Attachment_Past_Performance_LPTA.doc

DOC document 52 KB Posted

Attached to
Combined Missile Test Sets VLS Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
N63394-15-R-0008
Issued by
Department of the Navy Naval Sea Systems Command

About this file

From the source

Attachment 4 Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Combined Missile Test Sets VLS, newest first.
File Type Posted
N63394-15-R-0008-0006.pdf PDF
N63394-15-R-0008-0005.pdf PDF
N63394-15-R-0008-0004.pdf PDF
N63394-15-R-0008_CMTS_RFP_04102015.pdf PDF
N63394-15-R-0008_CMTS_RFP_Conformed_Amendment.R.pdf PDF
Amendment_0001_N63394-15-R-0008.PDF PDF
DD2345Form.pdf PDF
Attachment_GFI_GFP_Request_Form.doc DOC document
N63394-15-R-0008_VLS_CMTS_SF33_01152015.pdf PDF
Attachment_3_DSMS_Guidebook_SD-22.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

ATTACHMENT 6

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE COVER SHEET

(NOTE TO OFFEROR: For each past performance questionnaire to be completed by a federal agency and submitted to the Government as a reference, provide a copy of this cover sheet with your proposal identifying the project’s point-of-contact information. Ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact.)

1. OFFEROR:

2. FIRM BEING EVALUATED:

3. CONTRACT NUMBER:

4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

5. CONTRACT/TASK ORDER AMOUNT: __________________________________________

6. PERFORMANCE PERIOD: ___________________________________________________

7. REFERENCE ORGANIZATION NAME:

8. EVALUATOR’S CONTACT INFO:

a. NAME & TITLE:

b. PHONE NUMBER:

c. FAX NUMBER:

d. EMAIL ADDRESS:

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Adjectival Ratings/Definitions For Overall Technical Rating and Each Factor/Sub-factor

Rating
Definitions
N - Neutral
The offeror lacks a record of relevant or available past performance history. There is no expectation of either successful or unsuccessful performance based on the offeror’s past performance record.

A: - Acceptable

The offeror’s performance of previously awarded relevant contract(s)/task orders met contractual requirements. The assessed prior performance was either accomplished: without performance impacts; or in case of performance concerns corrective actions were proposed and executed and deemed effective. Performance within completed contracts was consistently of adequate or better quality or exhibits successful completion. The offeror’s past performance record leads to an expectation of successful performance.

U: Unacceptable
The offeror’s performance of previously awarded relevant contract(s)/task orders did not meet most contractual requirements and recovery did not occur within the period of performance. The assessed prior performance reflected significant problem(s) for which the offeror either failed to identify or implement corrective action(s) or for which corrective actions, implemented, or proposed to be implemented, were, or are expected to be ineffective. Performance within completed contracts was consistently of poor quality or exhibits unsuccessful completion. The offeror’s past performance record indicates a significant risk exists that the contractor will not successfully perform.

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. Was this a competitive Contract?
YES NO
2. Role of contractor.
Prime Sub
3. Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance.
N A U
4. Compliance with contractual terms and conditions.
N A U
5. Quality/integrity of technical data/report preparation efforts.
N A U
6. Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements.
N A U
7. Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program).
N A U
8. Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors?
N A U
9. Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports).
N A U
10. Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance.
N A U
11. Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations.
N A U
12. Effectiveness of on-site management and control multidiscipline construction categories, including subcontractors..
N A U
13. Effectiveness of material management.
N A U
14. Effectiveness of acquisition management.
N A U
15. Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client.
N A U
16. Contractor safety record.
N A U
17. Responsiveness regarding safety issues.
N A U
18. If this is/was a Government cost type contract, the Contractor’s timeliness in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation and monthly status reports/budget variance reports.
N A U
19. If this is/was a Government cost type contract, the Contractor’s accuracy regarding monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation and monthly status reports/budget variance reports.
N A U
20. Ability to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort.
N A U
21. Ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort
N A U
22. If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.
N A U
23. Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problem?
N A U
24. In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.
N A U

COMMENTS: Objective Comments/ concerns relating to this Offeror.

SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION

DISCLOSURE LIMITATIONS AS OUTLINED IN FAR 2.101 & 3.104 APPLY

PAGE

SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION

DISCLOSURE LIMITATIONS AS OUTLINED IN FAR 2.101 & 3.104 APPLY

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .