subcontracts, including subcontracts for commercial items, for electronic parts or assemblies containing electronic parts.

(End of clause)

HQ G-2-0004 PURCHASING OFFICE REPRESENTATIVES

PURCHASING OFFICE ATTN: PEDRO RIVAS

REPRESENTATIVE: NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND

NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER, CORONA DIVISION

P.O. BOX 5000

CORONA, CA. 92878-5000

Telephone Number: 951-393-4535

Fax Number: 951-273-4013

CONTRACTING OFFICER:

Email: pedro.rivas@navy.mil

ATTN: TBD

NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER

CORONA DIVISION

PO BOX 5000

CORONA, CA 92878-5000

Telephone No. 951-393-XXXX

Fax No. 951-393-XXXX

Email Address: TBD@navy.mil

PRODUCT DATA REPORTING AND

EVALUATION PROGRAM (PDREP)

DEPARTMENT COORDINATOR

REPRESENTATIVE: ATTN: TBD

NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER

P.O. BOX 5000

CORONA, CA 92878

Telephone No. 951-393-XXXX

Email Address: TBD@navy.mil

Note: Subject Matter Expert (SME) shall be used in lieu of Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR)

SUPPLEMENTAL INSTRUCTIONS REGARDING ELECTRONIC INVOICING (NAVSEA) (SEP 2012)

(a) The Contractor agrees to segregate costs incurred under this contract/task order (TO), as applicable, at the lowest level of performance, either at the technical instruction (TI), sub line item number (SLIN), or contract line item number (CLIN) level, rather than on a total contract/TO basis, and to submit invoices reflecting costs incurred at that level. Supporting documentation in Wide Area Workflow (WAWF) for invoices shall include summaries of work charged during the period covered as well as overall cumulative summaries by individual labor categories, rates, and hours (both straight time and overtime) invoiced; as well as, a cost breakdown of other direct costs

(ODCs), materials, and travel, by TI, SLIN, or CLIN level. For other than firm fixed price subcontractors, subcontractors are also required to provide labor categories, rates, and hours (both straight time and overtime) invoiced; as well as, a cost breakdown of ODCs, materials, and travel invoiced. Supporting documentation may be encrypted before submission to the prime contractor for WAWF invoice submittal. Subcontractors may email encryption code information directly to the Contracting Officer (CO) and Contracting Officer Representative

(COR). Should the subcontractor lack encryption capability, the subcontractor may also email detailed supporting cost information directly to the CO and COR; or other method as agreed to by the CO.

(b) Contractors submitting payment requests and receiving reports to WAWF using either Electronic Data

Interchange (EDI) or Secure File Transfer Protocol (SFTP) shall separately send an email notification to the COR and CO on the same date they submit the invoice in WAWF. No payments shall be due if the contractor does not provide the COR and CO email notification as required herein.

mailto:pedro.rivas@navy.mil

52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (JAN 1999)

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

Factor (1) Technical capability of the item(s) offered to meet the Governments requirement;

Factor (2) Past Performance; and Evaluated Price.

Technical Capability and Past Performance will be rated as Acceptable or Unacceptable. Award will be made to the lowest price technically acceptable offer.

(b) Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

(c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

HQ M-2-0001 BASIS OF AWARD (NAVSEA) (SEP 1990)

ALL UNITS OF ALL ITEMS WILL BE AWARDED TO ONE OFFEROR. OFFERS, THEREFORE, MUST BE

ON THE BASIS OF FURNISHING ALL UNITS OF ALL ITEMS.

HQ M-2-0016 USE OF PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEM –

STATISTICAL REPORTING (PPIRS-SR) IN PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION (NAVSEA)(SEP

2009)

(a) Each offeror’s past performance shall be evaluated in accordance with FAR 13.106-2 or 15.305(a)(2), as applicable. The Department of Defense (DOD) has authorized use of PPIRS-SR for use by DOD activities during the acquisition of supplies and services. For purposes of this solicitation, contractor past performance will be based on data from PPIRS-SR. The offeror’s quality and delivery classifications from PPIRS-SR will be used in conjunction with the offeror’s references, the criteria in FAR 13.106-2 or 15.305(a)(2), as applicable, and other provisions of this solicitation.

(b) The purpose of PPIRS-SR is to provide source selection officials with quantifiable past performance information regarding delivery and quality. This information is collected form existing DOD reporting systems during the source selection process.

(c) Quality: PPIRS-SR collects quantifiable quality data from existing systems and uses that data to classify supplier performance by Federal Supply code or federal Services Code (FSA group). Based on comparisons among suppliers in a specific FSC group, PPIRS-SR sorts suppliers into color ratings representing the supplier’s overall quality performance based on the following indices:

Color Position

Dark Blue Top 5% of suppliers in FSC group

Purple Next 10% of suppliers in FSC group

Green Next 70% of suppliers in FSC group

Yellow Next 10% of suppliers in FSC group

Red Bottom 5% of suppliers in FSC group

(Note: if all supplier ratings for a specific FSC group are equal, all suppliers with that group will be classified green.

Suppliers with no history in PPIRS-SR will be displayed without a rating and, for evaluation, receive a neutral rating.)

(d) Delivery: supplier deliver past performance is classified in PPIRS-SR by the suppliers percentage of on-time deliveries. On-time deliveries are calculated using the number of line items delivered and a weighting factor reflecting the length of time a delivery was overdue.

(e) PPIRS-SR classifications are determined monthly for each supplier and can be reviewed at http://www.ppirs.gov/.

(End of Provision) http://www.ppirs.gov/